Loading...
CC - Item 6D - Participation in the Preparation of Design Plans for Three Load Reduction Strategy Projects for the Rio Hondo River and Tributaries E M e ° 9 ° ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL ®d\ STAFF REPORT of rrr TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER�.iA• DATE: MAY 8, 2018 SUBJECT: PARTICIPATION IN THE PREPARATION OF DESIGN PLANS FOR THREE LOAD REDUCTION STRATEGY PROJECTS FOR THE RIO HONDO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES SUMMARY The Clean Water Act of 1972 regulates discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States as well as water quality standards. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) utilized the Clean Water Act to establish the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The NPDES permit regulates water discharge from any source point into navigable waters and requires implementation of pollution control measures. In California, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) regulates the discharge of water and its pollutants, into the waters of the U.S. The City is required to secure an NPDES Permit from the Regional Board to discharge water to Los Angeles River and its tributaries. The City of Rosemead is one of eight agencies that are a permittee under the Regional Board Order R4-2012-0175. One element of this Order is known as the Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Los Angeles River and its tributaries. The City of Rosemead and the other agencies listed above are all contributors to the Rio Hondo River and were required to turn in a plan for Bacteria Load Reduction in 2015. The study was completed by the County, and analyzed by a Consultant with the preliminary plan submitted as required. The analysis showed a large number of storm drains that would need to be treated to reduce the Bacteria load to the Regional Board established levels. The County, in reviewing the Load Reduction Strategies (LRS) available, looked at treating each storm drain separately (approximately 30 storm drains) versus accomplishing the treatment at three locations where they all collect. The County met with Regional Board staff and reached an agreement in principal that will allow the agencies to use the Alhambra Wash Channel, the Eaton Wash Channel, and the Rubio Wash Channel to collect the runoff from all storm drain outlets and treat the runoff before the storm drain runoff enters the Rio Hondo River. ITEM NO. 6.D City Council Meeting May 8,2018 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND The City is a Co-Permittee along with the County and seven other cities in the reduction of the Bacteria TMDL as part of the NPDES permit. Using the Alhambra Wash Channel, Eaton Wash Channel and the Rubio Wash Channel as the collector system for the treatment of the Bacteria Load avoids the need to build an alternative collection system or treat each outfall prior to discharge. This solution is the least expensive of the alternatives reviewed. The alternative collection system would be miles of pipe that would have to be maintained, whereas the channels are already in existence and are being maintained. Treatment prior to each outfall, while not as expensive as the collective treatment prior to the Rio Hondo.would involve individual fees to the County Sanitation District or additional rights of way to accommodate the individual treatment areas at each outfall. Fortunately, the drainage area within Rosemead is small in comparison to the other agencies and the reason the City has the smallest contribution of any of the agencies involved. The attached joint LRS Agreement sets out the terms between the agencies and spreads the costs based on each agency's tributary area within the drainage areas. Rosemead contributes to the Alhambra Wash drainage area, 112.65 acres of a 6,084.02-acre drainage area(1.8%), so its prorate share of the estimated cost for the design of the treatment system would be $12,492. The project would be administered by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), who are also listed as a party to the LRS Agreement. Costs incurred for the SGVCOG to administer the project and costs incurred by the County for the development of the LRS Addendum Report increase the cost for Rosemead by $687 for a not-to-exceed cost of$13.179. By meeting the LRS requirements of the Bacteria TMDI., the City will be allowed 7-years to determine if the proposal satisfies the Bacteria Load Allocation. If it does reduce the Bacteria Load, then the City will be in compliance and would not need to do anything else to meet the Bacteria TMDL. If, however, after the system is in place and the evaluation of the system shows that the Bacteria levels have not been reduced to the desired amount, the City will have the opportunity to submit an alternative solution and will be given an additional 7-years to implement those recommendations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Load Reduction Strategy Agreement. 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Load Reduction Strategy Agreement and submit to the County of Los Angeles. City Council Meeting May 8,2018 Page 3 of 3 FISCAL IMPACT As shown below, the City's prorate share for the cost of the design for the treatment system will be a not-to-exceed amount of$13,179. This cost includes the City's prorated share of$12,492, the fee of$246 incurred by the County for the development of the LRS Addendum Report, and the fee of$441 incurred for the SGVCOG to administer the project. The Fiscal Year 2018-19 Budget contains a total of $300,000 in General funds for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program compliance. Prorated Fee Payable to the Fee Payable to Jurisdiction Total Share City of LA the SGVCOG Alhambra $89,938 $85,362 $1,633 $2,943 Monterey Park $51,895 $49,274 $934 $1,687 Pasadena $860,530 $816.451 $15,717 . $28,362 Rosemead $13,179 $12,492 $246 $441 San Gabriel $16,800 $15,962 $299 $539 San Marino $256,417 $243,061 $4,761 $8,595 South Pasadena $21,218 $20,126 $389 $703 Temple City $243,863 $233,920 $3,545 $6,398 County $295,160 $312,352 (-$27,524) $10,332 Total $1,849,000 $1,789,000 $0 $60,000 Table 2: Party's Design Cost per Waterbedy Table 3: Rio Hondo LRS Addendum Report Table 4: SGVCOG Admin Fee STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT—None LEGAL REVIEW The LRS Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Ibis item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Prepared by: Submitted by: iii' A. I L naa afael M. Fajardo.P.E. City Engineer It ichelle Ramirez, Director •44 8lic Works Attachment A: Load Reduction Strategy Agreement iR O 5 l M 4k&C ialr Itell3Hale97 Attachment A Load Reduction Strategy Agreement AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITIES OF ALHAMBRA, MONTEREY PARK, PASADENA, ROSEMEAD, SAN GABRIEL, SAN MARINO, SOUTH PASADENA, AND TEMPLE CITY, AND THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR THE PREPARATION OF DESIGN PLANS FOR THREE LOAD REDUCTION STRATEGY PROJECTS FOR THE RIO HONDO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES This AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the date of the last signature set forth below by and among the SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SGVCOG), a California Joint Powers Authority, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of California, and the CITIES OF ALHAMBRA, MONTEREY PARK, PASADENA, ROSEMEAD, SAN GABRIEL, SAN MARINO, SOUTH PASADENA, and TEMPLE CITY, municipal corporations. Collectively, these entities shall be known herein as PARTIES or individually as PARTY. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, for the purpose of this AGREEMENT, the term PARTIES shall mean the COUNTY, the SGVCOG, and the Cities of Alhambra, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Rosemead, San Gabriel, San Marino, South Pasadena, and Temple City; WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (REGIONAL BOARD) has adopted National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175; and WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012, and requires that the COUNTY, the LACFCD, and 84 of the 88 cities (excluding Avalon, Long Beach, Palmdale, and Lancaster) within the Los Angeles County comply with the prescribed elements of the MS4 Permit; and WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identifies the PARTIES, except SGVCOG, as MS4 permittees (PERMITTEES) that are responsible for compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements pertaining to the Los Angeles River Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (LAR Bacteria TMDL) Resolution No. R10-007; and WHEREAS, the LAR Bacterial TMDL was adopted by the REGIONAL BOARD on July 9, 2010 and became effective March 23, 2012; and WHEREAS, the LAR Bacteria TMDL requires the responsible PERMITTEES to protect recreational uses in the Los Angeles River watershed by meeting targets and waste load allocations (WLAs) for the indicator bacterium E. coli; and Page 1 of 24 WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES have agreed to collaborate on the development of a Load Reduction Strategy (LRS) for the PERMITTEES to comply with the LAR Bacteria TMDL; and WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES have hired a consultant to develop the LRS for Rio Hondo River and Tributaries; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY, on behalf of the PERMITTEES, submitted the Rio Hondo LRS to the REGIONAL BOARD on March 23, 2016, as shown in Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the Rio Hondo LRS identifies twenty-six (26) priority outfalls that would have to be diverted or"turned off' by 2020 in order to meet the LAR Bacteria TMDL requirements for Alhambra Wash, Rubio Wash, Eaton Wash, and the Rio Hondo; and WHEREAS, the regional phased approach proposes to construct three (3) diversions at the mouth of Alhambra Wash, Rubio Wash, and Eaton Wash; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY, on behalf of the PERMITTEES, retained a consultant on September 13, 2016, as shown in Attachment B, to prepare a supplemental LRS document discussing the details of the regional phased approach, which was submitted to the REGIONAL BOARD on October 25, 2017, as shown in Attachment C; and WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES have agreed that hiring a consultant to prepare the design plans and other planning activities for the three (3) regional phased projects as described in Attachment C will be beneficial to the PERMITTEES; and WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES have agreed to cost share the preparation of design plans and other planning activities for three (3) regional phased projects; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to credit the COUNTY twenty-seven thousand five hundred twenty-four dollars ($27,524) towards its cost share for providing consultant services to develop the supplemental LRS document discussing the regional phased approach; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed that the total of each PARTY's cost share shall not exceed the total amount shown in Table 1 of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to have the SGVCOG, under the direction of the PERMITTEES: (a) administer this AGREEMENT; (b) to retain and manage a consultant to prepare design plans and other planning activities; (c) negotiate and enter into agreements with consultants for as-needed services to prepare design plans and other planning activities for three (3) regional phased projects; and (d) invoice and collect funds from the PERMITTEES to cover the cost of the aforementioned consultant(s); and Page 2 of 24 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the PERMITTEES, and of the promises contained in this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES agree as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are fully incorporated into this AGREEMENT. Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to cooperatively fund the preparation of design plans and other planning activities for three (3) LRS projects and to coordinate the payment between the PERMITTEES and SGVCOG. Section 3. Cooperation. The PARTIES shall fully cooperate with one another to attain the purposes of this AGREEMENT. Section 4. Voluntary. The PARTIES have voluntarily entered into this AGREEMENT for the preparation of design plans and other planning activities for three (3) LRS projects. Section 5. Term. This AGREEMENT shall become effective to each PARTY on the date the last PARTY signs this AGREEMENT, and shall remain in effect until (1) the SGVCOG has provided written notice of completion of the design plans and all other planning activities, and (2) the SGVCOG has received payment by all PERMITTEES of their allocated pro-rata share hereunder. Section 6. SGVCOG AGREES: a. Consultant Services. To act as lead agency and hire a consultant to prepare the PROJECT documentation required under the California Environmental Quality Act, and to deliver said documentation to the PERMITEES, for their review, comment, and approval prior to formal adoption. To hire a consultant to prepare all required preliminary and final plans, specifications, and cost estimates for PROJECT, and to deliver said preliminary and final plans, specifications, and cost estimates to the PERMITTEES, for their review, comment, and approval thereof. b. Permits and rights of way. To acquire on behalf of PERMITTEES all required authorizations and permits from government agencies necessary to design and construct the PROJECT and to identify what rights of way may need to be acquired. Should PERMITTEES desire to have the SGVCOG acquire such rights of way, a separate agreement for that work will be required. c. Invoice. To invoice the PERMITTEES for their share in the cost for the preparation and delivery of the design plans, as described in Table 1 of Exhibit A. The one- time invoice for the cost will be sent upon the effective date of this AGREEMENT, as set forth in Section 5, or in December 2018, whichever comes first. Page 3 of 24 d. Expenditure. To utilize the funds deposited by the PERMITTEES only for the administration of the consultant contract(s) and the preparation of design plans and other planning activities for the LRS projects. e. Contingency. To notify the PERMITTEES if actual expenditures are anticipated to exceed the cost estimate shown in Exhibit A and obtain written approval of such expenditures from all PERMITTEES. A 10 percent contingency will be not be invoiced unless actual expenditures exceed the original cost estimate. Expenditures that exceed the 10 percent contingency will require an amendment to this AGREEMENT. f. Report. To provide the PERMITTEES with an electronic copy of the draft and final LRS design plans. g. Accounting. To provide an accounting upon termination of this AGREEMENT. At the completion of the accounting, SGVCOG shall return to PERMITTEES any unused portion of all funds deposited with SGVCOG in accordance with the cost allocation set forth in Exhibit A. It Permit. To work with the consultant(s) to obtain all necessary permits and approvals for installation of permanent or temporary infrastructure, if needed, and/or modifications to monitoring sites, and access to storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar properties (FACILITIES) during monitoring events and maintenance necessary to perform the services for which consultant(s) have been retained. i. Responsibility. Upon completion of all work under this AGREEMENT, SGVCOG will relinquish all ownership of design plans and products stemming from planning activities to the PERMITTEES. Section 7. THE PERMITTEES AGREE: a. To provide SGVCOG all available plans, and survey data of existing PERMITTEE infrastructure necessary to design PROJECT. b. If the location of existing facilities of public and/or private utilities conflicts with the construction of PROJECT, SGVCOG will identify such facilities located within PERMITTEES' right of way and request that the PERMITTEES enforce available rights under existing franchise agreements or encroachment permits held by PERMITTEES for facilities' protection, relocation, or removal at no cost to SGVCOG. PERMITTEES may choose to authorize SGVCOG to coordinate and inspect such protection, relocation, or removal work, at PERMITTEES's discretion. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall restrict or affect PERMITTEES's or SGVCOG's ability to enter into separate agreements with utilities for any purpose, including for reimbursements of utility costs for protection, relocation, maintenance, or removal of their facilities. Page 4 of 24 c. To inform SGVCOG in writing within fifteen (15) days after receipt of each set of plans, studies, specifications, and/or cost estimates from SGVCOG, if any of the materials are incomplete or if additional information is necessary in order to facilitate PERMITTEE's review of the materials. d. To review and provide to SGVCOG any comments and suggestions to, or required approvals/disapprovals of each set of plans, studies, specifications, and/or cost estimates submitted to PERMITTEE within thirty (30) days after receipt of the complete materials. e. That the plans shall be considered complete and acceptable by PERMITTEES when the plans involving PROJECT have been reviewed and approved by the PERMITTEE's City Engineer, or his/her designated agent. Receipt by SGVCOG of PROJECT plans signed by PERMITTEE's City Engineer or his/her designated agent shall constitute PERMITTEE's approval of said plans. f. That the funds provided by PERMITTEES for this work shall be eligible for such expenditures. g. Payment. To pay the SGVCOG for its proportional share of the estimated cost for managing the consultant(s) and administering this AGREEMENT as shown in Exhibit A, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice from SGVCOG. The cost estimates presented in Exhibit A have been agreed upon by the PARTIES and are subject to changes in the LRS pursuant to new REGIONAL BOARD requirements and/or unforeseen challenges in the field. Any such changes proposed to the PERMITTEES' proportional share are subject to funding appropriation and will require written approval of the PERMITTEES as explained in section 6(d). ft Documentation. To make a good faith effort to cooperate with one another to achieve the purposes of this AGREEMENT by providing all requested information and documentation, in their possession and available for release to the SGVCOG and its consultant(s), that are deemed necessary by the PARTIES to prepare the design plans. i. Access. Each PERMITTEE will allow reasonable access and entry to the consultant, on an as needed basis during the term of this AGREEMENT, to the PERMITTEES' FACILITIES to achieve the purposes of this AGREEMENT, provided, however, that prior to entering any of the PERMITTEE'S FACILITIES, the consultant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals, including executing a Right-of-Entry Agreement as may be necessary, and provide written notice 72 hours in advance of entry to the applicable PERMITTEE. Permittees shall provide any required permits at no cost to the SGVCOG or its consultants. Section 8. Indemnification Page 5 of 24 a. Each PARTY, which includes the SGVCOG, shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY, including their special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including, but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees), arising from or connected with, and in relative proportion to, its own negligence or willful misconduct under this AGREEMENT; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for the latter PARTY'S own negligence or willful misconduct. b. The PARTIES agree that any liability borne by or imposed upon any PARTY or PARTIES hereto, arising out of this AGREEMENT and that is not caused by or attributable to the negligence or willful misconduct of any PARTY hereto, shall be fully borne by all the PERMITTEES in accordance with their respective pro rata cost shares, as set forth in Exhibit A. c. If any PERMITTEE pays in excess of its pro rata share in satisfaction of any liability described in subsection b. above, such PERMITTEE shall be entitled to contribution from each of the other PERMITTEES; provided, however, that the right of contribution is limited to the amount paid in excess of the PERMITTEE's pro rata share and provided further that no PERMITTEE may be compelled to make contribution beyond its own pro rata share of the entire liability; and provided further that no PERMITTEE shall indemnify another PERMITTEE for the latter PERMITTEE's own negligence or willful misconduct. d. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the SGVCOG shall require any contractor retained pursuant to this AGREEMENT to agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each PARTY, which includes the SGVCOG, their special districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, attorneys, agents, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including but not limited to demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including attorney and expert fees), arising from or connected with the contractor's performance of its agreement with the SGVCOG- In addition, the SGVCOG shall require any such contractor to carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect an insurance policy or policies, and each PARTY, its elected and appointed officers, employees, attorneys, agents and designated volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) with respect to liabilities arising out of the contractor's work. These requirements will also apply to any subcontractors hired by the contractor. Section 9. Termination and Withdrawal 1. This AGREEMENT may be terminated upon the express written agreement of all PARTIES. If this AGREEMENT is terminated, then all PARTIES must agree on the equitable redistribution of remaining funds deposited, if there are any, or payment of invoices due at the time of termination. Completed work shall be owned by the PARTY or PARTIES who fund the completion of such work. Rights Page 6 of 24 to uncompleted work by the consultant still under contract will be held by the PARTY or PARTIES who fund the completion of such work. 2. If a PARTY fails to substantially comply with any of the terms or conditions of this AGREEMENT, then that PARTY shall forfeit its rights to work completed through this AGREEMENT, but no such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY has first been given notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default. 3. SGVCOG will notify all PARTIES in writing of any PARTY failing to cure an alleged default in compliance with the terms or conditions of this AGREEMENT. The non- delinquent PARTIES will determine the next course of action. The remaining cost will be distributed based on the existing cost allocation formula in Exhibit A. If the increase is more than the 10 percent contingency, an amendment to this AGREEMENT must be executed to reflect the change in the PARTIES' cost share. 4. If a PARTY wishes to withdraw from this AGREEMENT for any reason, that PARTY must give the other PARTIES and the REGIONAL BOARD prior written notice thereof. The withdrawing PARTY shall be responsible for its entire share of the LRS development costs shown in Exhibit A. The effective date of withdrawal shall be the 6th day after SGVCOG receives written notice of the PARTY'S intent to withdraw. Should any PARTY withdraw from this AGREEMENT, the remaining PARTIES' cost share allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the cost allocation formula in Exhibit A. Section 10. General Provisions a. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this AGREEMENT, and any request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the PARTIES at the addresses set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The PARTIES shall promptly notify each other of any change of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in Exhibit B. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail or fax. A notice shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by e-mail; or (b) on the third (3rd) business day following mailing by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth in Exhibit B. b. Administration. For the purposes of this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES hereby designate as their respective PARTY representatives the persons named in Exhibit B. The designated PARTY representatives, or their respective designees, shall administer the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT on behalf of their respective PARTY. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this AGREEMENT on behalf of such PARTY. Page 7 of 24 c. Relationship of the PARTIES. The PARTIES are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY to this AGREEMENT shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PARTY unless expressly provided to the contrary by this AGREEMENT. No employee, agent, or officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another PARTY. d. Binding Effect. This AGREEMENT shall be binding upon, and shall be to the benefit of the respective successors, heirs, and assigns of each PARTY; provided, however, no PARTY may assign its respective rights or obligations under this AGREEMENT without prior written consent of the other PARTIES. e. Amendment. The terms and provisions of this AGREEMENT may not be amended, modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all non-delinquent PARTIES. For purposes of this AGREEMENT, a PARTY shall be considered delinquent if that PARTY fails to timely pay an invoice as required by Section 7(a) or withdraws pursuant to Section 9(d). f. Law to Govern. This AGREEMENT is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. g. Severability. If any provision of this AGREEMENT is determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this AGREEMENT will not be affected, and this AGREEMENT will be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this AGREEMENT. h. Entire Agreement. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire agreement of the PARTIES with respect to the subject matter hereof. i. Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY to this AGREEMENT of any term, condition, or covenant of this AGREEMENT shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any PARTY to any breach of the provisions of this AGREEMENT shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this AGREEMENT. j. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have been delivered to all PARTIES to this AGREEMENT. k. All PARTIES have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this AGREEMENT. Accordingly, this AGREEMENT shall be construed according to its fair language. Any ambiguities shall be resolved in a collaborative Page 8 of 24 manner by the PARTIES and shall be rectified by amending this AGREEMENT as described in section 10(e). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the PARTIES: Page 9 of 24 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES By MARK PESTRELLA, Director of Public Date Works APPROVED AS TO FORM: MARY C. WICKHAM County Counsel By Deputy Date Page 10 of 24 CITY OF ALHAMBRA By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 11 of 24 CITY OF MONTEREY PARK By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 12 of 24 CITY OF PASADENA By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 13 of 24 CITY OF ROSEMEAD By Gloria Molleda Date City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Ericka Hernandez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Rachel Richman City Attorney Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP Page 14 of 24 CITY OF SAN GABRIEL By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 15 of 24 CITY OF SAN MARINO By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 16 of 24 CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 17 of 24 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY By Name Date Title APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: By Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Name, Esq. City Attorney Page 18 of 24 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS By Marisa Creter Date Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Richard D. Jones Counsel for the SGVCOG Page 19 of 24 EXHIBIT A Rio Hondo and Tributaries Funding Contributions for LRS Implementation Table 1. Not-To-Exceed Party Cost-Share Jurisdiction Total Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Alhambra $89,938 $85,362 $1,633 $2,943 Monterey Park $51,895 $49,274 $934 $1,687 Pasadena $860,530 $816,451 $15,717 $28,362 Rosemead $13,179 $12,492 $246 $441 San Gabriel $16,800 $15,962 $299 $539 San Marino $256,417 $243,061 $4,761 $8,595 South Pasadena $21,218 $20,126 $389 $703 Temple City $243,863 $233,920 $3,545 $6,398 County $295,160 $312,352 (-$27,524) $10,332 Total $1,849,000 $1,789,000 $0 $60,000 Table 2: Party's Design Cast Per Waterbody Table 3: Rio Hondo LRS Addendum Repart Table 4: SGVCOG Admin Fee Page 20 of 24 O o Noon O O OD Nm N o M Q r O N C) NN r O CO I- Q N U Cin u CF) in w .0 N d O 0 0 0 0 o 00 .8L)1 CO CD N I-- CO O Cr) N O' C (0 r N :ate) U `m re a y0 0 00000' 0 Q o 0 o el c..- n m ga i r N O N c CO N n Q V m i) G Q CO „ N O O '1• 00 '1- O O N O ON N N 0 co Q m co oop O N a co Q a U u 69i» w C 0 VS L m ° ° ° S ° ° o O I s o ? pgo E of Ni m u m N C 0 CO Q N N p_ To U mE w a n � Q a K W V O O 0 0 0 O N C Q N F J ca N r Cl O O m C w c m O W Ni r a p .( ° r (O OI n N K p c O Q r r ei 0) w -p ._ m p S CONr W WOI (NO (OO N ON 0 Q O D_ _P C) N I-- Q o r (O O p C n N O) Q N N co O OI Q 2 0 0 co 69 Ni N CO r 69 (Na,W 69 m 4 L C 00 0 A c 3 al e o o e o 0 o O c C) r 00 N C) N O).. co u- j . ^ N I: t0 r N Ni Ni Q. Q N U L- 04) r O. a Z. O O u O r N N O) r O r N 0 q r C) Ni. N N r NI N0 C c q N (On Q Ni Lci 0( Op N-W N 0 0) m m rl Q 0 r 1 C) r N 0 N O a N r O N Q r N CO r (O O N O N COVNOOO N O O) r M (S N O) (O N N C) O CO- r C) N CO; W N O m V ~ 'o a m m 1' ° m U :p d c y 0 c co E m m m 0 r m a E Q m c m m c c 5 m E z r Q20. (0 in i EXHIBIT A Rio Hondo and Tributaries Funding Contributions for LRS Implementation Table 3. Rio Hondo LRS Addendum Report' Jurisdiction Total Rio Hondo LRS Addendum Report Drainage Area (ac)2 Percentage Cost Alhambra $1,633 751.10 4.91% $1,633 Monterey Park $934 430.37 2.81% $934 Pasadena $15,717 7,237.38 47.27% $15,717 Rosemead $246 112.65 0.74% $246 San Gabriel $299 137.59 0.90% $299 San Marino $4,761 2,193.21 14.32% $4,761 South Pasadena $389 179.51 1.17% $389 Temple City $3,545 1,632.35 10.66% $3,545 County $5,726 2,636.60 17.22% $5,726 TOTAL $33,250 15,310.76 100% $33,250 1. County's credit is$27 52a($33250-$5726) 2 Drainage Area=Drainage areas from Alhambra Wash+Eaton Wash+Rubio Wash Table 4. SGVCOG Admin Fee' Jurisdiction Total Drainage Area (ac) Percentage Alhambra $2,943 751.10 4.91% Monterey Park $1,687 430.37 2.81% Pasadena $28,362 7,237.38 47.27% Rosemead $441 112.65 0.74% San Gabriel $539 137.59 0.90% San Marino $8,595 2,193.21 14.32% South Pasadena $703 179.51 1.17% Temple City $6,398 1,632.35 10.66% County $10,332 2,636.60 17.22% Total $60,000 15,310.76 100% 1. SGVCOG Admin Fee o$60,000 Page 22 of 24 EXHIBIT B Rio Hondo River and Tributaries Responsible Agency Representatives AGENCY ADDRESS AGENCY CONTACT County of Los Angeles Paul Alva Department of Public Works Email: palva@dpw.lacounty.gov Stormwater Quality Division, 11th Floor Phone: (626)458-4325 900 South Fremont Avenue Fax: (626)457-1526 Alhambra, CA 91803 City of Alhambra David Dolphin 111 South First Street Email: ddolphin@cityofalhambra.org Alhambra, CA 91801 Phone: (626) 300-1571 Fax: (626)282-5833 City of Monterey Park Bonnie Tam 320 West Newmark Avenue Email: btam@montereypark.ca.gov Monterey Park, CA 91754 Phone: (626) 307-1383 Fax: (626) 307-2500 City of Pasadena Steve Walker P.O. Box 7115 Email: swalker@cityofpasadena.net Pasadena, CA 91109 Phone: (626) 744-4271 Fax: (626) 744-3823 • • • City of Rosemead Elroy Kiepke 8838 East Valley Boulevard Email: ekiepke@willdan.com Rosemead, CA 91770 • Phone: (562) 908-6278 Fax: (626) 307-9218 City of San Gabriel Daren Grilley 425 South Mission Avenue Email: dgrilley@sgch.org San Gabriel, CA 91776 Phone: (626) 308-2806 Fax: (626)458-2830 City of San Marino Cindy Collins 2200 Huntington Drive Email: ccollins@cityofsanmarino.org San Marino, CA 91108 Phone: Fax: Page 23 of 24 EXHIBIT B Rio Hondo River and Tributaries Responsible Agency Representatives City of South Pasadena Shin Furukawa 1414 Mission Street Email: sfurukawa@ci.south-pasadena.ca.us South Pasadena, CA 91030 Phone. (626)403-7246 Fax: (626)403-7241 City of Temple City Andrew Coyne 9701 Las Tunas Drive Email: acoyne@templecity.us Temple City, CA 91780 Phone: Fax: San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments Marisa Creter 1000 S. Fremont Ave. Unit 42 Email: mcreteresgvcoq.orq Bldg A10-N, Suite 10210 Phone: (626)457-1800 Alhambra, CA 91803 Fax: (626)457-1285 Page 24 of 24