Loading...
CDC - Item 2A - Minutes 11-20-07• • ~ Minutes of the Special Meeting ROSEMEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION November 20, 2007 Chairman Tran called the special meeting of the Rosemead Community Development Commission to order at 6:05 p.m. in the conference room of City Hall, at 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. The pledge to the flag was led by Commissioner Taylor and Commissioner Low led the invocation. ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS: Present: Commissioners Clark, Low, Taylor Vice-Chairman Nunez, Chairman Tran Absent: None 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE - None 2. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Resolution No. 2007.23 Claims and Demands Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2007-23 for payment of Commission expenditures in the amount of $46,144.72 demands no. 8183 through 8186 and 9311 through 9315. After discussion, Vice-Chairman Nunez made a motion, with a second by Commissioner Low to approve Resolution No. 2007-23 for payment of Commission expenditures in the amount of $46,144.72 demands no. 8183 through 8186 and 9311 through 9315. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: None Abstain: None Absent: None B. Recommended Terms to be used in a Promissory Note Payable to the City for an Advance Made by the City to RCDC on September 28, 2007 and a Recommendation to Execute the Promissory Note On June 12, 2007 the Rosemead Community Development Commission ("RCDC") held a special budget meeting. At that meeting, by a unanimous vote, the RCDC Commissioners approved the budget which includes a transfer from the City's General Fund to the RCDC Project Area No. 1 Capital Projects Fund of $2,497,920. A Promissory Note ("Note") is also necessary to complete this transaction. This report is to present to the Commission, for review, the terms to be considered for use in the attached Note and to recommend its execution by the Commission Chairman. Rosemead Community Development Commission Minutes of the Special Meeting - November 20, 2007 Page lo/`4 • 9 Recommendation: That the Commission: (1) Approve the terms listed to be used in the Note made by the RCDC. (2) Direct the Commission Chairman to execute the Note. After discussion, Vice-Chairman Nunez made a motion, with a second by Commissioner Low to approve the terms listed in the Staff Report to be used in the Note made by the RCDC and to direct the Commission Chairman to execute the Note. Vote resulted: Yes: Low, Nunez, Tran No: Clark Abstain: Taylor Absent: None 3. MATTERS FROM THE CHAIRMAN & COMMISSIONERS - None 4. MATTERS FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & STAFF A. Valley Boulevard Vision Plan On April 27, 2007, the City Council and staff attended an all day strategic planning retreat at the Double Tree Hotel in Rosemead. During this event, the City Council and staff identified specific goals and objectives to be implemented over the next several months. One of the major goals was to improve economic development along Valley Boulevard. In an effort to achieve this goal, the Council requested that a downtown vision or specific plan be prepared for Valley Boulevard. Later, as part of the 2007-2008 CDC Budget, funds were budgeted and approved for this initiative. Recommendation: That the Rosemead Community Development Commission approve the proposal from EDAW/AECOM for the development of a Valley Boulevard vision plan. After discussion, Vice-Chairman Nunez made a motion with a second by Commissioner Low to approve the proposal from EDAW/AECOM for the development of a Valley Boulevard vision plan. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: None Abstain: None Absent: None B. Project Area Merger Proposal Currently, California Redevelopment Law allows for cities that currently have more than one active redevelopment project area to be able to merge these areas into one. The benefit of merging project areas is the ability to spend tax increment funds generated in Rosemead Community Development Commission Minutes o the Special Meeting - November 20, 2007 Page 2 of 4 • 0 one area in another. In the City of Rosemead, this would allow tax exempt bond proceeds as well as tax increment generated project Area No. 1 to be spent in Project Area No. 2 for various capital improvement projects like street rehabilitation, public facilities renovations, etc. As part of the 2007-2008 CDC Budget, the Commission approved funding for the purpose of merging our two (2) redevelopment project areas. Staff has solicited proposals from reputable redevelopment consulting firms specializing in project area mergers and received responses from Urban Futures, Inc. and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Based upon previous relevant experience, thoroughness of the response, and overall price, staff is recommending that Urban Futures be selected to perform the project area merger. Recommendation: That the Community Development Commission enter into a professional services agreement with Urban Futures Incorporated in the amount of $135,000 for redevelopment consulting services. After discussion, Vice-Chairman Nunez made a motion, with a second by Commissioner Low to enter into a professional services agreement with Urban Futures Incorporated in the amount of $135,000 for redevelopment consulting services. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Low, Nunez, Taylor, Tran No: None Absent: None Abstain: None C. Update on Status of Development Site at the Southwest Corner of Rosemead Boulevard and Glendon Way On July 17, 2007, the Rosemead Community Development Commission ("CDC") approved the development of an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Primestor Development, Inc. for the development of an 8.5-acre site located on the southwest corner of Rosemead Boulevard and Glendon Way. Staff has worked with the CDC's legal counsel and the developer to draft an ENA which is acceptable to the City and developer. Highlights of the ENA include: • Initial negotiation period of 360 calendar days, subject to two (2) 180 calendar days extension periods based on Primestor's performance. • Commission will complete the Owner Participation process as soon as staff receives a more detailed project description from Primestor. • Primestor will be responsible for conducting all tests, investigations, surveys inquiries and due diligence, at no Commission expense, to determine if the site is suitable and appropriate for construction. • The ENA includes a proposed Schedule of Performance that would be a trigger for deadlines during the negotiation period. Rosemead Community Development Commission Minutes of the Special Meeting - November 20. 2007 Page 3 of 4 • C Recommendation: That the Commission approve the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement between the Rosemead Community Development Commission and Primestor Development for the development of a proposed project on the southwest corner of Rosemead Boulevard and Glendon Way. After discussion, Commissioner Clark made a motion with a second by Commissioner Taylor to postpone taking action on this item for two weeks. Vote resulted: Yes: Clark, Taylor No: Low, Nunez, Tran Abstain: None Absent: None After discussion, Chairman Tran made a motion with a second by Commissioner Low to not accept the recommendation. Vote resulted: Yes: Low, Nunez, Tran No: Clark, Taylor Abstain: None Absent: None 5. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:00 pm. The next Community Development Commission meeting will take place on December 11, 2007 at 6:00 pm. Rosemead Community Development Commission Minutes of the Special Meeting - November 20, 2007 Page 4of4