CC - Item 3I - Mission Drive/Ivar AvenueROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: OLIVER CHI, CITY MANAGER ~..~Q.;
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2008
SUBJECT: MISSION DRIVE/IVAR AVENUE VISIBILITY AND SIDEWALK
CONCERNS
SUMMARY
The Traffic Commission reviewed a request to add street markings, a flashing beacon,
in-road warning lights, and a crossing guard at the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar
Avenue. After visiting the site, staff recommended that the existing street markings be
updated and that red curbing be added on the north side of Mission Drive to help
improve visibility concerns. Staff also found that existing conditions do not warrant the
implementation of additional traffic control devices at this location. Based on these
observations, the Traffic Commission approved staff's recommendation to update street
markings, add red curbing, and deny the request to add new traffic control devices.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Traffic Commission's
recommendation and authorize staff to take necessary steps to implement traffic safety
enhancements at Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue.
DISCUSSION
Based on the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), certain
guidelines are used in considering the installation of a traffic control device. After
conducting field observations related to traffic conditions along Mission Drive at Ivar
Avenue, staff found that current conditions do not warrant the installation of new striping
or traffic control modifications (flashing beacons, in-road warning lights, and crossing
guard). Staff did find that the installation of new red curbing along the north side of
Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue would help improve visibility concerns at the intersection.
The Commission concurred with staff's recommendations and also asked that new
crosswalk warning signs be added at this location.
ITEM NO. ~_
APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA:
City Council Meeting
December 16, 2008
Page 2 of 2
If approved staff will proceed with the following street marking improvements:
• Install 30 feet of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from Ivar Avenue to
30 feet westerly.
• Install 48 feet of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from Ivar Avenue
easterly.
• Install new crosswalk warning signs.
• Repaint crosswalk and add ladder striping in the crosswalk area.
• Repaint other street markings at this intersection.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Funding for this work is included in the Fiscal Year 2008-09 budget.
Prepared by:
Chris Marcarello
Deputy Public Works Director
Submit d y:
Bri Saeki
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:
(1) July 17, 2008 Traffic Commission Agenda Report and Minutes
(2) November 6, 2008 Traffic Commission Agenda Report and Minutes
(3) Intersection Diagram
ATTACHMENT 1
S ~ M F ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC. COMMISSION.
q
~' ~ ~ STAFF REPORT
- a
..
~~AOft4TED ~4g4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
TO: _ THE. HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: JULY 17, 2006
SUBJECT:. MISSION DRIVE/IVAR AVENUE -SOUTHBOUND VISIBILITY
CONCERNS AND CROSSWALK CONCERNS
SUMMARY
A request was received at a recent Traffic Commission meeting from Mr. Peter Woo,
4644 Ivar Avenue, regarding the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue. Mr.
Woo indicated that southbound vehicles on Ivar Avenue have a difficult time seeing
westbound vehicles when trying to access Mission Drive. He has suggested the
addition of red curb to improve visibility.
An additional letter request (attached) .was received from Ms. Chalice Willis, 4423
Rosemead Boulevard. Ms. Willis indicates that pedestrians are not given .the right=of-
way when crossing this intersection. She has suggested the installation of a crossing
guard, or flashing yellow beacon or a pedestrian signal at the intersection of Mission
Drive/Ivar Avenue.
Staff Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission recommends the City Council
approve the installation of 30 feet of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from
Ivar Avenue to 30 feet westerly. Staff further recommends the Traffic Commission
recommend to the City Council to approve the installation of an additional 48 feet (21
feet + 6 feet + 21 feet) of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from Ivar Avenue
easterly. This will provide for a total of approximately 85 feet of red curb from Ivar
Avenue easterly. Exhibit A depicts this recommendation.
It is staffs recommendation that the pedestrian crossing issue at Mission Drive/Ivar
Avenue be reanalyzed in late September/early October after school resumes. This will
allow staff to gather school pedestrian crossing data and observe the location during
school crossing times. This request will be brought back to the Traffic Commission no
later than December 2008.
Traffic Commission Meeting
July 17, 2008
Page 2 of 6
ANALYSIS
Mission Drive is a 64-foot wide roadway with two lanes of traffic in each direction.
Opposing lanes of traffic are separated by a double yellow centerline. There are no
dedicated left turn lanes on Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue. The fronting uses on Mission
Drive are a mix of commercial and residential. Parking on the north side of Mission
Drive is restricted by "2 Hour Parking 9 AM to 6 PM, Except Sunday" in the vicinity of
Ivar Avenue. Mission Drive has a posted speed limit of 40 mph.
Ivar Avenue is an off-set roadway at its intersection with Mission Drive. The north leg of
Ivar Avenue is 40 feet wide and is approximately 240 feet east of the south leg. The
south leg of the intersection is 36 feet wide. Ivar Avenue is stop controlled at both its
intersection with Mission Drive. The fronting uses on Ivar Avenue north and south of
Mission Drive are primarily residential. The prima facie speed limit on Ivar Avenue is 25
mph.
At the intersection of Mission Drive and the west most leg of Ivar Avenue (south leg,
northbound approach) there is a yellow crosswalk for north/south pedestrians. This
yellow crosswalk is identified with "SLOW SCHOOL XING" pavement markings,
advance signs and signs at the crosswalk. The signs are fluorescent yellow green
(FYG) and identify the crosswalk as a school related crosswalk.
Exhibit "A" depicts existing conditions at the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar
Avenue.
Discussion
The reported accident history for the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue was
reviewed for the period from January 1, 2006 through April 21, 2008. The accident
history revealed one reported accident occurring on the west leg (where the yellow
crosswalk exists) on Saturday, March 11, 2006. This accident involved a westbound
vehicle rearending another westbound vehicle at 2:14'pm..
Based on the location, the accident may have occurred as a result of pedestrians
crossing Mission Drive in -the yellow crosswalk. Typically., a rearend accident at a
location without a stop sign or traffic signal and at a crosswalk is a result of one vehicle
yielding the right-of way to a pedestrian. A following vehicle may not have noticed the
stopped car and caused a rearend accident.
Southbound Visibility Concern
Mr. Woo indicated that parked vehicles on Mission Drive often obstructed the visibility of
eastbound and westbound vehicles traveling on Mission Drive for southbound vehicles
stopped on Ivar Avenue. .His primary concern was the vehicles parked east of Ivar
Avenue on Mission Drive.
Traffic Commission Meeting
July 17, 2008
Page 3 of 6
Field observations were made of the visibility situation for southbound Ivar Avenue
traffic. Currently, there is a commercial establishment on the northeast corner of the
intersection. There is on-site parking provided. The on-street parking on the Mission
Drive portion of this development allows for approximately 2 vehicles to park. On the
Ivar .Avenue portion of this development approximately 4 vehicles could park on the
street.
During our observations, the on-street parking on Mission Drive east of Ivar Avenue was
fully occupied (2 vehicles parked). West of Ivar Avenue, Mission Drive was
approximately 50% occupied (3 vehicles parked in a curb length that could
accommodate approximately 6 vehicles). The on-street parking on Ivar Avenue,
adjacent to the commercial development, was usually occupied by 50% (2 vehicles
parked). The on-street parking on Ivar Avenue immediately north of Mission Drive was
75% parked during our observations.
The parked cars on Mission Drive did hinder visibility of southbound vehicles exiting Ivar
Avenue onto Mission Drive. The parked cars reduced the visibility of oncoming both
eastbound and westbound vehicles. Observations indicated that many southbound
vehicles would "sneak out" of Ivar Avenue to get a better view of oncoming traffic.
Staff Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission recommends the City Council
approve the installation of 30 feet of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from
Ivar Avenue to 30 feet westerly. Staff further recommends the Traffic Commission
recommend to the City Council to approve the installation of an additional 48 feet (21
feet + 6 feet + 21 feet) of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from Ivar Avenue
easterly. This will provide for a total of approximately 85 feet of red curb from Ivar
Avenue easterly. Exhibit A depicts this recommendation. .
Crosswalk Concern
Ms. Willis indicated that vehicles do not stop for pedestrians. crossing Mission Drive at
the crosswalk at Ivar Avenue.
There are 3 options that should be considered to address the need to provide additional.
warning to motorists regarding pedestrians in this yellow crosswalk. These options, in
no particular order, include the placement of a crossing guard during school crossing
times, flashing yellow beacon, an in-roadway warning lights. Each of these options
could provide motorists warning of the yellow crosswalk when pedestrians are using the
crossing. .
The guidelines for the installation of the 3 options discussed require pedestrian data be
gathered. Ms. Willis' letter was received late the in school year. Staff was unable to
collect the necessary data with regards to the number of pedestrians using the yellow
crosswalk. This data is important information necessary to best address this concern.
Traffic Commission Meeting
July 17, 2008
Page 4 of 6
However, staff has provided a short description of in-roadway warning lights (IRWL) for
the Traffic Commission's edification..This is provided as an introduction to this relatively
new technology and the guidelines of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CA MUTCD).
The CA MUTCD provides the following description of in-roadway warning lights (IRWL):
"In-roadway lights are special types of highway traffic signals installed in the
roadway surface to warn road users that they are approaching a condition on or
adjacent to the roadway that might not be readily apparent and might require the
road users to slow down and/or come to a stop.°'
These flashing lights are activated by a pedestrian in an "active" or "passive" manner.
An active manner would be a pedestrian push button that must be pushed by the
pedestrian. The passive manner would be an electronic device (camera, infrared or
other similar form of detection) the senses when a pedestrian is present and wants to
cross the street. Most IRWL installations .in the southern California area are using
"active" activation.
After a pedestrian activates the IRWL's, the IRWL's will begin to flash. The lights are
directed towards the vehicles and away from the crosswalk area. The IRWL's continue
to flash for a sufficient number of seconds to allow a pedestrian to leave the curb or
shoulder and travel at a normal walking speed to at least the far side of the street.
Generally, there are no pedestrian indications (Hand/Man .signal head) at an IRWL
location. This is done to reinforce the need for pedestrians to look both ways before
crossing the location. As we have discussed previously, it is as much of the
_ responsibility of the pedestrian, as it is the motorist, to cross the street in a safe manner.
Pedestrians and motorist, as stated in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section
21950, are responsible when it comes to pedestrians crossing a roadway:
"21950. (a) The driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian
crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked
crosswalk at an intersection, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
(b) This section does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for
his or her safety. No pedestrian may suddenly leave a curb or other place of
safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle that is so close as to constitute
an immediate hazard. No pedestrian may unnecessarily stop or delay traffic while
in a marked or unmarked crosswalk.
(c) The driver of a vehicle approaching a pedestrian within any marked or
unmarked crosswalk shall exercise all due care and shall reduce the speed of the
Traffic Commission Meeting
July 17, 2008
Page 5 of 6
vehicle or take any other action relating to the operation of the vehicle as
necessary to safeguard the safety of the pedestrian.
(d) Subdivision (b) does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of
exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within any marked crosswalk
or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection.
The CA MUTCD has provided 8 items to consider when evaluating the need for IRWL's:
1. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled.
2. An engineering traffic study to determine if In-roadway warning lights are
compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may or
may not be controlled by traffic signals or STOP/YIELD signs.
3. Standard traffic signs for crossings and crosswalk pavement markings are
provided.
4. At least 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any two hours
(not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period.
5. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in
urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural during peak-hour pedestrian usage.
6. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 km/h (45 mph) or less.
7. In-roadway warning lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping sight
distance for posted speed limit.
8. Public education on IRWL is conducted for new installations.
Depending on the number of lanes at~~the marked crosswalk, the IRWL's are placed in
the middle of each travel lane. Again the CA MUTCD describes where the IRWL's shall
be placed depending on the number of travel lanes. For an intersection such as
Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue, a minimum of 8 IRWL would be installed. However,
based on the width of the roadway, an addition 10 IRWL would be recommended. The
estimated construction cost for such an installation of IRWL is $60,000.
Staff Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the pedestrian crossing issue at Mission Drive/Ivar
Avenue be reanalyzed in late September/early October after school resumes. This will
allow staff to gather school pedestrian crossing data and observe the location during
school crossing times. This request will be brought back to the Traffic Commission no
later than December 2008.
Traffic Commission Meeting
July 17, 2008
Page 6 of 6
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
Submitted by:
~,aatr~re s~~G~~a,,~r~
Joanne Itagaki
Traffic Engineering Deputy
Exhibit A: Existing and proposed improvements at Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue
Ms. 1Nillis Letter
C,haiice A Willis ~.~~~'t ~ ~,~(
4323.ILzmm~ac163vd'Tr~c 1 /]
~~' Iios.~mrad,~A 91;3i)-74if7 ((JJ
,, ~ .~
~' 4t5 ~ I~~~SS ~2~ 1'S ~ ~~~I:S~1Gv1~yj~E1~~ -1-1/a l"'
--^
.(~Lcxr ~ Y~~I C. ~.~',1M ~'i'1 r ~,`J 1~Y1
J
t G~ ~r?v~r~ -~
.. ~ ~C~~ri~'t1~5, l1rtt~- ~ ~Gi:>-atRt~~~ lv/~r_:~ ~ ~i)Gt L'~-
c~k7~~~rv~<( _~~il~Vzil ~~.f~,C~t1`':~; I~ct1°~;'rtvilf7tr't~ C~G~tlrlr~»f
r'~Y~-i-~ i ~~~1`r?t? l1 !" Grp '~'1'i.r. ~'t i'I1..Q ~~yirC(.C'~ <7 C~i ~ll,~ I ~~1 L~1
c~ ~ °~ ~t Gi r c ~ -~.'t=l ~. r.~ ~~, ~t_ /'~~ ~ vi ~- rc~. }''i.{ct ~ r~S }~ i~.~ ~
. ~;~
:~
~;~ be.Z~a I-~ ~:.~ CL..a,~ ~ Dire ~ , v ~ ~/~ll,;~cj ~~ ~{~ ~-~ r~~}w ~ t~~
~,u~ ct r~~~S i ~ ~-l~e. cT~ i ~ -~--v ,~r?~ ~'~. ~.'~~~ct.~- tom,-, ,
~~ vf'6~ ~~~~ $ ~~
~,:
~'~ f..>-J~~ V1~i ~i~. ~~"j ~~~7 ~ l..J~7 t'~ G~,~-- Li ~,A.,~GZ1 ~~7 ~ ~;,...}C":` ~ ~ ~' ~~~ ~'~~'~,
-{--~i q: ~`" ~"u~Gt ~ ~' .~v'~ `~' Yom: L ~ ~.~ ~ c~- i~~ ~~ ~ ~; ~ fi ~ r ci y}~ ~;
i ~ ) r-
~jt"_^'~~'Y'LQ_ ~? Z`1.~... 1 ~ "f, t C~ '~'-~" C3 ~' ~ ~ pt--.~~ j,_J ~~'1.,7T~J'1~'1 ~7Y-1) )C~
Y
~ t
DRAFT
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
JULY 17, 2008
The meeting. of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chairperson Knapp
at 7:00 p.m., in the Community Recreation Center, 3936 North Muscatel, Rosemead.
PLEDGE OF ALLIGIANCE - Vice Chairman Masuda
INVOCATION - Commissioner Gay
Rnl I COI I
Present: Chairperson Knapp, Vice Chairman Masuda, Commissioners Gay
and Lewin
Absent:. Commissioner Hunter
1. PRESENTATION
A. Recognition of Service -Joan Hunter.
B. Oath of Office -Keno Deary, Sr
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of June 26, 2008: Deferred to next meeting.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE -NONE
4. OLD BUSINESS -NONE
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. MISSION DRIVE/IVAR AVENUE -Southbound Visibility Concerns and
Crosswalk Concerns
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki .presented the staff report and study findings.
Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission recommends the City Council
approve the installation of 30 feet of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from
Ivar Avenue to 30 feet westerly. Staff further recommends the Traffic Commission
recommend to the City Council to approve the installation of an additional 48 feet (21
feet plus 6 feet plus 21 feet) of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive from Ivar
Avenue easterly. This will provide for a total of approximately 85 feet of red curb from
Ivar Avenue easterly. Exhibit A of the Staff Report depicts this recommendation.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting July 17, 2008 Page 1
Jl:mec (06160)17470/1002/Min02
DRAFT
It is staff's recommendation that the pedestrian crossing issue at Mission Drive/Ivar
Avenue be reanalyzed in late September/early October after school resumes. This will
allow staff to gather school pedestrian crossing data and observe the location during
school crossing times. This request will be brought back to the Traffic Commission no
later than December 2008. '
Speaking before the Commission:.
Mr. Frank Yuen
4412 Ivar Ave.
626-574-0663
(Property Owner)
r
Mr. Yuen is the owner of the property located at 4412 Ivar, an apartment building.
(Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki stated Mr. Yuen's property is on the east side of Ivar
just north of Mission.) Mr. Yuen stated the driveway approach of a new development on
the south side is close to the intersection of Ivar and Mission. Left turns would be
difficult, especially during school hours from Mission to Ivar. Mr. Yuen is of the opinion
that a regular signal light is needed, not red curbing. That area is needed for parking
during the daytime. New development on the south side should be a right turn only.
Speaking before the Commission:
Mr. Adam P. Velasco
8860 Mission drive
626-286-7134
Mr. Velasco completely agrees with Mr. Yuen. Signals should be installed at Mission
and Ivar.
Speaking before the Commission:
Mr. Peter Woo
4644 Ivar Ave.
626-715-5515
Mr. Woo stated there is a need for a red curb. If signal is installed, it needs to be.
synchronized.
Commissioner Lewin agrees with staff's recommendation for red curb.. Visibility is
hindered by the parked cars. A traffic signal would be tricky that close to Rosemead
Boulevard.
Commissioner Gay expressed his concern about the congestion problem coming off
Rosemead Boulevard. He believes the recommendation to wait until school is in
session is appropriate. Installing the red curb is a solution because of the visibility
factor. Aright turn only at the new development is the only way to go.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting July 17, 2008 Page 2
Jl:mec (06160)17470/1002/Min02
. DRAFT
Traffic Engineering Deputy Itagaki clarified that it is not staff's intention to only look at in-
roadway warning lights. They will look at signals, crossing guard, in roadway warning ,
lights; they will look at all issues that might be appropriate for this. location.
Vice Chairman Masuda agrees with waiting on analysis and installing -the red curb.
Commissioner Deary agrees with the red curb. He added that the painting is faded. He
agrees with the red curb, but the signs on the ground need to be repainted. He would
like to have a pedestrian signal installed.
Chairperson .Knapp concurs with staff's recommendations.
Commissioner Gay would also like to see ladder striping to yellow crosswalk.
Chairperson Knapp requested a motion.
Commissioner Gay motioned and Vice Chairperson Masuda seconded to accept staff
recommendation and to add ladder striping to the recommendation.
Vote Results:
Yes: Chairperson Knapp, Commissioner Deary, Commissioner Gay,
Commissioner Lewin, Vice Chairman Masuda
Noes: None
Abstain: None
6. STAFF REPORTS -NONE
7. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Commissioner Lewin requested that the Commission agendize the issue of not being
able to see some signals at certain locations. He cited Rio Hondo and Valley as one
location.
Commissioner Gay thanked the Commission and stated he has enjoyed working with
members of the Traffic Commission. He is also looking forward to sitting in the
audience.
Vice Chairperson Masuda also thanked the Commission members.
Commissioner Deary stated he is excited to be a part of the Commission and giving
back to his community.
Chairperson Knapp expressed concerned about southbound Walnut Grove and making
room for more cars to make the left turn onto Ramona Boulevard.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Juiy 17, 2008 Page 3
Jl:mec (06160)17470/1002/Min02
DRAFT
8. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was
adjourned until September 4, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. (August 7th meeting cancelled due to
lack of a quorum.)
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting July 17, 2008 Page 4
Jl:mec (06160)17470/1002/Min02
ATTACHMENT 2
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS
FROM: JOANNE ITAGAKI, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPUTY
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 2006
SUBJECT: MISSION DRIVE/IVAR AVENUE -SOUTHBOUND VISIBILITY
CONCERNS AND CROSSWALK CONCERNS
SUMMARY
This item was originally brought before the Commission on July 17, 2008. At that time,
the Commission approved the installation of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive
east of Ivar Avenue and to add "ladder" striping to the crosswalk.
This item has been brought back to the Commission to provide analysis of school
pedestrians crossing the intersection of Mission Drive/Ivar Avenue within the existing
crosswalk. The request is for the installation of a crossing guard, flashing beacon, or in-
roadwaywarning lights to provide additional notification of this school crossing location.
Staff Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission denies the request for the
installation/implementation of additional traffic control devices for the crosswalk on
Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue.
ANALYSIS
The existing conditions at the intersections of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue have not.
changed since this item was brought before the Commission in July. Exhibit "A" depicts
existing conditions at the intersection of Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue.
Discussion
The installation or implementation on most traffic control devices is based on guidelines
set forth in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The
following guidelines are summarized from the CA MUTCD.
Crossing Guards
"Adult crossing guards maybe used under the following conditions:
7. At uncontrolled crossings where (here is , no alternate controlled crossing
Traffic Commission Meeting
November 6, 2008
Page 2 of 4
within 180 m (600 ft); and
a. In urban areas where the vehicular traffic volume exceeds 350 during
each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) in which 40 or
more school pedestrians cross daily while going to or from school; or
b. In.rural areas where the vehicular traffic volume exceeds 300 during
each of any two hours (not necessarily consecutive) in which 30 or
more, school pedestrians cross daily while going to or from school.
Whenever the critical (85th percentile) approach speed exceeds 64 km/h (40
mph), the guidelines for rural areas should be applied."
Note: This is not the complete guideline as presented in the CA MUTCD. However, this is the section that
specifically applies to the crossing on Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue.
Flashing Beacons at School Crosswalks
"Flashing yellow beacons may be installed to supplement standard school
signing and markings for the purpose of providing advanced warning during
specified times of operation when justified.
A flashing yellow beacon may be justified when ALL of the following conditions
are fulfilled:
1. The uncontrolled school crossing is on the "Suggested Roufe to School'; and
2. At least 40 school pedestrians use the crossing during each of any two hours
(not necessarily consecutive) or a normal school day; and
3. The crossing is at least 180 m (600 ft) from the nearest alternate crossing
controlled by traffic signals, stop signs or crossing guards; and
4. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in
urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during the same hour the
students are going to and from school during normal school hours; and
5. The critical approach speeds exceed 55 km/h (35 mph) ~ or the approach
visibility is less than the stopping sight distance."
In-Roadway Warning Lights (IRWLs)
"The following shall be considered when evaluating the need for In-Roadway
Warning Lights:
a. Whether the crossing is controlled or uncontrolled.
b. An engineering traffic ,study to determine if In-Roadway Warning Lights are
compatible with the safety and operation of nearby intersections, which may
or may not be, controlled by traffic signals or STOP/YIELD signs.
c. Standard traffic signs for crossing and crosswalk pavement markings are
provided.
d. At leasf 40 pedestrians regularly use the crossing during each of any fwo
hours (not necessarily consecutive) during a 24-hour period.
e. The vehicular volume through the crossing exceeds 200 vehicles per hour in
urban areas or 140 vehicles per hour in rural areas during peak-hour
pedestrian usage.
f. The critical approach speed (85th percentile) is 70 km/h (45 mph) or less.
Traffic Commission Meeting
November 6, 2008
Page 3 of 4.
g. In-Roadway Warning Lights are visible to drivers at the minimum stopping
sight distance for the posted speed limit.
h. Public education on ln-Roadway Warning Lights is conducted for new
installations. "
Pedestrian and vehicular count data was collected on Tuesday, October 28, 2008. The
data is summarized on Exhibit "B" and reveal the following:
7:30 - 8:30 AM
2:00 - 3:00 PM
Pedestrian count
37 (4 adults)
16 (2 adults)
Vehicular count
1,527
1,096
Observations of the pedestrians indicated that most of the pedestrians were crossing in
the northbound direction in both the AM and PM periods. This would seem to indicate
that during the AM periods the students crossing are related to the high school. During
the PM period, the student crossing appeared to be related to the junior high- school.
Observations also identified most vehicles would stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk.
There were a couple of occasions when vehicles would not stop for the pedestrians.
The nearest controlled crossing would be at the intersection of Mission Drive and
Rosemead Boulevard. This is a signalized intersection that provides pedestrian signal
indications. This intersection is over 600 feet east of the intersection of Mission Drive
and Ivar Avenue. ~ i
The critical approach speed is approximately 45 mph. The exact critical approach
speed will be provided at the Traffic Commission meeting.
The data collected does not satisfy the guidelines presented for the
installation/implementation of crossing guards, flashing beacons or IRWLs. The, data
indicate that the pedestrian volumes do not satisfy the "40 school pedestrians" crossing
during any 2 hours (not necessarily consecutive). While the vehicular volume satisfies
the guidelines for all the traffic control measures considered. ~ The nearest controlled
crossing is more that 600 feet away and the critical approach speed is approximately 45
mph.
Based on the data collected at the marked pedestrian crosswalk on Mission Drive at
Ivar Avenue, the installation of any additional traffic control devices is not recommended
at this time.
Traffic Commission Meeting
November 6, 2008
Page 4 of 4
Staff Recommendation
It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission denies the request for the
installation/implementation of additional traffic control devices for the crosswalk on
Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has-been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
Submitted by:
Joanne Itagaki
Traffic Engineering Deputy
Exhibit A: Existing Conditions at Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue
Exhibit B: Pedestrian and Vehicle Counts at Mission Drive and Ivar Avenue
Minutes of the Regular
ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING
. November 6, 2008 -
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chairman Knapp
at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
FLAG SALUTE: Vice-Chairman Masuda
INVOCATION: Commissioner Deary
ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS PRESENT: Chairman Knapp; Vice-Chairman Masuda, Commissioner
Deary, Commissioner Lewin, Commissioner Russell.
_ OFFICIALS PRESENT: Deputy Public Works Director Marcarello, Field Services Manager
Ornellas, Senior Management Analyst Hentabli, and Traffic Engineer Itagaki.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 2, 2008 -Regular Meeting
Commissioner Deary made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Russell, to approve the
minutes along with clarifications. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Deary, Knapp, Lewin, Masuda, Russell
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
2. PUBLIC COMMENT FROM THE AUDIENCE -None
3. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS
A. MISSION DRIVEIIVAR AVENUE -Southbound Visibility Concerns and Crosswalk
Concerns '
This item was originally brought before the Commission on July 17, 2008. At that time, the
Commission approved the installation of red curb on the north side of Mission Drive east of
Ivar Avenue and to add "ladder" striping to the crosswalk.
This item has been brought back to the Commission to provide analysis of school
pedestrians crossing the intersection of Mission Drive/Ivar Avenue within the existing
crosswalk. The request is for the installation of a crossing guard, flashing beacon, or in-
roadway warning lights to provide additional notification of this school crossing location.
Rosemead Traffrc Commission Meeting
Minutes of November 6, 2008
Page 1 of 4
Staff Recommendation: It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission denies the
request for the installation/implementation of additional traffic control devices for the crosswalk on
Mission Drive at Ivar Avenue. ,
Commissioner Lewin made a motion, seconded by Chairman Knapp, to approve staff's
recommendation and in addition add arrow signs pointing down on both sides of the cross
walk. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Deary, Knapp, Lewin, Masuda, Russell
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
4. NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation on Citywide Street Striping and Signage Improvement Program
As part of the City's Fiscal Year 2008-09 budget, the City Council included funding to update
street striping conditions and street signage throughout the City. City staff will review a
presentation explaining the project and take input from the Commission on issues related to
these work' efforts.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission review the
presentation and provide input related to the Citywide Street Striping and Signage
Improvement Program.
Robert Garcia, Representative of Traffic Operations presented to the Traffic Commission and
reviewed the street improvement program. The program will help improve the visibility of street and
regulatory signs and improve the safety of pedestrians and motorists in the City.
B. EARLE AVENUE -Letter Request to Review Parking Conditions
SUMMARY
City Staff received a letter request from Sheryl Blum, 4824 Earle Avenue, regarding parking
conditions along Earle Avenue north of Mission Drive and south of Grand Avenue. Ms. Blum
has asked that the Traffic Commission review the existing conditions and identify possible
alternatives for improving parking in this area. A petition of residents on Earle Avenue was
also included with the letter request.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission direct staff to study
this item further and develop recommendations for the Traffic Commission's consideration.
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of November 6, 2008
Page 2 of 4
Sheryl Blum expressed concern over the parking conditions on Earle Avenue;-she explained the
current problems the residents are experiencing 6y the surrounding business and their employees.
Commissioner Lewin made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Russell, to direct staff to
study this item further and develop recommendations. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Deary, Knapp, Lewin, Masuda, Russell
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
C. 'SAN GABRIEL BOULEVARD SOUTH OF GARVEY AVENUE -Turning Movement
Concerns at Walgreens Driveway
Chairperson Knapp and Commissioner Russell both requested this issue be addressed.
The concern was with regards to vehicles parking adjacent to this driveway and the left turn
access from the driveway onto San Gabriel Boulevard.
Staff Recommendation: It is staffs recommendation that the Traffic Commission
recommends the following to the City Council:
Install 68 feet of red curb on the east side of San Gabriel Boulevard south of the driveway
access of Walgreen's south of Garvey Avenue.
2. Install two "No Left Turn" (R3-2) signs for vehicles entering and exiting the Walgreen's
driveway on San Gabriel Boulevard south of Garvey Avenue.
3. Remove the left turn pavement marking at the driveway of Walgreen's to be consistent with
the proposed "No Left Turn" sign.
Commissioner Russell made a motion, seconded by Chairman Knapp, to recommend staff's
recommendations to City Council. Vote resulted in:
Yes: Deary, Knapp, Lewin, Masuda, Russell
No: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
5. STAFF REPORTS
6. COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of November 6, 2008
Page 3 of 4
Commissioner Masuda suggested to the Commission to place a "keep clear intersection" sign on
Ivar Avenue and Mission Avenue.
Commissioner. Lewin indicated there was a visibility issue by the parking lot north of the
Rosemead Chamber of Commerce. Also, asked staff to look into Guess and Hart Avenue
intersection and add a "stop" sign, as well as, a "right turn only" sign on~the Rosemead pool parking
lot.
Chairman Knapp invited the Commission and residents to attend the Annual Pancake Breakfast
organized by People for People.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:39 pm. The next regular meeting is scheduled for December 4,
2008 at the Rosemead City Hall, City Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard.
Holly Knapp,
Chairman
ATTEST:
Chris Marcarello,
Deputy Public Works Director
Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting
Minutes of November 6, 2008
Page 4 of 4
~
D
N
X S
0
m
D
f ~
~~~~ zo
N~~
~a~Z
~
~
~ o
Ds
<~ca /
/ 9
~
r
~ /
/
r Ei ~
°o- ~ ~ / ~/
Rl ~ ~ J
D ~$~~ ~dn-.~ ~
N~ m
~ ~ z
~°~ ~
~ -ti
~x~ x /
N
_
fTl ~ ~~~~
EE6 1
pN rD ~I .Y/
ffynn N F /~/
u
n o ~4
z /
~ ~
=o `
a
. ~
m
u / / `O
~ `?
- r~ ~ - ~ / °~
/m~~
NAR AVENUE ~~ / ~'/
li / /
~I
/ 9
/ /
G
`
~ip d o
i
6
~ /
~
/
~
~~ m
l~
~~~ / /
~I /
/ ~~ ~~f °w ~n ~n
~ ti
~
~ x
r /
/ ~~
~ / /
N~
o N
m ~
o .~ m
m
Z
~.
v
~ /
_ D
/ ~~ ca ~=>-~ - - o 0
/
o ~ ~
/C 1~1 0 ~~
~
m
/
n
m / ~ -
- - -
r o
m
/
a
' ~
,r'
/ IVAR AVENUE m
°
/
V
~~~ n
; N
0 / V~ o„
~ v
,( ~
/ ~ ~ ;
~
f„3 ~/
`~ o
/ / y
~C a /
~ D
~ ~ X
~ //
G' ~I
/ / lid/ O n
l
/
N ~
~ ~ m
\ e
o Z
m'C ~
'~ Z
/ ~1. / o /
10• / '°a II
o
L~ ~ ;^
n
o~
a
QUimo-am ory'9wn v'-ae~i~.syraµ~yr+a.a.n ,.. ~a ae - aee~ ,
~ z
vS a ~ ~
~ ~~~ z
~ ~~
S3l~IH311 ~Z Wd
S~I~IK3A 5£ YVV-~
~~~~ ~~~~
N N
Op
Z_ Z
~ ~
M ~ ~ s
y a
00 \Vvy~ 538
~V Jd ~3
~ ~ ~~~
» ~o ~~
°<~ ~ ~ 5~8
~N ~Q~ i~aV
Z Z Z ~ ~ ,
W
C7 x x
~ ~ \O lJL ~ n
U U r(/~
W W
as
a
d' ~ .
S3l~IH3l~ ZZ Wd
r-S3'pIH3l1 SL Wd
~~~~ ~~~ ~
\~~~
~~
~~o~`
~Q