CC - Item 6D - Cost-Sharing Memorandum of Understanding Related to Load Reduction Strategy for the Rio Hondo River and Tributaries E M
s
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
KIJE STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JEFF ALLRED, CITY MANAGER 441
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2015
SUBJECT: COST-SHARING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
RELATED TO LOAD REDUCTION STRATEGY FOR THE RIO HONDO
RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
SUMMARY
Under the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, agencies are
mandated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to comply with the
Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements, as well as others (e.g. trash,
metal, etc.). Specifically, agencies in the tributary areas must develop and implement
strategies (known as Load Reduction Strategies [LRS]) to ensure that the maximum
limits of the E. coli bacterium in the Los Angeles River (LAR) will not be exceeded.
Rosemead has historically collaborated with other agencies on necessary efforts to
comply with the MS4 Permit requirements. Executing a cost-sharing MOU with the
County and other agencies for preparation of the Bacteria TMDL LRS document will
effectuate cost and time savings to Rosemead.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an
MOU with the County of Los Angeles and nine other cities for the development of a
Load Reduction Strategy for Compliance with Los Angeles River Bacteria TMDL.
DISCUSSION
The Los Angeles River Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was adopted by the
RWQCB in July 2010 and became effective on March 23, 2012. The LAR Bacteria
TMDL requires responsible parties to protect recreational uses in the Los Angeles River
watershed by meeting Waste Load Allocations (WLAs) for the indicator bacterium E.
coli. Parties are also encouraged to collaborate with each other and submit a
collaborative Load Reduction Strategy (LRS) planning document to meet their TMDL
requirements; and therefore, given additional time to comply (submit LRS document to
RWQCB by March 23, 2016). A LRS includes extensive monitoring and analysis to
ITEM NO. 6.D
APPROVED FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA:
City Council Meeting
October 13,2015
Page 2 of 2
determine a suite of actions that responsible parties must implement to achieve the
specified WLAs.
Traditionally, the City has opted to work in coalitions or regional approaches to
managing stormwater through participation in groups like the Coalition for Practical
Regulation, the Los Angeles Permit Group, regional monitoring activities for TMDL
compliance, and the recent Elected Officials and City Managers work group organized
through the California Contract Cities Association and the League of California Cities,
Los Angeles Division to study potential funding mechanisms. Through such
collaborative efforts, the City has realized cost and staff-time savings, as well as
benefits from other agencies experience/expertise.
Rosemead is located in the in Hondo sub-watershed contributing flows to the Rio Hondo
River, which is a tributary to the LAR. The attached MOU is related to development of a
LRS document for agencies contributing to the Rio Hondo River and/or its tributaries.
The agencies participating in this effort are L.A. County Unincorporated, L.A. County
Flood Control District, and the Cities of Alhambra, Montebello, Monterey Park, San
Gabriel, San Marino, South El Monte, South Pasadena, Temple City, and Rosemead.
The County, as the lead agency, has contracted with Paradigm Environmental to
conduct the monitoring activities and prepare the LRS document. The total cost of this
effort is proposed at $523,269.52; Rosemead's fair-share will be $37,502.46 (7.2%)
based its percentage of land in the tributary area. Participating in this joint effort will
ensure timely completion and submittal of the LRS document to the RWQCB by March
23, 2016, as well as effectuate cost and time savings to Rosemead.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The adopted Fiscal Year 2015-16 Annual Budget contains $180,000 for MS4 Permit
and stormwater management activities, which is sufficient to cover Rosemead's share
of the Bacteria TMDL LRS document cost.
Prepared by: Submitted by:
Sean Sullivan Anthony La
Public Works Manager Interim Public Works Director
Attachments:
1. Memorandum of Understanding
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, AND THE CITIES OF ALHAMBRA, MONTEBELLO,
MONTEREY PARK, PASADENA, ROSEMEAD, SAN GABRIEL, SAN MARINO,
SOUTH EL MONTE, SOUTH PASADENA, AND TEMPLE CITY
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING AMONG THE PARTIES
RELATED TO THE LOAD REDUCTION STRATEGY
FOR THE RIO HONDO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), made and entered into as of the date of
the last signature set forth below by and among the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
(COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of California, the LOS ANGELES
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (LACFCD), a body corporate and politic, and
the CITIES OF ALHAMBRA, MONTEBELLO, MONTEREY PARK, PASADENA,
ROSEMEAD, SAN GABRIEL, SAN MARINO, SOUTH EL MONTE, SOUTH
PASADENA, and TEMPLE CITY, municipal corporations. Collectively, these entities
shall be known herein as PARTIES or individually as PARTY.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (REGIONAL
BOARD) adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 (MS4 Permit); and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012, and
requires that the COUNTY, the LACFCD, and 84 of the 88 cities (excluding Avalon,
Long Beach, Palmdale, and Lancaster) within Los Angeles County to comply with the
prescribed elements of the MS4 Permit; and
• WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identified the PARTIES as MS4 permittees that are
responsible for compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements pertaining to the Los
Angeles River Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (LAR Bacteria TMDL) Resolution No.
R10-007; and
WHEREAS, the LAR Bacterial TMDL was adopted by the REGIONAL BOARD
on July 9, 2010 and became effective March 23, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the LAR Bacteria TMDL requires the responsible PARTIES to
protect recreational uses in the Los Angeles River watershed by meeting targets and
waste load allocations (WLAs) for the indicator bacterium E. coli; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to collaborate on the development of a
Load Reduction Strategy (LRS) for the PARTIES to comply with the LAR Bacteria
TMDL; and
Page 1 of 23
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have determined that hiring a consultant to develop
the LRS will be beneficial to the PARTIES, and the COUNTY, on behalf of the
PARTIES, agreed to retain and manage the consultant to assist in the development of
the LRS; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, on behalf of the PARTIES, has retained a consultant,
CDM Smith Inc. (CONSULTANT); and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT submitted a proposal to conduct non-stormwater
monitoring/screening and development of Bacteria Load Reduction Strategies for Rio
Hondo River and Tributaries dated June 1, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have approved the CONSULTANT's proposal, which
includes Tasks 1 through 5; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to pay the COUNTY the total amount
shown in Table 4 of Exhibit A for all Tasks, which includes a 5 percent administration
fee; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to have the COUNTY pay the
CONSULTANT to initiate Tasks 1 through 4 shown in Table 1 of Exhibit A of this MOU;
and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES will determine whether to initiate Task 5 shown in
Table 1 of Exhibit A of this MOU after the completion of Tasks 1 through 4 and have the
COUNTY pay the CONSULTANT the associated costs for Task 5; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY will reimburse the PARTIES who are not participating
in Task 5 their cost share shown in Table 3 of Exhibit A and will amend Table 3 to show
an updated cost share among the participating PARTIES; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY will reimburse all PARTIES their cost share shown in
Table 3 of Exhibit A if Task 5 is not initiated; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the
PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOU, the PARTIES agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this MOU.
Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOU is to cooperatively fund the
development of the LRS and to coordinate the payment between the COUNTY and the
PARTIES.
Section 3. Cooperation. The PARTIES shall fully cooperate with one another to
attain the purposes of this MOU.
Page 2 of 23
Section 4. Voluntary. This MOU is voluntarily entered into for the development of the
LRS.
Section 5. Term. This MOU shall become effective to each PARTY on the date that
PARTY signs this MOU, and shall remain in effect until (1) the COUNTY has provided
written notice of completion of the LRS, and (2) the COUNTY has received payment by
all PARTIES of their allocated pro-rata share hereunder.
Section 6. COUNTY AGREES:
a. Consultant Services. To manage the CONSULTANT and to be responsible for
coordinating the activities of the CONSULTANT. The COUNTY will be
compensated for the administration of the CONSULTANT contract at a rate of 5
percent of each PARTY'S contract cost as described in Exhibit A.
b. Invoice. To invoice the PARTIES for their share in the cost for the preparation
and delivery of the LRS, as described in Table 4 of Exhibit A. The one-time
invoice for the cost of all five Tasks will be sent upon the effective date of this
MOU, as set forth in Section 4, or in December 2015, whichever comes first.
c. Expenditure. To utilize the funds deposited by the PARTIES only for the
administration of the consultant contract and the development of the LRS.
d. Contingency. To notify the PARTIES if actual expenditures are anticipated to
exceed the cost shown in Exhibit A and obtain written approval of such
expenditures from all PARTIES. Upon approval, the PARTIES agree to
reimburse COUNTY for their proportional share of these additional expenditures
at an amount not to exceed 10 percent of the original cost estimate as shown in
Exhibit A. This 10 percent contingency will not be invoiced unless actual
expenditures exceed the original cost estimate. Expenditures that exceed the 10
percent contingency will require an amendment to this MOU.
e. Report. To provide the PARTIES with an electronic copy of the draft and final
LRS submittals and reports as submitted to the Regional Board within 5 business
days of receipt from the CONSULTANT.
f Accounting. To provide an accounting upon termination of this MOU. At the
completion of the accounting, COUNTY shall return any unused portion of all
funds deposited with COUNTY (including funds for Task 5 if not initiated by the
PARTIES) in accordance with the cost allocation formula set forth in Exhibit A.
g. Permit. To work with the CONSULTANT to obtain all necessary permits for
installation of permanent or temporary infrastructure, if needed; or modifications
to monitoring sites; and access within storm drains, channels, catch basins, and
similar properties (FACILITIES) during monitoring events and maintenance.
Page 3 of 23
Section 7. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE:
a. Payment. To pay the COUNTY for their proportional share of the estimated cost
for the development of the LRS and contract administration not exceeding the
invoice amounts as shown in Exhibit A, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the
invoice from COUNTY. The cost estimates presented in Exhibit A have been
agreed upon by the PARTIES and are subject to changes in the LRS pursuant to
new REGIONAL BOARD requirements and/or unforeseen challenges in the field.
Any such changes proposed to the PARTIES' proportional share are subject to
funding appropriation and will require written approval of the PARTIES as
explained in Section 6(d).
b. Documentation. To make a good faith effort to cooperate with one another to
achieve the purposes of this MOU by providing all requested information and
documentation in their possession and available for release to the
CONSULTANT that is deemed necessary by the PARTIES to develop the LRS.
c. Access. Each PARTY will allow reasonable access and entry to the
CONSULTANT, on an as needed basis during the term of this MOU, to the
PARTY'S FACILITIES to achieve the purposes of this MOU, provided, however,
that prior to entering any of the PARTY'S FACILITIES, the CONSULTANT shall
obtain all necessary permits and execute a Right-of-Entry Agreement and
provide written notice 72 hours in advance of entry from the applicable PARTY.
d. Task 5. To determine, after the completion of Tasks 1 through 4, whether to
initiate Task 5 shown in Table 1 of Exhibit A of this MOU. If any PARTIES agree,
in writing, to initiate Task 5, then the COUNTY will direct the CONSULTANT to
complete this task and COUNTY will pay the CONSULTANT with the funds
previously collected from those PARTIES. If any PARTIES do not agree to
initiate Task 5, then the COUNTY will refund those PARTIES their share of the
cost of Task 5, as set forth in Table 4 of Exhibit A. Table 3 will be amended to
show an updated cost among the participating PARTIES for Task 5.
Section 8. Indemnification
a. Each PARTY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY,
including its special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, agents,
attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability,
including, but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses
(including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees), arising from or
connected with the respective acts of each PARTY arising from or related to this
MOU; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for that
PARTY'S own negligence or willful misconduct.
b. In light of the provisions of Section 895.2 of the Government Code of the State of
California imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities solely by reason
Page 4 of 23
of such entities being parties to an agreement (as defined in Section 895 of said
Code), each of the PARTIES hereto, pursuant to the authorization contained in
Section 895.4 and 895.6 of said Code, shall assume the full liability imposed
upon it or any of its officers, agents, or employees, by law for injury caused by
any act or omission occurring in the performance of this MOU to the same extent
such liability would be imposed in the absence of Section 895.2 of said Code. To
achieve the above stated purpose, each PARTY indemnifies, defends, and holds
harmless each other PARTY for any liability, cost, or expense that may be
imposed upon such other PARTY solely by virtue of said Section 895.2. The
provisions of Section 2778 of the California Civil Code are made a part hereof as
if incorporated herein.
Section 9. Termination and Withdrawal
a. This MOU may be terminated upon the express written agreement of all
PARTIES. If this MOU is terminated, then all PARTIES must agree on the
equitable redistribution of remaining funds deposited, if there are any, or payment
of invoices due at the time of termination. Completed work shall be owned by the
PARTY or PARTIES who fund the completion of such work. Rights to
uncompleted work by the CONSULTANT still under contract will be held by the
PARTY or PARTIES who fund the completion of such work.
b. If a PARTY fails to substantially comply with any of the terms or conditions of this
MOU, then that PARTY shall forfeit its rights to work completed through this
MOU, but no such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY
has first been given notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the
alleged default.
c. COUNTY will notify all PARTIES in writing of any PARTY failing to cure an
alleged default in compliance with the terms or conditions of this MOU. The non-
delinquent PARTIES will determine the next course of action. The remaining
cost will be distributed based on the existing cost allocation formula in Exhibit A.
If the increase is more than the 10 percent contingency, an amendment to this
MOU must be executed to reflect the change in the PARTIES' cost share.
d. If a PARTY wishes to withdraw from this MOU for any reason, that PARTY must
give the other PARTIES and the REGIONAL BOARD prior written notice thereof.
The withdrawing PARTY shall be responsible for its entire share of the LRS
development costs shown in Exhibit A. The effective date of withdrawal shall be
the 6th day after COUNTY receives written notice of the PARTY'S intent to
withdraw. Should any PARTY withdraw from this MOU, the remaining PARTIES'
cost share allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the cost allocation
formula in Exhibit A.
Section 10. General Provisions
Page 5 of 23
a. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOU, and any
request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the
PARTIES at the addresses set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. The PARTIES shall promptly notify each other
of any change of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in
Exhibit B. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail or fax. A notice
shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by
hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by e-mail; or
(b) on the third (3rd) business day following mailing by registered or certified mail
(return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth in Exhibit B.
b. Administration. For the purposes of this MOU, the PARTIES hereby designate
as their respective PARTY representatives the persons named in Exhibit B. The
designated PARTY representatives, or their respective designees, shall
administer the terms and conditions of this MOU on behalf of their respective
PARTY. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY represents
and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOU on behalf of such
PARTY.
c. Relationship of the PARTIES. The PARTIES are, and shall at all times remain as
to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY to this MOU shall have
power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PARTY
unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOU. No employee, agent, or
officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent,
employee, or officer of another PARTY.
d. Binding Effect. This MOU shall be binding upon, and shall be to the benefit of
the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each PARTY; provided,
however, no PARTY may assign its respective rights or obligations under this
MOU without prior written consent of the other PARTIES.
e. Amendment. The terms and provisions of this MOU may not be amended,
modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all
non-delinquent PARTIES. For purposes of this MOU, a PARTY shall be
considered delinquent if that PARTY fails to timely pay an invoice as required by
Section 7(a) or withdraws pursuant to Section 9(d).
f. Law to Govern. This MOU is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
g. Severability. If any provision of this MOU is determined by any court to be
invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOU
will not be affected, and this MOU will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOU.
Page 6 of 23
h. Entire Agreement. This MOU constitutes the entire agreement of the PARTIES
with respect to the subject matter hereof.
i. Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY to this MOU of any term, condition, or covenant
of this MOU shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or
covenant. Waiver by any PARTY to any breach of the provisions of this MOU
shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any
subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOU.
j. Counterparts. This MOU may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have
been delivered to all PARTIES to this MOU.
k. All PARTIES have been represented by counsel in the preparation and
negotiation of this MOU. Accordingly, this MOU shall be construed according to
its fair language. Any ambiguities shall be resolved in a collaborative manner by
the PARTIES and shall be rectified by amending this MOU as described in
Section 10(e).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this MOU to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature
of the PARTIES:
•
Page 7 of 23
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
GAIL FARBER, Director of Public Works Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARY C. WICKHAM
Interim County Counsel
By
Deputy Date
Page 8 of 23
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
GAIL FARBER, Chief Engineer Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARY C. WICKHAM
Interim County Counsel
By
Deputy Date
Page 9 of 23
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
By
Mary Swink Date
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Lauren Myles
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Joseph M. Montes, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 10 of 23
CITY OF MONTEBELLO
By
Name Date
Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Name
Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Name, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 11 of 23
CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
By
Paul Talbot Date
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT AND FORM:
By
Karl H. Berger
Assistant City Attorney
Page 12 of 23
CITY OF PASADENA
By
Name Date
Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Name
Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Name, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 13 of 23
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
By
Jeff Allred Date
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Carol Cowley
Interim City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Rachel H. Richman
City Attorney
Page 14 of 23
CITY OF SAN GABRIEL
By
Name Date
Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Name
Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Name, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 15 of 23
CITY OF SAN MARINO
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
John Schaefer
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Steve Dorsey, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 16 of 23
CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE
By
Name Date
Title
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Name
Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Name, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 17 of 23
CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA
By
Sergio Gonzalez Date
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Evelyn G. Zneimer
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Teresa L. Highsmith, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 18 of 23
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
By
Michael D. Forbes Date
Community Development Director
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By
Bryan Cook
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Eric S. Vail, Esq.
City Attorney
Page 19 of 23
EXHIBIT A
Rio Hondo and Tributaries
Funding Contributions for LRS Implementation
Table 1. Contract Cost
TASK DESCRIPTION COST
Task 1 Non-stormwater Snapshot Monitoring/Screening $253,980.00
Task 2 Outfall Drainage Area Assessment $33,630.00
Task 3 LRS Development _ $85,230.00
Task 4 Prepare LRS Report $34,010.00
Tasks 1-4 Sub-Total $406,850.00
Task 5 BMP Structural Controls and Concept Designs $98,050.00
Tasks 1-5 Total $504,900.00
Table 2. Tasks 1 through 4 Cost Allocation Formula
PERCENT LRS ADMIN FEE TOTAL
CITY LAND AREA COST SHARE1 (5%)
Alhambra 7.86% $28,780.57 _ $1,439.03 $30,219.60
Montebello 12.15% $44,489.05 $2,224.45 $46,713.50
Monterey Park 9.40% _ $34,419.51 $1,720.98 $36,140.49
Pasadena 21.22% $77,700.21 $3,885.01 $81,585.22
Rosemead 7.86% $28,780.57 $1,439.03 • $30,219.60
San Gabriel 6.28% _ $22,995.16 $1,149.76 $24,144.92
San Marino 5.73% _ $20,981.25 $1,049.06 $22,030.31
South El Monte 3.79% _ $13,877.65 $693.88 $14,571.53
South Pasadena 0.43% $1,574.51 $78.73 $1,653.24_
Temple City 6.13% _ $22,445.91 $1,122.30 $23,568.21
County UA 19.15% $70,120.61 $0.00 $70,120.61
• LACFCD 0.00% $40,685.00 $0.00 $40,685.00
(10% Contribution) _
TOTAL 100.00% $406,850.00 $14,802.23 $421,652.23
Table 3. Task 5 Cost Allocation Formula
PERCENT LRS ADMIN FEE TOTAL
CITY LAND AREA COST SHARE1 (5%)
Alhambra 7.86% $6,936.06 $346.80 _ $7,282.86
Montebello 12.15% $10,721.77 $536.09 $11,257.86i
LACFCD's share of contract cost is 10 percent of the total cost. The LRS Cost Share therefore shows
this 10 percent amount for the LACFCD. The amount shown for the remaining PARTIES is calculated by
multiplying the total cost for the Task(s) minus the LACFCD's share by the percent land area for each
PARTY.
Page 20 of 23
EXHIBIT A
Rio Hondo and Tributaries
Funding Contributions for LRS Implementation
Monterey Park 9.40% $8,295.03 $414.75 $8,709.78
Pasadena 21.22% $18,725.59 $936.28 $19,661.87
Rosemead 7.86% _ $6,936.06 $346.80 $7,282.86
San Gabriel 6.28% $5,541.79 $277.09 $5,818.88
San Marino 5.73% $5,056.43 $252.82 $5,309.25
South El Monte 3.79% $3,344.49 $167.22 $3,511.71
South Pasadena _ 0.43% $379.45 $18.97 $398.42
Temple City 6.13% _ $5,409.41 $270.47 $5,679.88
County UA 19.15% _ $16,898.92 $0.00 $16,898.92
LACFCD (10% 0.00% $9,805.00 $0.00 $9,805.00
Contribution)
TOTAL 100.00% $98,050.00 $3,567.29 $101,617.29
Table 4. Total Cost (Table 2 + Table 3)
CITY TASKS 1-4 TASK 5 TOTAL
Alhambra $30,219.60 $7,282.86 $37,502.46
Montebello $46,713.50 _ $11,257.86 _ _ $57,971.36
Monterey Park $36,140.49 $8,709.78 $44,850.27
Pasadena $81,585.22 $19,661.87 $101,247.09
Rosemead $30,219.60 $7,282.86 $37,502.46
San Gabriel $24,144.92 _ $5,818.88 $29,963.80
San Marino $22,030.31 $5,309.25 $27,339.56
South El Monte $14,571.53 $3,511.71 $18,083.24
South Pasadena $1,653.24 $398.42 $2,051.66
Temple City _ $23,568.21 $5,679.88 _ $29,248.09
County UA i $70,120.61 $16,898.92 $87,019.53
LACFCD $40,685.00 $9,805.00 $50,490.00
(10% Contribution) _
TOTAL $421,652.23 $101,617.29 $523,269.52
Page 21 of 23
EXHIBIT B
Rio Hondo River and Tributaries
Responsible Agency Representatives
AGENCY ADDRESS AGENCY CONTACT
County of Los Angeles Paul Alva •
Department of Public Works Email: palva @dpw.lacounty.gov
Watershed Management Division, 11th Floor phone: (626) 458-4325
900 South Fremont Avenue Fax: (626)457-1526
Alhambra, CA 91803
Los Angeles County Flood Control District Terri Grant
Department of Public Works Email: tgrant @dpw.lacounty.gov
Watershed Management Division, 11th Floor Phone: (626)458-4309
900 South Fremont Avenue Fax: (626)457-1526
Alhambra, CA 91803
of Alhambra David Dolphin
City Email. ddolphin @cityofalhambra.org
111 South First Street Phone. (626) 300-1571
Alhambra, CA 91801 Fax: (626) 282-5833
City of Montebello D Batson
y Email: dbatson @cityofmontebello.com
1600 West Beverly Boulevard Phone: (323) 887-1462
Montebello, CA 90640 Fax: (323) 887-1464
Amy Ho
City of Monterey Park
320 West Newmark Avenue Email: (626 @moltereypark.ca.gov
Monterey Park, CA 91754 Phone: (626)7-250383
Fax (626) 307-2500
Steve Walker
City of Pasadena Email: swalker @cityofpasadena.net
P.O. Box 7115 Phone: (626) 744-4271
Pasadena, CA 91109 Fax: (626) 744-3823
of Rosemead Sean Sullivan
City Email: ssullivan @cityofrosemead.org
8838 East Valley Boulevard Phone: (626) 569-2189
Rosemead, CA 91770 Fax: (626) 307-9218
Page 22 of 23
EXHIBIT B
Rio Hondo River and Tributaries
Responsible Agency Representatives
Daren Grilley
City of San Gabriel Email. dgrilley @sgch.org
425 South Mission Avenue Phone: (626) 308-2806
San Gabriel. CA 91776 Fax. (626)458-2830
of San Marino Lucy Garcia
City Email: Igarcia @sanmarinoca.gov
2200 Huntington Drive Phone: (626) 300-0700
San Marino, CA 91108 Fax (626) 300-0709
City of South El Monte Tony Ybarra
Y Email: tybarra @soelmonte.org
1415 North Santa Anita Avenue Phone: (626) 652-3163
South El Monte, CA 91733 Fax: (626) 579-2409
City of South Pasadena Shin Furukawa
Y Email: sfurukawa @southpasadenaca.gov
1414 Mission Street Phone: (626)403-7240
South Pasadena, CA 91030 Fax: (626)403-7241
City of Temple City Andrew J. Coyne
C
City Las Tunas Drive Email: acoyne @templecity.us
Phone.
Temple City, CA 91780 (626)
Fax. (626) 285-8192
Page 23 of 23