CC - Item 6A - Consideration of Senate Bill 415 And Consolidation With A Statewide Election 5 E N E
° ! 9 ° ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
re
\ STAFF REPORT
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: BILL R. MANIS, CITY MANAGER ey,'
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2017
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SENATE BILL 415 AND CONSOLIDATION
WITH A STATEWIDE ELECTION DATE
SUMMARY
Senate Bill (SB) 415, also known as the California Voter Participation Rights Act, amended the
State Elections Code pertaining to municipal election dates. The bill requires cities that currently
hold standalone municipal elections to change their election dates to coincide with statewide
election dates, unless voter turnout rates for past standalone elections meet a certain threshold.
The City's past voter turnout rates are lower than the threshold established by SB 415, so the
City must move its election date to coincide with a statewide election date.
ANALYSIS
The goal of SB 415 (Attachment A) is to increase voter turnout rates for municipal elections,
which tend to be lower when such elections are not held concurrently with statewide elections.
Elections Code section 1001 provides that a statewide election is "an election held throughout
the state," which only includes elections held in June and November of even years. However,
beginning in 2019, the statewide primary election will be moved from June of even number years
to March of even years due to SB 568 (Attachment B). which was signed by the Governor on
September 27,2017.
The City of Rosemead currently holds its general municipal elections for City Councilmembers
in March, of odd-numbered years. The next municipal election is scheduled for March 2019. SB
415 prohibits local governments from holding municipal elections on any date other than the date
of a statewide election, if in the past, it has caused "a significant decrease in voter turnout." As
described in this bill, "a significant decrease in voter turnout" has occurred if the voter turnout
rate for a regularly scheduled City election, not held concurrently with a statewide election, is at
least 25% less than the average turnout rate within the City for the previous four statewide
general elections.
Staff has reviewed Rosemead's voter turnout data for the four most recent statewide general
elections on the County Registrar-Recorder website, as well as turnout data for the City's most
I HEM NUMBER: 6t"r
//
City Council Meeting
October 24,2017
Page 2 of 4
recent standalone municipal elections. Below is a chart comparing the turnout rate for
Rosemead's most recent standalone municipal elections to the average turnout rate within the
City for the last four statewide general elections:
Statewide General Election-Voter Turnout for Rosemead
November 2016 (Presidential Election) 63.09%
November 2014 (Gubernatorial Election) 21.12%
November 2012 (Presidential Election) 56.88%
November 2010 (Gubernatorial Election) 40.38%
Average voter turnout(%) over 4 statewide general elections: 45.36%
Minimum voter turnout to avoid statewide cycle: 34.02%
Rosemead General Municipal Election Voter Turnout
March 2017 (General Municipal Election) Cancelled
March 2015 (General Municipal Election) 11.04%
March 2013 (General Municipal Election) 13.37%
March 2011 (General Municipal Election) 14.27%
March 2009 (General Municipal Election) 23.00%
Average voter turnout (%) over 4 general municipal elections: 15.42%
According to Los Angeles County Registrar's past voter participation data, the City of Rosemead
meets the triggering criteria of SB 415. Rosemead's average turnout for the previous four
statewide election dates in November was 45.36%. In order to meet the 25% threshold to keep its
elections on an odd-year cycle, the City's prior municipal elections must have reached a turnout
figure of 75% of this average, or 34.02%.
As the above data illustrates, the voter turnout average for the City's most recent municipal
elections is 15.42%. Since the City experienced a "significant decrease in voter turnout,"
according to the definition in the bill, Rosemead must move its general municipal elections to a
statewide general election date in 2018, 2020, or 2022. SB 415 requires a local jurisdiction take
action to consolidate its election with a statewide election, or by January 1, 2018, adopt a plan to
consolidate its election with the statewide election no later than the November 8, 2022, statewide
general election. The City has had initial discussions with Los Angeles County staff and they
have indicated that they would be able to accommodate the City for the November 2018 election
or the March 2020 election, but ultimately that decision is left to the Board of Supervisors.
Additionally, pursuant to Elections Code Section 104035(b), no term of office may be increased
or decreased by more than 12 months, as a result of an ordinance consolidating elections.
The City appears to have three main options for compliance with SB 415. The City could move
elections currently scheduled for March of odd-numbered years back by four months, so that
they are held in November of the preceding even-numbered years during statewide general
elections. Second, the City could move its elections back by twelve months so that they are held
in March of even-numbered years during statewide primaries. Third, the City could move its
elections forward by twelve months so that they are held in March of even numbered years
City Council Meeting
October 24,2017
Page 3 of 4
during statewide primaries. All three of these options could he implemented starting in 2018,
2020, or 2022.
November Consolidation:
If the City Council approves a November consolidation plan, it could reschedule elections from
March of odd numbered years to November of the preceding even numbered years. Under this
option, those elected in March would have their terms reduced by four months, resulting in a
three year,eight month term. This would continue for two election cycles.
For example, the City has the option to hold elections in March 2019, and March 2021, as
planned, and reduce the terms of those elected in the 2019 elections by four months, so that they
serve a three year, eight month term. Under this plan, the offices for Councilmembers that were
elected in 2019 would be up for election in November 2022, when the City would hold its first
consolidated election concurrent with the statewide general election. This would meet SB 415's
November 2022, deadline for consolidation. The offices for Councilmembers that were elected in
2021 would also be reduced to three years and eight months and would be up for election in
November 2024. After that, City elections would continue in November of even numbered years
and everyone would serve a full four-year term.
March Consolidation:
The City could alternatively choose to consolidate municipal elections with statewide primaries
held in March of even-numbered years. which qualify as a "statewide election" for the purposes
of SB 415. However, since March elections fall exactly 12 months before or after the City's
current election cycle, the City has a choice of either reducing Councilmember terms or
increasing Councilmember terms by 12 months. This would also continue for two election
cycles.
For example, under this option, the next City election held in March 2019 could be moved
forward twelve months to March 2020. Under this plan, Councilmember terms will increase by
12 months. Alternatively, the election to be held in March of 2021 could be moved back twelve
months to March 2020. Under this plan, Councilmember terms would decrease by 12 months.
A list of potential options for consolidating future general municipal elections with a statewide
election date is listed in Attachment C. Upon the City Council providing direction, staff will
return at a future City Council meeting with the appropriate ordinance (Attachment D) to
effectuate the synchronization of the City's general municipal elections with a future statewide
election by the statutory deadline of November 8,2022.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council discuss the options available and provide direction to
staff.
City Council Meeting
October 24,2017
Page 4 of 4
FISCAL IMPACT
The change in future election dates will allow the County of Los Angeles to operate the City's
election. It is anticipated that the County election expenses will be somewhat less expensive than
the cost of the City's standalone election.
As an example, costs for the 2019 election are estimated to be approximately $90,000 for a
standalone election. The County of Los Angeles has provided an initial cost estimate of
approximately $45,000 (Attachment E) to conduct the consolidated election for the City in
November 2018. At this time, the county is unable to provide cost estimates for the year 2020.
In addition, the City is required to mail a notice of the election date change to every registered
voter in the City. The noticing requirement cost is not expected to exceed $12,000.
STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT—None
LEGAL REVIEW
The staff report and proposed options have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS
This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process.
Prepared by:
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
Attachment A: SB 415 Bill Language
Attachment B: SB 568 Bill Language
Attachment C: Election Date Options
Attachment D: Sample Ordinance Changing the City's General Municipal Election Date
Attachment E: Los Angeles County Election Cost Estimate
Attachment F: Data from Other Cities
E M
CL IC FRi0C
NCoRPOg4TEo ,Q59
Attachment A
SB 415 Bill Language
AUTHENTICATED
Senate Bill No.415
CHAPTER 235
An act to add Chapter 1.7(commencing with Section 14050)to Division
14 of the Elections Code,relating to elections.
[Approved by Governor September I,2015.Filed with
Secretary of State September 1.2015.]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 415,Hueso.Voter participation.
Existing law generally requires all state,county,municipal,district,and
school district elections be held on an established election date. Existing
law also establishes certain dates for statewide elections. Existing law
requires any state,county, municipal, district, and school district election
held on a statewide election date to be consolidated with a statewide election,
except as provided.
This bill, commencing January 1, 2018, would prohibit a political
subdivision,as defined,from holding an election other than on a statewide
election date if holding an election on a nonconcurrent date has previously
resulted in voter turnout for a regularly scheduled election in that political
subdivision being at least 25% less than the average voter turnout within
the political subdivision for the previous 4 statewide general elections,
except as specified.
This bill would require a court to implement appropriate remedies upon
a violation of this prohibition.The bill would authorize a voter who resides
in a political subdivision where a violation is alleged to file an action in
superior court to enforce this prohibition, and it would allow a prevailing
plaintiff other than the state or political subdivision 10 collect a reasonable
attorney's fee and litigation expenses,as provided.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION I. Chapter 1.7 (commencing with Section 14050) is added
to Division 14 of the Elections Code,to read:
CHAPTER 1.7. VOTER PARTICI PAI
14050. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the California
Voter Participation Rights Act.
14051. As used in this chapter:
(a) "Political subdivision" means a geographic area of representation
created for the provision of government services,including,but not limited
93
Ch.235 —2—
to, a city, a school district, a community college district, or other district
organized pursuant to state law.
(b) "Significant decrease in voter turnout"means the voter turnout for a
regularly scheduled election in a political subdivision is at least 25 percent
less than the average voter turnout within that political subdivision for the
previous four statewide general elections.
(c) "Voter turnout" means the percentage of voters who are eligible to
cast ballots within a given political subdivision who voted.
14052. (a) Except as provided in subdivision(b),a political subdivision
shall not hold an election other than on a statewide election date if holding
an election on a nonconcurrent date has previously resulted in a significant
decrease in voter turnout.
(b) A political subdivision may hold an election other than on a statewide
election date if,by January 1,2018,the political subdivision has adopted a
plan to consolidate a future election with a statewide election not later than
the November 8,2022,statewide general election.
14053. Upon a finding of a violation of subdivision(a)of Section 14052,
the court shall implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition
of concurrent election dates for future elections and the upgrade of voting
equipment or systems to do so.In imposing remedies pursuant to this section,
a court may also require a county board of supervisors to approve
consolidation pursuant to Section 10402.5.
14054. In an action to enforce subdivision (a) of Section 14052, the
court shall allow the prevailing plaintiff other than the state or political
subdivision of the state, a reasonable attorney's fee consistent with the
standards established in Serrano v. Priest(1977)20 Cal.3d 25,48-49,and
litigation expenses including, but not limited to, expert witness fees and
expenses as part of the costs.A prevailing defendant shall not recover any
costs, unless the court finds the action to be frivolous, unreasonable, or
without foundation.
14055. A voter who resides in a political subdivision where a violation
of subdivision (a) of Section 14052 is alleged may file an action pursuant
to that section in the superior court of the county in which the political
subdivision is located.
14056. This chapter does not apply to special elections.
14057. This chapter shall become operative on January 1,2018.
0
93
E M E
4S
-TPOgR}EO
Attachment B
SB 568 Bill Language
meq...
AUTHENTICATED
Senate Bill No.568
CHAPTER 335
An act to amend,repeal,and add Sections 316, 340, 1000, 1001, 1201,
and 1202 of the Elections Code,relating to elections.
[Approved by Governor September 27,2017.Filed with
Secretary of Slate September 27,2017.1
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 568,Lara.Primary elections: election date.
Existing law requires that the statewide direct primary be held on the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each even-numbered year.Existing
law requires that the presidential primary be held on the first Tuesday after
the first Monday in June in any year that is evenly divisible by the number
4, and requires that the presidential primary be consolidated with the
statewide direct primary held in that year.
This bill would,beginning in 2019,change the date of the statewide direct
primary and the presidential primary to the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in March and would continue the requirement that those elections
be consolidated.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION I. Section 316 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
316. (a) "Direct primary" is the primary election held on the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each even-numbered year, to
nominate candidates to be voted for at the ensuing general election or to
elect members of a party central committee.
(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January I.2019,and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC.2. Section 316 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
316. (a) "Direct primary" is the primary election held on the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in March in each even-numbered year.
(b) This section shall become operative January 1,2019.
SEC.3. Section 340 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
340. (a) "Presidential primary" is the primary election that is held on
the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in any year that is evenly
divisible by the number four, and at which delegations to national party
conventions are to be chosen.
(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2019.and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC.4. Section 340 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
93
Ch.335 —2-
340. (a) "Presidential primary" is the primary election that is held on
the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of any year that is evenly
divisible by four.
(b) This section shall become operative January I,2019.
SEC. 5. Section 1000 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
1000. The established election dates are as follows:
(a) The second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year.
(b) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each
odd-numbered year.
(c) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each year.
(d) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year.
(e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2019,and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC. 6. Section 1000 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
1000. The established election dates are as follows:
(a) The second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year.
(b) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each
odd-numbered year.
(c) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year.
(d) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March in each
even-numbered year.
(e) This section shall become operative January 1,2019.
SEC. 7. Section 1001 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
1001. (a) Elections held in lune and November of each even-numbered
year are statewide elections and the dates of those elections are statewide
election dates.
(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2019,and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC. 8. Section 1001 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
1001. The following are statewide elections and their dates are statewide
election dates:
(a) An election held in November of an even-numbered year.
(b) An election held in March of an even-numbered year.
(c) This section shall become operative January 1,2019.
SEC.9. Section 1201 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
1201. (a) The statewide direct primary shall be held on the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in June of each even-numbered year.
(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2019,and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC. 10. Section 1201 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
1201. (a) The statewide direct primary shall be held on the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in March of each even-numbered year.
(b) This section shall become operative January I,2019.
SEC. I I. Section 1202 of the Elections Code is amended to read:
1202. (a) The presidential primary shall be held on the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in June in any year that is evenly divisible by the
93
-3— Ch.335
number four, and shall be consolidated with the statewide direct primary
held in that year.
(b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,2019,and as
of that date is repealed.
SEC. 12. Section 1202 is added to the Elections Code,to read:
1202. (a) The presidential primary shall be consolidated with the
statewide direct primary in any year that is evenly divisible by four,and the
consolidated primary shall be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday
in March.
(b) This section shall become operative January 1,2019.
0
93
E M
ci 9c FRIDE
��RORRED 'Q.54
Attachment C
Election Date Options
List of Potential Options to
Synchronize General Municipal Elections with
Statewide General Elections by November 2022
A plan would need to be adopted by the City prior to January 1, 2018 indicating this preference
and outlining the move to a statewide elections not later than November 8,2022.
March Options
Option 1. Beginning March 2020, synchronize with statewide elections in March of each even-
numbered year, increasing City Officeholder terms of office by 12 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Two Councilmembers 3/2015 3/2019 3/2020
Three Councilmembers 3/2017 3/2021 3/2022
Option 2. Beginning March 2022, synchronize with statewide elections in March of each even-
numbered year, increasing City Officeholder terms of office by 12 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Three Councilmembers 3/2017 3/2021 3/2022
Two Councilmembers 3/2019 3/2023 3/2024
Option 3. Beginning March 2020, synchronize with statewide elections in March of each even-
numbered year, reducing City Officeholder terms of office by 12 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Three Councilmembers 3/2017 3/2021 3/2020
Two Councilmembers 3/2019 3/2023 3/2022
Option 4. Beginning March 2022, synchronize with statewide elections in March of each even-
numbered year, reducing City Officeholder terms of office by 12 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Two Councilmembers 3/2019 3/2023 3/2022
Three Councilmembers 3/2021 3/2025 3/2024
The statewide election dates are in March and November of each even-numbered year. (Elections Code§ 1001.)
November Options
Option 5. Beginning November 2018, synchronize with statewide elections in November of each
even-numbered year, reducing Officeholder terms of office by 4 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Two Councilmembers 3/2015 3/2019 11/2018
Three Councilmembers 3/2017 3/2021 11/2020
Option 6. Beginning November 2020, synchronize with statewide elections in November of each
even-numbered year, reducing Officeholder terms of office by 4 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Three Councilmembers 3/2017 3/2021 11/2020
Two Councilmembers 3/2019 3/2023 11/2022
Option 7. Beginning November 2022, synchronize with statewide elections in November of each
even-numbered year,reducing Officeholder terms of office by 4 months.
Beg of Term End of Regular Term New End of Term
Two Councilmembers 3/2019 3/2023 11/2022
Three Councilmembers 3/2021 3/2025 11/2024
AsM E
��O
lAW'
Attachment D
Sample Ordinance Changing the City's General Municipal
Election Date
ORDINANCE NO.2017-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1.12.010 OF THE
ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO MOVING THE CITY'S
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS TO THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER
THE FIRST MONDAY IN XX OF EACH EVEN-NUMBERED YEAR
BEGINNING IN XX OF 20XX
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemead's (City) general municipal elections are now held on
the first Tuesday following the first Monday in March of odd-numbered years; and
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 415 (SB 415)"Voter Participation"prohibits local governments,
beginning January 1, 2018, from holding an election on any date other than a statewide election
date if doing so has resulted in voter turnout being at least 25% below the average turnout in that
jurisdiction in the previous four statewide general elections; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with SB 415, the City has determined that it must adopt a
transition plan to consolidate its general municipal elections with a statewide election date to occur
not later than November 8, 2022; and
WHEREAS, Sections 1301 and 10403.5 of the California Elections Code, authorize the
City Council to reschedule its general municipal election and to increase or decrease any terms of
office by not more than 12 months; and
WHEREAS,the City Council desires to reschedule its general municipal election to the
first Tuesday after the First Monday in XX of even-numbered years to coincide with the statewide
XX election beginning in XX of 20XX.
NOW, THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Change of Election Day. Pursuant to Sections 1000 and 1301 of the
California Elections Code,as of XX of 20XX,the City' general municipal election shall be moved
from March of odd-numbered years to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in XX of even-
numbered years to coincide with the statewide XX election.
SECTION 2. Code Amendment. Section 1.12.010 of the Rosemead Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read:
"1.12.010 - General Election
Pursuant to Section 2601 of the California Elections Code and as authorized thereby, the
City general elections shall, commencing on XX of 20XX and henceforth, be held on the first
Tuesday following the first Monday in XX of even-numbered years."
SECTION 3. Adjustment to Terms of Office. In accordance with Sections 1301 and
10403.5 of the California Elections Code, the term of any elected City Officeholder that would
have expired in March 20XX and 20XX shall, instead, expire in the same manner, but after the
occurrence of the XX 20XX and 20XX general municipal elections established by this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. Consolidated Election. Pursuant to Section 1301 and 10403.5 of the
California Elections Code, the City hereby requests the County of Los Angeles approve this
ordinance and allow for consolidation of the City's general municipal election with the statewide
XX election conducted by the County in XX of each even-numbered year,beginning XX,of 20XX.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become operative upon approval by
the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors as provided by California Elections Code Sections
1301(b)(1) and 10403(a)(1).
SECTION 6. Notice to Voters. Pursuant to Section 10403.5(e)of the California Elections
Code,within 30 days after this Ordinance becomes operative,the City elections official shall cause
notice to be mailed to all registered voters informing the voters of the change in the election date
made by this Ordinance and that, as a result of the change in election date, the terms of office of
City Officeholders will be twill be extended or reduced by not more than 12 months.
SECTION 7. Request to the County. The City Clerk shall forward a copy of this
Ordinance to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors with a request that it be approved
pursuant to California Elections Code Sections 1301 and 10403.5.
SECTION 8 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this
ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each
and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional
without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
SECTION 9. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify this ordinance and cause
it to be published in the manner required by law.
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance will be effective 30 days after adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this XX day of XX, 2017.
Polly Low, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
Rachel Richman, City Attorney Marc Donohue, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF ROSEMEAD
I, Marc Donohue, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Rosemead, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rosemead held on the XX day of XX, 2017 and was adopted by the City
Council of the City of Rosemead at a regular meeting held the XX day of XX, 2017, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
ArMe
cr,ic aaioe
--4•3/440
14t
K
POR4Ep \O
Attachment E
Los Angeles County Election Cost Estimate
m
Z
� � VD g w. } \ \ - \ \ \
• \> o - -
/
• 'E co
^ cop - po
. . ° E 11
) ,
.
00 75 +a C1112 g 0 .40
app_ iEmea „ tic ,
ur
§ \ - : : „r e : :
� \ \ \ \ \
■ § -
- - (i. ( i ( / \
1- z . , t2 „ vt )
K � - - us §
§ 2 - LU LU S up
-
( \ { j \ \ \ \ \ } \ \ \ \ /
Z
z a . COco . ;
Um C
V VI
( : - ,
« � _ wz \ - -
_
2 I |/ pop
\ 0
Ir.- -
: _
Zu § ( ( a02 2 ) \• d
. : § § or 02 . ! 7 � � �
AEikM
F
CIVIC PRIDE
vi
0
�POg5iE0 0h
Attachment F
Data from Other Cities
Data from Other Cities
Cities with Odd March Elections
City Previous Election Cycle New Election Cycle Loss/Gain of Term
Bellflower Odd March Years November 2018 Loss of 4 Months
Calabasas Odd March Years November 2018 rI Loss of 4 Months
Monterey Park Odd March Years November 2022 1 Loss of 4 Months
Hidden Hills Odd March Years November 2020 Loss of 4 Months
Manhattan Beach Odd March Years November 2020 i Loss of 4 Months
San Dimas Odd March Years November 2022 1 Loss of 4 Months
Palos Verdes Estates Odd March Years November 2020 Loss of 4 Months
San Fernando Odd March Years November 2022 Loss of 4 Months
Rolling Hills Odd March Years November 2020 Loss of 4 Months
West Hollywood Odd March Years November 2018 Loss of 4 Months
Cities with Odd November Elections
City Previous Election Cycle New Election Cycle Loss/Gain of Term
Artesia Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Diamond Bar Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Duarte Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Montebello Odd November Years 1 November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
El Monte Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Hawaiian Gardens Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Hawthorne Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
South Pasadena Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
San Marino Odd November Years November 2020 Gain of 12 Months
Agoura Hills Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Bell Gardens Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Rancho Palos Verdes Odd November Years November 2020 _ Gain of 12 Months
Pico Rivera Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
West Covina Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Rolling Hills Estates Odd November Years June 2018 Gain of 7 Months
Santa Fe Springs Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Westlake Village Odd November Years November 2018 Gain of 12 Months
Cities with Even April Elections
_ City Previous Election Cycle New Election Cycle Loss/Gain of Term
La Puente Even April Years November 2018 Gain of 7 Months