Loading...
CC - Item 8B - AB 69 - Reform of Unfair Competition Law - Box 070~ l Il TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS ROSEMEAAD CITY COUNCIL FROM: BILL CR&E/ , CITY MANAGER DATE: APRIL 22, 2003 RE: . AB 69 (CORREA) - REFORM OF UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW - SUPPORT Attached for the City Council's review is a copy of AB 69 (Correa), current bill status, and complete bill history for this measure to reform the state's Unfair Competition Law. At your January 28 s meeting, the City Council supported reform of this important state consumer protection law, in order to reduce the possibility for further abuses and restrict frivolous and extortionist lawsuits. Additionally, staff and the City's legislative advocate were directed to seek sponsors for legislative reform. Chairman Lou Correa (Santa Ana-D), of the Assembly Business and Professions Committee, has introduced legislation that is designed to restrict extortionist-type lawsuits, like those that recently hit local restaurant and auto repair businesses. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council support AB 69 (Correa). ODUNCIL AGGENDA APR 2 2 2003 CC-13 ITEM No. AB 69 Assembly Bill - AMENDED BILL NUMBER: AS 69 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 3, 2003 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Correa DECEMBER 11, 2002 An act to add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 17300) to Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to business. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AS 69, as amended, Correa. Business: unfair competition. - Thie 19 1 weu!4 Existing law provides remedies for acts of unfair competition, as defined, that may be bought by the Attorney General or other designated public governmental law agencies or by a private person acting for the interest of itself, its members, or the general public. This bill would impose specified requirements on an unfair competition action brought on or after January 1, 2004, by a private person acting for the interests of the general public, which the bill would designate as a representative cause of action. The bill would require that a representative cause of action be verified and accompanied by a statement under penalty of perjury attesting to specified information. The bill would impose additional requirements, including notification of specified agencies of the filing of a representative cause of action. The bill would prohibit a private person acting for the interests of the general public from soliciting a settlement or resolution of an alleged act of unfair competition without first filing a complaint with the court. By adding new perjury crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: 148 yes State-mandated local program: Re yes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following: (a) The provisions of law in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17200) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code (hereafter the unfair competition law), are intended to protect consumers and the businesses that serve them from fraud Page 1 of 4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051.../ab_69_bill_20030403_amended_asm.htm 4/15/2003 AB 69 Assembly Bill - AMENDED , misconduct, and deception in the advertising and practice of commerce. (b) The unfair competition law is an important tea! provision of law that has provided great benefit to the people of California in -;;•_'_t_-_; preventing, halting, and remedying consumer and public market abuses. (c) Representative actions by private attorneys -~~,E e€ brought for the primary purpose of protecting consumers are a valuable component of the unfair competition law and permit appropriate enforcement of the law when public entities lack the resources to do so. (d) --any= The improper or unethical use of the unfair competition law damages the legitimacy and undermines the original intent of that law. These abuses a36e- hamper the ability of legitimate businesses to operate efficiently and provide the jobs, goods, prices, and services ee494 desired by the consumers of this state. (e) Law-abiding business owners of California have a right to ampeet reasonable protection from unlawful, unethical, repetitive, -e-1 and disproportionate lawsuits or settlement demands when the public good has not been appreciably endangered. SEC. 2. Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 17300) is added to Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, to read: CHAPTER 6. REPRESENTATIVE ACTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC 17300. This chapter applies to a representative cause of action filed on or after January 1, 2004. A representative cause of action is a cause of action asserted by a private plaintiff on behalf of the general public under Section 17204. A private plaintiff is a person other than the Attorney General, district attorney, county counsel, city attorney, or city prosecutor. 17301. A private plaintiff may,plead a representative cause of action on behalf of the interests of the general public under Section 17204 only if the requirements of this chapter are satisfied. 17302. (a) The private plaintiff shall separately plead the representative cause of action in the complaint and shall designate it as being brought "on behalf of the interests of the general public" under Section 17204. The complaint shall be verified pursuant to Section 446 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (b) The complaint shall include a statement under penalty of perjury by the private plaintiff and by his or her attorney of record that they do not have a conflict of interest or other impediment to their faithful representation of the interests of the general public they represent. A representative cause of action is not valid if filed without this statement, and the court may in its discretion take appropriate action to dismiss the action and award costs and attorney's fees to the defendant. 17303. (a) At the time of filing a representative cause of action, the private plaintiff shall notify and submit a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General, the district attorney for the county in which the complaint is filed, and the state or local body responsible for regulating the defendant named in the representative cause of action. (b) Filing of the complaint constitutes a representation to the court that the notice described in subdivision (a) has been or will be given as required by this section. Failure to provide notice as required by this section is subject to the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Section 128.7 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Page 2 of 4 http://w",w.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051.../ab_69_bill_20030403_amended_asm.htm 4/15/2003 AB 69 Assembly Bill - AMENDED 17304. The private plaintiff shall provide notice of any application for preliminary relief to the parties designated in Section 17303 in the same manner as notice is given to the defendant. 17305. (a) The State Bar of California shall prepare and make publicly available by June 1, 2004, a "Disclosure of Defendant's Rights" that describes, in simple and easy to understand terms, the legal rights and privileges applicable to a defendant in a representative cause of action. The document shall also include a description of abusive settlement tactics and instructions for contacting the Attorney General and the State Bar to report unethical conduct or any suspected abusive lawsuits. The document shall be made publicly available in English and in other languages principally spoken in this state. (b) The private plaintiff shall serve the defendants in a representative cause of action with the "Disclosure of Defendant's Rights." This document shall be served on the defendants with the complaint. Only the "Disclosure of Defendant's Rights" developed by the State Bar shall be used for this purpose. 17306. (a) A private plaintiff may not have a conflict of interest that reasonably could compromise the good faith representation of the interests of the general public pled in the complaint. The attorney for a private plaintiff shall be an adequate legal representative of the interests of the general public pled in the complaint. (b) On a noticed motion of a party or on the court's own motion, the court shall determine whether the requirements of subdivision (a) are satisfied. The determination may be based on the pleadings, or the court in its discretion may permit discovery on the issues. In making its determination, the court shall consider standards applied in class actions. If the court determines that the requirements of subdivision (a) are not satisfied, the representative cause of action shall be stricken from the complaint. (c) This section does not preclude the court from granting appropriate preliminary relief before making a determination under subdivision (b). 17307. (a) Before entry of a judgment or any modification of a judgment that is a final determination of the representative cause of action and before any settlement shall become effective, the court shall determine if all of the following requirements have been satisfied: (1) The proposed judgment and any stipulations and associated agreements are lawful, fair, reasonable, noncollusive, and adequate to protect the interests of the general public pled in the complaint. (2) Any award of attorney's fees included in the judgment or in any stipulation or associated agreement complies with applicable law. (3) All other requirements of this chapter have been satisfied. (b) If the court finds that the requirements of this chapter have not been satisfied, the court may impose sanctions pursuant to existing provisions of law. 17308. (a) At least 45 days before the date of the hearing described in Section 17307, the private plaintiff shall give notice of the proposed terms of the judgment or modification, including all stipulations and associated agreements between the parties, together with notice of the time and place set for the hearing on the entry of the judgment or modification, to all of the following: (1) The Attorney General. (2) The district attorney of the county where the action is pending. (3) The state or local body responsible for regulating the Page 3 of 4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051.../ab_69_bill_20030403_amended_asm.htm 4/15/2003 AB 69 Assembly Bill - AMENDED defendant. (4) Other parties known to the plaintiff with cases pending against the defendant based on substantially similar facts and theories of liability. (5) Each person who has filed with the court a request for notice of the terms of the judgment. (6) Other persons as ordered by the court. (b) On motion of a party or on the court's own motion, the court for good cause may shorten or lengthen the time for giving notice under subdivision (a). 17309. Judgments, stipulations, and associated agreements in a representative cause of action are public documents. 17310. Any notice provided to the Attorney General, a district attorney, or a regulatory body pursuant to this chapter imposes no duty on any of those offices. The Attorney General, district attorney, or regulatory body is not precluded from taking any action as a consequence of not acting in response to a notice provided under this chapter. 17311. The determination of a representative cause of action in a judgment approved by the court is conclusive and bars any further actions or causes of action brought by any private plaintiff against the same defendant based on substantially similar facts and theories of liability. 17312. A representative cause of action may not be dismissed, settled, or compromised, and no payments or monetary consideration may be collected or received by the plaintiff or its counsel without the approval of the court and a determination that the disposition of the representative cause of action satisfies the requirements of this chapter. 17313. No private person acting for the interests of the general public may solicit a settlement or resolution of an alleged act of unfair competition without first filing a complaint complying with the requirements of this chapter. SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XISI B of the California Constitution. Page 4 of4 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_0051.../ab_69_bill_20030403_amended_asm.htm 4/15/2003 AB 69 Assembly Bill - Status CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE : A.B. No. 69 AUTHOR(S) Correa. TOPIC Business: unfair competition. HOUSE LOCATION ASM +LAST AMENDED DATE 04/03/2003 TYPE OF BILL : Active Non-Urgency Non-Appropriations Majority Vote Required State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 04/07/2003 LAST HIST. ACTION Re-referred to Com. on JUD. COMM. LOCATION ASM JUDICIARY TITLE An act to add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 17300) to Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to business. Page 1 of 1 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asmlab_0051-0100/ab_69_bill_20030407_status.htmi 4/15/2003 AB 69 Assembly Bill - History COMPLETE BILL HISTORY BILL NUMBER : A.B. No. 69 AUTHOR Correa TOPIC Business: unfair competition. TYPE OF BILL : BILL HISTORY 2003 Active Non-Urgency Non-Appropriations Majority Vote Required State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy Page 1 of I Apr. 7 Re-referred to Com. on JUD. Apr. 3 Referred to Com. on JUD. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended. Jan. 6 Read first time. 2002 Dec. 12 From printer. May be heard in committee January 11. Dec. 11 Introduced. To print. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab 0051-0100/ab 69_bill_20030407_history.html 4/15/2003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD NOMINATING COUNCILMEMBER CLARK TO REPRESENT CITIES WITHOUT PRESCRIPTIVE WATER PUMPING RIGHTS ON THE BOARD OF THE SAN GABRIEL BASIN WATER QUALITY AUTHORITY MOTION BY COUNCILMAN IMPERIAL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN' TAYLOR that the Council adopt Resolution No. 2003-12. Vote resulted: Yes: Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez, Clark, Alarcon No: None Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. VII. CONSENT CALENDAR. CC-A APPROVAL OF TRACT MAP NO. 53377 - 8723-8729 MISSION DRIVE C-B AB 69 (CORREA) - REFORM OF UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW - SUPPORT CC-C CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CC-D AUTHORIZATION TO REJECT CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY FROM WAYNE ROBINSO? ' CC-E REVISIONS TO PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITY USE FORM-RULES AND REGULATIONS AND DEPOSIT REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CC-F AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT ANNUAL FUNDING REQUEST UNDER CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ACT MOTION BY COUNCILMAN TAYLOR, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN' IMPERIAL that the Council approve the aforementioned items on the Consent Calendar. Vote resulted: Yes: Imperial, Taylor, Vasquez, Clark, Alarcon No: None .Absent: None Abstain: None The Mayor declared said motion duly carried and so ordered. CC/CDC JOINT MEG: 422-03 Paee -°5 AGENDA REGULAR MEFT'ING ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL. CTIY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROSENUAD, CALIFORNIA MAY 13, 2003, AT 8:00 P.M. CALL iMGETING TO 0It1)E11 PLEDGIT TO T111 FLAG INVOCATION: ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5 800 P.M. MAYOR VASQUEZ BANTE CI LAO CHU OF THE LOS ANG~-LES BUDDHIST MONASTERY fi- COUNCILMEMBERS ALARCON, IMPERIAL, TAYLOR, MAYOR PRO TENS CLARK, MAYOR VASQUEZ_ N4t.4 D1 CEMBIER 10, 2002 - REGULAR MEETING APRIL 22, 2003 -.JOINT MEETING OF TtIE ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL AND THE ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF INTEREST TO CITIZEN S WISHING TO PARTICIPATE 1) Those wishing to speak on any Agenda Item, including public hearing, should have their Speaker Request Form submitted to the City Clerk no later than the time immediately Ibllowing Oral Communications. 2) Immediately alter approval of the minutes and again at the end of the meeting, there is a period of time set aside for those persons wishing to address the Council on matters not listed on the Agenda entitled: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDTENCE (please complete the Speaker Request Form stating your preference to speak either at the beginning or at the end of the meeting). 3) Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formals to persons with disabilities, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or . accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk's office at 626/569-2171 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. PRESENTATIONS: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FRONI THE AUDIENCE IL PUBLIC HEARINGS-EXPLANATION OF I FIE PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURES BY THF. CITY ATTORNEY D C A. PUBLIC LIEARING REGARDING ADOPTION OF THE ANNUAL FUNDING PLAN FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2603-04. The City held its first public hearing-on Tuesday, April 8, 2003, regarding its One Year Annual Funding Plan. The 30-day comment period ends on May 12, 2003. CCAOIiN DA: s_t 3-03 Page If I Recommendation: A(fer receiving public testimony, discussion and after any amendments, the Council approve the revised capital improvement finding request, approve the public service funding; approve submission of the Annual Funding Plan; and authorize the City Manager to execute all appropriate certifications and submit to HUD. I3. PUBLIC HEARING -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 53447; CONDITIONAL US[-; PERMITS 02-888 THROUGH 02-894 - APPEAL - 8719 MISSION DRIVE - CONTINUED FROM 4/08/03 Nevis Homes has submitted applications for the subdivision ofthree existing lots into sixteen parcels for the development of sixteen single-family residences, each with a living area over 2,500 square feet located at 8719 Mission Drive in tile R- I (Single-Family Residential) zone. This it was continued from the City Council meeting of April 8, 2003. Recommendation: Approve Tentative Tract Map 53447; Conditional Use Permits 02-888 through 02-894. t0 WV " ~ III. LEGISLATIVE l"~ . y_d A. '"RESOLUTION NO. 2003-14 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003-14, for payment ofCity expenditures. ~B. RF OLUIION NO. 2003-15 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD APPOINTING SPECIFIC REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL 01; GOVERNMENTS Mayor Pro Tem Clark currently serves on the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments as the City's Governing Board Representative. Former Councilman Bruesch served as the City's alternate. This resolution designates Mayor Vasquez as the Alternate and re-designates Mayor Pro Tem Clark as the Governing Board Representative. Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2003-15. 1V CONS NT CALENDAR- RECOINIM1,'NDATION: APPROVAL `y~\ \ CCIA RELEASE OF BONDS - PARCEL MAP 26466 - 4621 DELTA AVENUE A Faithful Performance Bond and a Labor Bond and Material Bond were required to guarantee construction of sewer house lateral, drive approaches, curb and gutter, AC pavement and sidewalk. In lieu of bonds, a Cash Deposit was issued to the City in the amount of5l 1,025. The improvements have been installed satisfactorily. r Rec emendation: Accept the Public improvements and authorize refund of the ash 9eposit, including accrued interest. ~D C-13 A EPTANCE OF EASEMENT - 9117 GARVEY AVENUE This item provides for the dedication of an easement at 911.7 Garvey Avenue for traffic signal loop detectors placed in the driveway to facilitate traffic signal operation on Garvey Avenue at the Garvey Community Center. Recommen ration: Accept the decd and direct the City Clerk to record the deed together with the Certification of Acceptance. CCAUP:N[)A 5-13.03 1'ngc 112 CC-C AUTiIORIZA'1'ION TO ALLOCA"rE JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILI-fY INCENrIV1 BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO .THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGEI-F-S DISTRICT ATT'ORNEY'S OFFICE The District Attorney annual requests that Rosemead assign Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) funding to the District Attorney's Office to support on-going enforcement programs serving Rosemead's serious juvenile offenders. CC-D APPROVAL OF h1REWORKS S-1-AND LOCA-rIONS All deposits have been received and certifications of insurance are on file. Recommendation: Approve the list of stands and locations and waive electrical permit fees. V_ MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION 7~/ A. L~ REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER BILL ORT17_ FOR REAPPOINTMENT ( TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Ortiz has requested reappointment to the Planning Commission VI. STATUS REPORT'S _ xff - - LL- VII. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS ~J°~~" ~X ✓ - U c . V VIII. ORAL COMMIJ IJNTCATI ONS FROM THE AUDIENCE IX. AD.10URNMENI` YI` Till: CITY COUNCIL WILL, ADJOURN TO MAY 20, 2003 AT~00 P.M. FOR A STUDY SESSION TO DISCUSS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROD -S. Posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting at the City Hall, 8838 E. Valley'Boulevard, Rosemead; the L.A. County Library, Rosemead Branch, 8800 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead; and other locations pursuant to RMC Sec. 1-08.020. C'CAO;NDA:5-13-03 Page #3