The URL can be used to link to this page

RFP - 2012-16 - Lead Tech EnvironmentalLEAD E N V I R O N M E N T A L November 25, 2012 City of Rosemead City Clerk's Office Attn: Gloria Molleda 8838 E. Valley Blvd Rosemead, California, CA 91770 RE: LEAD BASED PAINT AND ASBESTOS TESTING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD Dear Ms. Molleda: Please find enclosed three copies of Lead Tech Environmental Is proposal for the RFP referenced above. The principle of the company is Steven Denzler, and he is the primary contact person. Our corporate address is 2348 Camino Robledo, Carlsbad, CA 92009. The company telephone number is 760 - 634 -3700 or 310 - 831 -2479 and fax number is 760 - 634 -3703 and 310 - 831 -2465. The primary email addresses are steve@leadtecbenvironmental.com or ta11us500 @aol.com. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely Steven De r Encl: r A 2348 Camino Robledo, Carslbad, CA 92009, 760- 6343700 Fax 760 - 6343703 LEAD E N V I R O N M E N T A L REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CITY OF ROSEMEAD CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ATTN: GLORIA MOLLEDA 8838 E. VALLEY BOULEVARD ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 91770 LEAD BASED PAINT AND ASBESTOS TESTING & CONSULTING SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FROM LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO CARLSBAD, CA 92009 760 - 634 -3700 TALLUS500 @AOL.COM NOVEMBER 26, 2012 r- 4. O U. IVIIIVU MUOLCUU, UAKLSBAD, CA 92009• PH: (760)634 -3700 FAX (760)634 -3703 2. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS A. History & Qualifications Lead Tech Environmental (LTE) was formed in 1994 as an environmental consulting company specializing in working with municipal housing departments. LTE has eighteen years of experience in performing lead based paint and over 10 years of asbestos consulting work ( "Environmental Consulting ") on residential housing for public agencies. We have an expertise in conducting residential Environmental Consulting and interfacing with homeowners, city loan officers, city construction specialists, abatement contractors and general contractors. Our specialty is residential Environmental Consulting wherein the owner has applied for funds that originated with The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) such as CDBG funds, Home Funds, etc that are subject to 24 CFR Part 35. In addition, we have worked with property owners that need lead paint clearance testing for Section 8 tenants or the County Handyworker program. We perform asbestos consulting work for numerous City rehabilitation loan programs and for the Community Development Commission for the County of Los Angeles and Housing Authority for City and County of Los Angeles. We understand the dynamics and concerns of everyone involved and do our best to schedule the Environmental Consulting task at a convenient time for the owner or occupant. When requested, we notify the city construction or loan officer of the date of the inspection and provide him/her with verbal results shortly after performing the inspection. Lead Tech knows that only a finite amount of money is available and only recommends the most cost effective interim control or abatement options. LTE has worked with and currently works for over 20 municipal housing departments and economic development departments performing: lead based paint visual inspections, lead paint inspections, lead paint risk assessments, drafting abatement specifications, abatement monitoring and lead hazard clearance testing. Moreover, we also perform similar asbestos consulting work for city and county housing departments. About 90% of Lead Tech's business consists of testing residential structures, both single family and multifamily, for lead and asbestos per the requirements of a public agency. We currently perform Environmental Consulting for the following cities: Los Angeles Housing Department, Lynwood, Pico Rivera, Bell Gardens, Hawaiian Gardens, Alhambra, Maywood, Cudahy, La Mirada, Walnut, Rancho Palos Verdes, Bell, Santa Ana, South Gate, Downey, Paramount, Monterey Park, Diamond Bar, La Canada, Lake Forest, and Glendora. Lead Tech has a streamlined process to ensure a fast response time and the laboratory is put on notice to both expect and test the lead or asbestos samples and fax our office the results promptly so that our office can immediately generate the necessary report. We do not work with clients such as school districts and hospitals that have their own protocols and require a great deal of company resources. As a result, everyone on Lead Tech's staff from inspector to office assistant knows what needs to be done to meet the City's schedules and deadlines. Our inspectors are willing to work on weekends if necessary to accommodate a property owner that might work during the week. For emergency work, Lead Tech has performed a lead or asbestos inspection on the same day it was ordered P and emailed a report minus any laboratory samples to the city loan officer the same day. For lead based paint consulting, Lead Tech utilizes two XRF machines, 3 CDPH certified lead inspectors, 1 certified lead sampling technician, 3 certified lead monitors, and 2 certified project designers. For asbestos, Lead Tech utilizes 2 DOSH certified CAC asbestos inspectors, and 2 DOSH certified SSTs to ensure that we meet any deadlines. Please contact any of the public agency references provided in Section VII to confirm all the above. Lead Tech's primary competitive advantage is our expertise and experience. No company bidding on this contract has performed lead based paint consulting for The City of Los Angeles for longer than Lead Tech Environmental. The fact that we have continually worked for the LAHD Housing Department since 1994 -1995 despite having to submit responses to at least 4 exhaustive RFP's is proof of our ability, professionalism, competitive pricing and timely delivery of work product. We were one of the first companies to provide both lead based paint and asbestos consulting work for the CDC and County of Los Angeles. In summary, Lead Tech has performed and currently performs all the Environmental Consulting work required in this RFP on residential structures for over 20 housing authorities. That is our specialty and primary focus and the reason why our company, though smaller than some, offers the Housing Authority a proven leader in Environmental Consulting for Los Angeles public agencies. Your loan officers, construction specialists or any Housing Authority employee that need answers can generally call our office between 8:00 and 4:00 and speak directly to the company president. We don't have levels of bureaucracy at Lead Tech. 3. STATEMENT OF APPLICANT'S TRAINING /CERTIFICATES For management and coordination purposes, LTE assigns one person as a project manager for each municipal client. That person is responsible for coordinating all work, performing QAQC and discussing the project with the City /County representative, general contractor, owner, abatement contractor, etc. Mr. Denzler will be the project manger for the City of Rosemead. A. LEAD BASED PAINT STATEMENT OF APPLICANT'S TRAINING /CERTIFICATES LTE currently has on staff 3 California Department of Health Services certified lead based paint inspectors /assessors. If our work load necessitates additional inspectors, we utilize two floating inspectors. Three members of our staff are CDPH certified project monitors and two are project designers. CDPH certifications are attached hereto in Appendix 1. For management and coordination purposes, LTE assigns one person as a project manager for each job. That person is responsible for coordinating all work, performing QAQC and discussing the project with the City /County representative, general contractor, abatement contractor, resident, etc. A. LEAD PAINT Generally, Mr. Denzler is the project manager and involved with all aspects of each project from initial inspection risk assessment to final clearance test. STATEMENT OF APPLICANT'S TRAINING /CERTIFICATES LTE currently has on staff 4 California Department of Health Services certified lead based paint inspectors /assessors. If our work load necessitates additional inspectors, we utilize two floating inspectors. Three members of our staff are CDPH certified project monitors and one is also a project designer. CDPH certifications are attached hereto in Appendix 1. 1. The Project Manager assigned to this project is Steven Denzler, company President. He will oversee all work: confirm scheduling with home owner, draft or edit all reports, interact with City construction specialists regarding cost effective abatement methods, etc. He has a law degree and is a member of the California Bar Association. Mr. Denzler has performed over 500 lead inspections and risk assessments, monitored over 50 abatement jobs, helped devise efficient lead abatement scopes of work, written over 100 lead abatement specifications and conducted over 300 clearance tests. He is certified by the State of California Department of Health Services (CDPH) as a lead inspector /assessor, contractor supervisor, project monitor and project designer #1261. Mr. Denzler has worked in conjunction with numerous municipalities, construction specialists, outside CDBG consultant companies such as Willdan Associates, LDM and Associates and Comprehensive Housing Services as well as architects, and environmental engineering companies. He is an invited expert panelist for drafting and refining the California CDPH state exam for lead based paint professionals administered by Cooperative Personnel Services (initial exam in 1998 and 2002, 2003, 2004 revised exams). 2. Michael Kuretich is one of our project monitors and an occasional inspector CDPH # 460. He has a diversified background in lead based paint consulting and abatement and has worked in both the private and public sector. Mr. Kuretich has been CDPH lead certified as an inspector /assessor for 7 years. He is also a CDPH certified project monitor. Mr. Kuretich helped administer lead grant programs for the City of Riverside and City of Long Beach. He also was the contractor /supervisor for a lead based paint abatement company in Phoenix, Arizona. He has monitored over 50 lead abatement jobs and performed over 500 lead inspections and 300 clearance tests. 3. Our primary lead technician is Rolando Mireles. He generally makes the initial appointment with the home owner or borrower and performs the lead inspections and risk assessments. He is bilingual. Mr. Mireles has been a licensed sampling technician for 2 years and has personally performed over 300 inspections throughout LA County. His CDPH certificate 21624. 2 4. Monica Marathe is another lead based paint inspector assessor, project designer and project monitor. She has been a lead inspector for over 10 years. She is also an asbestos CAC. Her professional profile and CDPH certificate 2371. B. ASBESTOS As with lead based paint, LTE assigns one person as a project manager for each job and that person reviews the work order, instructs the field technician and drafts the reports. STATEMENT OF APPLICANT'S TRAINING CERTFICATES LTE utilizes two California Certified Asbestos Consultants, Joseph Somoye No 92 -0402 and Monica Marathe 03 -3303. Their DOSH California certifications are attached in Appendix 2. 1. The project manager for asbestos work is Joseph Somoye State of California Division of Occupations Safety and Health Certification No. 92 -0402. Mr. Somoye has been certified as an asbestos consultant for almost 20 years. 2. Monica Marathe is another CAC Lead Tech utilizes California Division of Occupation Safety Health Certification No. 03 -3303. She is duo certified in both lead and asbestos. 3. Our Site Surveillance Technician is Matt Kanbara (CAL OSHA NO. 04 -3610) He has conducted over 500 limited asbestos screenings of single family residences. His State of California DOSH certification is attached in Appendix 2. For the City of Bell, he has inspected at least 25 homes and performed at least 15 clearances. 4. Another Site Surveillance Technician is Michael Kuretich (CAL OSHA NO. 02- 3261) He has conducted over 150 limited asbestos screenings for the municipal housing departments and at least 25 inspections and 25 clearances for the City of Bell. 5. Rolando Mireles has taken all the asbestos training to become a Site Surveillance Technician, and will take the exam in January 2013. 6. Steve Denzler has taken all the classes to become a CAC, and expects to take the DOSH CAC State exam in January 2013. 4. COPIES OF CERTIFICATIONS All CDPH lead certificates are attached in Appendix 1 and CAL OSHA asbestos certificates are attached hereto in Appendix 2. 5. REFERENCES AND PROJECT EXPERIENCE 1. CITY OF BELL 2001 - Present Pursuant to regulation 24 CFR Part 35 and working with the City of Bell Housing Department, LTE has inspected for lead based paint and asbestos about 60 single family residences and mobile homes and conducted 30 clearance tests. Most of these jobs involved federal CDBG funds of less than $5,000 on mobile homes. Because some of the City loan program only involves painting the exterior of the residence, LTE primarily performs lead paint screenings and limited asbestos inspections and charges a reduced rate to inspect only the areas that will be disturbed rather than the entire residence. Contact Person: Estella Cruz City of Bell 323 - 773 -1596, 6330 Pine Street, Bell, CA 90201. 2. CITY OF LA MIRADA 2001 - Present Over the past six years, LTE has performed over 150 LBP inspections, screenings, risk assessments and clearance testing for City of La Mirada Housing Department. We also perform asbestos consulting work for them. Contact: Diana Ruedas562-943-0131-2956druedas@cityoflamirada.org 13700 La Mirada Blvd, La Mirada, CA 90638 3. CITY OF PICO RIVERA 2001 - Present LTE has performed LBP consulting for the City of Pico Rivera since 2001. We primarily perform inspections, risk assessments and clearance testing. In the past, we have also conducted limited lead screenings. Contact: Estella Cruz 562- 801 -4354 ecruz pico- rivera.ora 6615 Passons Blvd, Pico Rivera, CA 90660. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) 1998 TO PRESENT Over the past eight years, LTE has performed over 250 lead based paint inspections, visual assessments, clearance tests and risk assessments for the CDC and about 100 asbestos inspections and asbestos clearances. All of these projects were in the County of Los Angeles in mostly unincorporated cities. Housing and Rehabilitation Loan Program About 56 of these projects were for the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program over $25,000. We performed both lead based paint inspections, risk assessments and asbestos surveys on single family homes. If we detected lead based paint or asbestos, we also included a comprehensive abatement plan to eliminate the lead or asbestos hazard. Contact People: Margaret Jamerson (323) 890 -7244 margaret.iamerson&lacdc.org Community Development Commission 2 Coral Circle, Monterey Park, CA 91755. 5. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS 2005- PRESENT LTE has performed LBP consulting for the City of Hawaiian Gardens Housing Department for the last 7 -8 years. LTE primarily conducts LBP and asbetos inspections, screenings, risk assessments and clearances for the City of Hawaiian Gardens. In a given- year, LTE probably inspects 10 -20 single family homes. 0 Contact Person: Celina Estrada City of Hawaiian Gardens 562- 420 -2641 cestrada@hgeity.org 6. PROOF OF INSURANCE A copy of our certificate of insurance is attached in Appendix 7. 7. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF THE SCOPE OF WORK A. LEAD -BASED PAINT INSPECTION LTE performs all lead based paint inspections pursuant to the Housing & Urban Development ( "HUD ") Guidelines For The Evaluation And Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing. Our inspectors use a portable XRF LBP Spectrum Analyzer manufactured by Radiation Monitoring Devices ( "RMD ") to test for LBP. This machine measures the lead content in painted components without disturbing the paint. Pursuant to the HUD Guidelines, LTE will inspect all the painted components on the Residence's interior and exterior. The LBP analyzer is equipped with 12 mCi cobalt 57 sealed radioactive source. LTE calibrates the XRF pursuant to the manufacturer's specifications and regularly verified XRF readings against pre determined lead samples produced by the National Institute of Standards and Testing (KIST). All of these quality control measures produce a 95% confidence level that our XRF readings ace mg/cm urately reflect the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces. The HUD Guidelines and the Department of Health Services Title 17 define X -Ray fluorescent analyzer ( "XRF ") measurements greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm (milligrams per square centimeter) lead positive. However, "If there is a difference between Federal, State, or local regulations, the more stringent requirement must be observed..." HUD Guidelines. For purposes of any lead inspections in Los Angeles County and referencing Chapter 1 I of the Los Angeles Department of Health and Human Services Safety Code, LTE considers XRF readings equal to or greater than 0.7 mg/cm lead positive. Per the City of Rosemead's scope of work, LTE will provide the City construction specialist with written notice of any readings in excess of 1.0 mg/cm within 24 hours. In addition, LTE will include a CAL OSHA paragraph on worker safety protocols when we find lead readings equal to or greater than 0.8 milligrams per centimeter squared. Our report will denote where we tested, whether we detected lead paint, the areas that tested lead positive and the condition of the paint. It explains lead- testing procedures and provides a brief summary of various interim controls and lead abatement options. If requested, we can also provide the City with estimated abatement costs and work with the City's construction specialist in developing an abatement plan. I,' 1I 61"97 W 7 To easily identify the components tested, LTE creates a computer generated floor plan of the residence's interior and exterior. Generally, we request that the City provide us with the name and phone number of the owner/borrower and then we schedule the inspection with them and accommodate their schedules. We explain what we need to do, the time it takes, etc. The City or Municipality is our client and we will not provide copies of the lead report to the owners, realtors, contractors, etc. without the prior consent of the city official that ordered the lead consulting work. We will mail the City 2 copies of the lead inspection report within five days of conducting the inspection or upon receiving the laboratory results. B. RISK ASSESSMENT 24 CFR Part 35 mandates both a Risk Assessment and lead inspection if the rehabilitation loan exceeds $5,000. A Risk Assessment is defined as an assessment of a dwelling to check for the presence of lead -based paint hazards. It includes a visual assessment of dust, soil and paint and a written report of the results. In essence, the risk assessor tests to see whether the house contains excessive levels of lead dust on building components such as floors, window sills, window wells or in soil. Moreover, the inspector interviews the residents to find out if any children live in the residence and determine the children's use patters. Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations Division 1, Chapter 8 mandates stringent lead dust limits for floors, window sills, window wells and soil. LTE would first conduct a lead paint inspection. If we detect positive levels of lead based paint, we would visually examine the residence for visible paint dust and take requisite dust wipe samples. We will take dust samples as close as possible to lead positive components in defective condition. In addition, we will take soil samples in bare soil areas and along the residence's drip line. To keep costs low, we recommend performing both a lead inspection and risk assessment at the same time with the results contained in one hybrid report. The report will denote both the locations of any lead based paint identified during the inspection as well as identify if any lead hazards exist during the risk assessment. To determine if a lead hazard exists, LTE takes dust wipe samples and soil samples which we send to a laboratory accredited by both the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in their ELLPAT testing program for AAS analysis. Please note, the hybrid report I mentioned provides the City with all the information mandated by 24 CFR Part 35 in assessing whether a lead hazard exists or not. However, it does not ask the litany of questions mentioned in the HUD Guidelines. We currently use this format with the all our city clients and they appreciate everything being in one report as well as the substantial cost savings. 0 A sample report is attached hereto in Appendix 4. C. LEAD -BASED PAINT SCREENING While the City of Rosemead did not specifically mention a Lead Screening in the RFP, it is a service Lead Tech is currently providing many of our City clients. Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 35, only the painted surfaces that will be disturbed during the rehabilitation need to be inspected for lead based paint. Therefore, LTE can limit its inspection and or risk assessment to only the areas that will be disturbed rather than the entire residence. This saves both time and money. D. POST HAZARD REDUCTION CLEARANCE TEST LTE conducts clearance testing in accordance with the Housing & Urban Development ( "HUD ") Guidelines For The Evaluation And Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing revised in 1997 ( "HUD Guidelines "). LTE abides by Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations Division 1, Chapter 8 mandate regulatory lead dust limits for floors, window sills, window wells and soil. The purpose of the Clearance Testing is to confirm the lead abatement was properly done and that the Residence was cleaned so that no hazardous levels of lead dust remain in the Residence. In essence, it confirms the contractor did everything in the lead abatement scope of work and that the house is safe for occupancy. The clearance test should be performed as soon as the lead abatement contractor completes the job and performs cleanup. This avoids the potential for cross contamination. LTE requires a copy of lead abatement contractor's scope of work prior to visiting the site for final clearance testing. After reviewing the scope of work, our risk assessor /inspector visits the site and visually confirms that all the lead abatement work was properly completed. Subsequently, he /she takes dust wipe samples in the areas that underwent abatement and soil samples along the Residence's drip line area. We complete a chain a custody form and forward the samples to a laboratory for atomic absorption spectrometry ( "AAS ") analysis. LABORATORY LTE utilizes AmeriSci for AAS analysis. It is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in their ELLPAT testing program for lead. Unless requested otherwise, we have the laboratory fax us the results of the AAS testing within 24-48 hours of receipt. We review the laboratory results to determine whether the Residence is safe for occupancy (i.e. that the sample dust results tested below California DHS regulatory levels). Please note, LTE advises the City to include a provision in its contract with the lead contractor that should he /she fail the initial clearance test, he /she is responsible for all subsequent test charges. That is, the City should deduct the cost of subsequent clearance tests from any money owed the lead contractor. F. ASBESTOS TESTING AND REPORT Unlike lead paint inspections with XRF machines, asbestos testing requires taking bulk samples and sending them to a certified laboratory for PLM analysis. As with the limited lead based paint screening, LTE only inspects the suspect asbestos containing building components that will be disturbed during the rehabilitation for asbestos. The City would need to forward LTE with a copy of the scope of work and our CAC would review it and advise the SST what and where to sample. PROTOCOL LTE will inspect the materials that will be disturbed during rehabilitation pursuant to the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) 40 CFR Ch. I Section 763.86 page 654. For friable surfaces, this protocol requires taking at least 3 samples from each homogenous area that is 1,000 sq /ft or less; 5 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 1,000 sq /ft but less than 5,000 sq /ft and 7 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 5,000 sq /ft For non friable suspect ACMs, LTE will take 3 samples of each homogenous material which would include drywall, plaster, stucco, roofing materials and roofing mastic. Upon completion of the limited asbestos survey, our inspector will complete chain -of- custody forms and send them with the bulk samples to the laboratory for bulk sampling analysis. Asbestos samples will be sent to LA Testing or Patriot Laboratory for bulk sample analysis. Both Patriot Labs and LA Testing is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis. Bulk sample analysis is performed using Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "Interim Method of Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples ", EPA Method 600/M4 -82 -020 and EPA Method 600 /R- 93/116. The identification of asbestos fiber bundles is determined by the visual properties displayed when the sample is treated with various dispersion staining liquids. Identification is substantiated by the actual structure of the fiber and the effect of polarized light on the fiber, all of which is viewed by the trained laboratory technician. The EPA's Asbestos NESHAPs and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the local air pollution control district, define an asbestos - containing material as any material that contains a concentration of asbestos of greater than one percent ( >1.0 %) by area as determined by PLM (40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A, Subpart F Section 1). State worker protection laws, as set forth by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, define asbestos materials as those that contain greater than one tenth of one percent ( >O.1 %) asbestos by weight (a.k.a., trace). To evaluate whether a 10 "trace" material contains greater than 0.1 %, a test with a greater sensitivity, such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), would be required. LTE's asbestos reports were specifically drafted for loan officers or construction specialists to easily determine whether asbestos was found in the areas sampled. The report specifies where and why LTE inspected certain suspect building materials and provides an easily understood table of all the negative or asbestos positive asbestos samples. It also provides recommendations on how the asbestos materials should be removed. For clarification, we also provide a floor plan of asbestos sample locations. To reduce laboratory costs when one sample tests positive of a homogeneous surface, the remaining 1 or 2 samples are not analyzed as the homogeneous surface would be considered positive regardless of additional testing results. LTE would rather charge based on the work performed and samples taken rather than just assume all the jobs will require a set number of samples. The asbestos report would be a separate document from the lead based paint report. LTE will provide the City with 2 copies of each report. A sample report is attached hereto in Appendix 5. G. POST ABATEMENT CLEARANCE TEST AND REPORT For asbestos clearance sampling, an SST or CAC would visually confirm that the asbestos contractor properly removed all asbestos containing materials. After conducting the visual examination, he /she wold take clearance (air) samples and send them to a certified laboratory (AmeriSci or LA Testing) for PCM analysis. 8. DESCRIPTION OF STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES LTE included some of this information in Section 7 while discussing our approach to the City of Rosemead's scope of work. For management and coordination purposes, LTE assigns one person as a project manager for each job. That person is responsible for coordinating all work, performing QAQC and discussing the project with the City /County representative, general contractor, abatement contractor, resident, etc. Generally, Mr. Denzler is the project manager and is involved with all aspects of each project from initial assessment to drafting the abatement design and any close out report. LTE requests that the City provide us with the name and phone number of the owner/borrower and address of residence to be inspected and then we schedule the inspection with them and accommodate their schedules. We explain what we need to do, the time it takes, etc. The City or Municipality is our client and we will not provide copies of the lead report to the owners, realtors, contractors, etc. without the prior consent of the city official that ordered the lead consulting work. 11 A. LEAD INSPECTIONS AND XRF MACHINE For accuracy of lead test measurements, we abide by our XRF machines' performance specifications. Our inspectors use two portable XRF lead based paint Spectrum Analyzers manufactured by Radiation Monitoring Devices ( "RMD ") to test for LBP. Our RMD serial numbers are 1043 and 1918. When necessary, LTE also has access to another XRF machine. LTE calibrates the XRF pursuant to the manufacturer's specifications and regularly verifies 3 XRF readings against pre determined lead samples produced by the National Institute of Standards and Testing (KIST) every 4 hours or at the beginning or end of each LBP inspection. All of these quality control measures produce a 95% confidence level that our XRF readings accurately reflect the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces. In drafting the reports, we use a two step process to avoid errors. The lead inspector /assessor for the particular job drafts the initial report. For QAQC, Mr. Denzler reviews the report and double checks the field data to confirm all appropriate building components are designated as negative or positive for lead based paint. B. LEAD CLEARANCE TESTING LTE's lead assessor first requests a copy of the abatement contractor's scope of work if we do not already have it. We generally discuss the scope of work with the contractor prior to visiting the site. The assessor will schedule the clearance test with both the abatement contractor and site resident. We will also notify the City /County. Upon visiting the site, the inspector will conducted a visual examination throughout the entire residence to confirm all tasks in the scope of work was completed in a professional manner. Secondly, the assessor will confirm the site was properly cleaned. If he detects visible signs of paint dust, ripped polyethylene sheeting or other indications that the site was not properly cleaned he will call the office. The office will then notify the City /County construction specialist that the abatement contractor did not clean the site. Rather than waste samples, LTE will visually fail the contractor and immediately notify them of the problem. If the site was properly cleaned, we take dust wipe samples in the work areas and an adjacent area. We may also take a soil sample. We send the samples and chain of custody documentation to the Lab with a spiked sample to confirm lab's accuracy. Once the lab results are faxed back to our office, the project manager will review the results and draft the clearance report which states whether the contractor passed or failed the test. As stated above, LTE will have a certified inspector that did not conduct the initial lead inspection or risk assessment perform the lead clearance test. C. LEAD LABORATORY LTE utilizes LA Testing and AmeriSci for AAS analysis. They are accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participate in their ELLPAT testing program for lead. LA Testing is located at 159 Pasadena Avenue, South• Pasadena, CA 91030 and AmeriSci is located in 24416 Main Street 308, Carson, CA 90745. 12 D. ASBESTOS LTE will inspect the materials that will be disturbed during rehabilitation pursuant to the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) 40 CFR Ch. I Section 763.86 page 654. For friable surfaces, this protocol requires taking at least 3 samples from each homogenous area that is 1,000 sq /ft or less; 5 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 1,000 sq /ft but less than 5,000 sglW; and 7 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 5,000 sq /ft For non friable suspect ACMs, LTE will take 3 samples of each homogenous material which would include drywall, plaster, stucco, roofing materials and roofing mastic. LABORATORY Upon completion of the limited asbestos survey, our inspector will complete chain -of- custody forms and send them with the bulk samples to the laboratory for bulk sampling analysis. Asbestos samples will be sent to LA Testing or AmeriSci for bulk sample analysis. Both AmeriSci and LA Testing are accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis. LTE's asbestos inspectors will attempt to take samples in inconspicuous locations. For drywall sampling, our inspector will remove the face plate from electrical outlets and take samples that will not be visible. Likewise, he will take vinyl flooring samples under the kitchen sink cabinet whenever possible. 9. LITIGATION LTE has never been subject to legal action for services rendered. 10. SERVICE REQUEST FORM A sample service request form is provided in Appendix 6. We also included a lead paint abatement sheet that we can provide with our lead paint inspection reports at no extra cost. If requested, we can also include the same in our asbestos reports. 11. FEES A comprehensive fee schedule is provided in Appendix 3. 12. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY FEES LTE rarely charges hourly fees as we bid project by project. However, our hourly fees for certain projects are provided below: SERVICE COST Abatement Monitoring $50 an hour with 3 hour minimum Abatement Bid Assist from our office $50 an hour Project Meetings $50 an hour with 3 13 APPENDIX I CDPH LEAD BASED PAINT CERTIFICATIONS 14 State of California Departroerlt Of Public H"M Lead -R& tee 9.m"V--O Expeom"t Construction TIR.e. 310 ce"hicale "Moam ww� 019"W" *glow" .."Memo 3 14te of CA40rma Department or Pumtc Heaftn ,:�kl P.ewtea �po MJ*J. 04 ac 11 InppectorlAssessor t112412013 Supervisor 11124PZ013 Project Designer 11M412013 Pro Moallor w 11!2432013 3 Zdllffiw� State of Califorimlia booeromintof Public Health C,onsir4diot, Time E3 APPENDIX 2 DOSH ASBESTOS CERTIFICATIONS 15 .................. State of California °ulsio;, o` GCcupational Safety and Heat 'Certltled Asbestos Consultant Joseph A Somoye Certil Flo. 9 2 - Expires on 09/ 'L's xAi'icalci era` ssrod the W isu of Occ ica!ixa! Safety aid Heehh1 as autiadzed by S-dmz 7186 at W ?, of Ina quynecs and 0 michae(i Kdrefich Name Certification N. 02 -3261 Expires on 0 1/16113 abolllal Ron Dc up l 718n Q f U, I 0 N e cz ( ) SNOW _ .L) Zo c C mc .cz ~ L. C Q cc cz cz ..... U � " a U cz 3 a C l) � U W Cl) U 0 c sumom 0 snow o= -> U Q i a 0 -: !Q E z w !'M a) N - CU Toss loss c c' O O � X7 as to C/) -C C' �. U o `� 0 a) U U) o U U W -ovaci State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Certified Asbestos Consultant Madhavi K Marathe Certification No,.-.-- Expires on _, 03/20 13 sxk% 7-K c[ •e: 3.wmS5 wo P^jPizAns 4C—.1 I /- APPENDIX 3 FEE SCHEDULE t LEAD TECH LEAD BASED PAINT AND ASBESTOS CONSULTING PRICING SUMMARY AND ECONOMY OF SCALE DISCOUNT LEAD PAINT SERVICES PRICE Lead Paint Limited Inspection Exterior Only $150 Lead Paint Limited Inspection $195 + $10 a sample not to exceed $225 & Risk Assessment under a sample. Not to exceed price of $395 50% of Residence $100 Full HUD Lead Inspection if $289 no lead and no samples Full HUD Lead Inspection & $299 includes up to 3 laboratory samples Full Risk Assessment then $10 each not to exceed $319 Lead Clearance $100 + $10 a sample Not to exceed $150 Please note, the cost for a lead inspection and risk assessment are not cumulative. The price of the risk assessment includes the HUD lead inspection, so the total price would never exceed $319 for both a lead paint inspection and risk assessment. ASSBESTOS SERVICES PRICE Limited Asbestos Inspection $250 includes up to 8 samples Comprehensive Asbestos $275 includes up to 8 samples and then $10 Inspection a sample. Not to exceed price of $395 Asbestos Clearance Visual $100 Asbestos Clearance Air $175 including samples Sampling If LTE receives 2 or more jobs that we can schedule on the same visit, we will reduce our fees by 5 %. APPENDIX 4 SAMPLE LEAD INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT 17 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL LEAD -BASED PAINT INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT 1327 NEW HAMPSHIRE LOS ANGELES, CA 90006 OWNER: HILDA MORALES LS120069 LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT LEAD HAZARD REMEDIATION PROGRAM 1200 W. 7 TH STREET, 8 TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 PREPARED BY: LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (760)- 634 -3700 OCTOBER 11, 2012 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLAIMER Lead Tech Environmental prepared this report with specific application to a Lead -Based Paint Inspection and Risk Assessment of a front residence located at 1327 New Hampshire Avenue, Los Angeles, generally exercised by reputable professionals, under similar circumstances, in this or similar localities. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice presented herein. LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PAGE PAGE PAGE PAGE PAGE 6 PAGE PAGE 8 SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 2. MOST STRINGENT REGULATION CONTROLS 3. BUILDING DESCRIPTION 4. X -RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES 5. RISK ASSESSMENT LABORATORY RESULTS 6. PAINT CONDITION 7. RESIDENCE'S PAINT CONDITION 8. INTERVIEW FOR CHILDREN 9. TESTED AREAS FOR LEAD HAZARD 10. LABORATORY RESULTS 11. LEAD ABATEMENT MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 12. INTERPRETING THE REPORT 13. INTERPRETING THE DATA 14. RENOVATION, REPAIR & PAINTING (RRP) RULE 15. SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 16. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 17. RESOURCES ON LEAD BASED PAINT 18. ABATEMENT ALTERNATIVES 19. ABATEMENT INFORMATION POSITIVE RESULTS BY LOCATION LABORATORY RESULTS FLOOR PLAN FIELD DATA CDPH FORM 8552 INSPECTOR CDPH CERTIFICATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lead Tech Environmental ( "LTE ") performed a lead -based paint ( "LBP ") inspection and risk assessment of a single family residence located at 1327 New Hampshire Avenue, Los Angeles, CA referred to as the ( "Residence "). This was the rear residence. LTE conducted its inspection in accordance with the Department of Housing & Urban Development ( "HUD ") document entitled Guidelines for The Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing, 1997 edition. Rolando Mireles conducted LTE's LBP inspection on October 5, 2012. Mr. Mireles is a California Certified Lead Sampling Technician (21624). Mr. Denzler advised Mr. Mireles and drafted the lead paint report. Mr. Denzler is CDPH certified lead inspector /assessor (1261). BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Residence was two single -story, Type V, wood frame structure built in 1906. It contained three bedrooms and two bathrooms. Exterior building materials consisted of wood walls, and wood window components. Interior building materials consisted of plaster partition walls. This was the front residence. Please note bath 1 and bath 3, and bed 1 and bed 3 were new, and bath 2 was being remodeled. SUMMARY OF LEAD RESULTS LTE detected lead paint on the following components: • Interior laundry baseboards, A &C door frames & all window components; • Bed 2 all baseboards, B door & frame, C door frame, A closet door & frame, D1 -3 window sashes and frames; • Bath A walls • Living and Dining ceramic tile fireplace • Exterior All walls, porch ceiling, porch column and porch beam; • Exterior C door frame, all eaves and all fascia; • Exterior wood window components A3 -5, B1 -9, CI -5 and D1 -5. 1. INTRODUCTION Lead Tech Environmental ( "LTE ") performed a lead -based paint ( "LBP ") inspection and risk assessment of a single family residence located at 1327 New Hampshire Avenue, Los Angeles, CA referred to as the ( "Residence "). This was the rear residence. LTE conducted its inspection in accordance with the Department of Housing & Urban Development ( "HUD ") document entitled Guidelines for The Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing, 1997 edition. Rolando Mireles conducted LTE's LBP inspection on October 5, 2012. Mr. Mireles is a California Certified Lead Sampling Technician (21624). Mr. Denzler advised Mr. Mireles and drafted the lead paint report. Mr. Denzler is CDPH certified lead inspector /assessor (1261). 2. MOST STRINGENT REGULATION CONTROLS "If there is a difference between Federal, State, or local regulations, the more stringent requirement must be observed..." HUD Guidelines. For purposes of this report and referencing Chapter 11 of the Los Angeles Department of Health and Human Services Safety Code, LTE considers XRF readings equal to or greater than 0.7- mg/cm lead positive. 3. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Residence was two single - story, Type V, wood frame structure built in 1906. It contained three bedrooms and two bathrooms. Exterior building materials consisted of wood walls, and wood window components. Interior building materials consisted of plaster partition walls. This was the front residence. Please note bath 1 and bath 3, and bed 1 and bed 3 were new, and bath 2 was being remodeled. For clarification, Section 3 contains a floor plan of the Residence's interior and exterior. 4. X -RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGIES Our inspector used a portable XRF LBP Spectrum Analyzer manufactured by Radiation Monitoring Devices ( "RMD ") to test for LBP. Our RMD serial number was 1918 and the age of the radioactive source was two months. The LBP analyzer was equipped with 12 -mCi cobalt 57 sealed radioactive source. LTE calibrated the XRF pursuant to the manufacturer's specifications and regularly verified XRF readings against pre determined lead samples produced by the National Institute of Standards and Testing (KIST). All of these quality control measures produce a 95% confidence level that our XRF readings accurately reflect the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces. CALIBRATION READINGS TIME I READING 1 READING 2 READING 3 AVERAGE 9:30 1.0 mg /cm 0.7 mg /cm 0.9 mg/cm 866 m cm 1:00 z 1.1 mg/cm 0.8 mg/cm 0.8 mg/cm 0.9 mg/cmz 5. RISK ASSESSMENT & LABORATORY RESULTS The Code of Federal Regulation 24 CFR Part 35 defines a Risk Assessment as "An on- site investigation to determine the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead -based paint hazards." A lead hazard is defined as "any condition that causes exposure to lead from dust -lead hazards, soil -lead hazards, or lead based paint that is deteriorated or present in chewable surfaces, friction surfaces or impact surfaces, and that would result in adverse human health effects." 6. PAINT CONDITION For Risk Assessment purposes, paint is categorized in 3 types of condition: Intact, Fair or Poor. LTE categorized the paint's condition based on total area of deteriorated paint on each component pursuant to the HUD chart below: TYPE OF BUILDING INTACT FAIR POOR/ COMPONENT DEFECTIVE Large Exterior Surfaces Entire Surface is Less than or equal More than 10 intact to 10 sq /ft s /ft Interior Components of Entire Surface is Less than or equal More than 2 sq /ft large surfaces: ceiling intact to 2 sq /ft walls, doors, ceilings Interior & Exterior small Entire Surface is Less than or equal More than 10% of surface areas: windows intact to 10% of total total surface area sills, baseboards, etc surface areas INTACT Please note that Section 1 identifies whether a lead positive component is intact (I), Fair (F) or Poor (P). Intact is defined as paint, which is not flaking, peeling or chalking (i.e. you cannot lift the paint from the substrate with your fingernail). Components coated with intact lead based paint do not pose a lead hazard to the occupants. However, conditions can change over time and LTE recommends that the Owner periodically inspect the lead positive components for damage. Moreover, the Owner should possess an Operations and Maintenance Plan describing safe ways to minimize the likelihood of developing a lead hazard. FAIR Fair surfaces should be repaired but are not yet considered a lead hazard. POOR/DEFECTIVE SURFACE Lead Based paint in poor condition (i.e. flaking or peeling) poses a lead hazard and should be corrected. Poor paint will continue to erode increasing the likelihood of lead dust or paint chips falling to the ground. At a minimum, poor surfaces should be stabilized via wet scraping or sanding and then repainted. LTE recommends that the owner only retain a California Department of Public Health certified lead abatement worker or contractor supervisor to perform the wet sanding or scraping. 3 7. RESIDENCE'S PAINT CONDITION As detailed in Section 1, all the lead paint was in fair or defective condition. 8. INTERVIEW FOR CHILDREN Children live in the Residence. 9. TESTED AREAS FOR LEAD HAZARD After conducting our lead based paint inspection, LTE took dust wipe samples in areas near lead positive components or where visible paint dust was present. Specifically, LTE took six dust wipe samples from the porch floor, bed 2 floor, kitchen floor, entry floor, bed 2 window sill, and exterior A5window welt/trough. LTE also took two (2) soil samples from the (A) and (B) driplines. LTE conducted dust sampling in accordance with the Housing & Urban Development ( "HUD ") Guidelines For The Evaluation And Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing revised in 1997 ( "HUD Guidelines "). In addition, LTE used Ghost Wipes for sampling which meet ASTM E1792 performance requirements. LTE moved each dust wipe in an "S" pattern over the entire measured area. The wipes were then folded in half with the dust collected on the inside, and the area was gone over once again at a 90- degree angle to the first "S." LTE placed each sample in a centrifuge tube and completed a chain of custody form and shipped them to the LA Testing, South Pasadena, California. Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations Division 1, Chapter 8 and The Environmental Protection Agency's Residential Lead Hazard Standards TSCA Section 403 mandate the following regulatory lead dust limits for floors, window sills, window wells and soil: COMPONENTS LIMITS IN MICROGRAMS PER SQUARE FOOT INTERIOR FLOORS 40 g /ft INTERIOR SURFACES 250 µg/ft? EXTERIOR WINDOW WELL/ TROUGH 400 µg/f? EXTERIOR FLOOR 400 ltg/ft PLAY AREA BARE SOIL 400 ppm DRIPLINE SOIL 1000 nVm PAINT CHIP SAMPLE 600 ppm LABORATORY AmeriSci analyzed the dust samples using atomic absorption spectrometry ( "AAS" ): It is accredited by both the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in their ELLPAT testing program for lead. In addition, it is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST). 10. LABORATORY RESULTS The Residence's lead dust wipe samples are contained in Section 2. All of the samples passed (tested below threshold levels) except the following sample, which tested in excess (failed) the regulatory limits denoted above: 4 COMPONENTS LIMITS IN MICROGRAMS 1 PER-SQUAREFOOT Exterior A2 Window Well 1 840 /W The lead dust levels on the exterior wood window wells currently pose a lead hazard. These areas should be triple cleaned by HEPA Vacuuming, Washing with a cleaning solvent and HEPA Vacuuming. At a minimum, all the exterior wood window wells /troughs should be washed with a cloth and cleaning solution such as Simply Green. That will substantially reduce the existing lead dust levels. 11. LBP ABATEMENT /MANAGEMENTRECOMENDATIONS As detailed in Section 1, numerous interior components tested positive for lead paint. The lead positive baseboards can be repaired via paint film stabilization or abated via encapsulation. The As detailed under Section 1, Positive Results by Location, numerous exterior components tested lead positive. Numerous exterior wood window components were in defective condition. These components should be corrected to remove the possibility of a lead hazard developing. At a minimum, the components should be treated via paint film stabilization as defined in the Abatement Alternatives section of the report. A more permanent abatement solution would be to replace the wood sashes with vinyl or aluminum windows and encapsulate the wood window frames. Fixed window components that do not open or shut can be encapsulated. Double hung windows should not be encapsulated due to friction. An encapsulant can peel if coated on a window jamb with a moving sash. Some doors frames were in fair and defective condition. These components can be repaired via paint film stabilization or abated via encapsulation (both defined under the Abatement Alternatives section of the report) if the doors do not bang into the jambs. To reduce the impact surface area, a piece of felt or some other barrier can be placed on the door stop so that the door only comes into contact with the barrier and not the stop on the door jamb. Another alternative is to chemically strip the door jambs, neutralize and then repaint. The wood walls and all rafters, eaves and fascia were fair or defective condition. These components can be repaired via paint film stabilization or abated via encapsulation. Please note if the lead positive components identified in Section 1 will be disturbed, only an EPA RRP certified company using RRP trained workers should disturb the,.paim. The contractor must use lead safe work practices: mist the areas prior to prepping the paint, set up containment, and perform triple cleaning of the work areas via vacuuming, wet washing, and HEPA vacuuming. In addition, LTE recommends that only California Department of Public Health certified lead abatement workers perform the work and cleanup. _ 12. INTERPRETING THE LEAD REPORT LTE referenced all building components as existing on either side "A ", `B ", "C ", or "D" of the Residence. For the Residence's interior, LTE reports designated side A, B, C and D as follows: 1. Side A is the wall directly facing the street. 2. While facing side A, side B is the wall directly to the right of side A or the next side clockwise around the room. 3. While facing side B, side C is the wall directly to the right of side B or the next side clockwise around the room. 4. While facing side A, side D is the wall directly to the left of side A. For the Residence's exterior, LTE designated side A, B, C, and D, as follows: 1. Side A is the wall directly facing the street or the front of the building. 2. While facing side A, side B is the wall directly to the left of side A, or the next wall clockwise. 3. While facing side B, side C is the wall directly to left of side B or the next wall clockwise. 4. Side D is the wall directly to the right of side A or directly to the left of side C. Some of the side designations have a number associated with them, (e.g. A2.) These numbers designated similar building components on a particular side, and each component was consecutively numbered. From inside the Residence, similar building components are numbered consecutively from left to right (e.g. if 3 windows exist on the A side, window Al is the farthest left window and A3 is the farthest window to the right or closest window to the B wall). From the exterior and facing the Residence, similar building components on a particular side are numbered from right to left (e.g. if 3 doors are on the C side the farthest door to the right or closest to the B wall is Cl and the door closest to the D wall is C3). 13. INTERPRETING THE DATA For purposes of LTE's inspection, all XRF readings equal to or greater than 0.7 mg/cm are considered lead positive. 14. RENOVATION, REPAIR AND PAINTING (RRP) RULE Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745, anyone performing renovation, repair and painting projects that disturb painted surfaces in residences, child care facilities, and schools built before 1978 must be EPA RRP certified and follow specific lead safe work practices to prevent lead contamination. The rule applies where more than 6 square feet per room, or 20 square feet outside will be "disturbed ". 15. SUMMARY As detailed in Section 1, Positive Results by Location, numerous components tested lead positive. The components in fair and defective condition should be repaired as discussed under Item 11 page 5. Lead positive components in intact condition can be managed in place and should be monitored periodically to ensure that the paint condition has not deteriorated. Lastly, all the exterior window wells /troughs need to be cleaned to reduce the existing lead hazard as detailed under Item 10 pages 4 -5. Please note if the lead positive components identified in Section 1 will be disturbed, only an EPA RRP certified company using RRP trained workers should disturb the paint. In addition, LTE advises that California Department of Public Health (CDPH) certified workers should perform the preparation and cleanup to avoid contaminating the residence. 16. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS A copy of this report must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal Law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead -based paint hazards. 17. RESOURCES ON LEAD BASED PAINT For additional information on LBP, you can call 800 -LA -4 -LEAD for professional education and materials. Other information sources are the National Lead Information center (NLIC) 1- 800 - 424 -5323 at www.epa.gov /lead/ Consumer Product Safety Hotline for recalled products 1- 800 - 638 -2772. For a list of certified lead paint professionals in California, you can call CDPH at (800) 597 -5323 or go to http: / /www.cdph.ca.gov/ programs / CLPPB /Pages/LeadCompliance.aspx. Additional links for the RRP rule are: EPA Renovate Right Brochure Link http: / /www.epa.gov /opptintr/lead/ pubs /renovaterightbrochure.pdf, EPA RRP RULE LINK http: / /www.epa.gov /opptintr /lead /pubs /renovation.htm LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION I POSITIVE RESULTS BY LOCATION POSITIVE RESULTS BY LOCATION 1327 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE INTERIOR PAINTED COMPONENTS LOCATION SIDE COMPONENT CONDITION COLOR READING mg/cm Living All Baseboards Fair White 6.1 - Laundry Laundry A Door Frame Fair White 7.4 Exterior C Door Frame Fair White 3.6 - Laundry Laundry All Window Sashes & Frames Fair White 7.7 Bed 2 All Baseboards Fair White 1.1 Bed 2 B Door & Frame Fair White 1.5 Bed 2 C Door Frame Fair White 1.2 Bed 2 A Closet Door & Frame Fair White 1.5 Bed 2 Dl -3 Window Sashes & Frames Fair White 3.6 Bath 2 1 A Wall Fair Tan 4.6 INTERIOR CERAMI TILE COMPONENTS LOCATION SIDE COMPONENT CONDITION COLOR READING mg/cm2 Living B Fireplace Intact Brown 24 Dining A Fireplace Intact Green 12.7 EXTERIOR RESIDENCE PAINTED COMPONENTS LOCATION SIDE COMPONENT CONDITION COLOR READING mg/cm Exterior All Wood Walls Defective Cream 1.3 Exterior A Porch Ceiling Fair Cream 12 Exterior A Porch Column Fair Cream 11 Exterior A Porch Beam Fair Tan 9.8 Exterior C Door Frame Defective Tan 1.7 Exterior All Eaves Fair Cream 1.7 Exterior All Fascia Fair Brown 2.7 Exterior A3 -5 Window Components Defective Tan 4.5 Exterior B1 -9 Window Components Fair Tan 4.7 Exterior C1 -5 Wood Window Components Defective Tan 2.6 Exterior D1 -5 Wood Window Com onents Defective Tan 3.3 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 2 LABORATORY RESULTS 10/08/2012 NON 11:01 PAX ®002 /O0a AmedSci Los Angeles e ♦ 24418 S. Main Street, Ste 300 Casson, A11 ilE son, California 90745 ` e TEL: (310) 034 -4880 • FAX (310) 834 -4772 V Amerm dab N; 412101123 Date Received: 10/05/12 Lead Analysts Results Data Analyzed: 10/08!12 Dust Wipes BPA Method 3050Bl7000B Lead Tech Environ=Mtel Carlsbad, CA Job Site: 1327 S. New Hampshire; RJA Antbt0dp ©last Sample Arta Lead Coolant 412101123 Number Imathm (m1 (Pohl! - - - 01 I Entry Floor 1 14 02 2 Kitchen Flow t <10 03 3 Bad 2 Floor t <10 04 4 Bed 2 D2 Window Sill 0.17 96 as 5 Parch Floor 1 31 06 6 AS Window Well 0.17 340 I I Amend Neporikv Limit to 10 u9 pdor to anydllutlons due to ho snayte concentrations of mfi t Intederenaes. Ammdlid dose not cared sample (douse by the RavkwW by: blank value A0 snoyucal batch date met quaky control ardana unlade otherwise noted. Coll FLAP No, 2322. A114A lab No. 100080. ^ HID OuIdelMea furdustwkms are: Analysed b)p - 40 u0tll 2 for some, 260UgW for lndwtrrvAndowdte ,400upl82 for lntedorWridow Minh Phung, Chemist ' ELAP No: CA 2322 Pape 1 of 1 Boston a Los Angeles • Now York • Richmond 10/0912012 TUB 13:dp PAR ®002/004 AMEm SCI AmertSci Job fit 412101122 AmerlSel Los Angeles 24416 G. Mehl Street, Ste 300 Carson, C611fomla 80746 TEL: 1310) 0344065 - FAX' (310) &94.4772 Lead Analysis Results solm/5i oil 13PA Method 3050B/7000B DateReedwd: 10705/12 Date Anolyxoll: 10/09/12 Lead Tech Environmental Carfebad, CA Job Sitc: 1327 S. New Hampshire; WA AmerlSdS Cbaat Semple LeadCoatmt 412101122 Number L40141001 % (mom -Pl 01 7 Drip Line Sail A Side 010022 22 02 S Drip Line Solt B Side 0101 100 MwEd Repairing ama 10 20 myllg Odor to any d0us" due to high arroyo, concmv66 ot; or mabll interferences. AMWW dries not mrract *whale mule by the b e jr ' blmA Value. All analytical batch data mat quality 00" cdtada uMen athwMse rated. CA FLAP No. 2322. AINA Lab No. 100750. _ 0 400 mgag ran hlgb4onteclplay are*9, 1,000 MWk9 for low-e cl aeaa. Analysed by: . - L - Mlnh Phung. Chemist FLAP N0: CA 2322 Pago 1 of 1 Boston • Los Angeles # New York a lilchmand 10/06/2012 MON 11:02 PAX Asbestos, Lead Analysis Chain of Custody A ME / RISCI a Joe & .J wwiv.■mmisd.00m 1 L 0004 /004 AM ERISm LOS ANGELES 24418 8 Main St. suite 308 Carson, CA 9074$ Phone(310)&144W PeX(310) 834.4772 Asbestos, Environmental Chemistry and Miorobidlogy Ana�is Boston Los Angeles New York 1Liohmond Page _of —4 I PRAIT! �Wa2mm Asbestos, Environmental Chemistry and Miorobidlogy Ana�is Boston Los Angeles New York 1Liohmond Page _of —4 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 3 FLOOR PLAN 9327 S New Hampshire Ave. Los Angeles, CA. 90006 Interior Floor Plan 9 st Floor Lead Tech Environmental 2348 Camino Robledo Carlsbad, CA. 92009 WDA WD WD WD WD�'I WD Liv Rm Entry WD WID, WD WD , Bed 2 Din Rm ,VYD WD �WD p AL� Bath 1 tain WD I� I� Kitchen r WD AL Bed 1� WD' WD Laundry WD AL WD WD C 1327 S New Hampshire Ave. A Los Angeles, CA. 90006 W Interior Fluor Plan 2nd Floor ,I II Bed ? i D -� WD J Hall Bath .3 Lead Tech Environmental 2348 Camino Robledo C Carlsbad, CA. 92009 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 4 FIELD DATA LU W J W (D a F- y p 0rj) -J LLJ Z J OjLU z� zWz 5 z O aaCc a� pQ LSK ?�O mZU Qua w CIJ c s) J �-z J z z W m z O W N S LO W f ( 0 r W r Q O H WH O Z W W KV Qm w O O O . Oi G C O C O O O C O N O C O C O G C O w r W r W r_ W r_ W r w r w r w r w r_ w r Z 3 W r w r W r W r W r W r W r w r w c°i x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 0 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 a x 3 _r x 3 m r w w z W > w > w > w > w > W > w > W > w > w > W > > W > W > W > W > W > W > W > W > W > W > a a a a Q a ¢¢¢ a a a a a a a a Q a a y °a O W W w U' W w W W w w W W w W w m O w w U' w w W U' w W w O w w w O w W w U' W 'z z z z z z z z z z a z z z z z z IZ z z z Z O ZO U U U U U U U U U U U U U U F F ¢ ir z ¢ ¢ ¢ s s ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z - Z Z Z Z LL LL LL LL Z Z 2 LL LL LL Z Z z 2 Z Z LL w m r w w w w w w w w w w I ? r M r m r y r M r M O O m O O O ° O O O W ° O O O m O r M r M r M r U w r y O O W a a m a a O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 J O 3 O 3 O 3 J J J g J J O 3 I P i m a a m P m Z z z W co W W Z a w Z a LU O CL K C 0 O o Q LL w V z W g U 3 U V o w 0 0 z J W O O O J J J J O ] W 3 3 3 3 o Q m O °° O Q 2 C LL Z 3 Z 3 Z 3 Q 3 ¢ 3 a 3 Q 3 O a v w m m O C7 C7 (7 C9 m (7 c7 C7 (7 (9 (7 c7 C7 c7 z w z w z w z w z w z w z w K - z z z z z z z z z z z z z z J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y W H a ii m o° ¢ o U o m m N `a a N m a m o m ¢ m ca W J W O Fa p0� W Z J O LU O z w Z z O aa� a� wig UFO co z Q1 a w N CO) y -j r - J F- Z W 2 Z O 2 N w x '" W U) F- W ° x as � w ° >o N O O N cl O V M N O O M N M N V O O O O O O G O C O O G O O O i O O O O O O O O O 3 3 r 3 r 3 r 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m 3 3 3 3 3 3 m 3 m 3 m W w W w W W W W W W w w W w w w w w w w w w w W > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z LL LL w LL LL LL LL LL ? Z z z z z LL U D I LL LL LL LL w LL O w LL O w LL O m m z z z O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 w J H H M g F H 0 g M g F m g m g 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 crxmw O a a LL O a O a a LL O a a LL O a W a z O 0 0 Z W z m O z 3 Z W z a 0 z 3 z m zz 3 m OF W O o 3 3 3 � 3 zo:co J o 0 LL O y m O a w O 0 LL O 0 Z w z a O Z 3 w m M W z m 0 cc m W E y Z z z z z z ' Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y J a S J a S J a 2 J a S J a S J a 2 J a 2 J a S J a S a 2 J S fA y y N J a 1 4 a 1 0 0 0 m o m a m 1 0 a a a a v` 0 U) w J W �a y � ( O L� Z O zUJ z z O aa� CL Lu �° m z U aN wCl) J � Z J F- z W 2 z O Z N W I S � wvi° aGH w ° O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O fD z m W 3 W 3 w 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 w 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 W 3 z w z=_= 0 w F 3 W F 3 W F 3 W H x 3 w F x 3 W H x 3 W F x 3 w w w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w W w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W O 0 Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a z z z z z z a w LL O LL LL w LL LL z z z ? LL LL ? LL ? ? LL LL LL LL LL LL LL w w w w w w w w w w O o 3 m a m a y g a m a m 8 a O 0 3 O 0 3 O 0 3 O 0 3 O 0 3 O O 0 3 O O 0 3 O O 0 3 O O o 3 W J F O O o 3 F y g a F m o. H y 3 a H m 3 a W g a O O o 3 eG W s J Q 3 J Q 3 J Q 3 J Q 3 z J o m a 0 W y m a LL �a C O o a I a6 R O 0 a LL of K O 0 x Q N 30 w 0 z a 3 LL O J z 3 O v H z N ? I- J m a w m (� z J v W O g a W LL N J J 3 W 3 J J 3 J J 3 J J 3 J J 3 C7 z J v N O a °m W m m w (D z a z 0 z a z (D z U' z U' z a z 0 z U' z U' z 0 z (D z U' z 0 z U' z 0 z 0 z z 0 z 0 z 0 z M a m o o < a o 0 m ¢ o o a a m o 'o a It rn w J W 0 �a 0 � W 0 L LU O b. -•o zLUz z O ¢ate a2 04.. W20: �O mZU aNa W J CO ? J F- z W m z O s Z N W r S Lf) W U I-W� Q D H l l A 0 a V m n n o m o N m a r m m N m a m m o n ai ei v c c c o 6 6 o c c o o ° 6 6 6 6 W W W W W w W w W w w w W W W W W W W W a x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x a x x x X 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w > W w W W W > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1- a F co t a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a m m m U' U' U' W' U' U' U' U U' W O O O O O w W w W W w W W w w W W w W W W W W W W w W W Z a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a rc z rc z x a a a a x x x x x x a a z a a a Z LL LL LL LL LL Z Z Z Z LL W LL LL LL LL LL Z LL Z Z z w w w w w O O O O O F F F F F O O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ O O O O O O O O y m y m y O O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w 2 V) w w w w HI eC Q W W w ° d W W w 1 Z 0 C C w W W N w H m w K ❑ 2 2 O a O O O a s r y y O O U O O U U a w O O ❑ LL w O O O W W co Luwo Z p O O Z Z Q Z Q O O Z O O O Z Z °c 0 a a a a W Q O O LL 0 3 3 LL 3 w 3 3 3 3 o m❑❑ o U 3 U LL U 3 3 'z z z a rc 0 ❑ O O O O O Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y z z z z z z s z z z z z W W0: z m m m m > > > 7 > > F d_❑ ❑ O z z z z z z z z z z z 5 5 5 5 5 W W W W W W W W W W W W m m m m N N J N r J Q U Q m U a m U ❑ Q Q Q a a a O a co w J W 0 Fa � OjLU ;= O zwz 5 z = O ¢ate ag wia Cl) ?�O mz a tia w�� J � ? J z Z W 2 z O Z N W 2 � W (4) CD H w � a Lij GH W O >0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 ai a o 0 0 m W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 w ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 w ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 z a r W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 W ~ x 3 3 O m m 3 O m m Q W m 0 Q W m 0 Q W m 0 Q w m O Q w z¢ O z r L U > W > W > U J > L U > L U > W W W W W W w ] w > w > w > w > W W W W W W w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 z z z z z z a a a a a a z z z z z d d d a a a r z m LL LL m LL W LU O a z a z F z F z m < m LL F z F z F< z z a z W O W O W O W 0 m LL m LL w w w w w w w w 0 O 3 r a r < a r < a r < a r < a 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 r < a r < a r < a 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 0 O 3 w f Z O O z mm 0 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 3 (7 z w o m m a O m a m W f m LL eti c o W K LL O o 0 LL ad m0 O p r N ° O w w ¢ m 3 m a 2 z rc 3 a J a 3 J a 3 J a 3 J a 3 Q 0 a Q m m 0 0 J a 3 J a 3 J a 3 J a 3 (7 z J W U U 0 a z 7 J O U U 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 M w N W N W N W N w N W N W N W N W N W N W N x ¢ N S Q N 2 Q N x Q N x Q N x Q W X W X W X W X W x WW r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w w w w w w a m 0 o J Q m 0 0 0 a m 0 0 w J W 0 �a co (/) w O ~-7 O Z LU Z Z O Q ag LuX Wx 4 ? : O m Lu ana W Cl) z J r ? J H 2 W 2 Z O x Z N W r 2 � W CO) H W pK Q 0 F w�p m o w 7 n M r O o o m 7 n m m m m in Ol O O C C G G O N V m Z a r z Q r m z a r Z a r z a r z a r z a r z O m m O w m g W m U f W m U f� W m U W m U z O m m Z H Z F Z F Z F W > O a > W z > W z > W z W > O a > W z > W z > W z > W z W > m a W > m 0 a W > m a W > m a W > m m W > m m W > 0 a W > 0 a W > m a > > > > > > m LL m LL m LL U w p U a LU O m LL U w p r U Q ? U w p LL m LL m LL m LL m LL U L p m IaL U LL p LU m LL 00 3 o 3 o 3� F o 3 o 3 o 3� w o 3 o 3 o 3 o 3 o 3 o 3 o 3 o 3 00 3 00 3 w w W 0 0 a O O Z m n Q m O o m 0 m W m W K w m O m W m K p p m Q a m U m o J U O m m O U m O m W m W Q W W Q W W Q W W Q W Q Q a W Q m 0 CO) Z C 3 u , W ¢ m O W Z K 3 a Z m N O Z O W a 0 a 3 atl Z m N O Z W O Q o LL 3 atl m 0 m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m O m 0 m O m O m O C xWW W K W W K w w C W W C W W 5 w E W W K W W K W w C W w C FXW W K W w C VF W K W w C W w K FXW W C C a a o o l a l ea a 1 0 a I ca p p J a¢ m W m m o ID 0 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 5 bi l a Is y/l ul% .lWA St" 0fCaMMM&—HM1th sits Horrors Smw-sa A9arcy LEAD WIZARD EVALUATION REPORT SM"M I – D0111,01' Land "dMird EvWuldligbig, G&fifdMkaCifgWffM11GlFUi3llG Heats Sevillm 2 – TWO of Lad H=rd EnjuggW (th am bola only) Laid KvWW FI:Sh astlesurent 8 11111 1111 im 3 – SDUCWM WhM LOW Hazard E10111111atlDn Was CorducM of ft�m Ug,4AR buldrig I _ _ sdWW or aaymn: KY" I No _j 09 W_. Ljooggimnim 01110111111111 01 SWISM0411 01 bagilne"tgavit 1W WnW parson) Tallill n urnher 2 2 Zp ca� --n 0 – MeBURS Of Land Matendi egdjbgdjb, (.hk all MW apply) No MWbsod pagint detected 'red wad-baud pairn dgyntew 1306a*-.6t ea"auapmidoow N ggWWg%1Z=&deWCW 111anhMd ckA�gaurjd �:]LeddlC on"'n" � � SOP 10 " 9 "90 1 1 6 kulmdual Condw-ung L®d Hazard E Steven Denzier 760-634-3700 p stow ZIP Guilt 2348 Camino Robledo Carlsbad CA -92009 1261 f iM_ai;n aTp — H Rolando Mireles (21624) Sligictlan 7 –ARM* mda A ."UndatiOnciRS 11111 TOrsketuh0fthe soucture load-Daud pant: '*Azk'D " SPeWc bcMMS Of each lead harem M Presence of B Each W" Mild-hod. devxe, and sampli Mw &,. u C. A![ Cala ccigectggd. 1-duMg gamily control guta. labcrMlY nftK including lggb=gbrV num. address and phg:ne nut. Fag Wigy am aftgdeanams "kno ny inso"or 7h1d espy Wk ino aftwh"nbt) Iftigiled or gated to SOMW CWy and aftwhznta Meift Zy 0.fim, Glghlftggrepanmern PuMoMulth CMWMW Load Potswing go h n Bweh Papnrfa SW M&&A Salf Parkw", AWW q R Thim Flow Ftenrnand. CA 946044403 F": isio) eag-SM :gneh and LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 6 INSPECTOR CDPH CERTIFICATION State of Califomia Department of Public Health Lead.Rblated Eaoirafge Construction Tvee CerUrmate gm APPENDIX 5 SAMPLE ASBESTOS REPORT 18 LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL ASBESTOS SURVEY 11803 SLATER STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90059 OWNER: ARTURO GONZALEZ PREPARED FOR: MARGARET JAMERSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION HOUSING DEVELOPMENT & PRESERVATION 2 CORAL CIRCLE MONTEREY PARK, CA 91755 PREPARED BY: LEAD TECH ENVIRONMENTAL 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO CARLSBAD, CA 92009 760- 634 -3700 MAY 10, 2012 LEAD E N V I R O N M E N T A L O � W P ROJE .�1 �L EDnm yM�.. �R JOSEPH SO O ASBESTOS CONSULTANT C'� -OSHA CMTMCATWO NO 92 -0402 S. PACIFIC AVE, STE 202, SAN PEDRO, 1 A 90731 11 PH: (310) 831 -2479 FAX (310) 831 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PAGE PAGE PAGE 4 PAGE PAGE SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION 3. LIMITED AREAS SAMPLED FOR ASBESTOS 4. SAMPLING PROTOCOL 5. ANALYTICAL METHOD 6. DEFINITION OF ASBESTOS 7. CLASSIFICATIONS OF ASBESTOS MATERIALS 8. ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SAMPLED MATERIALS 9. LABORATORY RESULTS 10. RECOMMENDATIONS 11. REGULATIONS CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM AND LABORATORY RESULTS FLOOR PLAN REGULATIONS LIMITATIONS OF SURVEY CERTIFICATIONS 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760 - 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lead Tech Environmental (LTE) performed an asbestos survey of a single family residence located at 11803 Slater Street, Los Angeles, CA. ( "Residence "). The asbestos survey was performed by Matthew Kanbara, a certified site surveillance technician (CAL /OSHA 04 -3610) on May 3, 2012. Joseph Somoye, a California OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant reviewed and signed the report. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Residence was a one -story, Type V, wood frame structure built in 1927. It contained two bedrooms and one bathroom. Exterior building materials consisted of stucco walls, wood doors and wood and aluminum window components. Interior building materials consisted of plaster, vinyl and wood walls, and wood door components. Floors consisted of vinyl and carpet For clarification, Section 2 contains a floor plan of the Residence's interior and exterior. AREAS SAMPLED FOR ASBESTOS LTE sampled Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (SACM) in the Residence for asbestos content. LTE took a total of twenty -one (21) bulk samples of suspect asbestos - containing building materials from the interior plaster walls, acoustic ceilings, vinyl flooring, exterior stucco walls, roof penetration mastic, roof asphalt shingles. Please be advised that these were the only areas LTE sampled for asbestos. The list of bulk samples and their locations are documented on a chain of custody form that is contained with the laboratory results in Section 1. MATERIALS SAMPLED TESTING POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS • Vinyl floor tile; • Roof penetration mastic. 1. INTRODUCTION Lead Tech Environmental (LTE) performed an asbestos survey of a single family residence located at 11803 Slater Street, Los Angeles, CA. ( "Residence "). The asbestos survey was performed by Matthew Kanbara, a certified site surveillance technician (CAL /OSHA 04 -3610) on May 3, 2012. Joseph Somoye, a California OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant reviewed and signed the report. 2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Residence was a one -story, Type V, wood frame structure built in 1927. It contained two bedrooms and one bathroom. Exterior building materials consisted of stucco walls, wood doors and wood and aluminum window components. Interior building materials consisted of plaster, vinyl and wood walls, and wood door components. Floors consisted of vinyl and carpet For clarification, Section 2 contains a floor plan of the Residence's interior and exterior. 3. AREAS SAMPLED FOR ASBESTOS LTE sampled Suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (SACM) in the Residence for asbestos content. LTE took a total of twenty -one (2 1) bulk samples of suspect asbestos - containing building materials from the interior plaster walls, acoustic ceilings, vinyl flooring, exterior stucco walls, roof penetration mastic, roof asphalt shingles. Please be advised that these were the only areas LTE sampled for asbestos. The list of bulk samples and their locations are documented on a chain of custody form that is contained with the laboratory results in Section 1. 4. SAMPLING PROTOCOL LTE inspected the materials that will be disturbed during rehabilitation pursuant to the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) 40 CFR Ch. I Section 763.86 page 654. For friable surfaces defined in item 6. 1, this protocol requires taking at least 3 samples from each homogenous area that is 1,000 sq /ft or less; 5 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 1,000 sq /ft but less than 5,000 sg1W; and 7 samples from each homogenous area that is greater than 5,000 sq /8 . For non friable suspect ACM, LTE takes 3 samples of each homogenous material which would include drywall, vinyl, plaster, stucco, roof mastic, etc. 5. ANALYTICAL METHOD Upon completion of the limited asbestos survey, our inspector completed chain-of- custody forms and sent same with bulk samples to the laboratory for bulk sampling analysis. Asbestos samples were sent to Envirolabs, for bulk sample analysis. Envirolabs is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) i1nder the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis. Bulk sample analysis was performed using Polarized Light Microscopy With Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) "Interim Method of Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples ", EPA Method 600/M4 -82 -020 and EPA Method 600/R- 93/116. The identification of asbestos fiber bundles is determined by the visual properties displayed when the sample is treated with various dispersion staining liquids. Identification is substantiated by the actual structure of the fiber and the effect of polarized light on the fiber, all of which is viewed by the trained laboratory technician. 6. DEFINITION OF ASBESTOS The EPA's Asbestos National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the local air pollution control district, define an asbestos - containing material as any material that contains a concentration of asbestos of greater than one percent ( >1.0 %) by area as determined by PLM (40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A, Subpart F Section 1). State worker protection laws, as set forth by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, define asbestos materials as those that contain greater than one- tenth of one percent ( >0.1 %) asbestos by weight (a.k.a., trace). To evaluate whether a "trace" material contains greater than 0.1 %, a test with a greater sensitivity, such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), would be required. 7. CLASSIFICATIONS OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS Following EPA inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material was placed in one of the following EPA classifications: 1. Surfacing Material: spray or trowel applied to building materials 2. Thermal System Insulation: materials generally applied to various mechanical systems 3. Miscellaneous Materials: any materials which do not fit either of the above categories NESHAPS further segregates asbestos - containing materials into Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM), Category 1 Non - Friable Materials, and Category II Non - Friable Materials, defined as follows: 1. Regulated Asbestos - Containing Materials (RACM): Includes all friable asbestos materials, Category I Non - Friable ACM that has become friable, or will become friable, and Category II Non - Friable ACM that has a high probability of being crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation. 2. Category I Non - Friable ACM: Includes asbestos - containing packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering, ash asphalt roofing products that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. 3. Category II Non - Friable ACM: Includes all non - friable materials, excluding Category I Non - Friable ACM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure... 3 8. ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION OF SAMPLED MATERIALS 8.1 ASSESSMENT The first level of assessment for a material is to classify whether the material is friable or nonfriable. A friable material is one that is able to be broken, crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand - pressure. Most materials are easily determined as friable or not. While materials such as wallboard, joint compound, plaster and stucco in their finished state are classified as nonfriable, these same materials are often rendered friable when they are in a poor or damaged condition, or when they are involved in repair, renovation, or demolition activities. Some typically nonfriable materials also may become friable because of aging or deterioration, causing elements to separate from their binding agents. Visual inspection and physical handling are performed for all suspect materials to ensure proper friability classification. 8.2 CONDITION Once the friability of the material is determined, the material is assessed as to the condition of its present state. The assessment of a material considers factors such as damage, potential for disturbance, and estimated exposure potential. Suspect ACMs were assessed to be in good, damaged, or significantly damaged condition based on how their condition at the time of the survey related to the following: Good Condition - No or very limited visible damage or deterioration was observed. Damaged Condition - Crumbling, blistering, water damage, gouges, or other damage was observed over less than 25% of the materials (one -tenth if evenly distributed); or accumulation of suspect powder, dust or debris below the material was observed. Significantly Damaged Condition - 9. LABORATORY RESULTS Crumbling, blistering, water damage, gouges, or other damage was observed over greater than 25% of the material (one -tenth if evenly distributed); material is delaminating or showing adhesive failure; or accumulation of suspect powder, dust or debris below the material was observed. POSITIVE FOR ASBESTOS Asbestos was present in quantities greater than one percent ( >1 %) in representative bulk samples in the following materials: DESCRIPTION LOCATION SAMPLES COLLECTED ASBESTOS CONTENT FRIABLE CONDITION SIZE SQ /FT Vinyl Floor Bathroom #7 35% No Good 36sq ft Tile 12x12 Kitchen #8 200 sq ft Brown Roof Roof # 19 3% No Good <10 sq ft Penetration Mastic -Black NEGATIVE FOR ASBESTOS The followin bulk samples tested negative for asbestos: DESCRIPTION LOCATION SAMPLES ASBESTOS CONDITION COLLECTED CONTENT Interior Plaster Living #1 None Detected Good Walls -Beige Hall #2 Kitchen #3 Acoustic Den #4 None Detected Good Ceiling #5 #6 Vinyl Floor Tile Closet next to #10 None Detected Good 12x12 -Beige Kitchen 911 #12 Exterior Stucco Exterior #13 None Detected Good Walls -Pink Residence # 14 #15 Roof Shingles Roof #16 None Detected Good Dark Brown #17 #18 10. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the laboratory results from Envirolabs and our field observations, special precautions must be observed when/if the bathroom and kitchen vinyl floor tile and roof penetration mastic are disturbed as they contain asbestos. If these materials will be disturbed during the rehabilitation program, the requirements are as follows: BATHRO AND KITCHEN VINYL FLOOR TILE AND ROOF PENETRATION MASTIC • Removal of asbestos containing materials should only be performed by California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) certified asbestos contractors and workers under the supervision of a DOSH Certified Site Surveillance Technician or a DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant. • The surfaces should be misted to reduce airborne particulates. • The licensed asbestos contractor and workers must set up proper containment and utilize all necessary equipment for both removal and cleanup such as negative air machines, HEPA vacuums, etc. Moreover, they need to abide by all pertinent OSHA regulations and wear all necessary personal protective equipment. • Asbestos contractor must notify the SCAQMD 10 business days prior to perforrtiing the abatement if he /she will remove or disturb more than 100 sq /ft • Asbestos contractor must also notify OSHA at least 1 day before abatement. • All the ACM must be placed in double bag 6 -mil polyethylene sheeting. • These materials must be transported and disposed of pursuant to all appropriate regulations of the Department of Transportation, EPA, etc. • The contractor should provide the owner and or city representative with a copy of the completed waste manifest. In accordance with the EPA's NESHAPs 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, and South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 1403, all Regulated Asbestos - Containing Materials (RACM), Category I /Class I Non - Friable and Category HIClass II Non - Friable ACMs that may become friable, must be removed prior to demolition activities. In addition to asbestos regulations that control the release of asbestos to the ambient environment, state worker protection laws are applicable. Federal and State OSHA regulations outline specific work practices for handling ACMs. All contractors on the project site should be knowledgeable about the presence and proper handling of asbestos so that the risk of accidental exposure or contamination is minimized. 11. REGULATIONS Federal Regulations relevant to asbestos include 40 CFR 61 which discusses emissions; 29 CFR 1926.58 and 29 CFR 1926.1101 provides regulations for construction work and asbestos abatement procedures and 40 CFR 763 (AHERA) which was promulgated for schools in California but whose sampling protocol is the standard in the industry. Lastly, Section 5208 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations details the proper procedures for asbestos work. A detailed list of pertinent asbestos regulations is contained in Section 2. SECTION 1 CHAIN OF CUSTODY & LABORATORY RESULTS 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760- 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 5059507 A58E5T05 ANALV515T Enviralabs 02:21:28 p.m. OS -07 -2012 13116 FILM BULK ASBESTOS REPORT Reference sl: Customer Supplied Envlmlabslne P. 2012201 CLIENT: Lead Tech Environmental Attn: Steve Denzler 9Ha Address: CDC 2348 Camino Robledo 11803 Slater Street Carlsbad, CA 92009 Los Angeles, CA 90059 0 of Samples: Dab Received: 5/42072 Bah Analyzed: 5/72012 METHODOLOGY: 'Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples' EPA 800111,14.82 -020 ACCREDITED: National Institule of Standards and Technology (NVLAP Lab Code #200735 -0) LAB ID 0 t DETAILS TOTAL %ASBEST Location: Living RcomSoulh Wall Description: Plaster Wall NAD CLIENT ID / SWidl Grainy, Battle lle Material Asbestos Type: Ot Material: Cellulose, Granular Minerals, CaYareous Malone, LAB ID / DETAILS 2 Location: Halbveyal Bathrotxn TOTAL %ASBESTC Description: Plaster Wall NAD CLIENT D / Solid/ Gra Hy, Baps ps Maoris/ Nbsates Type; OIMr MateMl: CAllulaes, GrenWer Minerals, Calcareoos MotoriLAeID/ it S Loudon: ldkhon TOTAL % ASSESTO Description: Plaster Will NAD CLIENT ID # SolidlGrain , B 3 Y ps M aterial Asbestos Typr. LAB 10 / Dow Material: Cellulose, Gramrlr Minerva. Cakateous Materiel 4 Location: Den DETAILS TOTAL % ASBESTOE ONMptlen; Acoustic Cooing NAD CLIENT D / Solid. White Material 4 Asbestos Type: Other Material: CeuWo". Cekvaouo Mansial LAB ID / DETAILS a Locadon: Dan TOTAL %ASBESTOS Description: Acpuetic Ceding NAD CLIENT D / Solid, White Malorial S Asbestos Type: Other Matedal: Ceeulose, Caturarls Metarlal LAB ID a DETAIL4 a Location: Den TOTAL %ASBESTOS Description: Acoustic Ceiling NAD CLIENT ID / Sditl. White Material a Asbestos Type: Pg1DO S059S47 7 ENT ID a 7 ID a S NT ID a a IDs e YT ID N 0 Da 10 IT ID a 10 )a N T IDs 11 iN 12 - IDS 12 a 13 IDS 13 F 14 ID a 14 ASBESTOS ANALVSIST Envirolabs Location: Bathroom Dgwlpllon: 12X12 VFT -Brown Solid, Black Material Asbestos Type: Other Material: Calcareous Birders Mabdal DETAILS Location: Kitdm Dasadption: 12X12 VFT -Brown Sold Fibrous. 1361961 white! Dark Brown Malarial Asbestos Type: ChsyaMila ASbesbs OMw Mabdal: Cakarems Birders Ltaledal DETAILS Location; Xitchan DacrlPtion: 12X12 VFT-Brown Soled, Whw Dart Brown Material Asbestos Type: Other Mater W: Calcaroous Slyd6ra Mabdal DETAILS L -110n: Closet Ned to Kllchen OescrlPOOm 12X12VFT -Beige Patlems Solid, While, Material Asbestos Type; Ober Material: Calcareous Rhoden Matedal DETAILS Location: Closet Nero to IOMhen Descdption: 12X12 VFT -Beige Patbme Solid. White kAsub t AsWatoa Type; Othw Matwlel: Calcaraws Binders Malerid DETAILS Location: Closel Nest b IOhdien Description: 12X12 VFT -Bel9s Patlems Solid. White Materi l Asbestos Type: Othw Matadal: Calcareous Blndere Maeral DETAILS Location: Exterior Description: sh¢m walla S6Iiw Grainy. Pink Material Asbestos Type: Othw Me It* Granular Miswwc Calcareous M.WW DETAILs Location: Emew D"cdptlon: Sturm Wass Soadl Greirry. Pink Mabdal Aahntos Type; 02:21:47 p,m. 05 -07 -2012 NAD TOTAL %ASBESTOS 35% NAD TOTAL %ASBESTOS NAD TOTAL %AS NAD 0 CG1S7 %AS MAD Pg2 013 14/16 S059S47 ASBESTOS ANALYSIST EnvlrOlabs 02:22:04 p.m. OS -07 -2017 15 Lee"*": Ealakr ------ TOTAL %ASBESTOS Description: Stucco Wens NAO :DENT ID i Grainy. ry. Plnk Material Asbestos type: OthorMetadw- GranWir Minerals, Calcareous Mrdaral AB ID i Is DETAILS Locallaw Roo! TOTAL%ASBESTOS Description: Roof Shingle, NAD L LENT w x SOU& Fibrous. Dark BrowN Brown Materal 18 Asbestos Type: Otlwr Material: Celluloes, Giese Fiber, Aaphae, Granksar kewx Mineal, Calcareous Mabral f7 Locanon: ROOF DETAILS — TOTAL %ASBESTOS Description: Roof Shingles NAD .TENT w x Solid! Fibrous. Derr Browry Brown Meters, 17 AebeaMa Type: A ID i Other Material: CelluI03% Glass Fiber, Asphalt, Grara,lar Mineral, Calosreous MaNewl -- 1S DETAIL8 LOC Root TOTAL % ASOES709 Description: Roof Shkplu ]� NAD TENT ID x S011,11 Fibrnw, Dark Srownd &man Malarial 18 Aslleslos Type; B IDI Other Material Ce0ulm, GNU Fiber. As hall, Granular Mineral, Cakers%M Material 1O DETAILS Leostion: Roof TOTAL %ASBESTOS Descdption; Penaoa6on Mud, 3% ENT ID x Solid. Black Mastic Meltable, 19 Asbestos Type: Cn ryollMMbssles Other MaterlM: Binders Me1erN 1ID i 20 DETAILS Location: Roof TOTAL %ASBESTOS Description: Penetration mask NABS ENT wi Solid. Black Mesllt Material 20 Asbestos Type; Dow Material: lo 21 Locetlpn: Roof DETAILS TOTAL%ASSESTOS Description: Penetration Mask NAPS NT ID Y Said. Slaea Mastic Malarial 21 Asbestos Type: Other Matadal; apodbq NOhe: s1 %•ereslar lean l% NAIPSa No1Arulyse4(poshive&0 p e1% • lees Than NA = Not Analysed 1% NAD = No Asbestos Detected ( <1,0%) iComments:•PerClmm Mgt CC 40 An alysis Is Performed on ALL ssmpNs. _ SOM12 - "�'++•.vwwmma r. aramyryq rpny. ��n ae a.ace¢ IM npo�muYNprMnpolvM <rrea •,r W .mme ryyr by Ervmaa.ac rbn npwrm.lNGT M coq by W nenr acld+n pmumaawsemarr by brl p a.ny eR aaercy N ar U. a GOwlmwdl. _ Urarr eaV•Y toter, all meMwa[e.wemda alemrpneow coca -Real En d Qw,. r b. Ma rate) IS /16 2 Pg3of3 .SO59547 ASBESTOSANALYSIST Envlrolabs 02:12:25 p.m. 05 -07- 2012 16116 ADVANCED AMERICAN LABORATORIES CHAIN - OF - CUSTODY BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST UTILIZING POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY IYSPECHON DATE: 5/3172 CLIENT: PRO4F.('E"'IF.: II g. D -� PAGE , OF / 11026 \'rglurx DIIU. ti0ile I7, 5mdix ('ity, C114r11q 91604.3.%S (818)761 -4712 F,\ \1818)505947 E- MAIL: AALABSa,%oL- -(-(MI SECTION 1 FLOOR PLAN 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760 - 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 11803 S. SLATER STREET Lead Tech Environmental LOS ANGELES, CA 90059 A 2348 Camino Robledo FLOOR PLAN Carlsbad. CA 92009 U Bed 21T I� G] [f- SECTION 3 REGULATIONS 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760 - 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 1. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Publications: 29 CFR 19 10. 1001 Occupational Exposure to Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite 29 CFR 1910.1101 Asbestos 29 CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communication 29 CFR 1910.20 Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records 29 CFR 1910.132 General Requirements Personal Protective Equipment 29 CFR 1910.133 f T811AR [1X1IK1 29 CFR 1910.145 Eye and Face Protection Respiratory Protection Specifications of Accident Prevention, Signs and Tags 29 CFR 1926.58 29 CFR 1926.1101 40 CFR 61, Subpart A Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite General Conditions 40 CFR 61, Subpart M National Emission Standards for Asbestos 40 CFR 61.152 Standard for Waste Disposal for Manufacturing, Demolition, Renovation, Spraying and Fabrication Operations 2. Title 8 California Code of Regulations (CCR): Section 5208 General Industry Safety Orders Section 5144 Respirator Regulations 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District: Rule 1403 Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760- 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 In addition, the following publications are of use in providing information on asbestos issues: 1. American National Standard Institute (ANSI) Publications: Z9.2 -1979 Fundamentals Governing the Design and Operation of Local Exhaust Systems Z88.2 -1980 Practices for Respiratory Protection 2. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): Standard 90A Installation of Air Conditional and Ventilation Systems 3. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Publication No. Guidance for Controlling Asbestos - Containing 560/5 -85 -024 Materials in Buildings, June 1985 4. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Publications: E 849 -82 Safety and Health Requirements Relating to Occupational Exposures to Asbestos P -189 Specifications for Encapsulants for Friable Asbestos - Containing Materials 5. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Publications: Manual of Analytical Methods, 2 nd Ed., Vol. 1 Physical and Chemical Analysis Method (P &CAM): Method 239 Asbestos Fibers in Air Method 7400 Fibers (N 1, 3` Ed., Vol. 1) 6. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL) Publications: 586 -77 Test Performance of High Efficiency, Particulate, Air Filter Units (R1982) 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760 - 634 -3700 FAX 760- 634 -3703 SECTION 4 LIMITATIONS 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760 - 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 LIMITATIONS Conditions described in this report are as found at the time of investigation, unless otherwise stated. Lead Tech Environmental analyzed only the substances, conditions, and locations described in the report at the time indicated. No inferences regarding other substances, conditions, location, or time can be made unless specifically stated in this report. The survey and bulk sampling was limited to representative locations of the building(s) that were explicitly defined by the Client to be surveyed. Additional suspect materials and/or debris may be present in concealed or limited access spaces including, but not limited to, above - ceiling areas, within wall cavities, pipe chases, attics, and crawlspaces. Additional materials may be present below or behind equipment, beneath existing finishes and coverings, or below grade and will only be accessible during the course of partial or full renovation/demolition activities. Care should be exercised when accessing these areas. Any suspect environmentally - regulated materials (ERMs) encountered during the course of demolition/renovation activities that were not previously sampled, including ERMs not specifically addressed herein, should be presumed to be ACMs /ACCMs, LCMs, PCBs, universal wastes, ODSs, or other ERMs until sampled and proven otherwise. Quantities of materials expressed in this report are estimates only. For purposes of bid preparation, it is the Contractors' responsibility to observe and estimate the level of effort required to properly remove the requested asbestos containing building materials. This report is intended for the use listed in the section of this report titled "Introduction." The use of this report in any manner other than that listed in the Introduction requires the written consent of Lead Tech Environmental (LTE). This report must be presented in its entirety. The conclusions and recommendations presented above are based on the agreed upon scope of work outlined in the above report. LTE makes no warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of information obtained from information provided or compiled by others. It is possible that information exists beyond the scope of this investigation. Additional information, which was not found or available to LTE at the time of writing the report, may result in a modification of the conclusions and recommendations presented. This report is not a legal opinion. The services performed by LTE have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760- 634 -3700 FAX 760 -634 -3703 SECTION 5 CERTIFICATIONS 2348 CAMINO ROBLEDO, CARSLBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 PHONE 760- 634 -3700 FAX 760 - 634 -3703 State of California Division .of Occupational Safety and Health Cutifled SMe Survailla x* Tachalciait Mat thew K Kanbara Pry. Certification No. 044610 Expires on etu2on2 %a *ft rrYud dy dr MWm d OM PbW Sddyaad NO* r&*mdAW by &*M 7180 d* d M&I*M and Pmbsf= GA. State of California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Certified Asbestos Consultant Sos A S ommys NW. Certification No. 92'4402 Expires on _ 09I29H2 Tra to t*.Irw ".Is k die Mki'0 of u mpakul Sddy and 1rsti1" 50"n ty SWIM 7128 9 aa` d Ne id im and APPENDIX 6 SERVICE REQUEST FORM & ABATEMENT BID SHEET P q 0 a ) 0 3 _ k $ 2 ON 4 u \\ }/ \} }4 \� 2� u q et en j ] � § \ \ \ u j ) \ t ] \ o ® o ) I 2 3 9 E N V I R O N M E N T A L LEAD PAINT ABATEMENT BID SHEET The lead abatement scope of work for 10162 Laurel Canvon Blvd, Pacoima, CA is provided below. TASK LEAD PAINT SCOPE OF WORK ESTIMATED COST 1 Use lead safe work practices when prepping the paint on the $ lead positive components denoted on page 25 of the specification: Rafters 3 Waste Disposal $ (Hazardous and Non - hazardous) 4 Total Lead Abatement Cost $ The abatement company must be RRP licensed, and have an RRP certified supervisor. In addition, LTE suggests that the workers be certified by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) & must comply with current HUD Guidelines and CDPH Title 17. Proper containment and clean up is mandatory. The work areas must pass a lead clearance test. Any additional work or changes that the Contractor believes will enhance the competitiveness of their bid may be added as an addendum to this form. Please fill out all the following information: Company Name: Company Phone: Contact Person: Bid Date: Total Bid Amount: Estimated Abatement Time: I hereby agree to perform all lead based paint abatement work in compliance with the HUD Guidelines, CDPH Title 17 as well as any and all regulations governing lead abatement. Signature Technical Specifications for ACBMs and LB Abatement 10162 LAUREL CANYON BLVD. PACOIMA, CA 34 Primed on Recycled Paper %fir APPENDIX 7 PROOF OF INSURANCE Pill U1r7b111141� '``ll O CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE ° AT111161 ) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER 619 - 9083100 CONTACT NAME: Snapp & Associates 619. 908 -3110 Insurance Services, Inc. 438 Camino del Rio So. #112 San Diego, CA 92108 PHONE FAX AC No: EMAIL ADDRESS PRODUCER LEADT -1 CUSTOMER jolt, GENERAL LIABILITY INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED Lead Tech Environmental INSURER A: Endurance AmericanSpecialt 5 1,000,00 Steven Denzler 2348 Camino Robled Carlsbad, CA 92009 INSURER B: A INSURER C: X ECC10100708303 05/05112 INSURER D: MED EXP (Any one person) INSURER E: PERSONAL &ADV INJURY S 1,000,00 COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL &Ua POLICY OFF POUCYEXP TYPE OFINSURANCE PO ICYNUMBER L fMM1DDArYY7o LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE 5 1,000,00 PREMISES accurmrce S 50,00 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE Fx OCCUR X ECC10100708303 05/05112 05/05/13 MED EXP (Any one person) S 5,00 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY S 1,000,00 GENERAL AGGREGATE 5 2,000,00 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG S 2,000,00 POLICY PRO- LOC $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANV AUTD ECC10100708303 05/05/12 05/05/13 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (EA acciden0 5 1,DDD,DD BODILY INJURY (Per person) S ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) S SCHEDULED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) S X HIRED AUTOS X NON -OWNED AUTOS 5 5 UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE S EXCESSLIAB CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE 5 DEDUCTIBLE 5 5 RETENTION $ WO OTH- O R AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANDF1dPERS'LIILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETO"ARTNERIEXECUTIVE OFFICER /MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ NIA LIMIT S TORY LIMIT E.L EACH ACCIDENT 5 E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYE S (Mandatary in NH) If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 5 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A Professional Liab ECC10100708905 05155172 05/05/13 POIVProf 1,000,0 A Pollution ECC10100708303 05/05112 05/05113 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS! LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Addaion it Remarks Schedule, If more space is required) Re: Operations of the named insured subject to the terms and conditions of e policy- Certificate holder is named additional Insured per the attached rm. 10 days notice of cancellation In the event of nonpayment of premium/30 days notice of cancellation. CIROSE I Cityof Rosemead 8838 E Valley Blvd Rosemead„ CA 91770 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AU�UT- Hr�ORI RIIZZEE DDRREPREESSENTAA\T•IIVEE �^ /y ©1988 -2009 ACOF ACORD 25 (2009/09) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD reserved. Endurance Lead Tech Environmental Endorsement Number: 5 Automatic Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or Contractors This endorsement, effective 5/5/2012 attaches to and forms a part of Policy Number ECC101007083 -03. This endorsement changes the Policy. Please mad it carefully. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART CONTRACTORS POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: Any person(s) or organization(s) whom the Named Insured agrees, in a written contract, to name as an additional insured. However, this status exists only for the project specified in that contract. The person or organization shown in this Schedule is included as an insured, but only with respect to that person's or organization's vicarious liability arising out of your ongoing operations performed for that insured. FEI- 319 -ECC -0708