The URL can be used to link to this page

CC - Item 6O - Traffic Calming Improvements at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue - Award of ContractROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JEFF ALLRED, CITY MANAGER 90 DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2009 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS AT RUSH STREET AND ANGELUS AVENUE — AWARD OF CONTRACT SUMMARY As part of the City's Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program, the City Council approved a project to implement traffic calming improvements along Rush Street and Angelus Avenue, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. The proposed project includes the addition of red curbing, speed feedback signs, a school drop -off/ pick -up zone, traffic signs, curb ramp improvements, sidewalk repairs and in- pavement crosswalk warning lights. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the following: 1. Approve plans and specifications for the Rush Street and Angelus Avenue Traffic Improvement Project; 2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with Freeway Electric, Inc. for the installation of traffic calming devices around the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue in the amount of $87,087.00 and establish an amount of $17,400.00 as contingencies to cover the cost of any potential and additional unforeseen construction expense. DISCUSSION Background In December 2008, the City Council reviewed several conceptual traffic calming improvement plans for Rush Street, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. These plans were developed by an independent traffic engineer from Kimley -Horn and Associates (KHA) with a review/ input from the Traffic Commission, members of the public, and City staff. After reviewing these conceptual plans, the City Council voted to accept the ITEM NO. LD0 - APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: City Council Meeting December 8, 2009. Page 2 of 4 Traffic Commission's recommendation to implement certain traffic improvements (Attachment1). Subsequent to Council's approval, staff entered into discussions with Walmart to fund this work. Walmart's Condition of Approval #41 (COA #41) required Walmart to set aside monies to fund the installation of a flashing beacon at the nearby school crossing and fund a school crossing guard program at the corner of Rush Street and Delta Street for a minimum of 20 years (Attachment 2). After discussing the traffic calming improvements and resident concerns, representatives from Walmart agreed to use COA #41 funds to cover the costs associated with a proposed Council- approved traffic calming project. These funds total $125,000 and were programmed into the City's Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program budget. Proiect Details The proposed project includes the following improvements: • The extension of red curbing along the southern side of Rush Street just west of Delta Avenue. This will help improve visibility for cars making a left -turn from Delta Avenue onto westbound Rush Street. • The addition of speed feedback signs on both eastbound and westbound travel lanes of Rush Street. These signs will help remind drivers of their speeds and display a flashing yellow light when drivers are driving above the speed limit. • The repainting/ addition of street markings including crosswalks, painted bulb - outs on Rush Street and a drop- off /pick -up zone on the north side of Rush Street, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. The bulb -outs will help to give a narrowing appearance on the road and slow down traffic. The designated drop -off zone will be available for motorists on school days before and after school times. • The addition of in- pavement road warning lights at the school crossing along Rush Street, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. These lights will be activated by a push -button sensor and will display flashing lights when persons cross the street at this location. • The repair/ addition of curb ramps with truncated domes and miscellaneous sidewalk repairs in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines at the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue. • The removal of two magnolia trees south side of Rush Street, just west of the intersection of Rush Street and Delta Avenue. The tree removals are necessary to help increase safety and sight visibility for the new warning traffic signs for eastbound vehicular traffic. City Council Meeting December 8, 2009. Page 3 of 4 At 11:00 AM on December 2, 2009, the City staff publicly opened and read three (3) sealed bids with the following results RANK CONTRACTOR LOCATION BID AMOUNT 1 Freeway Electric, Inc. Riverside, CA $87,087.00 2 California Professional Eng. S. El Monte, CA $98,250.00 3 Steiny & Company, Inc. Baldwin Park, CA $102,950.00 Staff has reviewed the bid documents for completeness and investigated the contractor's background and recent projects for competency. Staff has concluded that Freeway Electric, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder to perform the construction of this project. Freeway Electric, Inc. has satisfactorily completed similar projects for other public agencies, including the City of Arcadia, the City of Bell and City of Cudahy. The City Engineer's estimate for this project was $105,000. Timeline If directed to move forward, staff will work to advertise and complete this project according to the following schedule: December 8th — City Council Awards Contract Week of January 4th — Begin Project Outreach with Local Residents January 11th — February 11th — Tentative Construction Schedule February 19th— Tentative Project Completion February 28th -Tentative Notice of Completion by City Engineer FINANCIAL REVIEW The total appropriation needed to award this project is $104,487.00, which includes a 20% contingency amount ($17,400.00) for potential additional and unforeseen construction expense. Funding for this project is included in the City's approved FY 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program Budget. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15304 (a) of the CEQA Implementing Guidelines. This exemption covers projects involving minor alterations of land that do not have a significant effect on the environment. City Council Meeting December 8, 2009. Page 4 of 4 Prepare. Rafael Fajardo Associate Civil Engineer Submitted by: Chris Marcarello Deputy Public Works Director Attachments 1- City Council Staff Report, October 27, 2009 2- Walmart Condition of Approval #41 3- Bid Summary/Analysis. 4- Dunn and Bradstreet Report — Freeway Electric, Inc. Submitted by: Brian Saeki Community Development Director A ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JEFF ALLRED, CITY MANAGER DATE: OCTOBER 27, 2009 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS AT RUSH STREET AND ANGELUS AVENUE — AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT BIDS SUMMARY As part of the City's Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program, the City Council approved a project to make traffic calming improvements along Rush Street and Angelus Avenue, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. The proposed project includes the addition of red curbing, speed feedback signs, a drop -off /pick -up zone, traffic signs, curb ramp improvements, sidewalk repairs, and in- pavement crosswalk warning lights. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to advertise and solicit bids to complete the improvement project. DISCUSSION Background In December 2008, the City Council reviewed several conceptual traffic calming improvement plans for Rush Street adjacent to Rice Elementary School. These plans were developed by an independent traffic engineer from Kimley -Horn and Associates (KHA) with review /input from the Traffic Commission, members of the public, and City staff. After reviewing these conceptual plans, the City Council voted to accept the Traffic Commission's recommendation and implement traffic improvements (Attachment 1). After receiving the City Council's approval to pursue traffic improvements, staff entered into discussions with Wal -Mart to fund this work. Through Wal -Mart Condition of Approval #41, Wal -Mart was required to set aside monies to fund costs associated with installing a flashing beacon at the nearby school crossing and fund a school crossing guard program at the corner of Rush and Delta for a minimum of 20 years (Attachment 2). After discussing the traffic calming improvements and resident concerns, representatives from Wal -Mart agreed to use the COA #41 funds to cover the costs ITEM NO. 4 APPROVED FOR CITY CUNCIL AGENDA. City Council Meeting October 27, 2009. Pace 2 of 4 Approval #41, Wal -Mart was required to set aside monies to fund costs associated with installing a flashing beacon at the nearby school crossing and fund a school crossing guard program at the corner of Rush and Delta for a minimum of 20 years (Attachment 2). After discussing the traffic calming improvements and resident concerns, representatives from Wal -Mart agreed to use the COA #41 funds to cover the costs associated with the Council- approved traffic calming project. These funds total $175,000 and were programmed into the City's Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program budget. Project Details The proposed project includes the following improvements: • The extension of red curbing along the southern side of Rush, just west of Delta Avenue. This will help improve visibility for cars making a right from Delta onto westbound Rush Street. • The addition of speed feedback signs on both eastbound and westbound travel lanes of Rush Street. These signs will help remind drivers of their speeds and display a flashing yellow light when drivers are driving above the speed limit (Attachment 3). • The repainting /addition of street markings including crosswalks, painted bulb - outs on Rush Street and a drop -off /pick -up zone on the north side of Rush Street, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. The bulb outs will help to give a narrowing appearance on the road and slow cars down. The designated drop off zone will be available for motorists on school days before and after school times. • The addition of in- pavement road waming lights at the school crossing along Rush Street, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. These lights will be activated by a sensor and will display flashing lights when persons cross the street at this location (Attachment 4). • The repair /addition of curb ramps with truncated domes and miscellaneous sidewalk repairs in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. • The removal of two magnolia trees adjacent to eastbound travel lanes on Rush Street approximately 150 feet east of San Gabriel Blvd. and adjacent to the crosswalk at Rush and Angelus. The tree removals are necessary to help increase sight visibility of traffic signs for vehicles and oncoming cars for pedestrians using the crosswalk. • The planting of approximately 20 magnolia trees along the north side of Rush Street in vacant tree well locations. The engineer's estimate for this project is $87,500. City Council Meeting October 27. 2009 Page 3 of 4 Timeline If directed to move forward, staff will work to advertise and complete this project according to the following schedule: October 27`h — Authorization to Proceed City Council Approval of Design, Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Proposals for the Rush Street Traffic Calming Improvement Project. November 19th and 26th — Advertisement Advertisement of Project in Local Publications/Trade Journals December 2nd — Bid Opening Public Bid Opening for Project December 8`h — City Council Awards Contract January 15`h — January 30`h— Tentative Construction Schedule January 30`h — Tentative Project Completion February 10'h-Tentative Notice of Completion by City Engineer FINANCIAL REVIEW Funding for this project was included in the City's Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Capital Improvement Program budget and will be funded through Wal -Mart Condition of Approval #41 funds. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15304 (a) of the CEQA Implementing Guidelines. This exemption covers projects involving minor alterations of land that do not have a significant effect on the environment. City Council Meeting October 27. 2009 Pave 4 of 4 Prepared by: Rafael Fajardo Associate Civil Engineer Submitted by: Chris Marcarello Deputy Public Works Director Co m Attachments 1- City Council Staff Report and Minutes. December 16, 2008 2- Wal -Mart Condition of Approval #41 8- Speed Feedback Sign Sample 4- In- Pavement Road Crosswalk Light Sample 5- Plans and Technical Specifications Development Director X41 ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I A- FROM: OLIVER CHI, CITY MANAGER DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2008 V SUBJECT: TRAFFIC STUDY AT RUSH STREET AND ANGELUS AVENUE AND CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC CALMING ENHANCEMENTS SUMMARY In December 2007, the City received a petition from local residents to evaluate traffic conditions at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. This issue was reviewed by the Traffic Commission and then forwarded to the City Council for review and further direction. On February 12, 2008, the City Council directed staff to improve traffic markings in the area and have an independent engineering company conduct a new traffic study at the location Since that time, staff has made traffic marking improvements and worked with Kimley- Horn and Associates (KHA) to conduct a new traffic study for this area. Traffic and pedestrian counts were taken in May 2008 and an overview of the data is included for review (Attachment 1). After traffic counts were taken, KHA worked with City staff and the Traffic Commission to review existing conditions and evaluate potential traffic calming enhancements for the area. After evaluating options at its October 2008 meeting, the Commission developed a recommendation to forward to the City Council for consideration. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council review the Traffic Commission's recommendation and direct staff to implement traffic calming enhancements. DISCUSSION Background At its February 12, 2008 meeting the City Council reviewed a report related to traffic safety concerns at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue, adjacent to Rice Elementary School. Since the most recent study of the area had been conducted in May 2007, the Council asked that staff hire an independent engineering firm to conduct a new study for the area. In May 2008, Kimley -Horn and Associates (KHA) took new traffic and APPROVED FOR WY COUNCIL AGENDA: C _ ITEM NO. E City Council Meeting December 16, 2008 Paoe 2 of d pedestrian counts for the area These new counts do not meet California Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. However, KHA worked with City staff to develop traffic calming options at the location for the Traffic Commission's consideration. On June 26, 2008, the Traffic Commission reviewed a presentation related to the conditions along Rush Street. The presentation (Attachment 2) included the following: • An overview of the background related to the concerns in the area • An explanation of traffic signal warrants and an explanation of criteria used to evaluate them • Traffic and pedestrian counts taken in May 2008 • Potential traffic calming measures that could be used at the location .After reviewing this presentation, the Traffic Commission provided staff with comments and further direction related to traffic calming options. Some options included installing bulb -outs near the intersection of Rush Street and Angelus Avenue, trimming existing landscaping on medians, in- pavement lighting and adding fed curbing. Recommendations Using comments and ideas from the Traffic Commission, KHA and staff worked to develop 3 conceptual plans (Attachment 3) for further consideration. These 3 concept plans, ranging from $10,000 to $100,000, were presented to the Traffic Commission on October 2, 2008. A brief summary is included below for review Concept Plan 1 — Estimated Cost. $10,000 • Extend red curb along southern side of Rush, just west of Delta Avenue • Paint a high visibility crosswalk at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue • Replace existing landscaping with low- growth plant material • Add speed feedback signs heading westbound and eastbound on Rush Street Concept Plan 2 — Estimated Cost: $20,000 • All Level 1 Improvements • Add painted bulb -outs along Rush Street • Add drop- off /pick -up zones along north side of Rush Street Concept Plan 3— Estimated Cost: 1100,000 • All Level 1 and 2 Improvements • Construct raised concrete bulb -outs along Rush Street • Add flashing yellow pedestrian crossing signals at Rush Street and Angelus Avenue • Add turning restrictions at Rush Street and Delta Avenue • Add left -turn lane at existing Wal -Mart signal City Council Meeting December 16, 2008 Page 3 of 4 After reviewing the presentation on October 2nd, the Traffic Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the City Council that the proposed Level 2 improvements be made along Rush Street; that staff continue monitoring traffic conditions; that staff work with Garvey School District officials regarding the installation of a drop- off /pick -up zone; and that plant materials be trimmed to improve visibility along the entire stretch of Rush Street. The implementation of the level 2 concept plan will allow staff to evaluate the effectiveness of improvements and "ramp up" the improvements to higher levels if necessary. After installation, staff will continue to monitor this location and provide the Traffic Commission and City Council with updates on traffic concerns at this location. Public Outreach Staff sent notification card mailers regarding this issue to households within a 500 foot radius of the location, individuals that signed the initial petition in December 2007, the Garvey Unified School District, and other affected parties. These notification cards were sent prior to the June 26'" and October 2nd Traffic Commission meetings. FINANCIAL REVIEW Funding for this project is not provided in the engineering division's fiscal year 2007 -08 budget. Should the City Council decide to move forward with traffic calming measures, additional funds will need to be appropriated to complete this project. Additional funding sources may be available through state grant funds or funds held by the City through Wal -Mart condition of approval #41 LEGAL REVIEW This staff report has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The City Attorney has also included a letter informing referencing issues related to "design immunity" standards and potential liability related to installing unnecessary traffic control devices. Prepared by: (,J, Chris Marcarello Deputy Public Works Director City Manager City Council Meeting December 16,2M8 Pace 4 of 4 Attachments: (1) Traffic and Pedestrian Counts — May 2008 (2) June 26 Traffic Commission Staff Report and Presentation (3) Rush Street/Angelus Avenue Conceptual Plans 1 -3 (4) October 2 Traffic Commission Staff Report and Presentation (5) June 26, 2008 Traffic Commission Minutes (6) October 2, 2008 Traffic Commission Minutes Minutes of the REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 16, 2008 The regular meeting of the Rosemead City Council was called to order by Mayor Tran at 7:00 p.m. in the Rosemead City Council Chamber located at 8838 East Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, Cafdomia. FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Low INVOCATION: Council Member Taylor ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS PRESENT: Council Member's Clark, Nuhez, Mayor Tran. Pro Tern OFFICIALS PRESENT: City Manager Chi, City Attorney Garcia, Assistant City Minag'er Saeki, Assistant City Manager Hawkesworth, Director of FinanceSdsco, Diieclor of Parks and Recreation Montgomery-Scott, Economic Development Administrator Ramire` RD puty Public Works Officer Marcarello, and City Clerk Molleda. PRESENTATION -Rosemead High School lotball Team/ Principal Larry Calliham -stated he was ve proud of the football team and introduced their couch Matt Kofler. Matt Kofler - stated h was honored and proud of every effort the team had given them in and out of the classroom Mr. Kofl6riaddedtha he was very proud to have represented the City of Rosemead. _tea I& The Mayor called a shori;recesN(7:13 p m. and reconvened at 7:16 p m. The MaRrIannouncedytliat Item 5B would be moved up for discussion because there were students that,were going to speak on the item and had to go to school the next morning. B. M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation Funding Request Recently, the M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation submitted for City Council consideration a funding request to assist with the development of a youth engagement project here in the City of Rosemead. The proposal request seeks a City contribution in the amount of $57,000 to develop what the Foundation has termed, Operation Civic Pride Service Learning Program, an initiative that seeks to accomplish the following objectives: Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16. 2008 ITEM NO. Page l of 15 • Establish of a legitimate voice for Rosemead youth. • Creation of a youth advisory board. • Help youth in decision making. • Mentoring. Based on current funding restraints and existing City efforts in the realm of youth programming, staff does not believe it to be prudent to grant this request at this time. Recommendation: That the City Council deny the funding request by the M. Janet Chin Foundation. . Janet Chin - addressed the City Council and reviewed the program and stated that if there were any questions she was available to answer them. She also introduced :a few"Of1the students who are involved in the Janet Chin Foundation.. Michael Wong - spoke in support of the foundation and He stated he had previously participated in a Washingtc his achievements since his return from that trip. Patty Santos - spoke in support of the foundation and asked i She added the project was not only run by Jaii hin but also Tony Hong - spoke in support of the explained how the program will bring the City Council for�thea support. trip the City had funded and stated cil for their support. advisory board. Council for their support. He to the community. Amanda Lee - spoke in ,support Mthe foundation.and asked the City Council for their support. Stated there was not it that targeted the yqi h in the City of Rosemead. program and stated he served in the board of the Janet Steven - Stated thi:City should not fund one organization when there are many in need. Added th "e Eity should help the youth find outside funding for the program. Mayor Pro � m Nunez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Low, to donate $25,000 to the Janet Chin foundation. Vote resulted in: Yes: Low, Nunez, Tran No: Taylor Abstain: Clark Absent: None Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 1008 Page 2 of 15 1. PUBLIC HEARING A. Municipal Code Amendment 08 -01 - A Request to Amend Zoning Ordinance Section 17.56.050(B), Light Manufacturing and Industrial, Permitted Uses, to Allow Live Poultry Slaughtering and Processing with our Without Retail Sales as a Permitted Use Mr. Quan Phu, owner of the Cal Poultry slaughtering and retail facility located at 6932 Garvey Avenue, has submitted an application requesting a municipal code amendment to allow poultry slaughtering and processing, with or without retail sales, as a permitted use in the Light Manufacturing and Industrial jM -1) zone. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Negati a Declaration and adopt Ordinance No. 868, modifying the zoning code with respect, to permitted uses in the M -1 (Light Manufacturing and Indust+nal):zohe, thereby,approving Municipal Code Amendment 08-01. ' Mayor Tran opened the Public Hearing at 8:04 p.m. Jean Hall - spoke against the approval of the code amendmerif:jshe expressed concerned in having this project approved and having other businesses come in o,the City and doing the same. Marlene Shinen - spoke against the approval of the code;'amendment. She added that if Council approved this project they would be ignoring the people's complains. Villa Navarro -spoke agains1`the'approval of the code amendment. She stated this business is unhealthy for the envirc rt,q I and tfie people wItl'ive around that area. Brian Lewin - stated he had ymized feefingsabout this project. Stated that if this project was approved he would asli that sta keep a very close eye on Cal Poultry and make sure they keep up with the regulations. "M �' Steven D -4 spoke against the approval of the code amendment. He stated this business has always beg,a problem Ad asked that this project be brought back to Council after all the regulations arebeing,!T(eI by Cal Poultry. Sandra ArmanlY- stated she was concern on how some of the Council Members votes would be cast. She stated that anyone who had received contributions from this business or anyone affiliated with this business should reframe from voting on this issue given that she felt it was a conflict of interest. There being no other speakers on the Public Hearing, Mayor Tran closed the hearing at 8:31 p.m. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 3 of 15 Mayor Pro Tem Nunez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Low, to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt Ordinance No. 868, modifying the zoning code with respect to permitted uses in the M -1 (Light Manufacturing and Industrial) zone, thereby approving Municipal Code Amendment 08.01. Vote resulted in: Yes: Low, Nunez, Tran No: Clark, Taylor Abstain: None Absent: None 2. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE Marlene Shinen - addressed Council regarding the CPRA submitted bygtier'td -the City on October 14, 2008 requesting a copy of the final settlement agreement betweew al -Mart and Save Our Community. -k Velia Navarro - expressed concern regarding a massage parlor locaited on 2236 S,i'San Gabriel Boulevard and asked why they had been given a business license. ;Si a asked how closely the City checked these types of businesses.' 3. CONSENTCALENDAR C. Resolution No. 2008 -83 Recommendation: Adopt ResolU -tion No. 2008 -83, for payment of City expenditures-inn the amount of $962,122.31 numbered 60023 through 60076 and 64575 thro ` h 64691.. ' D. California Contract Citi"g%sociation - Legislative Orientation Tour The 20Mkrinuaf�Sacfamento Legislation Orientation Tour will be held on January 12 -14, 2008 in Sacramento, CA. �ndation: That the City Council authorize any Council Member, the City and staff designee to attend the event at City's expense, of California Cities 2009 Mayors and Council Members Academy The League of Califomia Cities 2009 New Mayors and Council Members Academy will be held on January 21 -23, 2009 in Sacramento, CA. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize any Council Member, the City Manager, and staff designee to attend the event at City's expense. Rosemead Ch), Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 4 of 15 Authorization to Attend National League of Cities 2009 Annual Congressional City Conference The National League of Cities 2009 Annual Congressional City Conference will be held on March 14 -18, 2009 in Washington, DC. Recommendation: Thal the City Council authorize any Council Member, the City Manager, and staff designee to attend the event at City's expense. G. Radar Speed Survey— Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Update the Speed Limit Zones in the City of Rosemead y c At its November 18, 2008 meeting, the City Council introduced an ordinance that updates the speed limit zones Citywide. The Califomi ehicle.Cod9 requires that the City conduct a radar speed survey analysis every'seven ye�.ars in order to allow the use of radar in speed enforcement of local streets. °For state`,owned highways the City must complete the analysis every to years for speed limits- be enforceable. t k` Recommendation: That the City Council Reading. H. Resolution Reciting the F; November 4, 2008 and De On Decembee 9 2008, the t votes casta an tfi Certific CC frog "the County of Los election came to,138,45, evot k �.,... which declarers the official UI 869 on Second unicipal Election held as Required by Law received the final official statement of ate of the Canvass of the election retums for Measure Angeles, Election Department. The final tally for that es yes, and 6399 votes no. Resolution No. 2008 -84 results of the electron for Measure CC, is submitted to That the City Council adopt and approve Resolution No. 2008- Drivenvar Avenue Visibility and Sidewalk Concerns f" The Traffic Commission reviewed a request to add street markings, a flashing beacon, in -road warning lights, and a crossing guard at the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue. After visiting the site, staff recommended that the existing street marking be updated and that red curbing be added on the north side of Mission Drive to help improve visibility concerns. Staff also found that existing conditions do not warrant the implementation of additional traffic control devices at this location. Based on these observations, the Traffic Commission approved staffs recommendation to update street markings, add red curbing, and deny the request to add new traffic control devices. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes ojDecember 16, 1008 Page 5 of 15 Authorization to Attend National League of Cities 2009 Annual Congressional City Conference The National League of Cities 2009 Annual Congressional City Conference will be held on March 14 -18, 2009 in Washington, DC. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize any Council Member, the City Manager, and staff designee to attend the event at City's expense. G. Radar Speed Survey- Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Update the Speed Limit Zones in the City of Rosemead e At its November 18, 2008 meeting, the City Council introduded an ordinance that updates the speed limit zones Citywide. The Califomia'Vehicle.Code requires that the City conduct a radar speed survey analysis every seven years in order to allow the use of radar in speed enforcement of local str6ets.'For sta Awned highways the City must complete the analysis every te�ryears for speed limitsto-tie enforceable... Recommendation: That the City Council Reading. H. Resolution Reciting the Fr November 4, 2008 and Der On Decembee.,u99 ,22008, the f votes cast and ttie�Certifica CC fromethe Coufity of Los l 869 on Second lunicipal Election held as Required by Law R's office received the final official statement of Canvass of the election returns for Measure s, Election Department. The final tally for that and 6399 votes no. Resolution No. 2008 -84 the dffidal results of the election for Measure CC, is submitted to That the City Council adopt and approve Resolution No. 2008- Drivelivar Avenue Visibility and Sidewalk Concerns The Traffic Commission reviewed a request to add street markings, a flashing beacon, in -road waming lights, and a crossing guard at the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue. After visiting the site, staff recommended that the existing street marking be updated and that red curbing be added on the north side of Mission Drive to help improve visibility concerns. Staff also found that existing conditions do not warrant the implementation of additional traffic control devices at this location. Based on these observations, the Traffic Commission approved staffs recommendation to update street markings, add red curbing, and deny the request to add new traffic control devices. Rosemead Ciry Council Meering Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 5 of 15 I:A 0 0 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Traffic Commission's recommendation and authorize staff to take necessary steps to implement traffic safety enhancements at Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue. CaIPERS Waiver of 960-Hour Rule for Don Anderson Public Employee Retirement Law prohibits a retired annuitant from working more than 960 hours in a fiscal year unless a resolution is adopted in accordance with Government Code Section 21224(h). Don Anderson, a retired CalPERS annuitant has been working for the City for approximately two years and is close to his hour limit for the current fiscal year. Staff is currently working on a penmarent plan for his position, and will be ready to move forward by July 1, 2009. "0 - Recommendation: That the City Council adopt requesting an employment extension per Gover Biennial Review and Update of City The Political Reform Act (Cal. Gov't Codb § §All interests of public officials through disclosure ofsd on participation in the making of decisions ins reason to know he or she has a financial interest. r�M . 87300 and 87306, each city js" reguired to h Pursuant to Government Code sectionM302r th employees who must disclose property, and business positic making or participating in the n -79 21221(h). Merest Code 0 ef•seq.) controls conflicts of icial interests and prohibitions ich the official knows or has ?itrstiant to Government Code e a conflict -of- interest code. code is required to designate ts, income, interests in real and who must disqualify themselves from g of governmental decisions affecting those According to'Govemrr& Cbde section 87306 and 87306.5, this code must be r64wed>every-;tWoo years and amended when circumstances change, such as when newtpositiohs. created or duties of existing positions change. The code must be consisterit with the minimum requirements of the Political Reform Act. .RMC §.tZ24.020 sets forth the current designated positions and disclosure categories set forth in the code. The current biennial review of the City's conflict - 61[4nierest code reveals that certain changes need to be made as a result of the addition of new job titles, the deletion of certain old job titles, and changes in the job duties and descriptions. As a result staff is recommending that the RMC § 2.24.020 be amended to incorporate the updated 'designated positions' that are required to file FPPC Form 700 Statement of Economic Interests together.with updated disclosure categories. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16. 2008 Page 6 of 15 0 0 Recommendation: That the City Council introduce for first reading Ordinance No. 870 amending Rosemead Municipal Code 2.24.020 which updates the designated positions and disclosure categories required by Government Code Sections 87300 and 87302. Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to approve Consent Calendar with the exception of Items A, B, J, L, and M. Vote resulted in: Yes: Clark, Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: None Abstain: None Absent: None 2008 — Regular Meeting Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, secor approve the Minutes of October 14, 2008. Vole res Mayor Pro approve tt No: Clark, Taylor Abstain: None to ot(on, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to 2008. Vote resulted in: Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -80, for payment of City expenditures in the amount of $1,542,961.16 numbered 59982 through 60022 and 64415 through 64574. Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to approve Resolution No. 2008.80. Vole resulted in: Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 7 of 15 0 0 Yes: Low, Nunez, Tran No: Clark, Taylor Abstain: None Absent: None J. Approval of Specification and Authorization to Solicit Proposals for Citywide Parks, Facilities, and Public Right -of -Way Landscape Maintenance Services The City of Rosemead currently uses outside contractual services to perform landscape maintenance at its packs, facilities, roadway medians, and parkways. Services performed by contract landscape maintenance crews, irclude turf mowing, turf edging, blowing, turf aeration, weed eradication,,pesl control, and general cleanup. These services are cntical to ensure that the City's public landscaped areas are maintained contract with MadposaiHodi ultural Enterprises expired in June 2007 and the City has continues to work wi anxsa on a month -to- month. 9, Recommendation: That the City Cc maintenance services and authorize landscape maintenance firms. Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, approve the specifications for landscape m: proposals from qualified landscape mainten Yes: Clark, No: None.,.. Absent: L. „e'Hou'sirig,ElemeritRequest Proposal cations,46landscape from qualified by Councill Member Polly Low, to services and authorize staff to solicit Nvote'resulted in: On November 13, 2008, the City Council authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposa"{ FP) to seek a qualified professional consultant to update the City's �Housin6bement in accordance with State Law. The State of California requires that,611 cities prepare and adopt a Housing Element every five years (Government `code section 65581} 65589.8). The Housing Element must include identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs, resources and constraints to address these needs, overall housing goals and policies, and scheduled programs for the maintenance, improvement and development of housing for all economic segments of the community. The Rosemead Housing Element was last prepared and approved by the State in June 2002 and must now be updated and resubmitted to the State for their review and consideration. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December y 6, 1008 Page 8 of 15 0 Recommendation: That the City Council enter into a professional services agreement with GRC Associates, Inc. in the amount of $44,260 for the development of an updated Housing Element in accordance with State Law. Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to enter into a professional services agreement with GRC Associates, Inc. in the amount of $44,260 for the development of an updated Housing Element in accordance with State Law. Vote resulted in: Yes: Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: Clark Abstain: None Absent: None M. Transfer $90,000 Appropriation for Janitorial Services Department to the Parks & Facilities From time to time it is necessary to ma' Accordingly, the accompanying budget Janitorial Services which was originally Department to the Parks & Facility Mair Recommendation: That the will amend the FY 2008 -09 b sions to the budget. wilhransfer $90,000 for the General Services !.Resolution No. 2008 -81 which the resolution. Mayor Pro Tern John Nunezmv@Z a motion, seconded by Council Member Polly Low, to approve Resolution No. 2008 -81. Vote resuited.in: Yes: CIarkKbw,<Nuflez- Taylor, Tran 4. MATTERS FROM CITY MANAGER & STAFF A. 'ii4�(Iuarterly Interim Financial Update ` Historically it has been a common practice with many jurisdictions to provide governing bodies with financial statement information only once or twice per year. As new audit standards require greater financial awareness on the part of governing bodies, the issuance of unaudited interim summary financial repods provides a means of communicating that information. Additionally, before the new audit standards were issued, the city management work plan included issuing quarterly financial reports so the City Council and the public would have increased City financial familiarity. Rosemead Cip, Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 9 of l i 0 0 It is with the team's work plans and new audit requirements in mind that the first quarter FY 2008 -09 Quarterly Interim Financial Update report is being issued. The report is unaudited and does not include the extensive accounting accruals and adjustments that are included in audited financial statements. However, the report provides a summarized look at the City's finances for the first quarter of FY 2008- 09 and is expected to be valuable for assessing the City's overall financial condition. Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Quarterly Interim Financial Update report. No action was taken, report was received and filed. B. Award of Contract — Parks, Recreation, and Al its regular meeting on October 14, 2008, a Request for Proposals for a Parks, Rec Plan. __A The completed Master Plan will include existing facilities & progi renovation, expansion, and 15 years. It will include t should increase grant & o goals & strategies for the overview of thecfinancial I and will ,ement to Master Plan u cil apprR&JI the issuance of and General'Itacilities Master entory and assessment of all include recommendations for ommunity needs over the next put in planning for the future, ies, and will establish specific ementof facilities and programs, including an with which to achieve them. The proposed of a trail system along the Southern California t been withdrawn from the project as staff is ire use rights for available parcels. Requests foRP,%p sals (RFP) were solicited firms` Staff A'Wwed the proposals for understanding /of the scope of work, qualifc work schedule, and cost effectiveness. Fo interviews with the following results with responses received from six (6) completeness, relevant experience, ations of the project team, proposed it firms were invited to participate in Consultant Fee Proposal MIG,Inc. $101,625 PROS Consulting, LLC 5113,330 Lawrence R. Moss & Associates $128,000 Mia Lehrer & Associates' 5105,675 *Estimate excluded costs for general facilities evaluation Rosemead City Council Meeling Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 10 of 15 MIG, Inc. was ranked the highest. They submitted the most comprehensive proposal that met the City's timelines and project requirements. They have completed Master Plans for 120 cities of varying size and demographics. References were checked and their performance was deemed better than satisfactory. Their proposal was also the most cost effective. MIG's estimate for the Master Plan slightly exceeds the City's budgeted amount of $100,000 for this activity. Further, it is prudent to include a contingency in the event additional services are requested (extra surveys or interviews, GIs mapping, asset management plan, etc.). Therefore, an additional allocation of $15,000 is needed to cover fees in excess of the budgeted amount, ".which includes a contingency of approximately 14 %. �; 1p� A, Recommendation: That the City Council award the cor fraat b MIG, Inc., and authorize the City Manager and the City Clerk to execute the'oontract. Further, staff recommends that City Cound authorize Budget Resolutid 2008 -82 to transfer $15,000 from the undesignated Genera Fund balance to cover remaining project process. ; tk r, Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez made a motion, seconded by.Councll Member Polly Low, to award the contract to MIG, Inc., and authorize the City Mari ger and the City Clerk to execute the contract. Further, staff recommends that City Council authorize Budget Resolution 2008 -82 to transfer $15,000 from tti indesignated Genera Fund balance to cover remaining project process. Vote resulted in' "f Yes: Low, Nurift�Tran No: Clark,` ?s' Absent: to ParklSports Facility Use Policies and Fees City ofxRosemead parks, pools, and sports facilities are in very great demand by residents, community organizations; youth sports groups, "travel' clubs /teams, schoofs, non - residents, and City of Rosemead youth and adult sports programs. These facilities include Rosemead Park and Pool, Garvey Park and Pool, and the Jess Gonzalez sports Complex. The City of Rosemead has not reviewed the policies or fees governing these facilities since 1993 Current fees and policies do not distinguish between non - profit, resident, and non- residents users. While supervision and maintenance associated with these uses costs the City approximately $70,000 annually, we recover less than $15,000 in revenues. Thus, the City funds a significant portion of all uses. A survey of surrounding cities indicates that existing fees are much lower than those of other cities. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minuses of December l6, 2008 Page 11 of 15 0 0 This item was brought forward for City Council consideration at the November 182, meeting. At that time, staff was directed to reduce the proposed fee adjustments for residents by 50% for facility rental related costs Recommendation: That the City Council approve the proposed facility application including rules and regulations, fee schedule, and cancellation policy, and regular user responsibilities as outlined effective January 1, 2009, Council Member Polly Low made a motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez, to approve the proposed facility application including rules and regulations, fee schedule, and cancellation policy, and regular user responsibilities as outlined effective January 1, 2009. Vote resulted in: _`7si'A, Yes: Low, Nunez, Taylor Tran No: Clark Abstain: Taylor Absent: None D. Consolidated Disposal Application for Rate Increase tik On Wednesday, November 21, 2008, nsolidated Disposal Services (Consolidated) submitted alelter requesting :agate increase for 2009. The proposed rate increase of.. ' ' % Dior residential customers and 5.98% for commercial customers are schedcleld�to a ;e$ect on January 1, 2009. For 2008, the City Council approved a ratelincrease of 5.62% for residential customers and 5.79% for comrifeicial customers. As the Gift' Council will recall, 06hsolidated's annual rate increase is made up of 2 components with"assigned;we`ights as follows: `t �ne ,. QAnnuat'!�Los. Angeles Region Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase — Gate feettonnage disposal fee increases — Weighted 30% verified the annual CPI increase and is currently working with d to verify appropriate tonnage /disposal increases. For 2009, the Los Angeles County Sanitation District (SANS District) will be increasing fees at Puente Hills landfill by 15.09 %. Also for 2009, the SANS District will be reducing costs at the Commerce Refuse to Energy Facility by 6.56% In reviewing Consolidated's request letter, the tonnage /disposal fee potion of the City's increase is calculated as if all of the City's residential waste is taken to the landfill. Staff estimates that approximately 75% of the City's residential waste is taken to the landfill as trash while the remaining 25% is recycled. Staff is working to verify disposal records from 2007 -08 to ensure that the rate increase is based on actual disposal and recycling reports. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 12 of 15 0 In addition to details regarding the proposed rate increase, Consolidated also forwarded a copy of the Rosemead City Council Agenda from November 14, 2006. That agenda indicates that the City Council granted the City Manager the authority to implement any annual rate increase without holding a public hearing provided that the rate increase does not exceed the formula in the Consolidated contract agreement. For reference, staff went back and pulled the minutes for the meeting where the action was taken, and it does appear that the City Council granted the City Manager such authority. This means that unless there is any objection from the City Council, staff will move forward with verifying the increases and once approved, authorize the rate increase proposed by Consolidatetl�k Recommendation: That the City Council receive No action was taken; the report was received and filed. E. Traffic Study at Rush Street and Traffic Calming Enhancements In December 2007, the City traffic conditions at Rush St School. This issue was revi the City Council for review < Council directed staff Wimp and Consideration of I a petition"�Y-om local residents to evaluate Angelus Avenue' adjacent to Rice Elementary :the Traffic t ammission and then forwarded to ion. On February 12, 2008, the City ngs in the area and have an a new traffic study at the location. Since.thiihime, staff has made:Uatfic marking improvements and worked with ;aW f . Ki mley -Hom andrks;- fates °(KHA) to conduct a new traffic study for this area. ,Traffic and pedestrian counts were taken in May 2008 and an overview of the data ismCluded fodr 6r review. After traffic counts were taken, KHA worked with City staff 'ft G .m r and Trafficz.Commission to review existing conditions and evaluate potential traffic 61ming,enhancements for the area. After evaluating options at its October 2008 meeting, the Commission developed a recommendation to forward to the City Council for consideration. Recommendation: That the City Council review the Traffic Commission's recommendation and direct staff to implement traffic calming enhancements. Bob Bruesch - had a question on recommendation No. 2 and asked if all the trees would be taken out. Brian Lewin - stated that essentially the Traffic Commission liked the first stage but that it would be appropriate to go ahead and put in the drop off and pick up zone along the north side of Rush Street Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 1008 Page 13 of 15 E 0 Council Member Low made a motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern John Nunez, to accept Traffic Commission's recommendation level concept plan 2. Vote resulted in: Yes: Clark, Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5. MATTERS FROM MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL A. Recording Procedure of Meetings and Maintenance of the Official Record The City currently records the City Council, Community Development Commission, Planning Commission, and Traffic Commission meetings u`tlltzlog the Granicus system that was installed as part of the Chamber Upgrade protect. Due to an error in the Granicus system as explained at the November'18" Coriunirnity Development Commission meeting, the recording of the Octobe 12$r.2008 Community Development Commissionwallost. As;a result, the,;' Council requested that staff develop a back -up plan�o ensure that the recordings of future meetings would not be lost. q t 4�9a Staff has also received requeslto,pmvide [tie meeting recordings in multiple formats and would like the CounCt jo.provide direction as to what one media type will be maintained and provided in ttte eventof a public records request. ,That the City Council adopt one method of maintaining the the resulting public copies as requested. Marlene Shinen j:s�tated tliilitbe price for'the DVD's of the Council meetings was excessive and asked that Co6hicil- go' to wing audio tapes. Councf Wember Tay[6,r4ade'a motion, seconded by Council Member Clark, to make the audio cAs6ette the official record of the City Council meeting. Vote resulted in: Ye `Clark, Low, Taylor, Train ;No: None Abstain: Nunez Absent: None C. Discussion Regarding City Attorney Bills Recently, it was requested by Council Member Taylor that an item related to City Attorney bills be placed on the City Council agenda for discussion. Recommendation: That the City Council provide staff with additional direction. Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes of December 16, 2008 Page 14 of 15 0 0 This item was discussed earlier in the meeting. 6. ADJOURNMENT The City Council meeting was adjourned at 10:58 p.m. The next City Council meeting is scheduled to take place on January 13, 2009 at 7:00 p m. ATTEST: Gloria Molleda, City Clerk John Tran Mayor Rosemead City Council Meeting Minutes ojDecember 16, 2008 Page 15 of 15 ,-i- rederSign. SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY SYSTEM *O� see Introducing Radarsign's CSP (Child Safety Package) Help insure safer roads for your children with a safety system that includes flashing beacons and a Radarsign Driver Feedback Sign. Each system component is designed to meet the highest quality standards, withstand the toughest weather, and provide a reliable method of slowing traffic in school zones The CSP is more effective than stand -alone flashing beacons due to the physiological response of drivers to the radar sign showing their actual speed. Key features/benefits: f Data collection feature allow safety personnel to measure success in slowing traffic, and provides specifics to intelligently deploy law enforcement, which results in increased safety 8 Entire system works from single power source on a single pole, reducing costs 4 Industry leading energy efficient radar sign design means a smaller solar panel & battery backup and lower cost f Integrated design allows the timer/calendar to control both beacons and radar sign 4 The most vandal- resistant driver feedback sign design on the market today S Solar models carry 14 days of backup battery operation, ensuring continuous operation ! CSP arrives 90% assembled, for easy and quick installation 4 Available in AC or Solar models, also polycarbonate or aluminum housings for beacons 0 S pot D E V I C E S West Covina 9 In -Road Warning Lights Installations Danville. CA 1455 Kleppe Lane Sparks, NV 89431 888,520.D008 P 888 520.0007 F vwvw. spotdevices.com Description In -Road Warning Light (IRWL) Crosswalk Systems combine industry- leading durability and brightness with the Spot Devices System Infrastructure Management Applications (SIMA) suite, a set of secure Web -based tools for remote, enterprise -wide supervision of all Spot Devices systems. Operation In -Road Warning Crosswalk Systems pedestrian activates the system is activated, the fla in the roadway provide motorists. Light ORWL) remain dark until a system. Once the shing lights embedded a bright warning to �PO 1455 s,NV Lane Sparks, NV 89431 888.520.0008 Toll Free 888.520.0007 Fax D E V I C E S www.spotdevices.com Highlights ► Optional audible announcements assist sight- impaired pedestrians ► High- efficiency, bright LED modules ► SIMA- enabled (see back) ► AC or solar power ► 2 year warranty System Components RS320 IRWLs with SC320 controller RS200 IRWLs with SC200 controller (Not available with SIMA connectivity) _ Activation devices: • Pushbuttons • SC320PB Pushbutton Bollard Controller • SC320AA Automatic Activation Bollard Controller • Microwave detector V Solar panel or AC power supply Optional additional lighted peripherals Arrive Safely Description The RS320 Road Spot is an ultrabright In -Road Warning Light (IRWL) controlled by any of the Spot Devices network controllers, except for the SC315. The RS320 flashes a warning to motorists, pedestri- ans, light rail vehicles, and industrial vehicles based on a variety of inputs, including pedestrian activation, vehicle activation, and calendar activation. Highlights ► Stainless steel, modular lighting element ► Easily installed and maintained I► Ultrabright LEDs command attention at >400 feet ► Configurable Flash patterns and duration ► AutodimTM adjusts lights to ambient conditions s' MUTCD and CalTrans compliant ► Manufactured in the USA in an ISO 9001 facility 2 year warranty Specifications Number of LEDs Color Luminance Daylight distance visibility Night distance visibility Flash pattern and duration or bloirecuonal_____- 3 in each direction Amber (standard) ___Reds white, or blue (special order) 2.5 million cdim' >400 feet >0.5 mile---- Internet configurable OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS Power consumption 1W per LED Windows - - -.. — Connector Weight-- - -- Dimensions Maximum above- roadway height spot D E V I C E S 1455 Kleppe Lane Sparks, NV 89431 888.520.0008 Toll Free 888.520.0007 Fax www.spotdevices.com X id hermetic -- -- Arrive Safely n u F- r-I u 41. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for Phase 1 Improvements, Developer shall deposit an amount determined by the City Engineer for the costs of installing a flashing beacon at school crossing and funding a school crossing guard program at the corner of Rush Street and Delta Avenue for a minimum of 20 years. PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE DEPARTMENTIENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF ROSEMEAD RUSH AND ANGELUS TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPRC FISCAL YEAR 200 &2010 BID ANALYSIS BID OPENING: DECEMBER 8. 2008 -11:00 A.M. ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE FREEWAY ELECTRIC. IN. 120m s tos 000.W a1 ITEM DESCRIPTION : MjbQTY CLEARING AND GRUBBING. 1 , UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL LS I6 508.00 $ 500.00 1 2 DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS. 1 LS 9 250.00 S 250.00 3 CONSTRUCT "NCH THICK PCC SIDEWALK 2200 SF 8 6.99 S 15,358.00 4 CONSTRUCT POO CURB RAMPS. 4 EA 6 3,320.00 $ 13.280.00 5 CONSTRUCT POO VARIABLE HEIGHT RETAINING CURS (6'42-) 200 LF 9 I9S9 S 3,916.00 6 CONSTRUCT POD DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER APWA STD PLAN 1141. 300 SF S 13.75 6 4,125.00 7 TRAFFIC STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKERS. SIGNS 1 LS S 3,200.00 6 3,200.00 B INSTALL I"OAO WARNING UNIT SYSTEM 1 LS 8 32,700.00 6 32.700.00 B 916TALLSOWBSCHOOL ZONE SAFETY SYSTEM 2 IS 6 6.860.00 S 19,780.00 M TOTAL AMOUNt I f 81,087.00 CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING R STEINY AND COMPANY. INC A ITEM 1 DESCRIPTION - OTY UNIT UNIT PRICE , TOTAL $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 1 CLEARING AND GRUBBING. 1 1 LS 2 _ DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS. 1 LS $ 2,200.00 9 2.200.00 3 _ CONSTRUCT "NCH THICK PCC SIDEWALK 2200 SF $ 5.00 8 11,000.00 4 CONSTRUCT POD CURS RAMPS. 4 EA S 1,700.00 S 6.1300.00 5 CONSTRUCT POO VARIABLE HEIGHT RETAINING CURB (8' -12-) 200 LF S 15.00 $ 3.000.00 6 CONSTRUCT POO DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER APWA STD PLAN 110-1. 300 SF S 750 S 2,250.00 7 TRAFFIC STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKERS, SIGNS 1 LS 6 2,600.00 $ 2.600.00 13 INSTALL IN -ROAD WARNING UNIT SYSTEM I LS S 46.000.00 S 46.000.00 9 INSTALL SOLAR SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY SYSTEM 2 LS $ 7,350.00 S 14,700.00 M TOTALAMOUNT I I $ 98.28050 STEINY AND COMPANY. INC A ITEM 1 DESCRIPTION CLEARING AND GRUBBING. OTY UNIT', 1 LS UNIT PRICE $ 3,500.00 S 3500.00 2 DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIALS. i LS S 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 3 CONSTRUCT "NCH THICK PCC SIDEWALK 2250 SF 5 6.00 IS 13,200.00 4 CONSTRUCT POC CURB RAMPS. 4 EA 6 4.100 .00 S 16,450.00 5 CONSTRUCT POO VARIABLE HEIGHT RETAINING CURB (8' -12') 200 UP S 16.00 6 3MW.W 6 CONSTRUCT POC DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER MINA STD PLAN 1161. 350 SF S 12.50 $ 3,750.00 7 TRAFFIC STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKERS, SIGNS 1 LS $ 2,7W.W { 2,700.00 B INSTALL IN -ROAD WARNING UNIT SYSTEM 1 LS 6 37,500.00 6 37,000.00 A SCHOOL ZONE SAFETY SYSTEM 2 LS f 10,750.00 S 21500.00 M TOTAL A IS 102y50 A0 PAGE ' D&B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Small Business Comprehensive Insight Plus Report for D -U -N -S #: 62-697 -1688 FREEWAY ELECTRIC R I Solutions Report Pnnted: December 3,2009 0 Pnni this report 0 To save this report to your PC: Select File and then Save As from the browser menu bar. Click on the Save in: drop-down menu and select a location for your file. Enter a file name and save the report as a .html or .txt file. Copyright 2004 Dun & Bradstreet - Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber Chris Marwrello, City of Rosemead •.0 v:. r r =. • r -,•. ru • i r = - - • a 7i7f •'i�7fI71C•idIIRT�7IFiFTi7:3a . .PTSiC71;>,:TL1.7R'F "�7GT =TiG!7 Company Snapshot Business Summary Profile FREEWAY ELECTRIC 5942 Acorn St Riverside, CA 92504 Tel: 951 710 -1000 Fax: 951 688 -8073 D-U -N3 #: 62-697 -1688 D &B Rating: — Company Slats Year started Employees Manager S.I.C. Industry Highway /street construction This is a single location. Likelihood this company will not pay on MODERATE 0 time over the next 12 months Credit Score Class: 3 ♦ _ 1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High Likelihood this company will experience LOW financial distress in the next 12 months 2006 undetermined Financial Stress Class: 1 Bran Mendoza, owner 1611 1 2 3 4 Low Moderate High The Net worth amount in this section may have been adjusted by D &B to reflect typical deductions, such as certain intangible assets. Timeliness of historical payments for SLOW ,& this company - D&B PAY�DEX8: 71 100 0 Anti of p ates Prompt 30 120 daysslow daysslow Industry benchmark: Slow "Based on 5 trade experiences on file with D&B Payment performance trend over the past 90 days UNCHANGED D &B offers guidance on credit limits for this company based on Re profile as well as profiles of other companies similar in size, industry, and credit usage Evidence of bankruptcy, fraud, or criminal proceedings in the history of this business or its management Noteworthy special events in this company's file Total number of suits, liens and judgments in this company's fiM Value of open suits, liens and judgments for this company Value of open records refers only to 10 most recent filings for each record type. I Company Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filings History & Operations Banking & Finance Creditworthiness Summary Page 1 of 5 https:// smaflbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform /servlet/ViewReport?orderItemId= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Likelihood this company will LOW ® D&B Rating: — expenence financial distress In The blank rating symbol should not be interpreted as the next 12 months indicating that credit should be denied. It simply Likelihood this company will not MODERATE ® means that the information available to D &B does not pay on time over the next 12 permit us to classify the company within our rating months key and that further enquiry should be made before reaching a decision. Some reasons for using a symbol include: deficit net worth, bankruptcy proceedings, insufficient payment information, or incomplete history information. For more information, see the D &B Rating Key. Default on Payment: Financial Stress Summary Likelihood this company will experience financial distress in the next 12 months Financial Stress Class: 1 1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High LOW ® Key Factors - 5 trade experiences exist for this company. - Financial Stress Score: 1485 (high risk: 1,001 :1ow risk: 1,575) - Control age or date entered in D &B files indicates higher risk. During the prior year, firms in this Financial Stress Class had a failure rate of 1.2 %, which is 0.46 times lower than the national average. Financial stress national percentile: 94 (high risk: 1 %; low risk: 100 %) National percentile industry norm: 38 (high risk: 1 %; low risk: 100°/x) Payment within Terms: Credit Score Summary Likelihood this company will not MODERATE Q Key Factors pay on time over the next 12 - 5 trade experiences exist for this company. months - 62% of trade dollars indicate slow payment(s) are present. Credit Score Class: 3 - No record of open suit(s), lien(s), or judgment(s) in the D &B files. �a 1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High The Credit Score class of 3 for this company shows that 14.3% of fins with this classification paid one or more bills severely delinquent, which is lower than the average of businesses in D &B's database. Credit score percentile: 51 (high nsk: 1 %; low risk: 100 %) Industry norm percentile: 51 (high risk: 1 %; low risk: 100 %) Additional Information Financial Stress Summary - The Financial Stress Class indicates that this firm shares some of the same business and financial characteristics of other companies with this classification. It does not mean the firm will necessarily expenence financial stress. - The Incidence of Financial Stress shows the percentage of firms in a given Class that discontinued operations over the past year with loss to creditors. The Incidence of Financial Stress - National Average represents the national failure rate and is provided for comparative purposes. The Financial Stress National Percentile reflects the relative ranking of a company among all storable companies in D&B's file. - The Financial Stress Score offers a more precise measure of the level of risk than the Class and Percentile. It is especially helpful to customers using a scorecard approach to determining overall business performance . - All Financial Stress Class, Percentile, Score and Incidence statistics are based on 2004. Credit Score Summary - The Incidence of Delinquent Payment is the percentage of companies with this classification that were reported 90 days past due or more by creditors. The calwlation of this value is based on an inquiry weighted sample. - The Percentile ranks this firm relative to other businesses. For example, a firm in the 80th percentile has a lower risk of paying in a severely delinquent manner than 79% of all storable companies in D&B's files. Page 2 of 5 https:// smallbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform /serviet/ViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Company Snapshot CriLditworthiness Payment History & Trentlt: Public Fiy ling History & Operations Banking & Finance Payment History Summary Average payment performance trend UNCHANGED © Company's payment perfomiance over the UNAVAILABLE when weighted by dollar amount past 12 months compared with has peen Payment History Overview Payment experiences on file with D&B: 5 Average highest credit: $10,833 Payments made within terms: 4(75%) Largest high credit: $15,000 Amount placed for collections: 0(0%) Highest now owing: $5,000 Highest past due: $50 Historical Payment Trends: PAYDEX® Average payment performance trend when weighted by dollar amount Last 3 months: Trend is unchanged UNCHANGED last 12 months: 14 days beyond tens D&B PAYDEX®: 71 Industry benchmark: Slow � 100 0 Anticipates Prompt 30 120 daysslow daysslow Based on payments collected over last 12 months. Indications of slowness can be the result of dispute over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc. Accounts are sometimes placed for collection even though the existence or amount of the debt is disputed. Payment History Details Date Reported Paying Record High Credit (SI Now Owes ($) Past Due ($) Selling Terms Last Sale Within (months) 10/09 (001) 500 500 Cash account I 09/09 Prompt 7,500 5,000 0 I Net30 I 1 09/09 Prompt -Slow 20 10,000 250 50 IN 30 1 09109 Slow 15 15,000 0 0 Net30 12 -3 09109 (005) I I I Cash account Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of dispute over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. Payment Analysis By Industry Company's dollar - weighted payments listed by the primary industries of its suppliers Total Received Total Dollar Largest Within Slow 1 -30 Slow 31- Slow 61- Slow M Amount ($) High Credit Terms sit 90 91« (5) (% of dollar amount) Industry Mfg alarm/signal dvcs 1 Whit plumblhydronics 1 Mfg readymix concrete 1 Other payment categories Cash experiences 2 Payment record unknown 0 15,000 15,000 0 100 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 50 50 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 100 0 0 0 0 500 500 0 0 Page 3 of 5 https:// smafbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatf orm /servletfViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Unfavorable comments 0 0 0 Placed for collection 0 0 Liens With D &B 0 0 0 Other 0 N/A 0 Total in D &B's file 5 33,000 15,000 There are 5 payment experiences in D &B's file for the most recent 12 months, with 5 experiences reported during the last three month period. Company Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public_Filin s History & Operations Banking & Finance Public Filings Summary of Court Actions The following data includes both open and closed filings found in D &B's database on the subject company Record Type Open Records Open Value Total Records Most Recent Filing Date Suits 0 0 0 Liens 0 0 0 Judgments 0 0 0 - UCC Filings 0 N/A 0 - Bankruptcy Proceedings 0 WA 0 - Public filing data is for informational purposes only and is not the official record. Certified copies can only by obtained from the official source. Number and value of open mcoros refers only to 10 most recent filings for each record type. Government Activity Activity Summary Possible Candidate for Socio- Economic Program Borrower(Dir /Guar) No Consideration Administrative Debt No tabor Surplus Area Yes (2009) Contractor No Yes (2009) Small Business Grantee No Party Excluded from Federal Program(s) No 6(A) Firm N/A The details provided in the Government Activity section are as reported to D&B by the federal government and other sources. Company Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filings History & Oberst on Banking & Finance History & Operations Topic Description History Detailed information on the history of a company, including background information on the management team and key principals, and information on related companies. Company Detailed information on a company's operations, including the identity of the parent company, the geographic operations scope of the business, and the key holdings. Industry Details on the specific industry within which a company is classified. classification History Management: BRIAN MENDOZA, OWNER Ownership information provided verbally by Brenda Wai, Accountant, on Sep 16 2009. Business started 2006. BRIAN MENDOZA Antecedents are unknown. Page 4 of 5 https:// smaflbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatfomi lservletfViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Page 5 of 5 Company Operations Description: Contactor of highways and streets (10D%). Terms are undetermined. Sells to undetermined. Territory : Lord. Nonseasonal. Employees: undetermined which indudes owner. Facilities: Owns premises in concrete block a building. Location: Commercial section. Industry Classification SIC NAICS .16110000 Highway and street construction 237310 Highway,Street and Bridge Construction Based on information in our file, D &B has assigned this company an extended &digk SIC. D &B's use of 0-digit SICs enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than a we use the standard 4-digd code. The 4-digit SIC numbers link to Me description on the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Web site. Links open in a new browser window. Comoany Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment H'story & Trend Public Filinos History & Operations Banking & Finance Banking & Finance Key Business Ratios D &B has been unable to obtain sufficient financial information from this company to calculate business ratios. Our check of additional outside sources also found no information available on its financial performance. Finance 0911612009 On September 16, 2009, Brenda Wei, Accountant, confirmed and updated company information. As of September 16 2009 a search of Dun & Bradstreets Public Record database found no open suits, liens, judgements or UCCs to which Freeway Electric at 5942 Acom St, Riverside CA was named defendant or debtor. Public records received hereafter will be entered into the database and will be included in reports which contain a Public Filings section. Company Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filinos History & Operations Banking & Finance Customer Service CNeed help? Call Customer Service at (800) 333 -0505, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Local Time. 0 Print this report 0 To save this report to your PC: S91W File and then Save As from the browser menu bar. Click on the Save in: drop-down menu and select a location for your file. Enter a file name and save the report as a .html or .bd file. Copyright 2004 Dun & Bradstreet— Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber Chris Marcarello, City of Rosemead https:// smaflbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform /servletfViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 ' D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC ® Small Business Comprehensive Insight Plus Report for D -U -N -S M: 62- 697 -1688 FREEWAY ELECTRIC Solutions Report Printed: December 3, 2009 Print this report 0 To save this report to your PC: Select File and then Save As from the browser menu bar. Click on the Save in: dmp-down menu and select a location for your file. Enter a file name and save the report as a .html or .bd file. Copyright 2004 Dun & Bradstreet - Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber Chris Marcarello, City of Rosemead Company Snapshot Business Summary Profile FREEWAY ELECTRIC 5942 Acom St Riverside, CA 92504 Tel: 951 710 -1000 Fax: 951688-8073 D-U-NS N: 62-697 -1688 D&B Rating: – Company State Year started Employees Manager S.I.C. Industry Highway /street construction This is a single location Likelihood this company will not pay on MODERATE time over the next 12 months Credit Score Class: 3 - _ 1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High Likelihood this company will experience LOW financial distress in the next 12 months 2006 Financial Stress Class: 1 undetermined Brian Mendoza, Owner - 1611 ,1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High The Net worth amount in this section may have been adjusted by D &B to reflect typical deductions, such as certain intangible assets. Timeliness of historical payments for SLOW Q this company^ D&B PAY�DEX& 71 100 D Antiapates Prompt 30 120 daysslow days slow Industry benchmark: Slow ^Based on 5 trade experiences on file with D &B Payment performance trend over the past 90 days UNCHANGED D&S olbrs guidance on credit limits for this company based on its profile n well n profiles of other companies similar in sin, industry, and credit usage Evidence of bankruptcy, fraud, or criminal proceedings in the history of this business or its management Noteworthy special events in this company's file Total number of suits, liens and judgments in this company's file Valor of open suss, lien and judgments for this company Value of open records refers only to 10 most recent filings for each record type. r 5 i Creditworthiness Summary Page 1 of 5 https:// smallbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform/ servlettViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Likelihood this company will LOW experience financial distress in the next 12 months Likelihood this company will not MODERATE pay on time war the next 12 months Default on Payment: Financial Stress Summary Likelihood this company will experience financial distress in the next 12 months Financial Stress Class: 1 1 2 3.s 4 5 Low Moderate High D &B Rating: — The blank rating symbol should not be interpreted as indicating that credit should be denied. It simply means that the information available to D &B does not permit us to classify the company within our rating key and that further enquiry should be made before reaching a decision. Some reasons for using a symbol include: deficit net worth, bankruptcy proceedings, insufficient payment information, or incomplete history information. For more information, see the D &B Rating Key. LOW ® Key Factors - 5 trade experiences exist for this company. - Financial Stress Score: 1485 (high risk: 1,001;knv risk: 1,875) - Control age or date entered in D &B files indicates higher risk. During the prior year, firms in this Financial Stress Class had a failure rate of 1.2 %, which is 0.46 times lower than the national average. Financial stress national percentile: 94 (high risk: 1 %; low, risk: 100 %) National percentile industry non: 38 (high risk: 1 %; low risk: 100 %) Payment within Terms: Credit Score Summary Likelihood this company will not MODERATE Key Factors pay on time over the next 12 ,& - 5 trade experiences exist for this company. months - 62% of trade dollars indicate slow payment(s) are present. Credit Score Class: J - No record of open suit(s), lien(s), or judgment(s) in the D &B files. 1 2 3 4 5 Low Moderate High The Credit Score class of 3 for this company shows that 14.3% of firms with this classification paid one or more bills severely delinquent, which is lower than the average of businesses in D &B's database. Credit score percentile: 51 (high risk: 1 %; low, risk: 100 %) Industry norm percentile: 51 (high risk: 1 %; low risk 100 %) Additional Information Financial Stress Summary - The Financial Stress Class indicates that this firm shares some of the same business and financial characteristics of other companies with this classification. It does not mean the firm will necessarily experience financial stress. - The Incidence of Financial Stress shows the percentage of firms in a given Class that discontinued operations over the past year with loss to creditors. The Incidence of Financial Stress - National Average represents the national failure rate and is provided for comparative purposes. - The Financial Stress National Percentile reflects the relative ranking of a company among all scorable companies in D &B's file. - The Financial Stress Score offers a more precise measure of the level of risk than the Class and Percentile. It is especially helpful to customers using a scorecard approach to determining overall business performance . -All Financial Stress Class, Percentile, Score and Incidence statistics are based on 2004. Credit Score Summary - The Incidence of Delinquent Payment is the percentage of companies with this cia55ification that were reported 90 days past due or more by creditors. The calculation of this value is based on an inquiry weighted sample. - The Percentile ranks this fine relative to other businesses. For example, a firm in the 80th percentile has a lower risk of paying in a severely delinquent manner than 79% of all scomble companies in D &B's files. Page 2 of 5 https:// smallbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform /servlet/ViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Company-Snapshot Oreditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filings History 8 Operations Banking & Finance Payment History Summary Average payment performance trend when weighted by dollar amount Payment History Overview Payment experiences on file with D &B: Payments made within terms: Amount placed for collections: UNCHANGED© Company's payment performance over the UNAVAILABLE past 12 months compared with its peers 5 Average highest credit: 4(75%) Largest high credit: 0(0%) Highest now owing: Highest pest due: Historical Payment Trends: PAYDEXO Average payment performance trend when weighted by dollar amount Last 3 months: Trend is unchanged UNCHANGED Last 12 months: 14 days beyond terms D&B PAYDEXO, 71 Industry benchmark: Slow -_ 100 0 Anticipates Prompt 30 120 days slow daysslow $10,833 $15,000 $5,000 $50 Based on payments collected over last 12 months. Indications of slowness can be the result of dispute over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc. Accounts are sometimes placed for collection even though the existence or amount of the debt is disputed. Payment History Details Date Reported Paying Record High Credit ($) Now Owes ($) Past Due ($) Selling Terms Last Sale Within (months) 10109 (001) 500 500 Cash account 09/09 Prompt 7,500 15,000 0 Net30 1 09/09 1 Prompt -Slow 20 10,000 250 50 Net30 1 09/09 Slow 15 15,000 0 0 Net30 2 -3 09/09 I (005) I I Cash account Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyond terms can be the result of dispute over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc. Each experience shown is from a separate supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported. Payment Analysis By Industry Company's dollar - weighted payments listed by the primary Industries of Its suppliers Total Received Total Dollar Largest Within Slowl -30 SIow31- Slow61- Slow W Amount ($) High Credit Terms 60 90 91* ($) (% of dollar amount) Industry Mfg alarm /signal dvcs 1 Whol plumb/hydronics 1 Mfg readymix concrete 1 Other payment categories Cash experiences 2 Payment record unknown 0 15,000 15,000 0 100 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 50 50 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 100 0 0 0 0 500 500 0 0 Page 3 of 5 https:H smallbusiness. dnb. com/ ePlatform lservletIViewReport?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 ' D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Unfavorable comments 0 0 0 Placed for collection 0 0 Liens With D &B 0 0 0 Other 0 N/A 0 Total in D &B's file 5 33,000 15,000 There are 5 payment experiences in D &B's file for the most recent 12 months, with 5 experiences reported during the last three month period. Company-Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trench Public Filings History & Ocerations Banking & Finance Public Filings Summary of Court Actions The following data includes both open and closed filings found in D &B's database on the subject company Record Type Open Records Open Value Total Records Most Recent Filing Date Suits 0 0 0 Liens 0 0 0 Judgments 0 0 0 - UCC Filings 0 N/A 0 - Bankruptcy Proceedings 0 N/A 0 - Public filing data is for informational purposes only and is not the official record Certified copies can only by obtained from the official source. Number and Value of open records refers only to 10 most recent finings for each record type. Government Activity Activity Summary Possible Candidate for Socio- Economic Program Borrower(Dir /Guar) No Consideration Administrative Debt No Labor Surplus Area Yes (2009) Contractor No Yes (2009) Grantee No Small Business Parry Excluded from Federal Program(s) No B(A) Finn N/A The details provided in the Government Activity section are as reported to D &B by Me federal government and other sources. Company Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filmo History & Operations Bankino & Finance History & Operations Topic Nbinry Company Operations Industry Classification Description Detailed mfomtabon on the history of a company, including background information on the management team and key principals, and information on related companies. Detailed information on a company's operations, including the identib of the parent company, Me geographic scope of the business, and the key holdings. Details on the specific industry within which a company is classified. History Management: BRIAN MENDOZA, OWNER Ownership information provided verbally by Brenda Wei, Accountant, on Sep 16 2009. Business started 2006. BRIAN MENDOZA. Antecedents are unknown. Page 4 of 5 https: / /smallbusiness .dnb.com /ePlatform /servlet/V iewReport?orderltemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009 ' D &B Comprehensive Insight Plus Report: FREEWAY ELECTRIC Page 5 of 5 Company Operations Description: Contractor of highways and streets (100 %). Terms are undetermined Sells to undetermined. Territory Local. Nonseasonal. Employees: undetermined which includes owner. Facilities: Owns premises in concrete block a building. Location: Commercial section. Industry Classification sic NAILS 16110000 Highway and street construction 237310 Highway,Street and Bridge Construction Based on Information in our fib. D &B has assigned this company an extended S-diga SIC. D &B's use of &-dga Scs enables us to be more specific to a company's operations than If we use the standard 4-dga code. The 4-dgk SIC numbers link to the description on the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Web sae. Links open In a new browser window. Banking & Finance Key Business Ratios D &B has been unable to obtain sufficient financial information from this company to calculate business ratios. Our check of additional outside sources also found no information available on its financial performance. Finance 09/16/2009 On September 16, 2009, Brenda Wei, Accountant, confirmed and updated company information. As of September 16 2009 a search of Dun & Bradstreets Public Record database found no open suits, liens, judgements or UCCs to which Freeway Electric at 5942 Acom St, Riverside CA was named defendant or debtor. Public records received hereafter will be entered into the database and will be induced in reports which contain a Public Filings section. Comoanv Snapshot Creditworthiness Payment History & Trends Public Filinos History & Operations Banking & Finance Customer Service CNeed help? Call Customer Service at (800) 333 -0505, Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM Local Time. 1 Print this remit To save this report to your PC: Select File and then Save As from the browser menu bar. Click on the So" in: drop -down menu and select a location for your file. Enter a file name and save the report as a .html or .bd file. Copyright 2004 Dun & Bradstreet— Provided under contract for the exclusive use of subscriber Chns Marcarelb, City of Rosemead https: // smallbusiness. dnb. com /ePlatfonn/servlet ViewReporL?orderItemld= 106421631 &do... 12/3/2009