CC - Item 2B - Ordinance No. 800 . !
to0
A
staff eport
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR
AND MEMBERS OF
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANK G. TRIPEPI, CITY MANAGEj-!
�V �
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1999
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 800 - ZONE CHANGE 99-210, PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03 AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Amending the Zoning Map from C-3; Medium Commercial to PD; Planned
Development-1717 Walnut Grove Avenue
DISCUSSION
This item was presented at apublic hearing before the Planning Commission on October 4, 1999.A
copy of the Planning Commission report, which provides a detailed analysis of the subject zone
change and planned development review,is attached for your review. There were six(6)individuals
from the neighborhood that attended the Planning Commission meeting. Opposition to the project
was heard t fou n: three letters, one verbal telephone statement and two testimonies from
individuals before the Planning Commission. Most concerns were centered on noise impacts.hours
of operation, deliveries and expansion/development of the vacant Edison property to the north. The
City Manager also offered an explanation and clarification of the applicant's proposed operations.
The Planning Commission, after hearing both supporting and opposing statements, voted
unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the proposed zone change and planned
development review.
The project site consists of one parcel totaling 11 acres and is currently located in the C-3;Medium
Commercial zone. It is designated Light Industrial/Office per the Rosemead General Plan. The
existing 150,000 square foot structure was constructed in 1979 and seismically retrofitted in 1957.
Until recently it had been the corporate headquarters for Chicago Title and Trust Company. The
project site is located in an area that contains a mixture of office, institutional and residential land
uses. A majority of the residential uses lie within South San Gabriel,an unincorporated area of Los
Angeles County.
MUNCH_ AG ND `A I
NOV - 91999
B
ITEM No. J1 '` A 1
The applicant, ABS Computer Technology Inc., assembles personal computers. They currently
employ approximately 210 persons. ABS Computer Technology has proposed a space plan of the
180,000 square foot building that would utilize: 105,000 square feet of the building for office related
uses, 41,000 square feet for the storage and warehousing of computer parts, 20,500 square feet for
assembly purposes and 13,500 for ancillary uses (e.g. fitness room, lunch area and daycare). This
reuse would include interior modifications of the building, but there would be no additional floor
area added to the site.
The majority of the structure is proposed as administration and offices. Both are allowed uses within
the C-3 zone. In addition, the facility will serve as the corporate and assembly headquarters for
•
ABS. However,staff determined that the inclusion of storage and assembly,of approximately 34%
of the total building area,necessitated a zone change to Planned Development(PD). The PD zone is
used to accommodate various types of development within the guidelines of the General Plan.
Environmental issues relative to noise and potential geologic problems were identified in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and have been addressed in both the mitigation monitoring program
and as conditions of approval. In addition,other planning related issues(i.e. aesthetics,circulation,
traffic and landscaping)were addressed in the conditions of approval.
There was discussion at the Planning Commission meeting regarding the number of large vehicle
(tractor-trailer)deliveries ABS will be permitted to have. It was recommended by the City Manager
and staff to allow two (2) large vehicle deliveries daily. Condition #26 has been added and staff
recommends City Council adoption of the modified conditions of approval. Also some discussion
centered around the possible change of use in the future if and when ABS relocates. Staff feels that
an additional condition of approval should be added to address this concern. Therefore, condition
#27 has been added that will require a planned development review application be submitted to the
City and a public hearing held, if a change of use or tenant is proposed at a later date.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and place Ordinance No. 800 on first reading and
schedule the item for a second reading at the meeting of December 14, 1999.
Attachments:
1 Draft Ordinance No. 800
2. Modified Conditions of Approval
3. PC Report, dated October 4, 1999
4. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
5. PC Minutes
6. PC Resolution No.99-36
7. ABS Information Packet
8. Existing Building Configuration
ORDINANCE NO. 800
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 99-210, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-03 AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION,AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD ZONING MAP LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM C-3; "MEDIUM COMMERCIAL" TO PD;
"PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1717
WALNUT GROVE AVENUE (APN: 5279-027-010). .
WHEREAS,ABS Computer Technology Incorporated(c/o Mr.Howard Tong),applicant,of
9997 Rose Hills Road, Whittier, CA 90601 filed an application requesting a zone change from the
C-3; "Medium Commercial" to PD; "Planned Development"for property located at 1717 Walnut
Grove Avenue on September 15, 1999; and
WHEREAS,the City of Rosemead has an adopted general plan,zoning ordinance,and map,
including specific development standards to control development; and
WHEREAS, Rosemead's General Plan designates the subject property for Office/Light
Industrial uses,and the property has been developed with a 180,000 square foot office building since
1979; and
WHEREAS, Rosemead's official Zoning Map designates the site for C-3; "Medium
Commercial" development which allows for professional and administrative office buildings.
However,34%of the total building area is dedicated to assembly and storage of parts,which are not
allowed uses. In addition,the reuse of the building as an outright computer assembler is not allowed,
but 11.4% of the floor area is used for assembly purposes and 23% for warehousing and parts
storage,the project proposal; and
WHEREAS, Section 65860 of the California Government Code requires that zoning
ordinances and zoning map be consistent with the adopted general plan; and
WHEREAS, Sections 17.116 and 17.124 of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorize the
Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed zone changes to the City Council;and
WHEREAS, on September 22, 1999, an initial study for the proposed zone change was
completed finding that the few significant environmental impacts associated with this zone change
could be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation
measures and a mitigated negative declaration was prepared; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 1999, notices were posted in 10 public locations and 204
notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property specifying
the public comment period and the time and place for a public hearing pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65091(a)(3); and
WHEREAS,on October 4, 1999,the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive
testimony relative to Zone Change 99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-03; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 1999 the Planning Commission held public hearings and
adopted PC Resolution 99-36, approving a recommendation to the City Council to approve Zone
Change 99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-03; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 1999, notices were posted the San Gabriel Valley Tribune, in
10 public locations and 204 notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from
the subject property specifying the availability of the environmental analysis, plus the date, time
and location of the public hearing for Zone Change 99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-
03: and
Ordinance No. 800
Zone Change 99-2)0/Planned Development Review 99-03
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1999, the Rosemead City Council held duly noticed public
hearings and sufficiently considered all testimony presented to them in order to make the
following determination.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED,by the City Council of the City of Rosemead
as follows:
Section 1. The City Council has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
together with all comments, both written and oral, received during the public review and public
hearing process. The City Council hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Zone
Change 99-210 and Planned Development 99-03 with the finding that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The approval of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration is made upon the basis of the Initial Study, all comments received
and staff responses to comments.
Section 2. The City Council HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that placing the
property in the PD; Planned Development zone is in the best interest of the public necessity and
general welfare and good city planning practice dictates and supports the proposed zone change. The
change to the PD zoning classification would allow the applicant to reuse an existing 180,000 square
foot office structure for administrative, storage and assembly functions.
Section 3. The City Council FURTHER FINDS AND DETERMINES that Zone Change
99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-03 are consistent with the Rosemead General Plan as
follows:
A. Land Use;The designation provided by Zone Change 99-210/Planned Development Review
99-03 would allow the property owner to reuse an existing 180,000 square foot office
structure for administrative,storage and assembly functions. The site is located in Planning
Area 8 of the Land Use Element of the Rosemead General Plan and has been designated for
office/light industrial uses. Areas to the north and southeast are designated office/light
industrial,to the east—public facilities(Whittier Narrows Golf Course,unincorporated L.A.
County)and to the west and southwest—residential(South San Gabriel,unincorporated L.A.
County).
B. Circulation; The site is located on Walnut Grove Avenue. Walnut Grove Avenue is
classified as a secondary arterial street in the General Plan. Primary access is provided via
Walnut Grove Avenue and secondary access via Delta Avenue. The existing circulation
design would be maintained. Traffic patterns are anticipated to be similar to those of the
previous tenant.
C. Resource Management; The applicant has provided adequate landscaping on the proposed
site and the project will not have any negative impacts on air or water quality in the City.
D. Noise;The proposed use is one that assembles computers using simple tools,without the use
of presses,punches or other heavy machinery. Anticipated noise related impacts associated
with deliveries have been addressed through mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and enforced through conditions of approval outlined in Planned
Development Review 99-03.
E. Public Safety; The project site is located in the Alquist-Priolo Special Study zone and in a
liquefaction area. Seismic retrofits were added to the building in 1987. To mitigate potential
impacts associated with geological problems, mitigation measures have been incorporated
requiring a geologic report, per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act, for future building
construction and the maintenance of an emergency preparedness plan.
Ordinance No. 800
Zone Change 99-210/Planned Development Review 99-03
Page 3 of 3
Section 4. The City Council HEREBY APPROVE Zone Change 99-210 and Planned
Development Review 99-03, amending Rosemead Zoning map land use designation from C-3;
"Medium Commercial"to PD;"Planned Development"for property located at 1717 Walnut Grove
Avenue (APN: 5279-027-010).
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
same to be published as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 23rd day of November, 1999.
JOE VASQUEZ, Mayor
ATTEST:
NANCY VALDERRAMA, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
CITY OF ROSEMEAD)
I, Nancy Valderrama, City Clerk of the City of Rosemead, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 800 being:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD
APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 99-210, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-03 AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION,AMENDING THE ROSEMEAD ZONING MAP LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM C-3; "MEDIUM COMMERCIAL" TO PD;
"PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1717
WALNUT GROVE AVENUE (APN: 5279-027-010).
was duly introduced and placed upon first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
9th day of November and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of November, 1999, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NANCY VALDERRAMA, City Clerk
EXHIBIT"A"
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03
1717 Walnut Grove Avenue
MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
November 9, 1999
1. Approval of Planned Development Review 99-03 shall not take effect for any purpose
until the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead an affidavit stating that he/she is
aware of and accepts all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of
- conditions.
2. Planned Development Review 99-03 is approved for one (1) year from the date of these
conditions. At least 30 days prior to the end of this one (1) year period, the applicant
shall file a written extension request to the Planning Department. This approval shall
expire after one (I) year without progress towards completion of the use authorized by
this permit.
3. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning, prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy
permits,or any other appropriate request.
4. Any future additions to the building or site will require the owners to provide a geologic
report,per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of 1972.
5. Applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for emergencies
related to the occurrence of an earthquake. Proof of said plan will be required prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
6. Applicant shall limit hours of delivery to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday thru Saturday.
7. Applicant shall resurface the existing asphalt area with an application of slurry seal or
other acceptable paving material,prior to occupancy approval.
8. Parking stalls, handicap stalls, speed bumps, red curbs, directional arrows and other
parking and traffic indicators shall be re-painted in a clear, visible and orderly manner.
Striping shall be done in accordance with City standards and be completed prior to
Certificate of Occupancy approval.
9. Parking space markers and other traffic indicators shall be maintained and re-painted
periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. A letter by
the property owner shall be given to the City authorizing enforcement. Said striping shall
be maintained in a clear, visible and orderly manner.
10. A complete and detailed sign plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department,
indicating proposals for monument, building, directional and other relevant signage. The
sign plan shall indicate measurements, colors, materials and method of illumination. Said
sign plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to Certificate
of Occupancy issuance.
11. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least 6" tall with a minimum character width
of 1/4", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. The
location, color and size of such sign shall be subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
12. A]] signs and sign structures shall be well maintained by the tenant and/or Landlord.
Illumination must be of uniform intensity and well maintained for all letters and/or
symbols. Upon notice by the City, the Landlord shall be required to repair or refurbish
their sign and/or sign illumination within seven (7) working days.
13. The applicant shall repaint the building, walls, courtyard, planter boxes and other
structures to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Proposed colors shall be
reviewed and approved prior to painting. Work shall he completed before occupancy
permit is issued.
14. Applicant shall replace missing light standards in parking area prior to occupancy permit
issuance. Said light standards shall match existing. All light standards shall be well
maintained and direct light and glare away from adjoining residential properties.
15. Existing landscape planters that are barren and/or contain missing, diseased or dying
plant materials shall be replanted with matching landscape materials prior to Certificate
of Occupancy approval. Proposed changes to landscaping of the site shall be reviewed
by the Planning Department prior to installation.
16. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be provided insuring regular
automatic irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement.
17. All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped and
maintained on a regular basis.
18. All new utilities shall be placed underground, including facilities and wires for the supply
and distribution of electrical energy, telephone, cable, etc. The underground conversion
of these utilities shall consider all future connections to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
19. All rooftop appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from view to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
20. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed, litter free state in accordance with Sections
£.32.010, .020, .030 and .040 of the Rosemead Municipal Code, which pertains to the
storage, accumulation, collection, and disposal of garbage, rubbish, trash, and debris. All
trash containers shall be stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. Any new
litter and graffiti shall be removed within twenty-four (24) hours. A 24-hour, Graffiti
Hotline can be called at(626) 307-0463 for assistance.
21. All waste materials shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with local, state and
federal laws and policies. No waste material shall be washed or poured into any public
street, storm drain or sewer at any time.
22. The applicant shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws relative to the approved
use including the requirements of the Planning, Building, Fire, Sheriff and Health
Departments.
23. The applicant shall maintain a minimum clearance of five (5) feet (free of any debris,
storage, furniture, etc.) from any electrical/mechanical equipment and/or emergency
exits.
24. Any changes to the conditions of operation listed in this Exhibit "A" must first be
approved by the Planning Commission through a modification application.
25. Violation of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of
revocation proceedings.
26. Applicant shall he limited to two (2) large vehicle deliveries (i.e. tractor-trailers) daily.
27. Any change in use or tenant will require the submittal of a planned development review
application and public hearing.
mfft
• staf eport
x,,.own.m.+
\
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
October 4, 1999
CASE NO: ZONE CHANGE 99-210
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03
REQUEST: 1) Change the zoning designation from C-3; Medium
Commercial to PD; Planned Development.
2) Approve a Planned Development for a computer assembly
operation in the PD zone.
LOCATION: 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue
(APN: 5279-027-010)
APPLICANT: ABS Computer Technology Inc., c/o Mr. Howard Tong
9997 Rose Hills Road
Whittier, CA 90601
OWNER: Chicago Title&Trust Company
171 North Clark
Chicago, II 60601-3294
PUBLIC NOTICE: Notices were mailed to 65 property owners within 300 feet of the
subject property plus posted in 10 public places on 09-23-99.
EXHIBITS: A. Conditions of Approval
B. Assessor's Maps
C. Zoning Map
D. General Plan Map
E. Initial Study, dated 9-22-99
F. Application
I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Zone Change 99-210/Planned Development 99-03 is a request to change the zoning of 1717 Walnut
Grove Avenue from C-3;Medium Commercial to PD;Planned Development. The proposal would
also entail reuse of the existing 180,000 square foot building to accommodate a personal computer
assembler. This reuse would involve interior modifications to the building, but does not include
additional floor area. The proposed facility would include administrative offices, warehousing,
assembly and research & development.
An initial study has been completed (September, 22, 1999) in accordance with state (CEQA) and
local environmental regulations. This study analyzes the potential environmental impacts that could
be created from the proposed project. The study was sent to all property owners within 300' of the
subject property and noticed in 10 public locations, soliciting comments for more than a 21-day
period prior to the City Council hearing.
The study found that the few significant impacts associated with this zone change could be mitigated
to a level of less than significant impact, with the implementation of mitigation measures. In
addition, the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rosemead General
Plan. In review of the General Plan,an environmental document,the environmental impact report,
was prepared which assessed the impacts associated with the reuse of the proposed project.As such,
several mitigation measures are necessary and a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared.
' OSEMEAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT/
ZC 99-210/PD 99-03
October 4, 1999
Page 2 of 4
II. CODE REQUIREMENTS
A. General Plan -Section 65300 et seq of the California Government Code sets standards for
each city to prepare,adopt and amend a comprehensive general plan. This plan coordinates the long-
term physical development goals and objectives of the city. Government Code Sections 65860,
66473.5 and 66474 require that day-to-day development decisions, such as zoning and land
subdivision should be consistent with the general plan.
B. Zone Change - Chapters 17.116 and 17.120 of the Rosemead Municipal Code set forth the
procedures and requirements for zone changes and amendments. Zone changes are permitted
whenever the public necessity,convenience,general welfare or good zoning practice justifies such
action. A zone change must be found consistent with the Rosemead General Plan.
C. Planned Development - Regulations for planned developments are contained in Section
65450 et seq of the California Government Code and Chapter 17.76 of the Rosemead Municipal
Code. A planned development can be an effective tool for implementing the General Plan policies
and objectives.
Planned Development zones may be established to provide diversification in the location of
structures and other land uses while insuring compliance with the General Plan and compatibility
with existing and fixture developments in surrounding areas.
III. PROPERTY HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION
The project site consists of one parcel totaling 11 acres. The existing 180,000 square foot structure
was constructed in 1979 and seismically retrofitted in 1987. Until recently it had been the corporate
headquarters for Chicago Title and Trust Company. This structure sits in the center of the property.
Parking areas lie to the north, east and west of the building. Landscaping surrounds the property
perimeter and is also interspersed throughout the development.
IV. SURROUNDING LAND USES
North:
General Plan: Office/Light Industrial
Zoning: C3; Medium Commercial
Land Use: Vacant
South (east portion):
General Plan: Office/Light Industrial
Zoning: C-3D; Medium Commercial —Design Overlay
Land Use: Countrywide Loan Corp.
South (west portion):
General Plan: L.A. County
Zoning: Residential
Land Use: Residential
East:
General Plan: L.A. County
Zoning: Public Facilities
Land Use: Golf Course
ZC 99-2)0/PD 99-03
October 4, /999
Page 3 of 4
West:
General Plan: L.A. County
Zoning: Residential
Land Use: Residential
V. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
•
A. LAND USE
The site at 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue is located in Planning Area 8 of the Land Use Policy
Element of the Rosemead General Plan. This area has been designated for Office/Industrial uses.
This designation was created due to available larger lots and the close proximity to an arterial street.
The project site is located in an area that contains a mixture of office, institutional and residential
land uses. Headquarters for Edison International and a regional office for Countrywide Loan are
located to the northwest and the south respectively. Property to the north is zoned C-3 and
designated as Office/Light Industrial per the General Plan. To a portion of the south, property is
zoned C-3D and designated Office/Light Industrial. Areas to the east lie within unincorporated Los
Angeles County and are utilized as a public golf course. Properties to the west and a portion of the
south are residential uses within South San Gabriel,an unincorporated area of Los Angeles County.
The applicant, .ABS Computer Technology Inc., assembles personal computers. They currently
employ approximately 250 persons. ABS Computer Technology has proposed a spaceplan of the
180,000 square foot building that would utilize: 105,000 square feet of the building for office related
uses, 41,000 square feet for the storage and warehousing of computer parts, 20,500 square feet for
assembly/manufacturing purposes and 13,500 for secondary uses(e.g.fitness room,lunch area and
daycare). This reuse would include interior modifications of the building, but there would be no
additional floor area added to the site
The current zoning designation for the site is C-3, which allows for medium commercial uses.
Development standards for this zone allow for a maximum of five employees and no more than 50%
of the floor area to be used for manufacturing, which is clearly incidental to the retail business
conducted on the premises. The applicant proposes to use approximately 20,500 square feet of the
180,000 square feet for assembly/light manufacturing,which is 11.4% of the floor area. Since the
primary use of this facility is to function as the headquarters of ABS administrative and assembly
operations, a zone change request to Planned Development(PD)is required. The PD zone is used to
accommodate various types of development within the guidelines of the General Plan.
B. PARKING/CIRCULATION
The main entrance to the property is located on Walnut Grove Avenue. Two secondary drive
approaches are located at the rear (west) of the property on Delta Avenue. These approaches are
currently chained off to prevent access to the site. All drive approaches have adequate width to
accommodate two-way traffic. Parking areas are located to the front (east), north and rear of the
property and are provided landscape planters.
The following parking ratios are required of the following floor area uses. The office use is required
to provide parking at a ratio of one space for each 250 square feet of floor area. The manufacturing
(assembly) would require one space for each 400 square feet. Storage and open space areas are
required to provide one parking space for every 1,000 square feet. Secondary uses have been
calculated at a parking ratio of one space required for every 1,000 square feet of building area. The
proposed floor area distribution consists of approximately:
ZC 99-210/PD 99-03
October 4, 1999
Page 4of4
• 105,000 square feet of the building for office related uses (420 spaces);
• 20,500 square feet for the manufacturing/assembly (51 spaces);
• 41,000 square feet for storage/warehouse (41 spaces) and
• 13,500 square feet(14 spaces)for secondary uses(e.g. gym,lunch area and daycare)
This floor area distribution would require 526 parking spaces. 566 spaces are provided. In addition,
loading spaces and a dock are provided within an enclosed area at the rear of the building.
Due to the extended vacancy of the site, staff is recommending a slurry seal pavement application
and striping of standard,compact and handicap stalls,red curbs,speed bumps and directional arrows.
The applicant must also comply with the current number of handicap parking stalls required per the
Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)and Title 24. Conditions of approval will be incorporated
into the Planned Development Review.
C. NOISE
Residential properties are located to the west and a portion to the south of the subject site. Both
residential areas are provided a landscape buffer/berm and setback distance,approximately 100'for
properties to the south and 325' for those to the west. The building has also been designed to contain
the noise related uses well within the building in order to reduce any potential noise impacts.
However,there may be impacts associated with deliveries occurring during times other than standard
operating hours. To mitigate potential impacts,a mitigation measure has been incorporated for this
issue. Conditions of approval will be incorporated into the Planned Development Review.
D. GEOLOGICAL ISSUES
The project site is located in the Alquist-Priolo Special Study zone and is located in a liquefaction
area as noted by the Seismic Hazard Zones Map (March 1999). In 1987, approximately 2 million
dollars in seismic retrofit were put into the building. Staff recommends conditions of approval that
will obligate the owners to provide a geologic report,per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of
1972,for any future building additions and require maintenance of an emergency preparedness plan.
At this time, the applicant has no plans to expand the existing facility. Conditions of approval will
be incorporated into the Planned Development Review.
E. AESTHETICS
The PD zone includes a design overlay. This provides the City an opportunity to review plans and
subsequent changes to development of this site. The proposed zone change will allow greater
aesthetic review than the existing C-3 zone. More specifically, staff will recommend conditions of
approval incorporated into the Planned Development Review requiring repainting of the building,
landscape improvements, sign plan submittal and repair of light standards.
VI. RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of:
1) Mitigated Negative Declaration for ZC 99-210; and
2) Zone Change (ZC) 99-210, changing the zoning designation from C-3 to PD.
3) Planned Development Review 99-03, for a computer assembly operation in the PD
zone.
EXHIBIT "A"
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03
1717 Walnut Grove Avenue
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
October 4, 1999
1. Approval of Planned Development Review 99-03 shall not take effect for any purpose until
the applicant has filed with the City of Rosemead an affidavit stating that he/she is aware of
and accepts all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions.
2. Planned Development Review 99-03 is approved for one (1) year from the date of these
conditions. At least 30 days prior to the end of this one(1) year period, the applicant shall
file a written extension request to the Planning Department. This approval shall expire after
one(1)year without progress towards completion of the use authorized by this permit.
3. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning, prior to final approval of the associated plans, building permits, occupancy
permits, or any other appropriate request.
4. Any future additions to the building or site will require the owners to provide a geologic
report,per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of 1972.
5. Applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for emergencies
related to the occurrence of an earthquake. Proof of said plan will be required prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
6. Applicant shall be limit hours of delivery to 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.,Monday thru Saturday.
7. Applicant shall resurface the existing asphalt area with an application of slurry seal or other
acceptable paving material,prior to occupancy approval.
8. Parking stalls,handicap stalls,speed bumps,red curbs,directional arrows and other parking
and traffic indicators shall be re-painted in a clear,visible and orderly manner. Striping shall
be done in accordance with City standards and be completed prior to Certificate of
Occupancy approval.
9. Parking space markers and other traffic indicators shall be maintained and re-painted
periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. A letter by the
property owner shall be given to the City authorizing enforcement. Said striping shall be
maintained in a clear, visible and orderly manner.
10. A complete and detailed sign plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department,indicating
proposals for monument, building, directional and other relevant signage. The sign plan
shall indicate measurements, colors, materials and method of illumination. Said sign plan
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to Certificate of
Occupancy issuance.
11. The numbers of the address signs shall be at least 6"tall with a minimum character width of
1/4", contrasting in color and easily visible at driver's level from the street. The location,
color and size of such sign shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
12. All signs and sign structures shall be well maintained by the tenant and/or Landlord.
Illumination must be of uniform intensity and well maintained for all letters and/or symbols.
Upon notice by the City, the Landlord shall be required to repair or refurbish their sign
and/or sign illumination within seven (7)working days.
13. The applicant shall repaint the building,walls,courtyard,planter boxes and other structures
to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Proposed colors shall be reviewed and
approved prior to painting. Work shall be completed before occupancy permit is issued.
14. Applicant shall replace missing light standards in parking area prior to occupancy permit
issuance. Said light standards shall match existing. All light standards shall be well
maintained and direct light and glare away from adjoining residential properties.
15. Existing landscape planters that are barren and/or contain missing, diseased or dying plant
materials shall be replanted with matching landscape materials prior to Certificate of
Occupancy approval. Proposed changes to landscaping of the site shall be reviewed by the
Planning Department prior to installation.
16. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be provided insuring regular automatic
irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement.
17. All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped and
maintained on a regular basis.
18. All new utilities shall be placed underground, including facilities and wires for the supply
and distribution of electrical energy, telephone,cable,etc. The underground conversion of
these utilities shall consider all future connections to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
19. All rooftop appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from view to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.•
20. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed, litter free state in accordance with Section
5401-5405 of the Rosemead Municipal Code,which pertains to the storage, accumulation,
collection, and disposal of garbage,rubbish,trash,and debris. All trash containers shall be
stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. Any new litter and graffiti shall be
removed within twenty-four(24) hours. A 24-hour, Graffiti Hotline can be called at (626)
307-0463 for assistance.
21. All waste materials shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with local, state and
federal laws and policies. No waste material shall be washed or poured into any public
street, storm drain or sewer at any time.
22. The applicant shall comply with all Federal,State and local laws relative to the approved use
including the requirements of the Planning,Building,Fire,Sheriff and Health Departments.
23. The applicant shall maintain a minimum clearance of five (5) feet (free of any debris,
storage, furniture, etc.) from any electrical/mechanical equipment and/or emergency exits.
24. Any changes to the conditions of operation listed in this Exhibit"A"must first be approved
by the Planning Commission through a modification application.
25. Violation of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation
proceedings.
r.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
City of Rosemead
1. Project Title: Zone Change 99-210
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rosemead Planning Department
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, California 91770
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jason Golding, Associate Planner
(626) 288-6671
4. Project Location: 1737 Walnut Grove Avenue
County of Los Angeles, State of California
Assessor Parcel Number(s): 5279-027-010
5. .Applicant's Name and Address: ABS Computer Technology Inc., c/o Mr. Howard Tong
9997 E. Rose Hills Rd.
Whittier, CA 90601
6. General Plan Designation: Office/Light Industrial 7. Zoning Designation: C-3
8. Description of Project (describes the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of
the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features for its implementation. Attach additional
sheets if necessary): This project is a request to change the zoning of 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue from C-
3;Medium Commercial to PD;Planned Development. The PD zone is used to accommodatevarious types
of development within the guidelines of the general plan. The existing 180,000 square foot structure had
been until recently the corporate headquarters for Chicago Title until recently. ABS Computer Technology
proposes to use approximately: 105,000 square feet of the building for office related uses, 41,000 square
feet for the storage and warehousing of computer parts, 20,500 square feet for manufacturing/assembly
purposes and 13,500 for secondary uses. This reuse would include interior modifications of the building,
but there would be no additional floor area added to the site. (See Attachment A (I)for more detail).
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting(Briefly describe the project's surroundings): Walnut Grove Avenue is an
arterial street. Properties to a portion of the south are zoned C-3D and the land use designation is Office/Light
Industrial. To the north, a vacant lot is zoned C-3 and designated Office/Light Industrial per the City's General
Plan. To the east is a publicly managed golf course. Properties within unincorporated Los Angeles County lie
to a portion of the south and west are zoned and used for single-family residences.
10. Other Public Agencies whose approval is required (e.g.,permits, financing approval, or participation
agreement): Building permits for tenant improvements.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that
is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
Land Use/Planning _ Transportation/Circulation _ Public Services
Population and Housing Biological Resources _ Utilities and Service Systems
x Geologic Problems Energy and Mineral Resources _ Aesthetics
Water _ Hazards _ Cultural Resources
Air Quality x Noise _ Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Initial Environmental Smtly Page 1 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
RI. DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation (check statement that best applies):
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. -
I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURES described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least
one effect; 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described
on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated". AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment,
there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects;
1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have
been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures
that are impo -. ton the project.
September 22. 1999
Signature Date
Peter Lyons City of Rosemead
Printed Name For
•
Initial Environmental Srvd_v Page 2 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Midcation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
IV. ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES)
A. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation x
or zoning? (source #(s) 1, 2 & 3)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental
plans or policies adopted by agencies
with jurisdiction over the project?
(source #(s) 2 & 3)
c) Be incompatible with existing land use _ x
in the vicinity? (source #(s) 2 & 5)
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations _ z
(e.g. impacts to soils or farn lands, or
impacts from incompatible land uses)?
(source #(s) 2 & 3)
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement _ x
of an established community (including a
low-income or minority community)?
(source #(s) 2)
B. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional - _ x
or local population projections? _
(source #(s) 2 & 3)
b) Induce substantial growth in an area
either directly or indirectly (e.g. through
projects in an undeveloped area or extension
of major infrastructure)? (source #(s) 2 & 3)
c) Displace existing housing, especially _ x
affordable housing? (source #(s) 2)
C. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in, or expose people to potential
impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture? _ x
(source #(s) 2, 6 & 7)
b) Seismic ground shaking?
(source #(s) 2, 6 & 7)
c) Seismic ground failure including liquefaction? x _
(source #(s) 2 & 6 )
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? _ x
(source #(s) 2)
Initial Environmental Study
Page 3 of]3
Case No. ZC 99-270
•
Potentially
Significant
• Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
e) Landslides or mudflows?
(source#(s) 2 & 6)
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable _ x
soil conditions from excavation, grading,
or fill? (source #(s) 2)
g) Subsidence of the land?
x
(source #(s) 2)
b) Expansive soils?
x
(source#(s) 2)
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
(source#(s) 2)
D. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff 7(source #(s) )
b) Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding?
(source #(s)
c) Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)? (source#(s) )
d) Changes in the amount of surface water _ x
in any water body? (source #(s)
e) Changes in currents, or the course or _ x
direction of water movements?
(source#(s)
0 Change in the quantity of ground waters, _ x
either through direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations or through substantial loss
of groundwater recharge capability?
(source#(s) )
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of _ x
groundwater (source #(s) )
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
(source#(s)
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of _ x
groundwater otherwise available for
public water supplies? (source #(s)
Initial Environmental Study Page 4 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
i.
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
•
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
E. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute _ _ _ x
to an existing or projected air quality
violation? (source #(s) 2, 3 & 5)
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? _ _ x
(source #(s) 2, 3 & 5)
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, _ _ x
or cause any change in climate?
(source #(s) 2&3)
d) Create objectionable odors? _
—
x
(source #(s) 2, 3 & 5)
F. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? _ _ x
(source#(s) 2, 3 & 5)
b) Hazards to safety from design features x
(e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections,
or incompatible uses like farm equipment?
(source #(s) )
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to _ x
nearby uses? (source #(s) 2)
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or x
off-site? (source#(s) )
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or _ x
bicyclists? (source #(s) )
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting _ x
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? (source #(s) )
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? x
(source #(s) 2)
G. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species, or _ x
their habits (including but not limited to
plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds?
(source #(s) )
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage _ x
trees)? (source#(s) )
Initial Environmental Study Page 5 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
Potentially
Sienificam
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Imnact Impact
c) Locally designated natural communities _ a
(e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
(source #(s) )
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)? (source#(s)
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? x
(source #(s) )
H. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? (source#(s) 2)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful x
and insufficient manner? (source #(s)
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known x
mineral resource that would be of future
value to the region and the residents of
the State? (source#(s) )
HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of _ x
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? (source #(s) 5)
b) Possible interference with an emergency x
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
(source #(s) 2)
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential _ x
health hazard? (source #(s) 5)
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazard? (source#(s) )
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? (source#(s) 2)
J. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
(source #(s)
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x
(source #(s)
Initial Environmental Smdy Pane 6 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
R. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
following areas?
a) Fire Protection? (source #(s) ) _ _ _ x
II) Police Protection? (source #(s) ) x
c) Schools? (source#(s) ) x
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including _ x
roads? (source#(s) )
e) Other governmental services? _ _ x
(source #(s) )
L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal.result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantia] alterations to the following
utilities:
a) Power of natural gas? (source#(s) ) x
b) Communication Systems? (source #(s) ) _ x
c) Local or regional water treatment or - x
distribution facilities? (source#(s) )
d) Sewer or septic tanks? (source#(s) ) _ _ x
e) Storm water drainage? (source #(s) ) x
0 Solid Waste disposal? (source#(s) ) _ x
g) Local or regional water supplies? _ x
(source #(s) )
M. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? _ _ x
(source#(s) )
h) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic x
effect? (source #(s) )
c) Create light or glare? (source #(s) ) _ x
N. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? _ x
(source#(s) )
Initial Environmental Study Page 7 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
•
Potentially
•
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Disturb archaeological resources? _ x
(source #(s) )
c) Affect historical resources?
(source#(s) )
d) Have the potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique ethnic
cultural values? (source#(s)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area?
(source #(s) )
O. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or _ x
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
(source #(s) )
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
(source #(s) )
V. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to x
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are _ x
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)
d) Does the project have environmental effects x
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Initial Environmental Study Page 8 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
VI. EARLIER ANALYSIS
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects
have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration, Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a
discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for
review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Incorporated", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from
the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the
project.
Initial Environmental Smdy Page 9 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
ATTACHMENT A
Environmental Evaluation
Zone Chane 99-210
I. INTRODUCTION
A. SCOPE AND INTENT: This project is a request to change the zoning of 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue from C-3:
Medium Commercial to PD;Planned Development. The PD zone is used to accommodate various types of development
within the guidelines of the general plan. This site is located on Walnut Grove Avenue south of Rush Street and is
designated for Office/Light Industrial uses under the Rosemead General Plan.
ABS Computer Technology Inc. assembles persona] computers. The existing 180,000 square foot structure located on the
property had been until recently the corporate headquarters for Chicago Title. ABS Computer Technology proposes to use
approximately: 105,000 square feet of the building for office related uses, 41,000 square feet for the storage and
warehousing of computer parts,20.500 square feet for manufacturing/assembly purposes and 13,500 for secondary uses
(e.g. fitness room, lunch area and daycare). This reuse would include interior modifications of the building, but there
would be no additional floor area added to the site.
B. SITE DESCRIPTION: Rosemead is a suburban community located in the San Gabriel Valley, 10 miles east of
the City of Los Angeles. It is bounded on the north by the cities of Temple City and San Gabriel, on the west by South
San Gabriel and Monterey Park, on the south by Montebello and by El Monte and South El Monte on the east. The
City is 5.5 square miles or 2,344 acres in size. Rosemead is home to a resident population of approximately 55,760
people.
Land uses surrounding the site and along this portion of Walnut Grove Avenue are a mixture of office, institutional and
residential. Properties to the south and north are designated Office/Light Industrial per the Rosemead General Plan and
zoned C-3D and C3 respectively. Property to the east is located within unincorporated Los Angeles County and is
utilized as a public golf course. To the west and a portion to the south are residential uses also within unincorporated
Los Angeles County. The predominant land use around the site is residential. However, office, institutional and
industrial land uses line the lower section of Walnut Grove Avenue. Route 60 is located approximately one half mile to
the south. Route 60 is a major east/west freeway moving vehicles to and from downtown Los Angeles.
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The zoning for 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue would be changed from C-3 to PD.
This would allow a planned development of office/light industrial uses in accordance with the general plan. The project
would consist of redeveloping an existing building from a title company headquarters to a personal computer assembler.
This facility would include administrative offices, storage/warehousing, research and development, and assembly for
approximately 200-400 employees (at this time).
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
A. Land Use and Planning. The site at 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue is located in Planning Area 8 of the Land Use
Policy of the Rosemead General Plan. This area has been designated for Office/Industrial uses. This designation was
created due to the larger lots available and the close proximity to an arterial street. The plan notes the importance of
Walnut Grove Avenue as a major transportation corridor.
The current zoning designation for the site is C-3, which allows for medium commercial uses. Development standards
for this zone allow for a maximum of five employees and no more than 50% of the floor area to be used for
manufacturing, which is clearly incidental to the retail business conducted on the premises. The applicant proposes to
use approximately 20,500 square feet of the 180,000 square feet for assembly/light manufacturing, which is 11.4% of
the floor area. However, the primary use of this facility is to function as the headquarters of ABS administrative and
assembly operations with approximately 250 employees. Therefore, they are requesting a zone change to PD, which
allows for planned developments in accordance with the general plan.
The project site is located on Walnut Grove Avenue, which in this particular area contains a mixture of office,
institutional and residential land uses. Headquarters for Edison International and a regional office for Countrywide Loan
are located to the northwest and the south respectively. Property to the north is zoned C-3 and designated as
Office/Light Industrial per the General Plan. To a portion of the south, property is zoned C-3D and designated
Office/Light Industrial. Areas to the east lie within unincorporated Los Angeles County and are utilized as a public golf
Initial Environmental Study Page 10 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
-course. Properties to the west and a portion of the south are residential uses within South San Gabriel, an
unincorporated area of Los Angeles County.
The proposed use is a mixture of office, assembly and storage. However, since the area to be used for personal
computer assembly and will not include heavy equipment or machinery, chemicals or special ventilation systems, no
significant impacts are expected to result from this project.
B. Population and Housing. There is no existing housing on this site that would be displaced. The site has been
developed for an office/light manufacturing (assembly) use and is located in an urbanized area that has developed
infrastructure- The new business will create a net increase of the number of jobs in the area. These jobs will have a
range of income levels with a larger portion toward moderate to high incomes. These new positions will be able to
afford the housing in Rosemead which is generally lower than the average for the area. Further analysis of this issue is
not recommended.
C. Geological Problems. The project site is located in the Alquist-Priolo Special Study zone and is located in a
liquefaction area as noted by the Seismic Hazard Zones Map (March 1999). However, the applicant is not expanding
the existing facility and the following mitigation measures have been incorporated. In addition, approximately 2 million
dollars in seismic retrofit were put into the building after the 1987 earthquake. Staff recommends implementing
mitigation measures that will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The first would require that any future
building additions obligate the owners to provide a geologic report, per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of 1972.
At this time, the applicant has no plans to expand the existing facility. Therefore, there will be no impact at this time.
Secondly, the applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for emergencies related to the
occurrence of an earthquake.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
GPI: Any future additions to the building or site will require the owners to provide a geologic report, per
the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of 1972.
GP2: Applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for emergencies related to the
occurrence of an earthquake.
D. Water. The water in this area is provided by San Gabriel Valley Water Company. There are existing water lines
that have been developed to serve the existing development of this site and the surrounding area. No potential impact is
anticipated since the proposal does not indicate further development at this time.
E. Air Quality. Air quality impacts associated with the operation of the proposed use may involve emissions from
vehicles used by employees. However, the potential traffic impacts generated by the proposal will he less than the
existing land use/zoning and the previous tenant. The previous development was reviewed when the general plan land
use element was updated in 1987. The proposed use of the site is consistent with the General Plan Office/Industrial land
use designation, so no new air quality impacts associated with traffic would result. In addition, no other air quality
impacts are anticipated since this proposal entails occupancy of an existing building and new construction is not
proposed.
F. Transportation/Circulation. This existing site is located on Walnut Grove Avenue south of Rush Street. The
redevelopment plan proposes to use the site as it has been developed. Circulation patterns (ingress/egress) would be
unchanged from a result of this project. Since this proposal involves the reuse of an existing building, there are no
anticipated impacts related to hazards or barriers for pedestrians/bicyclists and conflicts with alternative transportation
policies.
The office use is required to provide parking at a ratio of one space for each 250 square feet of floor area. The
manufacturing(assembly) would require one space for each 400 square feet. Storage and open space areas are required
to provide one parking space for every 1,000 square feet. Secondary uses have been calculated at a parking ratio of one
space required for every 1,000 square feet of building area. The proposed floor area distribution consists of
approximately: 105.000 square feet of the building for office related uses (420 spaces), 20,500 square feet for the
manufacturing/assembly (51 spaces), 41,000 square feet for storage/warehouse (41 spaces) and 13,500 square feet (14
spaces) for secondary uses (e.g. fitness room, lunch area and daycare). This floor area distribution would require 526
parking spaces. 566 spaces are provided. In addition, this facility has operated as an office building (100%) with no
impact from parking. Therefore, staff finds that no impact would result from this proposal.
G. Biological Resources. This is an existing, developed lot in the center of an urban community. There are no plant
or animal species that would be impacted by the project. No potential impact is anticipated.
Initial Environmental Study Pa2e 11 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
H. Energy and Mineral Resources. The Housing Element of the Rosemead General Plan has set forth policies and
design standards encouraging energy conservation in construction practices, such as landscaping, building design.
weatherization techniques and glazing. Also, operation of the proposed project will not require significant amounts of
energy resources due to adherence to State and City energy-conservation regulations pertaining to efficient use of
lighting, appliances and heating and cooling systems. No known or suspected mineral resources exist on the project
site. No potential impact is anticipated and further analysis is not recommended.
I. Hazards. The project is a computer assembly facility, with the majority of floor space used for office related uses.
The nature of this land use will not require the transport, use or disposal of explosive or hazardous materials. Since also
there is no new construction proposed there are no potential risks associated with the release of demolition related health
hazards (i.e. lead based paint dust or asbestos). Fire hazards in areas with flammable brush, grass and tress have been
reduced to a level of insignificance since the proposed project will include regularly maintained and irrigated landscape
materials. Further analysis of this issue is not recommended.
J. Noise. Residential properties are located to the west and a portion to the south of the subject site. The building has
been designed to contain the noise related uses well within the building in order to reduce any potential noise impacts.
However, there may be impacts associated with deliveries occurring during times other than standard operating hours.
To mitigate potential impacts, a mitigation measure has been incorporated limiting delivery hours from 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. The incorporation of this mitigation measure should reduce the level of impact to less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
NI: Applicant shall limit hours of delivery from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
K. Public Services. The need for public services will all be below a level of significant impact. First, public safety
services are provided by contract with Los Angeles County. Fire Station #4 is located at 2644 San Gabriel Boulevard
and is approximately 1.5 miles from the project site. Sheriff services are based from Temple Sheriffs Station and
deputies are constantly patrolling the subject area. Secondly, the proposed use would not generate additional school age
children and/or a significant level of new residents, therefore not impacting existing schools and/or governmental
services. Finally, this project entails reuse of an existing office building that at one time was employing 600 persons.
Since the proposal indicates employment of approximately 200 persons, the need for maintenance of public roads is at a
level of insignificance. No further review of the issue is recommended.
L. Utilities and Service Systems. The site has adequate utilities and services for an 180,000 sq. foot office building.
The addition of the assembly operation will provide an insignificant increase in the amount of these resources required.
No potential impact is anticipated.
M. Aesthetics. The PD zone also includes a design overlay. This will provide the City the opportunity to review any
plans and subsequent changes to development of this site. The planned development will allow greater aesthetic
mitigation than the existing C-3 zone, which has no design review. In addition, the existing site has light standards that
are directed away from adjoining residential uses and are buffered by an adequate rear and side setback. No further
review of the issue is recommended.
N. Cultural Resources. There are no known cultural resources located in the area where the subject site is located.
No potential impact is anticipated.
O. Recreation. No impacts to recreation needs are anticipated. Any new development will be required to pay
development fees under the Quimby Act.
III. CONCLUSION
The few significant impacts associated with this zone change can be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact,
with the implementation of mitigation measures attached. However, the proposed project is consistent with the goals
and policies of the Rosemead General Plan. In review of the General Plan, an environmental document, the
environmental impact report, was prepared which assessed the impacts associated with the reuse of the proposed project.
As such, several mitigative measures are necessary and a Negative Declaration will be prepared.
Initial Environmental Study Page 12 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
III. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation measures as indicated below will be monitored through the Conditions of Approval incorporated into Planned
Development Review 99-03. Adherence to the Conditions of Approval will be required prior to issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy.
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS 1: Any future additions to the building or site will require the owners to
provide a geologic report, per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of
1972.
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS 2: Applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for
emergencies related to the occurrence of an earthquake.
NOISE 1: Applicant shall limit hours of delivery from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.in.
V. SOURCE LIST
1. Rosemead Municipal Code. Adopted 1959, as amended.
2. Rosemead General Plan. CottonBeland/Associates, Inc., 1987.
3. Rosemead General Plan: Final Environmental Impact Report. Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., 1987.
4. California Environmental Quality Act: Statute and Guidelines. Governor's Office of Planning and
Research, 1992 (with amendments through July, 1994).
5. .ABS Computer Technology Inc. Response to City Questions. Zone Change 99-210 application submitted
September 15, 1999.
6. State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map: El Monte Quadrangle. California Department of Conservation,
Division of Mines and Geology, 1999.
7. Alquist-Priolo Zone Information. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology
(Complied by City of Rosemead), 1991.
Initial Environmental Study Page 13 of 13
Case No. ZC 99-210
-1U�
CITY OF ii\) 0SEMEAD
8838 EAST VALLEY itOULEVARD
l'\' OSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
October 4, 1999
1U-
CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the City of Rosemead Planning Commission was called to order
by Vice-Chairman Ortiz at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Rosemead City Hall at 8838 East
Valley Boulevard, Rosemead
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Ruiz.
Invocation was delivered by Vice-Chairman Ortiz.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Vice-Chairman Ortiz, Commissioners Breen, Loi, and Ruiz
ABSENT: Chairman Alarcon
EX OFFICIO: Tripepi, Wagner, Price, Lyons, Golding, Wilkinson, and Romanelli
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular meeting of September 7, 1999
(MO) Motion by Commissioner Breen, seconded by Commissioner Ruiz,that the minutes of the
City of Rosemead Regular Planning Commission Meeting of September 7, 1999, be
APPROVED as submitted.
Vote results:
YES: ORTIZ, BREEN, LW, RUIZ
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: ALARCON
Vice-Chairman Ortiz declared said motion duly carried and so ordered
2. EXPLANATION OF HEARING PROCEDURES AND APPEAL RIGHTS:
Deputy City Attorney, Stan Price, explained the public hearing process and the right to appeal
planning commission decisions to the city council.
3. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH:
The commission secretary administered the oath to members of the audience wishing to speak before
the planning commission.
10/4/99 Mimi es,PAGE 2
4. PUBLIC REARING:
A. ZONE CHANGE 99-210/PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 99-03-1717 Walnut Grove
Avenue
A request by Howard Tong/Ed Indvik,dba"ABS Computer Technology,Inc.,"to change
the zoning designation from Medium Commercial(C-3)to Planned Development(PD)for an
existing 180,000 square foot building situated on a 10.77 acre lot.
Prior to the staff report, the City Manager,Frank Tripepi, stated for the record that this
application is a aprecise land developments request appurtenant to ABS
Computer only; wherefore, the assemblage of personal computers is consigned to this
facility, and the deployment of any hazardous toxic materials is strictly prohibited.
Furthermore, shipping shall occur twice a day between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday(no Sunday deliveries).
Mr. Lyons presented the staff report. The subject site consists of one (I) parcel totaling
eleven (11) acres; wherein, the existing 180,000 square foot facility was originally
constructed in 1979, and until recently comprised the corporate headquarters for Chicago
Tide and Trust Company. The applicant has proposed the subsequent space plan utilizing:
• 105,000 square feet for office-related uses
• 41,000 square feet for computer parts storage and warehousing
• 20,500 square feet for assembly/manufacturing purposes
• 13,500 square feet for secondary uses (i.e-, fitness room, lunch area, and
daycare).
This reuse will involve interior modifications, but will not include the creation of additional
floor area. Whereas, ABS proposes to use only 11.4 percent for incidental manufacturing
purposes—less than the C-3 zone requisite of fifty percent(50%)—a zone change to PD is,
accordingly, applied for. Traffic right of entry will be from Walnut Grove Avenue with two
(2) secondary drive approaches located at the rear (west) of the property on Delta Avenue.
In correlation, the parking ratios for the abovementioned site are as follows:
• Warehouse/Storage ONE(1) SPACE per 1,000squarefeet
=41 spaces
• Secondary uses ONE(1) SPACE per 1,000 squarefeet
=14 spaces
• Manufacturing/assembly ONE(1) SPACE per 400 square feet
=51 spaces
• Office ONE(1) SPACE per 250 square/ea'
=420 spaces
Albeit, the floor area apportionment mandates a total of 526 parking stalls; the site is,
nevertheless, striped to equip 566 spaces. Consequently, ample parking will be
adequately accessible and all civic guidelines satisfied. In regards to aesthetics; staff has
recommended that the respondent restore the parking lot, repaint the exterior, and enhance
landscaping. Forasmuch as this project locale is appropriate for office/industrial-related
ventures, and the petitioner is receptive to counsel; staff feels that the establishment of a
computer assembly operation is justified heretofore.
Staff recommendation: Planning commission APPROVE for referral to the city council
and adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance
with CEQA guidelines.
Applicant(s): In the audience.
10/4/99 MA'U Es,PAGE 3
Questions from the commissioners to the staff.
Mr. Lyons acknowledged affirmatively to both Commissioners Breen and Loi;
wherein,the ABS and previous tenant, Chicago Title,personnel size similarity along
with the Delta Avenue southwest corner location of the structure's loading/unloading
dock were in question.
Public hearing was opened by Vice-Chairman Ortiz to those IN FAVOR of this
application:
Representatives for ABS Computer Technologies--Mr. Ed Indvik of 13181
Crossroads,Suite#300,City of Industry;and Mr.Howard Tong of1216 Walnut
Grove Avenue, Rosemead—approached the podium to thank staff and
commissioners for their hard work and dedication, as well as to reaffirm their
commitment to and acceptance of all stipulations. Additionally,Mr.Indvik restated
that the proposed land use intensity would be reduced in contrast to the former
leaseholder,Chicago Title;moreover,the minimal truck impact edict and biohazards
restraint will apply. In response to Commissioner Breen's prior personnel size
inquiry,Mr.Tong confirmed a present staff of two hundred ten(210)with potential
expansion to two hundred fifty(250)employees.
Mr. Tong refuted Commissioner Ruiz' concerns with respect to the application of
solvent cleaning chemicals during component assembly.
Public hearing was opened to those who wished to OPPOSE the application:
Ms.Isabel Sahagun of 1634%North Delta Street,South San Gabriel, expressed
apprehension regarding a vacant lot contiguous to the subject site that she fears may
be detrimentally exploited in the near future.
The City Manager, Mr. Tripepi, assured Ms. Sahagun that the twenty-one (21)
acre parcel to which she alludes to is owned by Southern California Edison
Company; wherein, presently there is no site development interest. Alternatively,
Edison has committed approximately thirty-two million dollars ($32,000,000) in
reconditioning their existing adjoining office buildings; wheretofore, a zoning
modification would not constitute the investment of such an exorbitant amount of
money. Hence, the lot will not be"industrially"zoned for two(2)primary reasons:
1. The City of Rosemead does not desire it.
2. Edison will safeguard their interests.
Mr.John Furukawa of 8356 Elmore Drive,Rosemead, approached the podium to
solicit ABS Computer's contemplated operational hours.
Mr. Lyons replied that a tentative schedule of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. has been
established; however, a "skeleton crew" of approximately ten (10) to fifteen (15)
employees will be functioning during the evening hours of 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. In
comparison, Mr. Lyons stressed the fact that the former occupant, Chicago Title,
had an all-night crew working.
The Deputy Attorney,Mr. Stan Price, entered into the record the following three
(3) disaffirmatory letters:
> Mrs. Newton of 1109 Delta Avenue,South San Gabriel
• Ms. Jan Komuro of 8343 Rmher Rose lane,Rosemead
• Mrs. L. Martinez of Rmberwood Condos on Delta Avenue,
Rosemead(declined address)
There being no one further wishing to address the commission, Vice-Chairman Ortiz
closed the public hearing segment for this project.
10/4/99 Mm2rtEs,PAGE 4
(MO) Motion by Commissioner Breen, seconded by Commissioner Ruiz,to recommend
APPROVAL to the city council for Zone Change 99-210/Planned Development
Review 99-03 subject to the conditions listed in "Exhibit A."
Vote results:
YES: ORTIZ,BREEN, LOA, RUIZ
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: ALARCON
Vice-Chairman Ortiz declared said motion duly carried and so ordered
5. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-749(CONTINUANCE)-97/3 East Valley Boulevard
A request by Phi N.Huynh, dba"Philletex Corporation,"to extend a permit allowing the
operation of a garment manufacturing business.
In view of the fact that persistent outstanding transgressions still prevail, Vice-Chairman
Ortiz recommended that Conditional Use Permit 98-749 (Continuance) be
CONTINUED again to the next Planning Commission Regular Meeting of October l8,
1999.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. PC RESOLUTION 99-35: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING INS/6NBEY/EW99-77 ALLOWING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
THREE (3)-UNIT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX WITH OFFICES, WAREHOUSES, AND
SHOWROOM, "BOTTLEMATE, INC.," ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT Si 3EPST
YAllfTAvEluf/970MUNE STAEfT(APN: 8577-009-040/025/043).
Deputy Attorney, Stan Price, presented the resolution(s) by title only.
(MO)Motion by Commissioner Breen,seconded by Commissioner Ruiz,to waive further
reading and adopt said resolution(s).
Vote results:
YES: ORTIZ,BREEN, LOA, RUIZ
NO: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: ALARCON
Vice-Chairman Ortiz declared said motion duly carried and so ordered
7. ORAL COMMUNICATION FROM THE AUDIENCE:
This is the time for the public to address the planning commission on any matter not presented on the
agenda.
No response.
8. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS AND STAFF:
A. In anticipation of his October 5 reassignment to the City of Simi Valley, Mr. Lyons bid a
warm farewell and thanked the commissioners and staff for their past support.
B. The commissioners and deputy attorney thanked Mr.Lyons for his excellent quality of work
and commitment to the City of Rosemead and congratulated him on his subsequent
investiture. Thereafter, the commissioners welcomed back Mr.Brad Johnson as the city's
new planning director.
10/4/99 MINUTES,PAGE 5
C. The Assistant City Manager,Mr.Wagner, thanked Mr.Lyons for returning to Rosemead
to oversee the commission proceedings one last time. Mr. Wagner then introduced Mr.
Stewart's replacement as Director of Administrative Services, Mr. Bill Crowe.
D. Commissioner Ruiz proposed to convene the commission meeting in reverence to Mr.
Lyons' prior dedication to the City of Rosemead.
9. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no other business to come before the commission,the meeting was adjourned at Ari
QOL The next meeting will take place on MONDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1999, at 7:00 P.M.
I
PC RESOLUTION 99-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONE
CHANGE 99-210, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03 AND
ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AMENDING
THE ROSEMEAD ZONING MAP LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM C-3;
"MEDIUM COMMERCIAL" TO PD; "PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1717 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE(APN: 5279-
027-010).
WHEREAS,ABS Computer Technology Incorporated(cio Mr.Howard Tong),applicant,of
9997 Rose Hills Road,Whittier, CA 90601 filed an application requesting a zone change from the
C-3; "Medium Commercial"to PD; `Planned Development" for property located at 1717 Walnut
Grove Avenue on September 15, 1999; and
WI-IF REAS,the City of Rosemead has an adopted general plan,zoning ordinance,and map,
including specific development standards to control development; and
WHEREAS, Rosemead's General Plan designates the subject property for Office/Light
Industrial uses,and the property has been developed with a 180,000 square foot officebuilding since
1979; and
WRFREAS, Rosemead's official Zoning Map designates the site for C-3; "Medium
.Commercial"development which allows for a maximum of five employees and no more than 50%of
the floor area to be used for manufacturing, but not the reuse of the building as a computer
assembler,which utilizes 11.4%of the floor areafor assembly(manufacturing),the project proposal;
and
WHEREAS, Section 65860 of the California Government Code requires that zoning
ordinances and zoning map be consistent with the adopted general plan; and
WHEREAS, Sections 17.116 and 17.124 of the Rosemead-Municipal Code authorize the
Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed zone changes to the City Council; and
R HEREAS, on September 22, 1999, an initial study for the proposed zone change was
completed finding that the few significant environmental impacts associated with this zone change
could be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact with the implementation of mitigation
measures and a mitigated negative declaration was prepared; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 1999, notices were posted in 10 public locations and 204
notices were sent to property owners within a 300-foot radius from the subject property specifying
the public comment period and the time and place for a public hearing pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65091(a)(3); and
WHA REAS,on October 4, 1999,the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive
testimony relative to Zone Change 99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-03; and
WHEREAS,the Planning Comnissionhas sufficiently considered all testimony presented to
make the following determination.
NOW,THFREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rosemead as follows:
Section 1. The Planning Commission HEREBY RECOMMENDS that a Mitigated Negative
Declaration shall be adopted. An initial study was completed to analyze potential environmental
impacts pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This study analyzes the
potential environmental impacts that could be created from the proposed amendment. The study was
noticed in 10 public locations, soliciting comments for more than a 21-day period prior to the City
Council hearing. This study found that the few simnficant environmental impacts associated with
this zone change could be mitigated to a level ofless than significant impact with the implementation
of mitigation measures and a mitigated negative declaration was prepared.
Section 2. The Planning Commission HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that placing
the property in the PD;Planned Development zone is in the best interest of the public necessity and
general welfare and good city planning practice dictates and supports the proposed zone change. The
change to the PD zoning classification would allow the applicant to reuse an existing 180,000 square
foot office structure for administrative, storage and assembly functions.
Section 3. The Planning Commission FURTHER FINDS AND DETERMINES that Zone
Change 99-210 and Planned Development Review 99-03 is consistent with the Rosemead General
Plan as follows:
A. Land Use;The designation provided by Zone Change 99-210/Planned Development Review
99-03 would allow the property owner to reuse an existing 160,000 square foot office
structure for administrative,storage and assembly functions. The site is located in Planning
Area 8 of the Land Use Element of the Rosemead General Plan and has been designated for
office/light industrial uses. Areas to the north and southeast are designated office/light
industrial, to the east—public facilities (unincorporated L.A. County) and to the west and
southwest—residential (unincorporated L.A. County).
B. Circulation; The site is located on Walnut Grove Avenue. Walnut Grove Avenue is
classified as a secondary arterial street in the General Plan. Primary access is provided via
Walnut Grove Avenue and secondary access via Delta Avenue. The existing circulation
design would be maintained- Traffic patterns are anticipated to be similar to those of the
previous tenant
C. Resource Management; The applicant has provided adequate landscaping on the proposed
site and the project will not have any negative impacts on air or water quality in the City.
D. Noise;The proposed use is one that assembles computers using simple tools,without the use
ofpresses,punches or other heavy machinery. Anticipated noise related impacts associated
with deliveries have been addressed through mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and enforced through conditions of approval outlined in Planned
Development Review 99-03.
E. Public Safety; The project site is located in the Alquist-Priolo Special Study zone and in a
liquefaction area Seismic retrofits were added to the building in 1987. To mitigate potential
impacts associated with geological problems, mitigation measures have been incorporated
requiring a geologic report,per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act, for future building
construction and the maintenance of an emergency preparedness plan.
Section 4. The Planning Commission HEREBY RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Zone
Change 99-210, Planned Development Review 99-03 and the associated Mitigated Negative
Declaration, amending Rosemead Zoning map land use designation from C-3; "Medium
Commercial"to PD; "Planned Development" for property located at 1717 Walnut Grove Avenue
(APN: 5279-027-010).
Section 5. This resolution is the result of an action taken by the Planning Commission on
October 4, 1999, by the following vote:
YES: ORTIZ,BREEN, LOI, RUIZ
NO: NONE
ABSENT: ALARCON
ABSTAIN: NONE
Section 6. The secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall transmit
copies of same to the applicant and Rosemead City Clerk.
PASSED,APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of OcctQober, 1999. / �%� ���
flAr
William Alarcon, Chairman
CERTIFICATION
I, Donald Wagner, Secretary of the Rosemead Planning Commission, hereby certify that the
foregoing is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Rosemead at its regular meeting, held on the 18th day of October, 1999, by the following vote:
YES:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: •
Donald Wagner, Secretary
n
DATE /0/Y/.19_
E?;}IMIT "A"
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-03
1 717 Walnut Grove Avenue
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
October 4. 1999
L Approval ofPlanned Development Review 99-03 shall not take effect for any purpose until
the applicant has fled with the City of Rosemead an affidavit stating that he/she is aware of
and accepts all of the conditions set forth in the letter of approval and this list of conditions.
2. Planned Development Review 99-03 is approved for one (1) year Mom the date of these
conditions. At least 30 days prior to the end of this one (1)year period,the applicant shall
nle a written extension request to the Planning Department This approval shall expire after
one (1)year without progress towards comnietion of the use authorized by this permit
3. The following conditions must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning, prior to final approval of the associated plans, building peimi's, occupancy
permits, or any other appropriate request
4. Any future additions to the building or site will require the owners to provide a geologic
report,per the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Act of 1971
5. Applicant will be required to maintain an emergency preparedness plan for emergencies
related to the occurrence of an earthquake. Proof of said plan will be required prior to
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
6. _Applicant shall limit hours of delivery from 7:00 am.to 7:00 p.m.,Monday thru Saturday.
7. Applicant shall resurface the existing asphalt area with an application of slurry seal or other
acceptable paving material,prior to occupancy approval.
S. Parking stalls,handicap stalls,speed bumps,red curbs,directional avows and other parking
and traffic indicators shalt be re-painted in a clear,visible and orderly manner. Striping shall
be done m accordance with City standards and be completed prior to Certificate of
Occupancy approval.
9. Parking space markers and other traffic indicators shall be maintained and re-painted
periodically to City standards to the satisfaction of the Planning Depa uhent. A letter by the
property owner shall be given to the City authorizing enforcement. Said striping shall be
maintained in a clear, visible and orderly manner.
10. A complete and detailed sign plan shall be submitted to the Planning Deparmhent,indicating
proposals for monument, building, directional and other relevant signage. The sign plan
shall indicate measurements, colors,materials and method of illumination. Said sign plan
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to Cerifcate of
Occupancy issuance.
•
11. The numbers of the address signs shall he at least 6"tall with a minimum character width of
114", connoting in color and easily visible at dnvers level from the street The location,
color and size of such si ma shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
12. All sins and sign structures shall be well main'ained by the tenant and/or Landlord.
Illumination must be of uniform intensity and well maintained for all letters and/or symbols.
Upon notice by the City, the Landlord shall be required to repair or refurbish their sign
and/or sign illumination within seven (7) working days.
13. The applicant shall repaint the building,walls,courtyard,planter boxes and other structures
to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Proposed colors shall be reviewed and
approved prior to painting. Work shall be completed before occupancy permit is issued.
14. Applicant shall replace missing light standards in parking area prior to occupancy permit
issuance. Said light standards shall match existing. All light standards shall be well
maintained and direct light and glare away from adjoining residential properties.
15. Existing landscape planters that are barren and/or contain missing, diseased or dying plant
materials shall be replanted with matching landscape materials prior to Certificate of
Occupancy approval. Proposed changes to landscaping of the site shall be reviewed by the
Planning Department prior to installation.
16. A permanent landscape maintenance program shall be provided insuring regular automatic
irrigation, fertilization and weed abatement.
17. All open area not covered by concrete, asphalt, or structures shall be landscaped and
maintained on a regular basis.
18. All new utilities shall be placed underground, including facilities and wires for the supply
and distribution of electrical energy,telephone,cable, etc. The underground conversion of
these utilities shall consider all future connections to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director.
19. All rooftop appurtenances and equipment shall adequately be screened from view to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
20. The site shall be maintained in a clean, weed, litter free state in accordance with Section
5401-5405 of the Rosemead Municipal Code,which pertains to the storage, accumulation,
collection, and disposal of garbage,rubbish,trash, and debris. All trash containers shall be
stored in the appropriate trash enclosure at all times. Any new litter and graffiti shall be
removed within twenty-four (24)hours. A 24-hour, Graffiti Hotline can be called at (626)
307-0463 for assistance.
21. All waste materials shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with local, state and
federal laws and policies. No waste material shall be washed or poured into any public
street, storm drain or sewer at any time.
22. The applicant shall comply with all Federal,State and local laws relative to the approved use
including the requirements of the Planning,Building,Fire, Sheriff and Health Departments.
23. The applicant shall maintain a minimum clearance of five (5) feet (free of any debris,
storage, furniture, etc.) from any electrical/mechanical equipment and/or emergency exits.
24. Any changes to the conditions of operation listed in this Exhibit "A"must first be approved
by the Planning Commission through a modification application.
25. Violation of the conditions of approval may result in citation and/or initiation of revocation
proceedings.
i ( m
a
kh
American Business Services
ABS Computer Technologies Inc.
Computer Technologies Inc.
Introduction
Founded in 1991. ABS set out to provide quality custom built PCs to our customers. As
a PC manufacturer selling directly to the end user, there are many challenges which ABS
has conquered: by providing high quality. reliable solutions with the latest technologies
and at an unbeatable value. By adhering to the highest quality standards, and developing
key technology partnerships with major chin and component manufacturers_ ABS has
exploded into the PC world.
Mission Statement
ABS shall provide the highest quality computer products and premium service to our
clientele. In addition to quality product& customer service shall be among our highest
priority. Our philosophy shall be to extend ourselves indefinitely to our customers,
providing for their every need We will never compromise our efforts to provide the best
overall value and total satisfaction for our customers.
Genera! Information
Location: ABS Computer Technologies Inc.
9997 E Rose Hills Road
Whittier. CA 90601
Telephone: (562) 695-8823
Fax: (562) 695-8923
Facility Size: 75.000 SOFT. 10.000 units per month capacity
No of employees: 190, (40 sales, 34 technical, 19 research and development. 47
warehouse and assembly. 23 administration. 2 MIS.
8 purchasing. 14 general management. 3 executive management)
Executive Officers: Fred Chant CEO
Ken Lam. VP-Marketing
Howard Tone. General Manager
/ •
Computer Technologies Inc.
P c
Projected Growth
ABS is please to announce that we are continuing to grow at a significant rate:
1996 1997 1998 1999* 2000*
Gross Revenue $42,000,000 $62,000,000 $85,000,000 $120,000,000 $200,000,000
State Sales Taxes $64,000 $315,000 $410,000 $600.000 , $1,500,000
_ __
No. of employees 50 125 81 3 230 375
ca='
Operations Breakdown:
ro€, = `132sr cc- gS,ozc 7-171_5."_?:,:-e 27atr/ -6ifs 57445 sip -
Office Spaces 60%,/ Warehouse 25%/7 e Assembly 15 - -
Retail Sales Simple Storage of Assemble computers using
Corporate Sales Computer parts Screwdriver as only tool.
Technical Support
Customer Service No machinery required Loading of software
Accounting To move parts.
Administration Quality assurance inspections
Research&Development
Traffic Analysis: •
ABS does not require a large amount of trucking services. FedFx is our exclusive carrier and
reserves one trailer for ABS daily. The trailer is dropped off each morning at 11:00am and is
picked up each evening at 6:00pra Any additional truck traffic is minimal and utilizes smaller
18' type vehicles.
The only other type of traffic is normal car traffic from employees daily commute.
* Projected figures are estimated based on current growth patterns.
For Sale or Lease =- `
ff
± 1180,000 SQUARE FEET : F
Corporate Administrative/Operattonst f
r
i
y
f R _
s s
}to
y\
J ` �`ty. \ "«
H
`
xx,,. T.. ♦ }. syr, , ,:p `sh'
1717 Walnut Grove avenue
_ . ...... yts _
-,--N-24,---
4
n �'l
icor:uth:7 lnlornmtion Meat, Contacn 2.806 Eas! Copley give
Torn Taylor °g
David Bui uite 100
aESEeklY
m.,
Shaun Riley o:,mo <, 6 : ca ,o na 91766
Phone: (626) 964-2225it7mcori
owe, ,-
Fez: X909) 860-9669
The Property •
a r-���i nl r
si• te , jEi�, _
•1116110. ..111111111111...
_
a.. _
i • - _ = �--
- -� -
•
Description: Features:
This approximately 180.000 Square Foot Size: • 180.000 square feet - Total
facility was built in 1979. It is especially • 131-000 square feet - Office
suited for Corporate Administrative,' • 40.000 square feet-Warehouse
Operations Centers. The project is a highly • 9.000 square feet- Cafeteria
efficient self-contained office operations
center. The office and warehouse arc well Commercial • Montebello Town Center& Square Shopping Centers
desitmed to easily accommodate the needs of Support • Sheraton. Montebello
a vanetx of uses.
• Whittier Narrows Recreational Arca/Golf Course
• Rosemead Square (retail center)
This facility is well located in the city of
Rosemead in wood proximity to retail stores
and restaurants- This centralized location is Office Layout: • Raised floor throughout ound floor operation area
in the huh of one of Southern ost • Raised floor throw*hoot computer room
California'ss
populated business communities. • 10 restrooms - men if women
• Approximately 123 private offices
• 2 elevators
• Sprinklered
11 arehouse: • 1 dock hiwh door
• 2 around level doors
• Spnnkiered
Parking: • 588 spaces
.9dacei t Land: • Approximately 20 acres
Power: • 1000 amps.408'208 208 120 volt. 3 phase power
Floor Plan
1st Floor
I- I H Iµ - !' n / c�
1� J OPEN AREA(RA!SEROOR)
WAREHOUSE I�� ' SII' r! r
! LJ
H7 TI I � I _-J 1L_
` 1
b H �;1_I_i rF� I L
L �1 7Lossv
tim:: ! 1
OPEN AREA(RAISED FLOOR) -
__
RECORD CAFE I[RIA OPEN APEA
ARCHIVESRECORDj
(RAISED FLOOR)
,L _.
OPEN MEA(RAISED FLOOR)
C1 V A I A A C T �11 EL
A2nd Floor
N*4iri
iiily
pi J _ITT TIPJTI1L-L ,i
OPEN AREA
r 1 i IMISED FLOOR)
I
HI L-� If
LI _LU
I
:` .fr '- ..--r >34Lr? r 3 ---
.y.
YfK ,/ P
l ,pe 7:-. am: _ ! C w' a-
ads : 7 i r� i •_ - 'r 's4 a .r1
rttlyhlitder 8 :-c "> • 4 e
_ t ..:-.24..,-,. •.
T•- i i'
- 4,77. ''''. - Jr ' r------;-- - -- , _
L.,
_ __
I NM
nil
--Ontario
�zToSemeay - --- i
_ �s _ Rlv rside• .. 0
Pa-r lc 0-ea-
1 0 '
N seam
- Location: - Easily accessible to the 60/10/710/605 Freeways
• Los Angeles International Airport-263 miles
•Ontario International Airport-252 miles
• Burbank Airport-17.7 miles
• Downtown Los Angeles-9.7 miles
• Universal City(Burbank)- 165 miles
i For Further Information.Please Contact. 2i7D1)East Copley Drive
t Tom Taylor111E;
David Bei
suite 111D � 7
r Shaun Riley Diamond Bat California 91755SEESECEnlalEfr
Phone: (626) 964-2223 fax (909)LWD-9659