Loading...
TC - Item 3C - Draft Citywide Engineering and Traffic SurveyROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CHRIS MARCARELLO, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 2013 SUBJECT: DRAFT CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY The California Vehicle Code requires that the City conduct a citywide speed analysis (Engineering and Traffic Survey) of local streets every 7 years. This requirement helps to ensure the proper posting of speed limits and also to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement efforts. For state -owned highways (i.e. Rosemead Boulevard) the City must complete the analysis every 10 years for speed limits to be enforceable. To meet this requirement, staff has coordinated an analysis to evaluate the existing speed zones within the City of Rosemead. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Traffic Commission: 1. Review and approve the draft Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey establishing speed limit zones; and 2. Recommend approval of the Engineering and Traffic Survey to the City Council. DISCUSSION The California Vehicle Code (CVC) establishes certain speed limits based on specific criteria. These are called prima facie speed limits. A blanket speed limit of 15 mph is established on all alleys, blind intersections, and at blind railroad crossings. The 25 mph speed limit may be established under the following conditions: 1) On any business or residential district; 2) At school zones, when children are present, and; 3) In senior zones. The California Department of Transportation requires that the criteria set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( MUTCD) be utilized in the establishment of speed limits. This manual requires that a speed limit should be set at or as close to the 85 percentile of existing speeds as possible. The 85 percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85% of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Based on data collected in an engineering and traffic survey, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5 -mile per hour increment to the 85 percentile speed. The MUTCD does allow for certain conditions to warrant lower speeds, if necessary. In reviewing speed zones and making recommendations, several criteria is considered, including the 85 percentile of Traffic Commission Meeting February 7, 2013 Page 2 of 2 existing speed conditions, accident history, roadway conditions, pedestrian activity, and speed limits in neighboring jurisdictions. The existing speed zones for most of the City were approved by the City Council on March 20, 2006. 42 City street segments were included in the analysis, not including Rosemead Blvd. Since Rosemead Blvd. is a state -owned highway, the California Vehicle Code provides for a 10 year review period for approving speed zones. Based on this, the speed survey analysis was last approved by the City Council on December 16, 2008. A copy of the Engineering and Traffic Survey is included with this report. The report was completed under the direction of a licensed traffic engineer and includes a significant amount of data collection including speed sampling, a review of accident histories, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use. Based on a review of this information, the survey includes the recommendation of reducing speeds on 4 of the streets surveyed as follows: tree mom �t = _Erstrg Seed= ecorrrre.il= Del Mar Avenue Garvey Avenue Hellman Avenue 40 35 Ellis Lane Olney Street Temple City 30 25 Boulevard Mission Drive Walnut Grove Rosemead 40 35 Avenue Boulevard San Gabriel Garvey Avenue Hellman Avenue 40 35 Boulevard The survey indicated that each of these street segments was recommended for a decreased speed based on 85 percentile speed threshold levels. After further review of these findings, it is recommended that the Traffic Commission concur with the survey findings and recommend approval by the City Council. FINANCIAL REVIEW Funding for the radar survey was included in the City's Fiscal Year 2013 operating budget. Submitted by: �-�/ Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works Attachments: 1- Draft Citywide Radar Speed Survey ooAF ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD NOVEMBER 2012 *P'WILLDAN I Ye#ending Engineering reach November 1, 2012 Mr. Chris Marcarello Director of Public Works City of Rosemead 8838 East Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Subject: 2012 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr. Marcarello: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. These segments were last surveyed in 2006, and require an update to comply with the 7 -year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E &T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City's arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( California MUTCD) dated January 2012, and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Rosemead and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILLDAN Vanessa Munoz, P.E., T.E. Traffic Engineer Enclosure Engineering I Geotechnical I Environmental I Sustainability I Financial I Homeland Security 562.906.6200 1 600.499.4464 I fax: 562.695.2120 1 13191 Crossroads Parkway North, Suite 405, Industry, CA 91746 -3443 1 www.willdan.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe INTRODUCTION.......................................................... ............................... 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ........ ............................... 2 -3 SURVEYCONDITIONS.. ............................................................................ 4 Survey Locations ........................................................ ............................... 4 DataCollection ........................................................... ............................... 4 SpeedData ............................................................. ............................... 4 CollisionData .......................................................... ............................... 5 FieldReview Data ................................................... ............................... 5 ANALYSIS.................................................................... ............................... 6 Criteria........................................................................ ............................... 6 Results and Recommendations .................................. ............................... 6 -7 Table 1- Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes .............. 7 Table 2- Summary of Recommendations .................... ............................... 5 -10 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES ..................................... ............................... 11 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code .......... ............................... 11 -16 APPENDIX A - Segment Data Street Segment Sheets Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX B - Collision Rates APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Rosemead. This Engineering and Traffic Survey presents recommended speed limits for 42 street segments in the City of Rosemead. Engineering and Traffic Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Sheriff's Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City's police officer(s) have completed a 24 -hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(13)(i)(1)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 and as required by Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code. The Code further describes three elements of an engineering and traffic survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one -half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, onlythe driverwhose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 specifies the methodologyto be used forcompleting Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85 percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5 -mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below. Options: 1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th - percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85 th - percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of Rosemead If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E &TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria: A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85 percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E &TS. B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85 percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E &TS. C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85 percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above - average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. A summary of the collision rates for the 42 surveyed street segments is provided in Appendix B. Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Rosemead. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non - congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 42 locations during the months of September and October 2012. Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 42 locations during September and October 2012. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off -peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 City of Rosemead Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the City's SWITRS electronic collision database. For this study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from August 30, 2009 to August 30, 2012. The collision rates for the 42 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24 -hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: R= Ax1,000,000 tx365 days xlxv year A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R = Collision Rate (accidents /million vehicle miles) t= Time Period Covered (in years) I= Length of Segment (miles) v= Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2009 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on- street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was complied and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated January 2012. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The "basic speed limit" is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85 percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Rosemead. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10 -mile pace was selected unless an collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of Rosemead speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. TABLE 1 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES No STREET FROM TO EXISTING NEW CHANGE 3 DEL MAR AVE GARVEY AVE HELLMAN AVE 40 35 DECREASE 5 ELLIS LANE OLNEY ST TEMPLE CITY BLVD 30 25 DECREASE 22 MISSION DR WALNUT GROVE AVE ROSEMEAD BLVD 40 35 DECREASE 32 SAN GABRIEL BLVD GARVEY AVE HELLMAN AVE 40 35 DECREASE Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead E E 0 U 0 0 U ) N 0 - C C 0 U a m m m 0_ U) � L 6 3 v C L E 3 �L a in E d � ) N w II m m 5 m U p cuU L 0 N N N N ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z ❑ Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ w W IL Cl) 2 F- LO m O F Om ❑ U F- w W m w 2 F- LO m w W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LO m O F 0 ❑ U F- W W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 2 F- LC) m U F m0 ❑ U F- W W m w 2 F- LO m O F m0 ❑ U F- W W m w 2 F- N m w W m w 2 F- LO m w W m w 2 F- LO m W W m w 7- F Lo m W W m w 2 F- LO m O :::I 0 0 0 ::I F- 0 F- 0 F- 0 0 0 0 :::1 0 :::I 0 0 0 0 0 F- w W W O z ¢ O W w W w O w W w O w W w O z ¢ O W w W w O w W w O w W w O w W w O w W w O w W w O z ¢ 0 m w W w O z ¢ O W w W w O w W w O w W w O w W w O w W w O J U a J U J U J U¢ J U J U J U J U J U J U D J U Q J U J U J U J U J U U U U U O (h m co m (o O C7 m N `O N `O N i O N m (h m CJ W m m co O w LO N LO co LO N LO C) LO N LO co LO co O O LO O O O co Cl) CO ( t C) L • m O (` m (O Co O I (` (D w d' V' m m O LO m co V N co Cl) N N co Cl) C) C) C) Cl) co co N m V m N m m • O co r N LO O .4 O C) O co x N LO O x LO N \ O x LO N LO LL) C) «) M «) co m co O co • LO N O L) C) « N O LO co x N LO O LO co w LO N LO 4 • Cl) co w 0) (o It Cl) m • i w w w ® W E'l J J zli • J W > 11J ¢ Q (7 W Q J W 2 U J o W w O ¢ > m J 2i W F- > m J 0 Z Q w ❑ Q w N w 3 O J w Q g J w ❑ > m J 0 Z Q w Q > O C Z J Q ~ O w Q W ❑ J m ❑ W w O ¢ Q > Lij 0 (¢7 Z> J Q > ¢ Q 0 F- J O w Q W w a z U z W Q > O ¢ Z J Q ❑ J m Q W w O ¢ W Q ¢ Q 2 > Q 0 O 2 O ¢ > m Q w O ¢ W Q W Q ¢ o W Q w ¢ < 0 w Q W Q ? F- 1- W Z J O W Q W z ❑ ¢ O_ w F- F _ U F w w w > Q Q `i J W ❑ > p J w ¢ Q C7 Z Q w Q > O ¢ (.7 ❑ Z¢ J Q > Q w F- OJ Q m U W Q W z W > Q W > Q ¢ C7 > m U J m w F- > CO Q> `G W w O ¢ Q F J W ❑ Q > O ¢ U ❑ Z J Q > m Q W w O ¢ w Q F- ¢ Q _ F Q W W ❑ Q W ❑ > Q Q J W ❑ > Q Cc Q J W ❑ ¢ ❑ O J ¢ Q w Z J w J J W U d Z Ow ¢ W w > Q Q ~ Z U Z W W Q W > CC Q C7 W Q W > CC Q C7 W Q W > m Q C`3 W Q W > ¢ Q C7 W > Q ❑ Z Q ¢ C7 > Q Z Q 2i J W z > Q Z O w 0 Q -� F- w C/) ❑ LL O J ¢ (n N Q ¢ W � O J CO(n J J ¢ m ¢ Q J J 2 w ¢ Q cn J J ¢ w ¢ Q C0 J J ¢ w ¢ Q N (h O ^ m O O N CJ 7 m 0 L- O m O N E E 0 U 0 0 U ) N 0 - C C 0 U a m m m 0_ U) � L 6 3 v C L E 3 �L a in E d � ) N w II m m 5 m U p cuU L 0 N N N N N N Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z ❑ ❑ z 0 Z Z ❑ O CL ❑ U F W W a w 2 F W oo W W a w 2 F oo W W a w 2 F oo W W m w 2 F m 0o 0 F 0 U F W W m w 2 F m oo W W m w 2 F LO oo W W m w 2 � -- m oo W W w w 2 F m oo W W m w 2 �-- w m W W w w 2 F❑ m oo 0 F 0 U F W W a w 2 F Lo m W W a w 2 F❑ LO oo 0 F 0 (..� F W W a w 2 F- LL) oo 0 F 0 ❑❑ U 0 F 0 U W W a w 2 F_ LO oo 0 F 0 F- 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F 0 F F¢ F F¢ F¢¢ F z w w w w z w w w w w w z w w z w z z w m 0 W W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 Q 0 w W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 W w 0 m 0 W W w O W w O x 0 w W w O m 0 LL w 0 W W w O a J U J U J U J U Q J U J U J U J v J U J U Q J U J U Q J U a Q J U U U U U U U + + + O 4 LO oo N LO � LO N � LO oD O ( ) LO N � LO co N � N LO � Cr) 'd' Lo co O V O 4 Lo co Lo co Lo tF O V O <t O 7 O O O O Lo d Cl) Cl) V V • ('o (O [o N LO <t 00 I� m a' N (O M N co DD co r) Cl) O • 7 ('7 (`') ('� P') M N M (h d' d' M V V M m d' V It 7 • O O LO N LO N W co O V) N �O m N 2 O N L! O V O 7 O d' O 7 LO (o LO M LO 7 O V O d' O d' �t m co v v ' > > ¢ > ' O (j F J ¢ > m Q W U) 0 ❑ J m J � ¢ ¢ w¢ w Q >- Q > a ❑ J } J a o ❑ 0 3: Q a¢ ¢ > 0 (3 F- J Cl) ~ J w¢ W Q >- CC > ¢ Q w¢ ❑ J } J _ J ~ U Q 0 > m Q W w 0 w > (D F Cl) w D¢ w > } CC � ¢ Q w ❑ J co J a ¢> o d?> w ❑ (7 x> z x w¢ d x> J H U F s (n W W > 0 0 ¢ F ❑ Z J a ❑ J m W 2 W w 0¢¢¢ 07 J¢ ¢ 2 w ¢ w w W > ¢ C7 W > 0 C7 F- ❑ Z J F¢ U) >- W Z J O W } W > m a o J m J CC m < Z a w H �_ J H V x F D 0¢ w F Cl) 2 w W w < } W > Q o F w >- W Z J O> ❑ J m >- J J a w > ¢ F- ~O J m a x U ❑ J m Q W 2 W (n O m J m J CC M a 0 Z a w F- w x w 5 W W ¢¢ >- W > CC a o W a J w x W ❑ z O_ w U) 2 ❑ z O V1 w 2 CC ❑ z O U1 n 5� ¢ L F U¢ CO3 D �E W ¢ w Z J m z a ¢ w ¢ o z O CC w U 0.. a w W w 0 Q F = W CC M W m c Z a w M W m c Z a¢ w m W ac m c Z w ❑ m F_ W CL 2 w F- ❑ m F W M 2 w¢¢ F >> J m w J >> J m w J ¢ > CC C� D Z J a ¢ > CC CS D Z J a a > W C7 D Z J a > > M C7 D z J a • N co V LO (O n CO D) O N M V lCl CO h N O) O N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M V N C N E 0 U O 0 d CO rn C 0 c a m � m 0 U a m � U LO N � f) w �a 3 v w� C L 0 3 0 lL a co E U N U N w II a� m � m c'n m U C) W Cc: F_ O a m () Q) m c OL 0 �a U p t— o a cU m m .c c m .c W 0 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code: Section 627. (a) `Engineering and traffic survey, "as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district: a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures. b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. C. The portion of highway is longer than one - quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant Engineering and Traffic Survey 11 City of Rosemead establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. (a) The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: (1) Fifteen miles per hour: A) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. B) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right -of -way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. C) On any alley. (2) Twenty -five miles per hour: A) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (B) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (C) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs. (b) This section shall become operative on March 1, 2001. Engineering and Traffic Survey 12 City of Rosemead Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. Speed Trap Prohibition Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speedtrap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code. Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of Rosemead Speed Trap Section 40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage and federal -aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration, except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the street or road is not shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one -half mile of a uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. (2) For purposes of this section "school zone" means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: (A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of Rosemead (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the. radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 10 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speedtrap. Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of Rosemead (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 City of Rosemead APPENDIX A Street Segment Data Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DE ADELENA STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD TO ELLIS LANE SPEED FACTORS On- Street Parking Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 26 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 29 mph Average Speed 27 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 22 -31 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 93 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 56 COLLISION HISTORY Roadway Conditions Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 5.022 TRAFFIC FACTORS registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Average Daily Traffic 983 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control STOP @ ELLIS, ROSEMEAD BLVD, RIO HONDO Crosswalks? @ ALL STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.740 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). _. TF 9341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DEL MAR AVENUE FROM GRAVES AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE TO GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Average Speed 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 30 -39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 106 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 9 Annual Collision Rate 3 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.963 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,062 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES S /OF GARVEY. 4 LANES N OF GRAVES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GRAVES, GARVEY, HIGHCLIFF Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES - RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting , Adjacent Land Use 0.500 miles 64 feet NONE NONE GOOD FAIR YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET DEL MAR AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM GARVEY AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Average Speed 33 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29 -38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 126 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 10 Annual Collision Rate 3.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.762 TRAFFIC FACTORS COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 23,982 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND DOROTHY Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES, N.P.A.T. @ INTERSECTIONS. Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dr iveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions FAIR Lighting EAST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET EARLSWOOD DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM IVAR AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD PLACE SPEED FACTORS YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 25 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 28 mph Average Speed 26 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 21 -30 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 86 COLLISION HISTORY GOOD Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 2.011 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traff ic 1,747 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control STOP @ IVAR Crosswalks? NONE Pedestrian Traff ic .- LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? NONE Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.260 miles Width 36 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, @ HERSHEY, IVAR Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD O5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET ELLIS LANE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM OLNEY STREET TO TEMPLE CITY BLVD SPEED FACTORS YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Date of Speed Survey 10/1/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 22 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 26 mph Average Speed 23 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 19 -28 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92 Recommended Speed Limit 25 mph Number of Survey Samples 86 COLLISION HISTORY GOOD Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 2.321 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,606 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control STOPS @ TEMPLE CITY, OLNEY , MARSHALL Crosswalks? @ MARSHALL Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.980 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, @ RALPH Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET EMERSON PLACE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM NEW AVENUE TO SAN GAB BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 33 mph Average Speed 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25 -34 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 101 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 7 Annual Collision Rate 2.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.353 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks? 4,923 Date Counted 9/18/2012 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW T.S. @ NEW, DEL MAR, SAN GABRIEL;STOP;PROSPECT,JACKS ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.960 miles 36 feet YES, BET DEL MAR & EVELYN NONE GOOD GOOD BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL, PARK Field Study By LT Checked By VIA CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET ENCINITA AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM MISSION ROAD TO LOWER AZUSA ROAD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 27 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 30 mph Average Speed 28 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 24 -33 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 109 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.635 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 7,569 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ LOWER AZUSA, MISSION; STOP @ RIO DELL Crosswalks? ALL T.S. & STOPS. PITKI, ROSE Pedestrian Traffic HEAVY Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES,BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED; LOADING/U N LOADI N Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.380 miles 42 -44 feet NONE NONE GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL, PARK Field Study By LT Checked By VM. CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). - TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO DEL MAR AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Average Speed 33 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 28 -37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 103 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 13 Annual Collision Rate 4.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.922 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 26,287 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL & SECTIONS OF RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DEL MAR, JACKSON Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? YES Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD �9 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM DEL MAR AVENUE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD SPEED FACTORS YES. BOTH SIDES RESTICTED Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Average Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 30 -39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of S urvey Samples 103 COLLISION HISTORY GOOD Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 12 Annual Collision Rate 4 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.808 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 26 ,590 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TW LTL & SECTIONS OF RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, KELBURN, DEL MAR Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES. BOTH SIDES RESTICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.510 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? YES, SLIGHT Q DEL MAR Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Average Speed 31 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29 -38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 113 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 15 Annual Collision Rate 5 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.956 TRAFFIC FACTORS COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 29,235 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL & SECTIONS OF RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE, DELTA, SAN GABRIEL Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dr iv e ways ? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traff ic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 11 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 35 mph Average Speed 31 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 27 -36 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 28 Annual Collision Rate 9.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.652 TRAFFIC FACTORS COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 26,236 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ LEE,COMM. CTR,ROSEMEAD PL,MUSCATEL,WAL GRV Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.590 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD f2 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET GRAND AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Average Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 28 -37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Surrey Samples 101 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents /year Collisions p er Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 3,363 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control STOP @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ ALL STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Drive YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.870 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, @ MUSCATEL Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES,BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD Ej ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET HELLMAN AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM NEW AVENUE TO WALNUT GROVE AV SPEED FACTORS YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Average Speed 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 26 -35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 101 COLLISION HISTORY GOOD Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 17 Annual Collision Rate 5.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.452 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 7,130 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @WALNUT GRV.,SAN GABRIEL,DEL MAR,JACKSON,NEW,10 Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND ROCKHOLD Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dri veways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1.500 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? YES @ KELBURN Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 14 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET JACKSON AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM GRAVES AVENUE TO GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 25 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 28 mph Average Speed 26 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 21 -30 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY YES, N /OF GRAVES Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.396 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Average Daily Traffic 2,617 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY ; STOP @ FERN, GRAVES Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S., STOPS, EGLEY Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic NONE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Drive YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 36 feet Vertical Curve? YES, N /OF GRAVES Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD, BULB OUT @ EGLEY Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TC 99A1 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD t5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET LOFTUS STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM TEMPLE CITY BLVD TO EAST CITY LIMIT SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 10/1/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 33 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Average Speed 34 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 30 -39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 113 COLLISION HISTORY YES, @ EAST END SLIGHT Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0. TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL Average Daily Traffic 13,127 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ TEMPLE CITY BLVD Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES D YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.130 miles Width 60 feet Vertical Curve? YES, @ EAST END SLIGHT Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: [,Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TP 1 31AI Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD Elq ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET LOWER AZUSA ROAD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD TO ENCINITA AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Truck Traff ic Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33 -42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY Visibility Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.384 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 14,396 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ ROSMEAD, ENCINITA Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traff ic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES. BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.330 miles Width 56 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). i TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD DA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET FROM DELTA AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Length of Segment Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 35 mph Lighting Average Speed 32 mph RESIDENTIAL 10 mph Pace Speed 28 -37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 105 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks? 5,894 Date Counted 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE 9/18/2012 Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic On- Street Parking Sidewalks? Driveways? @ ALL T.S. LIGHT LIGHT YES, BOTH SIDES YES, BOTH SIDES YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.270 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WALNU GROVE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS Number of Years Studied Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 25 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 28 mph Number of Lanes Average Speed 25 mph T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GRV.;STOP@ MUSCATEL,BARLET 10 mph Pace Speed 21 -30 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 6 Annual Collision Rate 2 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.167 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 8,859 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, WALNUT GRV.;STOP@ MUSCATEL,BARLET Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.530 miles 40 feet NONE YES,E/OF BARLETT,W /OF RSM GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTAIL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD TO HART AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 33 mph Average Speed 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 24 -33 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 101 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied Total Collisions Annual Collision Rate Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 3 years 12 4 accidents /year 4.280 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic Number of Lanes Type of Traffic Control Crosswalks? Pedestrian Traffic Truck Traffic On- Street Parking Sidewalks? Driveways? 10,668 Date Counted 9/18/2012 4 LANES WITH RAISED MEDIAN T.S. @ ROSEMEAD; STOP @ HART @ T.S. LIGHT LIGHT NORTH SIDE ONLY, RESTRICTED YES, BOTH SIDES YES, BOTH SI ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.240 miles 70 feet NONE NONE GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: [,Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MARSHALL STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM HART AVENUE TO RIO HONDO AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Average Speed 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25 -34 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 106 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.578 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 6,323 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control STOP @ HART, RIO HONDO, CLAUDIA Crosswalks? Q RIO HONDO Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic NONE On- Street Parking BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? Y ES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.250 miles 40 feet NONE NONE GOOD GOOD SOUTH SIDE ONLY RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 21 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WEST CITY LIMIT TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED F Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Average Speed 38 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33 -42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 114 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.398 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 16,389 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ T.S., EARLE, DELTA Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.280 miles Width 62 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within Rosemead was under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly the City of performed registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD zz ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO ROSEMEAD BLVD SPEED FACTORS On- Street Parking Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Average Speed 33 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 28 -37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 105 COLLISION HISTORY Roadway Conditions Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.369 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,677 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW AND TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ ROSEMEAD, MUSKATEL, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ T.S. AND IVAR Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.560 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD E2N ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MISSION DRIVE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD TO VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 33 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Average Speed 34 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 30 -39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 107 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.283 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 12,428 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ VALLEY, ROSEMEAD, ENCINITA Crosswalks? @ T.S. AND NEWBY Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.520 miles Width 62 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES @ CLAUDIA Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 12a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET MUSCATEL AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM MARSHALL STREET TO GRAND AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 29 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 32 mph Average Speed 30 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25 -34 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 107 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.262 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL, CIVIC CENTER, SCHOOL Average Daily Traffic 6,219 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW AND SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MISSION, VALLEY; STOP @ MARSHALL, GRAND Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S., STOPS AND SCOTT Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1.120 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, CIVIC CENTER, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD E2N ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET NEW AVENUE FROM GRAVES AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE TO GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 35 mph Average Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 25 -34 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 101 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 0 Annual Collision Rate 0 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.000 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 7,377 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY, NEWMARK; STOP@ GRAVES Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S.,,STOPS AND FERN Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.500 miles 56 feet YES, NORTH OF GRAVES NONE GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDNETIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: 1, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD E20 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET RAMONA BOULEVARD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM WALNUT GROVE AVENUE TO IVA AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 30 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Average Speed 31 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 26 -35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 100 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 4 Annual Collision Rate 1.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 2.197 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 3,614 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WALNUT GROVE; STOP @BURTON Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking EAST AND SOUTH SIDE ONLY RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.460 miles 32 feet NONE YES,W /OF BURTON & WLNT GR GOOD GOOD YES, MOSTLY SOUTH SIDE RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 12 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET RIO HONDO AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM OLNEY STREET TO VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS On- Street Parking Date of Speed Survey 9/28/2012 Posted Speed Limit 30/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 23 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 28 mph Average Speed 24 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 21 -30 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Recommended Speed Limit 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 103 COLLISION HISTORY Roadway Conditions Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 2 Annual Collision Rate 0.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.537 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 6,187 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH SKIP YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ VALLEY BLVD;STOP @ DE ADELANE, MARSHALL Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.550 miles Width 40 feet Vertical Curve? YES, SLIGHT N /OF DE ADELA Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD F2N ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET ROSEMEAD PLACE FROM GARVEY AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE TO EARLSWOOD DRIVE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Time of Speed Survey 13:00 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph 85th Percentile Speed 37 mph Average Speed 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 31 -40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90 Number of Survey Samples 88 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Speed Justification CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied Total Collisions Annual Collision Rate Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 3 years 1 0.33 accidents /year 1.143 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 1,902 Date Counted 9/18/2012 Number of Lanes 2 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S @ GARVEY Crosswalks? @ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? SECTIONS OF SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.420 miles Width 54 -55 feet Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use NONE NONE GOOD GOOD YES, MOSTLY ON EAST SIDE RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: [,Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD E201 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET RUSH STREET CERTIFICATION DATE FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD TO WALNUT GROVE AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 33 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Average Speed 35 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 29 -38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 0/25 mph Number of Survey Samples 102 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.169 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL,SCHOOL,COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 11,000 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ SAN GABRIEL, WALNUT GROVE Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND ANGELUS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Drive YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.490 miles Width 86 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, E /OF SAN GABRIEL Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, ON RAISED MEDIANS Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL,SCHOOL,COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD LA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO DELTA STREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 45/25 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Average Speed 41 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 37 -46 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph Number of Survey Samples 108 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 5 Annual Collision Rate 1.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.395 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 17,505 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH RAISED MEDIAN Type of Traffic Control T.S.@TOWN CENTER, WALNUT GROVE, DELTA, 60 FWY Crosswalks? 2 ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traff ic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? SOME, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.660 miles 84 feet NONE YES, N /OF 60 FWY GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). i TE 2341 Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 31 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM RUSH STREET TO GARV AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Truck Traffic Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Average Speed 37 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 32 -41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 104 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 12 Annual Collision Rate 4 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.6 16 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 23,722 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. Q RUSH, GRAVES, GARVEY, KLINGERMAN Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BBOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.750 miles Width 84 feet Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use YES, N/O KLINGERMAN NONE GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 13z ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET SAN GABRIEL BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM GARVEY AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS LIGHT Date of Speed Survey 9/17/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 14:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Average Speed 32 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 28 -37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 152 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 14 Annual Collision Rate 4.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.818 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 31,261 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY, EMERSON, HELLMAN Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES D riveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD F 33 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM OLNEY STREET TO VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 10/1/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 38 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Average Speed 39 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 35 -44 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 112 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 6 Annual Collision Rate 2 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.586 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 16,711 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ LOFTUS, MARSHALL, VALLEY Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment Width Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use 0.560 miles 64 feet NONE YES, AT ELLIS GOOD GOOD YES, BOTH SIDES RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 34 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET TEMPLE CITY BLVD FROM VALLEY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE TO NORTH CI LIMITS SPEED FACTORS LIGHT Number of Years Studied Date of Speed Survey 10/1/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Number of Lanes Average Speed 37 mph T.S. @ VALLEY 10 mph Pace Speed 31 -40 Visibility Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples ill Adjacent Land Use COLLISION HISTORY LIGHT Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 3 Annual Collision Rate 1 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.252 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 19,890 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ VALLEY Crosswalks? 2 ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking NO PARKING BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.110 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTAIL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET VALLEY BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE FROM CHARLOTTE AVENUE T ROSEMEAD BLVD 35 SPEED FACTORS Length of Segment Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 31 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 36 mph Lighting Average Speed 32 mph COMMERCIAL, CIVIC CENTER 10 mph Pace Speed 26 -35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 115 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 32 Annual Collision Rate 10.7 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.148 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 29,954 Date Counted 9/26/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DELTA,WALNUT GROVE,MUSCATEL,IVAR,ROSEMEAD Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.850 miles Width 76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, CIVIC CENTER Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET VALLEY BLVD FROM ROSEMEAD BLVD CERTIFICATION DATE TO STRANG AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Length of Segment Date of Speed Survey 10/1/2012 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 34 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Lighting Average Speed 34 mph COMMERCIAL 10 mph Pace Speed 30 -39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82 Recommended Speed Limit 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 110 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 26 Annual Collision Rate 8.67 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.048 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 22,664 Date Counted 10/2/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ROSEMEAD,HART,MISSION,RIO HONDO,TEMPLE CITY Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 1.000 miles Width 74 -76 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VIM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 37 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM SAN GABRIEL BLVD TO RUS S TREET SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 41 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 46 mph Average Speed 43 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 38 -47 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Recommended Speed Limit 45 mph Number of Survey Samples 123 COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied Total Collisions Annual Collision Rate Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 3 years 4 1.33 accidents /year 0.274 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 18,006 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH TWLTL Type of Traffic Control T.S. Cal SAN GABRIEL, RUSH Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. EXCEPT WALMART Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGTH On- Street Parking NO PARKING BOTH SIDES Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dri v e ways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.740 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? Horizontal Curve? Visibility Roadway Conditions Lighting Adjacent Land Use YES, S /OF SAN GABRIEL YES, SLIGHT @ LANDIS VIEW FAIR FAIR YES, BOTH SIDES COMMERCIAL, GOLF COURSE Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 30 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM RUSH STREET TO GARVEY AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 40 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Average Speed 39 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 36 -45 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 11 1 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 16 Annual Collision Rate 5.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.172 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL Average Daily Traffic 16,411 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S.@ RUSH ,EDISON,KLINGERMAN,FERN,GARVEY Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dri v e ways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.760 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting YES, BOTH SIDES Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD EA ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM GARVEY AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/18/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 15:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 85th Percentile Speed 43 mph Average Speed 38 mph Width 10 mph Pace Speed 31 -40 NONE Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 120 GOOD COLLISION HISTORY Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 9 Annual Collision Rate 3 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.840 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 19,576 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ GARVEY, HELLMAN Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDERESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Dr iveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 14 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM HELLMAN AVENUE TO VALLEY BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 13:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 32 -41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 107 COLLISION HISTORY YES, @ 1 -10 Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 7 Annual Collision Rate 2.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.404 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Average Daily Traffic 21,677 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S., @ HELLMAN, MARSHALL, VALLEY Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED. NSAT HELLMAN TO Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.730 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? YES, @ 1 -10 Horizontal Curve? YES, @ 1 -10 Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VIA CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 41 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM VALLEY BLVD TO MISSION BLVD SPEED FACTORS Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:00 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 36 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Average Speed 38 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 33 -42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 105 COLLISION HISTORY NONE Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 3 Annual Collision Rate 1 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.317 TRAFFIC FACTORS RESIDENTIAL Average Daily Traffic 17,268 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S.@ VALLEY, MISSION,WELLS /EDMOND Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.500 miles Width 64 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? NONE Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number CITY OF ROSEMEAD 4z ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STREET WALNUT GROVE AVENUE CERTIFICATION DATE FROM MISSION BLVD TO NORTH CITY LIMIT SPEED FACTORS On- Street Parking Date of Speed Survey 9/24/2012 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:30 Speed Justification 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 35 mph CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED 85th Percentile Speed 39 mph Average Speed 36 mph 10 mph Pace Speed 32 -41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 Recommended Speed Limit 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 108 COLLISION HISTORY Roadway Conditions Number of Years Studied 3 years Total Collisions 1 Annual Collision Rate 0.33 accidents /year Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.263 TRAFFIC FACTORS Average Daily Traffic 11,969 Date Counted 9/20/2012 Number of Lanes 4 LANES WITH DOUBLE YELLOW Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MISSION; STOP @ GRAND Crosswalks? @ ALL T.S. AND STOPS Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On- Street Parking YES, BOTH SIDES RESTRICTED Sidewalks? YES, BOTH SIDES Driveways? YES, BOTH SIDES ROADWAY FACTORS Length of Segment 0.290 miles Width 56 -62 feet Vertical Curve? NONE Horizontal Curve? YES, @ MISSION TO 500' N Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By LT Checked By VM CERTIFICATION: I, Vanessa Munoz, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Rosemead was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Vanessa Munoz Date State Registration Number Radar Speed Distribution Forms Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead APPENDIX B Collision Rates Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead ' O O O o O O o u') m m m O O O O O O O m O m m m m m m m v v v v m m m m ao m m m N N M N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N N m m N N V N CO m O m O d' m O 1-- m m O m 1- O M M m m m M m O �t It m M O N N In O O N N O O O O O O O O d' O �t o O m m m m m M M n O O M M 1- M 't m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M • co m O m M 7 h O m N m (Mp m a�D N m L M N M N co M N r ^ m N N M m m m m m m N M n Cl) N N N N M h N M 7 OCT O m e V (n O = V h N M N 4') CC ' O ^ N N O m N a • • • z g �> J W W Q W m Q U' > z a _j J w 2 w U J W a W g w w O W ❑ > J m F- U � a_ 2 w F- ❑ > J m W W 0] a 0 Z a w ❑ W Q ❑ WW O J > Q W a 15 J W ❑ ❑ > J m W CC m Q 0 Z a w > Q W > W C7 z J a F } N U F- (n a W ❑ J MOLL[ Q W w O EC > a W > C7 F- z J Q �: W Q W > Ir a O F } U ~ F- (n a W Q z U z W > Q W > Q 0 F- Z J Q ❑ J m a W � w M O Q W > a Q 2 W > a ❑ Z 0 _ Q ❑ J M Q w ' O W Q W a Ir W a W W a > W Q F- >- W Z J O > a W Z ❑ Z O 2i F- 2 J }_ F U ~ W 3: W a Q J W ❑ > J m J W a O Z Q cn Q W > O (.7 j Z J a w Q F- F O a 2 U W > > a > W Z w Q W > a W a > J m } U J (L 2i w F- ❑ J [0 a W U) O W W > Q F J W ❑ Q W > O ❑ Z J a �: ❑ J 0] 0 ❑ Q W (n O ¢ W a F cr a 2 F- Q W J ❑ Q w ❑ > a CC J w ❑ > Q Ir < J w ❑ ¢ ❑ ❑ O U T Q W Z J J J W C) Q a Z O W W > Q Q Z U z W W a W M a W Q w Q a W a W Q a W a W 2 a w > a ❑ a w > a Z J w > a Z w U Q ~ U ❑ O cl Q N Q W O w J J U W Q w J J U ft Q w J J U CC Q ( J J m W Q N M d' m m 1l m m O N M V m m 1� m m O N Z� m m o � O �U rn c c Q O O O O O O O O In �(! lD N u0 lfl N Ln Ln O O O [+) (h C7 N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M C7 O � 00 (D O O 7 It 1- O N N (A (n (D (D 1 1\ d' O 7 CO N N O N Cn V co 00 to N O N CO "t O O O O O N C7 r CJ 6 O 6 C5 r CJ CJ 6 00 (0 N N O (0 W N O) (D CC) O (D Cf) O V (D O Cl) N LO Cn LO It N V V (D 1� LO W 00 O 1l r LO (` O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (A • C") 1 r� (D 00 N d' O N 1� C) V (D 1 cc) N W O O O LO O Cf) N N 1 (0 N r r O m W V' (D m dt co (0 (0 O O r d' (D h t() 1` h (fl (fl (` N (fl C7 (p - r I P I (`7 N (I) (D O I O N N N CO I (D I (A N ( N It N N O It N M N dT (0 M cm N 7 O M 1� Y W W W O • J a > m ❑ Q W 0¢ m > o m W Q Z a¢ C7 w > a > C7 w ¢ a¢¢¢ ?> ❑❑ J m J m O 0 J w W 0 Z F w¢ ❑ w > a > 0 >❑ Q z w¢ x> m J J U F- O z J m ❑ a W O� m w > ¢ a w x Cc w > a > a 0 >❑ ¢ z w¢ x > m W > F- J F U W W > O F- D Q W ❑ J m Q W :5 p¢ ¢ co J Q 2 m W Q W W > ¢ m¢ C`3 W > 0 O F- Z J F- w } W Z J¢¢ o W Q >- W > m U J m W m m ¢ O Z w ~ } ~ U 2 F- D O❑¢ U F- 2 W m w Q >- W > m 0 U >- W Z J o> ❑ m } w J a W > WW `� p J m Q x U ❑ J m Q W � w U) O m J m W CC m a (7 Z Q❑¢ m F 2 (n m W Q } W > m 0 > z Q J w x m ❑ z 0 (n m z 0 (n m ❑ z o (n > < W F Q U � > Q w w ❑> J m a z 0 < ¢ o Z o 2 p w U g m Q w 2 w 0 o F m¢¢¢ x � D m W_ m m 0 Z ¢ m W_ m m 0 Z ¢ m W_ m m 0 Z ¢ ❑ m F () W J a w w ❑ m F U w J a w w > m }} w J a ❑> ❑ m w J ¢ a > m z Q a > m z Q a >> m z ¢ a m z Q N M V M O 1 M W O N M V N O r m m O N N N N N N N N N m [+) I MP A (7 m m m m V Z � m ('n m V) o roU a y m N C W m y 0 a� caU m c . m m c W APPENDIX C Survey Equipment Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements for this survey was a K -15 Model Hand -Held traffic Radar manufactured by MPH Industries of Owensboro, Kentucky. The calibration of the unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The K -15 Hand -Held Traffic Radar was last calibrated on October 28, 2011 by RHF Inc. Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Rosemead