PC - Item 3B - Design Review 15-13 at 8225 Garvey Avenue 4,„.. O ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
K �,�At ,r
TO: THE HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DIVISION
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 2016
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 15-13
8225 GARVEY AVENUE
Summary
CVS Pharmacy has submitted a Design Review application to request to improve the
façade of an existing commercial building at 8225 Garvey Avenue (APN: 5288-009-
052). The proposed project would not add any new floor area to the property. The
subject property is located in the C-3/D-O (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay)
zone.
Environmental Determination
Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines exempts
projects consisting of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing,
or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical
equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use
beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. Accordingly, Design
Review 15-13 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section
15301 of CEQA guidelines.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 16-01 with
findings (Exhibit "K), and APPROVE Design Review 15-13, subject to the 27 conditions
outlined in Attachment "A" attached hereto.
Property History and Description
The subject property is located on the north side of Garvey Avenue, between San
Gabriel Boulevard and Charlotte Avenue. According to the Los Angeles County
Assessor's Office, the site consists of one (1) parcel, totaling approximately 59,369
square feet of lot area. In 1968, a 17,835 square feet commercial building was built.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 2 of 14
fi `A
E
qs .d a :Ye,- T .
s •
Front Elevation(Existing)
Site and Surrounding Land Uses
The project site is designated in the General Plan as Commercial and on the Zoning
Map as C-3/D-0 (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay) zone. The site is
surrounded by the following land uses and zones:
North
General Plan Designation: Commercial
Zoning: C-3(Medium Commercial)
Land Use: Commercial
South
General Plan Designation: Commercial
Zoning: C-3/D-0 (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay)
Land Use: Commercial
East
General Plan Designation: Commercial
Zoning: C-3/D-O (Medium Commercial with Design Overlay)
Land Use: Commercial
West
General Plan Designation: Commercial
Zoning: C-3(Medium Commercial)
Land Use: Commercial
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 3 of 14
Administrative Analysis
As illustrated in Exhibit "B", the applicant is proposing to remodel the exterior façade of
an existing commercial building. According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section
17.28.020(A)(1), in the Design Overlay zone, Design Review procedures shall be
followed for all improvements requiring a building permit or visible changes in form,
texture, color, exterior facade, or landscaping.
The proposed project would not add new floor area to the existing building, affect the
existing floor plan, or change the existing site layout.
Elevations
The proposed project includes adding new parapets, providing new stucco finish for the
exterior walls, and adding new brick veneer. The applicant is proposing to utilize the
"Minced Onion" color by Benjamin Moore on the stucco walls; and the `Brookline Beige"
and "Mayflower Red" colors by Benjamin Moore on the trims and parapet. The
aluminum storefront and door would be dark bronze anodized finish to match the
existing finish. Brick veneer by Coronado Stone would be utilized to match the existing
brick color and finish along the bottom portions of the building.
Municipal Code Requirements
According to Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(A)(1), in the Design
Overlay zone, Design Review procedures shall be followed for all improvements
requiring a building permit or visible changes in form, texture, color, exterior facade, or
landscaping.
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.28.020(C), provides the criteria by which the
Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an
application:
A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the
proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for
the general neighborhood.
The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade of an
existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior facade design would be complementary to
the existing developments in the vicinity.
B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the manner
in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected
against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on
the environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash,
storage and loading areas.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 4 0114
The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade of an
existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. As such, the proposed project would not produce any foreseeable
adverse impacts. All construction work would be required to comply with the
timeframe and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance.
C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site
developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local
environment to materially depreciate in appearance and value.
The proposed exterior facade design of the existing building would complement
the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the subject site.
The proposed project utilizes colors and materials that would not be at variance
with the appearance of existing neighboring buildings. As such, approval of the
proposed project would not cause the nature of the local environment to
materially depreciate in appearance and value.
D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed
developments on land in the general area, especially those instances where
buildings are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part
of the Civic Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately
adjacent to land included within any precise plan which indicates building shape,
size, or style.
The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade of an
existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior facade design of the existing building would
complement the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the
subject site. As such, the proposed project would be in harmony with the
developments within the vicinity of the subject site.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code and
other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved.
The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade of an
existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior façade design of the existing building would
complement the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the
subject site. As such, the proposed project would be in conformity with the
standards of the Zoning Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the
location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 5 of 14
F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has been
given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile
and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view
of public streets.
The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade of an
existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The site plan and design of the parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features would not be affected by the proposed project.
The proposed design of the exterior façade of the existing building would
produce a visually pleasing effect of the development from the view of public
streets.
Public Notice Process
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process, which
includes a 300-foot radius public hearing notice to forty-two (42) property owners,
publication in the Rosemead Reader on January 21, 2016, and postings of the notice at
the six (6) public locations and on the subject site.
Prepared by: Submitted by:
Cory H Michelle Ramirez
Associate Planner Community Development Director
EXHIBITS:
A. Planning Commission Resolution 16-01 with Attachment"A" (Conditions of Approval)
B. Site Plan and Elevations
C. Assessor Parcel Map
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 6 of 14
EXHIBIT "A"
PC RESOLUTION 16-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 15-13, PERMITTING THE
REMODELING OF THE EXTERIOR FACADE OF AN EXISTING
COMMERCIAL BUILDING. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED
AT 8225 GARVEY AVENUE (APN: 5288-009-052), IN THE C-31D-O
(MEDIUM COMMERCIAL WITH DESIGN OVERLAY) ZONE
WHEREAS, on November 25, 2015, CVS Pharmacy submitted a Design Review
application to request to improve the façade of an existing commercial building at 8225
Garvey Avenue;
WHEREAS, 8225 Garvey Avenue is located in the C-3/D-0 (Medium
Commercial with Design Overlay) zoning district;
WHEREAS, Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code provides the
criteria for a Design Review;
WHEREAS, Sections 65800 & 65900 of the California Government Code and
Section 17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the Planning
Commission to approve, conditionally approve, or deny Design Review applications;
WHEREAS, on January 21, 2016, forty-two (42) notices were sent to property
owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property, the notice was published in
the Rosemead Reader, and notices were posted in six (6) public locations and on site,
specifying the availability of the application, and the date, time, and location of the
public hearing for Design Review 15-13;
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2016, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
and advertised public hearing to receive oral and written testimony relative to Design
Review 15-13; and
WHEREAS, the Rosemead Planning Commission has sufficiently considered all
testimony presented to them in order to make the following determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Rosemead as follows:
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 7 of 14
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY DETERMINES that Design
Review 15-13 is classified as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Section
15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines. Section 15301 of the
California Environmental Quality Act guidelines exempts projects consisting of the
operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of
existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical
features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of
the lead agency's determination.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES
that facts do exist to justify approving Design Review 15-13, in accordance with Section
17.28.020(C) of the Rosemead Municipal Code as follows:
A. The plans indicate proper consideration for the relationship between the
proposed building and site developments that exist or have been approved for the
general neighborhood.
FINDING: The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade
of an existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior facade design would be complementary to the
existing developments in the vicinity.
B. The plan for the proposed structure and site development indicates the
manner in which the proposed development and surrounding properties are protected
against noise, vibrations, and other factors which may have an adverse effect on the
environment, and the manner of screening mechanical equipment, trash, storage and
loading areas.
FINDING: The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade
of an existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. As such, the proposed project would not produce any foreseeable
adverse impacts. All construction work would be required to comply with the timeframe
and decibel levels indicated in the City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance.
C. The proposed building or site development is not, in its exterior design and
appearance, so at variance with the appearance of other existing buildings or site
developments in the neighborhood as to cause the nature of the local environment to
materially depreciate in appearance and value.
FINDING: The proposed exterior facade design of the existing building would
complement the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the subject
site. The proposed project utilizes colors and materials that would not be at variance
with the appearance of existing neighboring buildings. As such, approval of the
proposed project would not cause the nature of the local environment to materially
depreciate in appearance and value.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2010
Page B of 14
D. The proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed
developments on land in the general area, especially those instances where buildings
are within or adjacent to land shown on the General Plan as being part of the Civic
Center or in public or educational use, or are within or immediately adjacent to land
included within any precise plan which indicates building shape, size, or style.
FINDING: The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior façade
of an existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior façade design of the existing building would
complement the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the subject
site. As such, the proposed project would be in harmony with the developments within
the vicinity of the subject site.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this Code
and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance of the
buildings and structures are involved.
FINDING: The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior façade
of an existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The proposed exterior façade design of the existing building would
complement the existing commercial site developments within the vicinity of the subject
site. As such, the proposed project would be in conformity with the standards of the
Zoning Code and other applicable ordinances in so far as the location and appearance
of the buildings and structures are involved.
F. The site plan and the design of the buildings, parking areas, signs,
landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicates that proper consideration has
been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile
and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effect of the development from the view of
public streets.
FINDING: The proposed project solely consists of remodeling the exterior facade
of an existing commercial building, and would not modify the existing use and site
configuration. The site plan and design of the parking areas, signs, landscaping,
luminaries, and other site features would not be affected by the proposed project. The
proposed design of the exterior façade of the existing building would produce a visually
pleasing effect of the development from the view of public streets.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission HEREBY APPROVES Design Review
15-13 for the remodeling of the exterior façade of an existing commercial building at
8225 Garvey Avenue, and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 9 of 14
SECTION 4. This action shall become final and effective ten (10) days after this
decision by the Planning Commission, unless within such time a written appeal is filed
with the City Clerk for consideration by the Rosemead City Council as provided in
Rosemead Municipal Code, Section 17.160.040—Appeals of Decisions.
SECTION 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning
Commission on February 1, 2016, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
SECTION 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and
shall transmit copies of same to the applicant and the Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 2016.
John Tang, Chair
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 1st day of
February, 2016, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Michelle Ramirez, Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gregory M. Murphy, Planning Commission Attorney
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 10 of 14
ATTACHMENT "A"
DESIGN REVIEW 15-13
8225 GARVEY AVENUE
(APN: 5288-009-052)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
February 1, 2016
1. Design Review 15-13 is approved for the remodeling of the exterior façade of an
exciting commercial building at 8225 Garvey Avenue, in accordance with the
plans marked Exhibit "B", dated January 19, 2016. Any revisions to the approved
plans must be resubmitted for Planning Division review and, if satisfactory,
approval.
2. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Planning
Division prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits,
occupancy permits, or any other appropriate request.
3. The conditions listed on this exhibit shall be copied directly onto any
development plans subsequently submitted to the Planning and Building
Divisions.
4. Approval of Design Review 15-13 shall not take effect for any purpose until the
applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead a notarized affidavit stating that
he/she is aware of and accepts all of the conditions of approval as set forth in the
letter of approval and this list of conditions within ten (10) days from the Planning
Commission approval date.
5. The on-site public hearing notice posting shall be removed by the end of the 10-
day appeal period of Design Review 15-13.
6. Design Review 15-13 is approved for a period of one (1) year. The applicant shall
commence the proposed project or request an extension within 30 calendar days
prior to expiration. The one (1) year initial approval period shall be effective from
the Planning Commission approval date. For the purpose of this petition, project
commencement shall be defined as beginning the permitting process with the
Planning and Building Divisions, so long as the project is not abandoned. If
Design Review 15-13 has been unused, abandoned, or discontinued for a period
of one (1) year, it shall become null and void.
7. The Planning Commission hereby authorizes the Planning Division to make
and/or approve minor modifications to the project and to these conditions of
approval.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 11 of 14
8. Design Review 15-13 is granted or approved with the City and its Planning
Commission and City Council retaining and reserving the right and jurisdiction to
review and to modify the permit, including the conditions of approval based on
changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to,
the modification of the use, a change in scope, emphasis, size, or nature of the
use, or the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration, or change of use. This
reservation of right to review is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the right of the
City, its Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify
any permit granted or approved under the Rosemead Municipal Code for any
violations of the conditions imposed on Design Review 15-13.
9. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Rosemead
or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Rosemead or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set
side, void, or annul, an approval of the Planning Commission and/or City Council
concerning the project, which action is brought within the time period provided by
law.
10. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws relative to the
approved project, including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire,
Sheriff, and Health Departments.
11. Building permits will not be issued in connection with any project until such time
as all plan check fees and all other applicable fees are paid in full. Prior to
issuance of building permits, any required school fees shall be paid. The
applicant shall provide the City with written verification of compliance from the
applicable school districts.
12. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least six (6) inches tall with a
minimum character width of 3/4 inch, contrasting in color and easily visible at
driver's level from the street. Materials, colors, location, and size of such address
numbers shall be approved by the Community Development Director, or his/her
designee, prior to installation.
13. The site shall be maintained in a graffiti-free state. Any new graffiti shall be
removed within twenty-four (24) hours.
14. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed and litter free state.
15. The hours of construction shall be limited from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday
through Saturday. No construction shall take place on Sundays or on any federal
holiday, without prior approval by the City.
16. The Building Division, Planning Division, and Engineering Division shall have
access to the subject property at any time during construction to monitor
progress.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 12 of 14
17. All requirements of the Building and Safety Division, Planning Division, and
Engineering Division shall be complied with prior to the final approval of the
proposed construction.
18. All new roof-top appurtenances and equipment shall be adequately screened
from view to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Such equipment shall not
exceed the height of the parapet wall. There shall be no mechanical equipment
located on the sides of the building.
19. All ground level mechanical/utility equipment (including meters, back flow
prevention devices, fire valves, A/C condensers, furnaces, and other equipment)
shall be located away from public view or adequately screened by landscaping or
screening walls so as not to be seen from the public right-of-way. Planning
Division approval of the screening type and location must be obtained prior to
installation of any screening.
20. All exterior lighting shall be fully shielded and directed downwards as to not
project over the property lines of the subject site.
21. Planning Division approval of sign plans must be obtained prior to obtaining
building permits and/or installation for any signs.
22. The parking area(s), including the parking spaces and maneuvering lanes, shall
be paved with asphaltic, concrete surfacing, or other acceptable material in
accordance with specifications approved by the City Engineer. Such parking
area(s) shall be maintained free from conspicuous cracks or holes. All parking
striping shall be maintained in a clear, visible, and orderly manner to the
satisfaction of the Planning Division.
23. The property shall be graded to drain to the street, but in no case shall such
drainage be allowed to sheet flow across public sidewalk. A grading and/or
drainage plan shall be prepared, submitted to, and approved by the Building
Official, and such grading and drainage shall take place in accordance with such
approved plan.
24. The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning
Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation
plan shall comply with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and with
the Guidelines for Implementation of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
and include a sprinkler system with automatic timers and moisture sensors. The
landscape plan shall include a wide variety of colorful and drought tolerant trees,
shrubs, flowers, and ground covers. All landscaping and irrigation shall be
installed and completed prior to final Planning Division approval.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 13 of 14
25. All open areas not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be
landscaped and maintained on a regular basis to the satisfaction of the Planning
Division.
26. The trash enclosure shall comply with the standards set forth in the Rosemead
Municipal Code.
27. Violations of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of
revocation proceedings.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 1,2016
Page 14 of 14
EXHIBIT "C"
2002 ∎ O � ( �__1 I
PAR - - AVE.:
®oT" .Q ®P....
® o m c^n
® c @ ��� O
E_J E® ® 8 .8:
Imo ' r�-itig lgiW ° SUBJECT
�' .3- ili° a SITE
ARVEV „, g
...
. r-.r. n,AcaR.4F