Loading...
CC - Item 4F - Assignment of Freeway Corridor Mixed-use Overlay Zone and CEQA Analysis/Report Contract to RRM Design Group 5 E M F Q- O t lo ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL PRIDE STAFF REPORT koRPpRATED, TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: GLORIA MOLLEDA, CITY MANAGER.\../t DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2019 SUBJECT: ASSIGNMENT OF FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE AND CEQA ANALYSIS/REPORT CONTRACT TO RRM DESIGN 2 GROUP SUMMARY In accordance with Strategic Plan Strategy 1(C), on July 29, 2019, the Community Development Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to seek qualified land use planners, urban designers, and environmental professionals to assist the Planning Division with preparing a Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone for areas along the Interstate 10 (I-10) Freeway corridor on- and off-ramps within the City limits (project area). The project includes the preparation and completion of project related General Plan, Zoning Code, and Zoning Map amendments. The Planning Division will utilize the Senate Bill 2(SB 2)grant funds to compensate all Consultant fees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract agreement with RRM Design Group in the amount of$160,000. 2) Appropriate $160,000 from the unassigned General Fund Balance from the Fiscal Year • 2019/20 Budget. The City has secured SB 2 planning grant in the amount of$160,000 as reimbursement. DISCUSSION The development of the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will streamline both the development approval process and California Environmental Quality Act environmental review process by pre-entitling and analyzing environmental factors in advance based on the'estimated development potential within the planning area. AGENDA ITEM 4.F City Council Meeting December 10,2019 Page 2 of 3 On July 29, 2019, the Community Development Department sent RFP 2019-10 to 22 qualified land use planning firms and opened the RFP to all interested parties on the City's website. On August 21, 2019, the City received three project proposals from KTGY Architecture & Planning, RRM Design Group, and The Arroyo Group. Staff reviewed each proposal for several criteria, including the firm's familiarity with the scope of work, experience with similar projects, technical ability, task timeline, and budget. On October 15, 2019, the City's Commercial Task Force Committee conducted an interview with all three firms and recommended The Arroyo Group or RRM Design Group for the project. After the interviews,Planning Division staff conducted reference checks for both firms and determined that RRM Design Group would be best fit for this project. For this reason, Planning Division staff is recommending that the contract be awarded to RRM Design Group. RRM Design Group is a multi-discipline firm that specializes in planning and urban design, architecture, landscape architecture, civil engineering, and surveying. They have reshaped underutilized areas of cities through the implementation of updated development regulations. Furthermore, they are experienced in grant-funded projects and ensuring grant compliance. The Planning Division will utilize the SB 2 grant funds to compensate RRM Design Group for their assistance with this project. On September 18, 2019, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued the City a 2019 Planning Grants Program Award letter, which conditionally commits to an award in the amount of$160,000. According to RRM Design Group's proposal, the estimated project total is $159,880. The draft Professional Services Agreement has been included in this report as Attachment "A". RRM Design Group's proposal is included as Attachment "B". Work will begin once the agreement with HCD for the SB 2 grant funds is fully executed. The agreement is currently being drafted and should be sent to the City next month. FISCAL IMPACT — Staff is requesting for an appropriation from the unassigned General Fund Balance from the Fiscal Year 2019/20 budget of$160,000. Staff will receive a reimbursement of $160,000 from HCD for the SB 2 Planning Grant. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT—The proposed CEQA analysis is required as part of the Planning entitlement process. Consideration of the proposed development project meets the Strategic Plan's goal to pursue quality economic development. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. City Council Meeting December 10,2019 Page 3 of 3 Prepared by: A � , •1 Lily Va enzuela, Planning & Economic Development Manager Submitted by: .r► Ben Kim, Ass.:r:nt City Manager Attachment A: Draft Contract Agreement Attachment B: Proposal by RRM Design Group E M iDdr&li F CIVIC PRIDE B7 7 'NCORPORATEO 19b% Attachment A Professional Service Agreement for Freeway Corridor Mixed-Used Overlay Zone PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE AND CEQA ANALYSIS/REPORT RRM DESIGN GROUP 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this this 10th Day of December, 2019 (Effective Date) by and between the City of Rosemead, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 8838 E. Valley Blvd., Rosemead, California 91770 ("City") and RRM Design Group a corporation with its principal place of business at 32332 Camino Capistrano Suite 205, San Juan Capistrano, California, 92675 ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional land use consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California and is familiar with the plans of City. 2.2 Project. City desires to engage Consultant to render such ongoing professional consulting services for the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and CEQA Analysis/Report ("Services") as set forth in this Agreement. 3. TERMS. • 3.1 Scope of Services and Term. 3.1.1 General Scope of Services: Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional consulting services for the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and CEQA Analysis/Report necessary for the Project, herein referred to a "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit A "Scope of Services" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, RRM Design Group Page 2 of 26 this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a one-year period from the Effective Date shown above, with one one-year extension at the sole and absolute discretion of the City, unless earlier terminated ,as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant. 3.2.1 Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.2.2 Schedule of Services: Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements: All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City. 3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel: Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall RRM Design Group Page 3 of 26 be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City. 3.2.5 City's Representative: The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative"). City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City's Representative or his or her designee. 3.2.6 Consultant's Representative: Consultant hereby designates Diane Bathgate, or his/her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his/her professional skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.2.7 Coordination of Services: Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees: Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant represents that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, including a City business License, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. 3.2.9 Laws and Regulations: Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with applicable local state and federal laws, rules and regulations in RRM Design Group Page4of26 any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the City, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall indemnify and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any liability to the extent found to be arising out of any failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3:2.10 Insurance: Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit B attached to and part of this agreement. 3.2.11 Safety: Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of its employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.3 Fees and Payments. 3.3.1 Compensation: Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement and shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty Thousand Dollars ($160,000) and in accordance with consultant's proposal dated August 21, 2019. Consultant's proposal is hereby incorporated and found in Exhibit A. Extra Work may be authorized in writing, as described below, and will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.3.2 Payment of Compensation: Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, RRM Design Group Page 5 of 26 1 as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 30 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses: Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City. 3.3.4 Extra Work: At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City's Representative. 3.3.5 Prevailing Wages: Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws to the extent they are applicable to Consultant. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft; classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request and shall post, copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.4 Accounting Records. 3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection: Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. RRM Design Group Page 6 of 26 3.5 General Provisions. 3.5.1 Termination of Agreement. 3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination: City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination: If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant toprovide all finished or unfinished Documents/ Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.5.1.3 Additional Services: In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.5.2 Delivery of Notices: All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: RRM Design Group 32332 Camino Capistrano, Suite 205 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attn: Diane Bathgate, Principal in Charge Tel: (949) 361-7950 CITY: , City of Rosemead 8838 Valley Boulevard Rosemead, CA 91770 Attn: Lily Valenzuela, Planning & Economic Development Manager Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours by certified mail or deposit in the U.S. Mail, first-class postage prepaid and RRM Design Group Page 7 of 26 addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property: This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. The Documents & Data are intended for use solely with respect to the project for which they were prepared. Any reuse or modification by City shall be at City's sole risk. 3.5.3.2 Confidentiality: All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, 1, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City. 3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts: The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.5.5 Attorney's Fees: If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and RRM Design Group Page 8 of 26 recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of such action as part of prevailing party's total damages as determined by court of competent jurisdiction or as agreed upon by the parties in settlement. 3.5.6 Indemnity and Defense. a. Indemnity and Defense To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Agency and any and all of its officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including legal counsel's fees and costs, to the extent caused by the negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any agency or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of services under this agreement. Consultant's duty to indemnify and hold harmless Agency shall not extend to the Agency's sole or active negligence. b. Duty to Defend In the event the Agency, its officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from the performance of the services encompassed by this agreement, and upon demand by Agency, Consultant shall defend the Agency at Consultant's cost or at Agency's option, to reimburse Agency for its costs of defense, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the defense of such matters to the extent the matters arise from, relate to or are caused by Consultant's negligent acts, errors or omissions. Payment by Agency is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this provision. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and Agency, as to whether liability arises from the sole or active negligence of the Agency or its officers, employees, or agents, Consultant will be obligated to pay for Agency's defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the Agency as solely or actively negligent. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. 3.5.7 Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.5.8 Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Los Angeles County. 3.5.9 Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. RRM Design Group Page 9 of 26 3.5.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants: City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.5.11 Successors and Assigns: This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties. 3.5.12 Assignment or Transfer: Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.5.13 Construction; References; Captions: Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement. 3.5.14 Amendment; Modification: No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.5.15 Waiver: No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 3.5.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries: There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.5.17 Invalidity; Severability: If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.5.18 Prohibited Interests: Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona RRM Design Group Page 10 of 26 fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subconsultants to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City's Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.5.19 Equal Opportunity Employment: Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.5.20 Labor Certification: By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.5.21 Authority to Enter Agreement: Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.5.22 Counterparts: This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.6 Subcontracting. 3.6.1 Prior Approval Required: Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. [Signatures on next Page] RRM Design Group Page 11 of 26 CITY OF ROSEMEAD RRM DESIGN GROUP By: Gloria Molleda, City Manager Date Name: Attest: Title: Ericka Hernandez, City Clerk Date [If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES, President OR Vice President AND Secretary, AND CORPORATE SEAL OF CONTRACTOR REQUIRED] Approved as to Form: By: Name: Rachel Richman Date City Attorney Title: RRM Design Group Page 12 of 26 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES/ FEE SCHEDULE TASK 1: INITIAL RECONNAISSANCE, PROJECT KICK-OFF, AND WORK REFINEMENT PROGRAM Task I.I Project Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit The consultant team will prepare for and conduct an initial kick-off meeting with City staff. This task will include the following: • Identification of key project contacts and information exchange • Review of project objectives, scope of work, and project timeline • Obtain client-supplied maps, documents, and related information • Discussion of general problems, hot spots, study area boundaries, and issues to be focused on during the project • Identification of optimal working relationship, in terms of receipt and review of materials,turnaround times, etc. • Review of public outreach strategy and identification of potential stakeholder interviewees • Discussion of document and product format, organization, and graphic quality presentation • Tour of study area The kickoff meeting will serve as a discovery process looking at the existing General Plan, Zoning Code and Map, related Design Guidelines, City's Strategic Plan, and any other necessary information. In addition,the discussion will inform any needed refinements to the project schedule, milestones, and tasks. RRM will prepare an agenda and follow up with a refined scope of work and timeline, as needed. City staff will be responsible for logistics for meeting and tour of the study area. DELIVERABLES: • Meeting agenda and list of data needs • Meeting and study area tour attendance TASK 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS, ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES Task 2.1 Review Background Information The consultant team will gather and review data that is relevant to this project. The primary purpose of this effort is to get up to speed on past and current planning efforts and harness the wealth of existing data that can be used in the planning process. This task will include a review of City materials as well as information from other affected agencies as available. Preliminarily resource documents and data include: • Rosemead General Plan • Rosemead Zoning Code and Zoning Map • Garvey Avenue Master Plan RRM Design Group Page 13 of 26 • Rosemead Strategic Plan • Final ER for 2008 Rosemead General Plan Update and subsequent 2010 Addendum • City GIS data This initial phase of the planning process will involve data collection and analysis to: • Identify State and federal laws to be addressed • Identify any necessary General Plan Amendments and Zoning Code and Zoning Map Amendments that need to be completed • Summarize applicable regulatory frameworks • Identify existing land use and circulation conditions • Summarize local social and economic character of the study area Based on the initial data collection effort, an analysis of existing conditions will be compiled. The analysis will present a description of:existing conditions and will analyze the information to identify potential issues, opportunities, and challenges. RRM Engineering will support this task by conducting a review of available infrastructure relying on available City documentation. During this phase, in collaboration with City staff, RRM will provide three real-life examples of similar projects. Each example will be analyzed for its effectiveness and applicability to the Freeway Corridor Mixed- Use Overlay Zone project. Profile information such as project location, applicable zoning and regulations, and development summary will be provided. As part of this task, using City-provided data, RRM will prepare a project area base map in AutoCAD/GIS format. The base map will be used throughout the project for various mapping and design exhibits. DELIVERABLES: • Background report describing existing conditions in the study area and identifying issues to be addressed by the project • Summary of similar successful projects • Base map using City-supplied GIS data Task 2.2 Meet with Staff RRM will meet with City staff to review the background report and discuss important issues to be addressed in the project. Review of the background report and discussion of important issuest will inform the community engagement strategy and efforts under Task 2.3 Community Engagement. DELIVERABLES: • Meeting attendance and PowerPoint presentation Task 2.3 Community Engagement While this effort is numbered as Task 2.3, community engagement is envisioned to be conducted throughout the project process at key points. RRM will further develop and refine the public engagement strategy in an RRM Design Group Page 14 of 26 effort to educate, inform, and seek input on the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone regulations. Community engagement will focus on directly affected stakeholders, including property owners, businesses, interest groups, civic decision-makers, and the community-at-large. This effort will be designed to be effective in building a collaborative interest and obtaining consensus in the project given the potentially diverse group of stakeholders that may have differing needs and expectations. Preliminarily, the community engagement task includes a joint study session with the Planning Commission and City Council with the broader community invited, as requested in the addended RFP. In addition, a day of stakeholder interviews is proposed to be conducted to introduce the project and gain insights and gather information relevant to shaping the new Mixed-Use Overlay Zone. We welcome further discussion to augment the proposed scope and fee to include on-line engagement, community workshops, or other community engagement strategies to best serve the effort and reflect City priorities.This task provides a number of hours that can potentially be reallocated to support different types of engagement activities. Over the course of the project, this task also includes the provision of materials for posting on the City's website such as project scope and schedule, frequently asked questions, and completed products as they are developed. To support additional meetings staff may wish to conduct with decision-makers or stakeholders, briefing materials would be provided under this task. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare agenda and assist staff to facilitate one (I) joint study session • Prepare for and facilitate one-day of back-to-back stakeholder interviews • City staff will be responsible for meeting notification, facility, and logistics TASK 3: FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE PREPARATION Task 3.1 Key Elements and Opportunity Sites RRM's team of planners, urban designers, architects, landscape architects, and engineers will collaborate with the City to generate realistic concepts that consider development, placemaking, and design opportunities and constraints. The concepts will be the basis for the Freeway Corridor Overlay Zone and will likely include: • Urban design framework such as building placement, form, height, and densities • Circulation and streetscape concepts and strategies • Detailed document outline and contents Opportunity sites will be analyzed in this task as well. Building on the existing conditions analysis, RRM will identify underutilized or vacant sites whose location, size, or surrounding uses, provide the opportunity for mixed-use development. For up to three (3) sites, the following will be provided: • Individual maps illustrating area boundaries and parcel-specific land use designations • A brief'description of the site characteristics that make an area an opportunity site • A conceptual site plan and elevation sketch describing a future vision for the site with preferred and alternative uses RRM Design Group Page 15 of 26 A summary of key concepts and opportunity sites will be prepared in memorandum or PowerPoint form for review and feedback by City staff. DELIVERABLES: • Summary of key concepts and opportunity sites to inform Administrative Draft Task 3.2 Administrative Draft No. I Based on the information collected during previous tasks, the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will be drafted. Any necessary General Plan, Zoning Code, and Zoning Map amendments will be prepared by RRM as well. Preliminarily, the products for this task are envisioned to be organized as follows, to be further tailored in collaboration with City staff. Overall, we envision a graphically rich, easy-to-use policy document that will reflect the desires of the community and be truth-tested internally by our multi-discipline team of planners, architects, urban designers, landscape architects, and civil engineers. I. Goals, Implementation Measures, Planning Principles—Grant and project goals and supporting measures or principles will describe the vision for the study area and desired outcomes. 2. Planning Process Description—This section will provide an overview of outreach results and the overall planning process. 3. Opportunity Sites—This section will summarize the analysis of up to three (3) opportunity sites as developed under Task 3.I. 4. Land Use Element— • Land Use Plan—The location and boundaries of designated land uses will be depicted. This portion of the document will also identify any General Plan or Zoning text and/or map changes and will be accompanied by an explanatory narrative. Permitted and conditional uses will be identified with a lens of streamlining development review where feasible. • Development Standards—These development standards will supersede existing zoning standards and will be written in a clear and concise fashion for ease of implementation with supporting graphics where appropriate. Mixed-use zoning typically requires tailored standards addressing topics such as: o Location and compatibility of uses o Building height and form o Building massing and form o Building relationship to the street o Building design o Site landscaping and outdoor space o Services 5. Infrastructure Element—This chapter will describe policies supporting planned uses relating to the transportation and circulation system, streetscape and landscape concepts, and provision of utilities and public services. 6. Implementation Element—This chapter will describe specific implementing actions, potential funding/financing mechanisms, responsible parties, and phasing. Administration and non-conforming uses and structures may also be addressed. RRM Design Group Page 16 of 26 DELIVERABLES: • RRM will provide Administrative Draft No. I as described above • We ask that the City provide one (I) consolidated, marked-up redline version with all City comments Task 3.3 Administrative Draft No. 2 Following the completion of the Administrative Draft of the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and receipt of the single set of redlined comments from the City on the Administrative Draft, RRM will produce a second Administrative Draft.At this point, all of the City's comments will have been integrated and this draft will provide an additional internal review opportunity prior to the development of the Public Hearing Draft. DELIVERABLES: • RRM will provide Administrative Draft No. 2 documents • We ask that the City provide one (I) consolidated, marked-up redline version with all City comments Task 3.4 Public Review Draft This draft is intended for public review and will include any remaining requested revisions and edits from City staff. DELIVERABLES: • Public Review Draft Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Regulations and Map (electronic copy of the suitable for distribution and posting on the City's website) TASK 4: PREPARE CEQA DOCUMENTATION Task 4.1 CEQA Documentation As the proposed Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will be considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), appropriate CEQA documentation will be required. The proposed approach leverages existing environmental documentation and resources with goals of streamlining future actions and providing defensible CEQA compliance documentation. Morse Planning Group will be responsible for the CEQA documentation task and works frequently and closely with RRM Design Group. We envision an integrated CEQA compliance process to result in improved policy design and self-mitigating strategies where possible. The City certified a Final Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the General Plan Update in October 2008. The establishment of the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will implement policy direction in the General Plan,the environmental effects of which are anticipated to have been evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Assumptions for the proposed CEQA approach include: RRM Design Group Page 17 of 26 • The CEQA document will tier off the Rosemead General Plan Update Final EIR dated October 2008 and supplemental 2010 Addendum and utilize information relative to the site and applicable mitigation measures. • No technical analyses are included as part of this scope of work. • City staff will be responsible for SB 18 and AB 52 Tribal Consultation. Following preparation of the draft overlay zone regulations, Morse Planning Group will meet with the City staff and the RRM team to confirm the environmental review strategy and timeline. Morse Planning Group will review the draft regulations and the General Plan EIR and identify any inconsistencies or additional analyses required. If no changes are necessary, the options include an EIR Addendum or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. A memo confirming the environmental review strategy will be provided to the City. The following task description includes details for both options. The fee scheduled conservatively reflects the more labor-intensive Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. If an Addendum approach is supported, project timeline and budget efficiencies may result. If at any time the need for a Subsequent EIR is potentially triggered due to a significant impact that was not discussed in the previous EIR or any other reason, the team will consult with City staff immediately. If a Subsequent EIR is ultimately determined to be necessary, a revised scope and fee estimate may be required. Option A: EIR Addendum This option assumes preparation of an Addendum to the General Plan EIR and that the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and regulations will result in some changes or additions to the General Plan EIR, but will not change buildout characteristics in a manner that results in new significant impacts or an increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. The ER Addendum will include: • Introduction. This section will introduce the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Regulations and describe the level of CEQA review required. • Project Description. Based on project description information provided by RRM, Morse Planning Group will prepare an overview of the project and its relationship to the General Plan. • Environmental Analysis. Morse Planning Group will evaluate each of the topic areas analyzed in the General Plan EIR to determine whether the project could result in adverse impacts not previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Morse Planning Group will prepare an Administrative Draft EIR Addendum for City staff review (one round) and revise the document. The EIR Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review but can be included with public hearing documents when the regulations undergo review by decision-makers. The EIR Addendum would be considered, along with the previous EIR, before decision-makers consider adopting the regulations. Morse Planning Group has assumed that City staff will be responsible for public noticing to comply with City requirements, such as posting notices or newspaper notices. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Determination for City staff review and signature. City staff will file the NOD with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse, if necessary. This task excludes the required California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) consultation and fees. RRM Design Group Page 18 of 26 DELIVERABLES: • Administrative Draft Addendum (one round of revisions) • Notice of Determination Option B: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Morse Planning Group will prepare an Initial Study in accordance with CEQA,the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Rosemead CEQA Guidelines. The Initial Study will include detailed explanations of all checklist determinations, discussions of potential environmental impacts, and mitigation measures, if applicable. The Initial Study analysis shall be in accordance with all applicable sections of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The environmental document will be presented with the following sections: Introduction, Project Description, Initial Study Checklist, Environmental Analysis, and Initial Study Determination. Morse Planning Group's approach to the analysis portion of the document is to provide thorough, detailed, and conclusive impact analysis. The topics to be reviewed include: • Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources • Energy • Geology/oils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/Water Quality: • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation • Utilities/Service Systems • Wildfire • Mandatory Findings of Significance Morse Planning Group will submit the Administrative Draft Initial Study for review and comment by City Staff. Morse Planning Group will also submit one"check copy" of the administrative draft document, which will incorporate one complete set of comments received from City staff. Following receipt of comments and incorporation of revisions, Morse Planning Group will submit the Public Review Draft Initial Study to City staff for distribution for public review. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Intent for City staff review and signature. This task assumes that City staff will be responsible for transmitting notices and CDs to designated reviewing agencies and will be responsible for public noticing to comply with City requirements, such as posting notices or newspaper notices. Following the IS/MND public review period, Morse Planning Group will respond to written comments received on the Public Review Draft Initial Study during the public review period, and prepare thorough, reasoned and sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Administrative Responses to Comments for review and comment by City Staff. Morse Planning Group will submit one"check copy" of the final Responses to Comments document, which will incorporate one complete set of comments received from City Staff on the Administrative Responses to Comments. For budgeting purposes, up to eight hours has been assumed for Morse Planning Group to prepare the Responses to Comments. Should the comments be excessive and require more than the budgeted time, this task and associated costs would be revisited. Morse Planning Group will prepare the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA Section 21081.6. Morse Planning Group will submit a draft version for City staff review and will follow with a final MMRP. Following City Council approval of the CEQA document, Morse Planning Group will prepare a Final environmental document, which will consist of the revised Public Review Draft Initial Study text, as necessary to address the comments received during the public review period, and the MMRP. CEQA Notices: Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Determination for City staff review and signature. City staff will file the NOD with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse, if necessary. This task excludes the required California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) consultation and fees. DELIVERABLES: • I electronic file (PDF and Word) of Administrative Draft IS/MND • I electronic file (PDF and Word) of"Check Copy" of Draft IS/MND • 20 CDs with PDF Files of Draft IS/MND • I electronic copy (PDF) of Draft IS/MND • I electronic copy (Word) of Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program • I electronic copy (Word) of Final Mitigation Monitoring Program • I electronic copy (PDF) of Final IS/MND TASK 5: FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE ADOPTION Task 5.1 Public Hearing Materials To support the public hearing process, the consultant team will prepare the necessary public hearing notices using City-supplied templates. The consultant team will prepare initial drafts of staff reports, ordinances, and resolutions for one (I) Planning Commission and one (I) City Council hearing. City staff will be responsible for agendizing the items and finalizing agenda item materials as well as posting and mailing notices. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare public hearing materials as described above Task 5.2 Public Hearing Attendance RRM will prepare for and attend up to five(5) Planning Commission and City Council hearings to help City staff present the Overlay Zone,General Plan Amendments, and Zoning Code Amendments. Morse Planning Group will prepare for and attend up to (2) public hearings. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare for and attend up to five (5) public hearings • Assist City staff in presenting the Specific Plan at City Council hearings including preparation of PowerPoint presentation materials Task 5.3 Final Documents Following the action taken by the City Council, RRM will make the final edits and modifications to the documents. It is assumed that one (I) set of revisions will be made, incorporating both the Planning Commission recommendations and City Council action. Errata sheets may be used to discuss preferred changes between the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. DELIVERABLES: • Make final edits and provide electronic file(s) of final documents Task 5.4 Ongoing Project Management/Coordination Throughout the project, RRM will need to coordinate with City staff, various departments, subconsultants, and interest groups. This task is intended to allow for necessary coordination between the project team members and City staff, including teleconferences, meetings, correspondence, record-keeping, electronic file management, and additional necessary coordination. DELIVERABLES: • Ongoing project coordination and management as described above • This assumes an average of two (2) hours per week for up to ten (10) months adI Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone ON11T1.. �TE f �,.2r. 3/53/3/G3/53/3/GFee 5dted Ude 5111533 onCo5.1 ILLa1al Mn1b 1ama1M 05ua August 21,2019 .per .I.w. R.m ow./ nom►, I„y:, n...■. CIE/o , 95$3/0311• 15I■' * I11014E9.. 1/111/104. 133311pr5453 11/11.,... HI n.I'e. Imp./.pea/ 1bIN IT IAL NEC ON NAEIS4ANCE,PRD.�CTKOKOPr& MDRKPIERRE"ENT P ORAM FEE15511 TYPE 1.1 R4.31ltl.e.d1 lbdh0■.1 Me Ad 11r3311t $ (MO 10 11913 10 11,110 III 1211:0 0 ID 0 *3 4 IOM 11200 T..A1711■:$ lin Ts 2:DOMINO CONCIT IONS,ISSUES,OPPORT UNIT IES.AND CNALLEN7ES FEE n 114E 21 119,194 a.dpoud lion dun 1IWNit I 11,/0 10 14600 44 WED I 1415 4 0100 10 IR 404 14 444303 22 r■Idlhltdl Iir1.R 1 *1800 a 10 Aa a *440 0 e1 0 p 0 51 1. 51'll 29 Comm/1y try.a....4 nw/tt $ 143 24 $4441 32 Asea 1. $41130 o p o 10 is =11141 Tag 21I Yu:$ 51,310 'Ti 1M 9:FREMI V CORRIDOR MUTED-USE OYER LAY 2 ONE PREPARATION FEE 3713E 11 pry 11•314319 geed OPlon..1y 603 11Mr41C 9 13380 II 42303 34 12144 4 {121 11.'i 1 II2.1 23 $2293 N 12 Ad.11YnIM DIM Me.1 41*344t 1 111,50 30 15305 5 C.3E0 r 1 ,.• • 1 ' {1 au 113 113145 >v 15 M44.a1■15.11■111115.2 11!8014111 0 10,180 1 11410 51 14340 2 0. 1 57 13 1477 u 3.4 ROM Iftr'.01.11 Tanana $ 4129 . 5,10 11 '♦2300 a s - a 24 12210 53 Ti.►311144:$ 51423 Teak 4:PREPARE CEOS COCU11N TATON FEE TYPE 41 Enol Occ.1••.P 1.4 1119313t $ 21/00 0 51 0 $0 0 W 4 5 a 00 0 IC I 02A0•' T.1c4YAW:$ 21,0$0 Ta 1114 s FREER%V CORRIODR MIXEDU SE CYERLA V 2 CNE ADOPT ION FEE TYPE 5.1 Publlo I.■11■MEW W. 41YNrt 1 glee I 31.100 u µ1D5 5 ID Cl iD o ID G ID 52 P.re I1•445 Ab.dr.o WIN It I 33,113 51 *4,10 10 /110 0 $0 0 N 0 II I $$13 Ill DI 33555!!: ■n u . 453/4111 5 .31w 1 9244 I TWD I ID• D ID o w 213 571 (0- S4 asdy PRy.ellb.q..■.ICm11t.Itr. 11N{de 0 11,140 24 14443 4a *530 0 N a W 0 53 '1 P3 T.*5Y1u1:$ 34311 Fe.Footadaa $ 1SS$190 A.Estl3315.3Nile NSapfrown as Mir armMeV/ft 541 tuE5414f1'TIMN1Elss pqugtl far rblmalor01pugcraony.A ramie 01114180 bast mils 554/5511 etait Ise tuI r.31r1.11111nd N Yt, 40 51 353 3 1411(1pprx.I Pry the d11M. 6 1201 R1r11I11s0I.Expanse Atri lel 11e kind RPM Dann(loop a arty 4413 rrrulanl I mbml at 51513 par $ 116,531 SN bit hl bit mama*■151u1Wd 15 as dams gaup mu 111 IDX 0 mbar Is a4etlp10 and aim.r.alllp,4 512591 1 *Modulen'le He 4411,BIlls0 Raba FIHM mares 4 rho 1 Ohl 4 41411 I{IDM 14111 01110 IIn14l1 bal1I. I.rrm croup EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of the Work, Consultant will maintain insurance in conformance with the requirements set forth below. Consultant will use existing coverage to comply with these requirements. If that existing coverage does not meet the requirements set forth here, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Consultant acknowledges that the insurance coverage and policy limits set forth in this section constitute the minimum amount of coverage required. Any insurance proceeds available to City in excess of the limits and coverage required in this agreement and which is applicable to a given loss, will be available to City. Consultant shall provide the following types and amounts of insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO "insured contract" language will not be accepted. Business Auto Coverage on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or the exact equivalent. Limits are subject to review, but in no event to be less that $1,000,000 per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the general liability policy described above. If Consultant or Consultant's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Consultant shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. Workers Compensation on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Excess or Umbrella Liability Insurance (Over Primary) if used to meet limit requirements, shall provide coverage at least as broad as specified for the underlying coverages. Any such coverage provided under an umbrella liability policy shall include a drop down provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary but covered by the umbrella. Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. Policy shall contain a provision obligating insurer at the time insured's liability is determined, not requiring actual payment by the insured first. There shall be no cross- liability exclusion precluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another. Coverage shall be applicable to City for injury to employees of Consultant, subconsultants or others involved in the Work. The scope of coverage provided is subject to approval of City following receipt of proof of insurance as required herein. Limits are subject to review but in no event less than $1 Million per occurrence. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the consultant and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of' the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend the Named Insured. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Insurance procured pursuant to these requirements shall be written by insurers that are admitted carriers in the state of California and with an A.M. Bests rating of A- or better and a minimum financial size VII. General conditions pertaining to provision of insurance coverage by Consultant. Consultant and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by` Consultant: 1. Consultant agrees to have its insurer endorse the third-party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 (or otherwise consistent with the insurer's endorsement). Consultant also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Consultant, or Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contractor and available or applicable to this agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Consultant shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period} that may affect City's. protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Consultant or deducted from sums due Consultant, at City option. 8. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice to City of any cancellation of coverage. A ten (10) day notice to City shall apply to nonpayment of premiums. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, or that any party will "endeavor" (as opposed to being required) to comply with the requirements of the certificate. 9. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage (except Professional Liability and Workers' Compensation) required to be provided by Consultant or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, noncontributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 10. Consultant agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in - conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 11. Consultant agrees not to self-insure or to use any self-insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to, self-insure its obligations to City. If Consultant's existing coverage includes a deductible or self-insured retention, the deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Consultant, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self-insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 12. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 13. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 14. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 15. Consultant will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether or not the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 16. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Consultant's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and/or additional insured endorsement as required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five days of the expiration of the coverages. 17. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Consultant under this agreement. Consultant expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials and agents. 18. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue, and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all inclusive. 19. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 20. The requirements in this Section supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Section. 21. Consultant agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Consultant for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. E M CIVIC PRIDE fig, 7 'NCORPORATEO• ,0 Attachment B Proposal for Freeway Corridor Mixed-Used Overlay Zone Proposal Prepared for the Cay of Rosemead on August 11,2019 L <, - ..t' It .Ie 4: d O :',.:Z.4404,74"1,-;.*Ea r'. 1 " '1- -- )1. . , �1 0 - I Consulting Services for the Preparation of the „� ii Freeway Corridor A: Astri, t f Ii 1 .,,,,4 - -� tf f l Mixed-Use Overlay Zone i J 1 'piney :; _ s n - • -►•*- ilii • ENVIRONMEEN 5 rrm PEOPLE rr design U- ENJOY, ”'group ' :: ' . ... ., ! e, t"'" . ' '_, . may;%, / -4 -R - rr m imiiiiHmarilir.... " groudesgpn August 21,2019 RE: CREATING A FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY TO SUPPORT ROSEMEAD'S ECONOMIC, HOUSING, AND COMMUNITY Lily Valenzuela CHARACTER GOALS Planning&Economic Development Manager Dear Ms.Valenzuela, City of Rosemead 8838 E.Valley Boulevard Built on community member aspirations, Vision 2020 for Rosemead envisions Rosemead,CA 91770 a welcoming and thriving small-town community in the heart of an urban environment. Strategy I of the City of Rosemead's Strategic Plan 2018-2020 specifically calls for creating an Overlay Zoning District for opportunity sites r r m along the 1-10 Freeway. This concept is further supported by the General Plan Visions and establishment of Mixed-Use Residential/Commercial land use design group categories, among other policies. To implement these goals, Rosemead is now poised for transformative CREATING improvements by leveraging Senate Bill 2 (SB 2)grant resources to create ENVIRONMENTS a Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone resulting in new housing PEOPLE ENJOY® opportunities, economic revitalization and attractive placemaking in underutilized areas.After a thorough review of the issued Request for Proposals (RFP) www.rrmdesign.com and supplemental addendum as well as gathering additional input in the field 32332 Camino and review of available documents, we are confident that our experience and Capistrano,Ste.205 capabilities are a direct match with your needs. San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675 A MULTI-DISCIPLINE FIRM with nearly 140 employees in four offices p:(949)361-7950 f(949)361-7955 throughout California.We have been in business 45 years, and our clients include a mix of both developers and public agencies which gives us a very balanced perspective in terms of the needs of both entities to work collaboratively for the success of projects. Our professional services include planning and urban design, architecture, landscape architecture, civil engineering, and surveying. We work in a collaborative manner employing the skills and experience of various professionals on each job with the demands of the assignment. Our multi- discipline approach offers benefits such as development standards that are truth- tested by architects that have designed and constructed mixed-use projects. We also thrive serving as an extension of City staff! EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE in helping communities reshape underutilized areas of town through the implementation of updated development regulations and extensive experience working with developers on infill projects. Our experience working on the private development side of the equation, coupled with our experience seeing projects through construction, is vital to creating a realistic vision and plan that fosters private investment. Our development regulations are user-friendly, clearly organize, and importantly,tailored to carry out the community's vision. In addition, our experience managing grant-funded projects will ensure grant compliance and optimize benefit for Rosemead. WE PLAN FROM WITHIN THE COMMUNITY: While our team brings r I m considerable experience, and expertise in the land use, design and planning fields, we see our first job as understanding existing values, goals and the image design that the stakeholders and community at large see for the project area. We group have structured a process for the community, representative stakeholders, and decision-makers to be informed and provide input throughout the project. We CREATING welcome working with staff to further tailor approaches to cultivate interest ENVIRONMENTS and result in a process and regulations that will be supported by City leaders, PEOPLE residents, businesses, and property owners. ENJOY® We are enthusiastic about working on a project of such importance to Rosemead, and to bring our experiences, resources and lessons learned from other communities to help you, your civic leaders, and citizens achieve your goals. Our team is available to begin work immediately and is fully committed to dedicate time, key personnel, and resources for the duration of the project. If you need more information or have any questions regarding our capabilities, please feel free to contact us! Sincerely, RRM Design Group TiUAL' / II Diane Bathgate,AICP, CNU-A Principal-in-Charge P.S. Please feel free to contact me on my cell phone number at(949)533-5874. FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section Name I 1 Firm Profile and Relevant Experience 15 2 Project Approach and Scope of Services 27 3 Project Team 37 4 References 41 5 Cost Breakdown 45 6 Timeline GRAPHICS & PHOTOGRAPHS: This document features images of RRM Design Group's projects,graphics,and photos of which are owned and copyrighted by our firm.There are no stock photos or images of any kind used in this proposal. ABOUT RRM DESIGN GROUP: 32332 Camino Capistrano,Ste.205•San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675 p:(949)361-7950•f(949)361-7955•w:rrmdesign.com California corporation •Leonard Grant,Architect C26973 •Robert Camacho,PE 76597•Steven Webster,LS 7561 •Jeff Ferber,PLA 2844 The written and graphic materials contained in this proposal are the exclusive property of RRM Design Group. The unauthorized use of any portion of these text or graphic materials without RRM's prior written consent is expressly prohibited. ©2019 RRM Design Group RRM PROJECT Alhambra General Plan Update 2015 S. ♦2 ►) , mow 014:4 . ,4 ...,* PAI '1 . 4.N,,'„ .2 1114-4:-. , A. - jib Iit M 'La' a�.'S A _it"' 4, I It rt' • t .4.• /I 7 I1111%— .:; - ''..... — 'IA'. -4;',`,"*.. It 4.,,j ,iiii%,,,, -, •;,:•!*,i-.....',:els '',', \ -. II% r.. 00) y ., ., S_ { t is.' _ `_'f''�!^ , • .• w — �IIIIIt ,, * I AIhhanibrl , - Y � .. t 11' ' rr ! „ >>•,__ rr- • -rte _ - ,, . ice - ,��� '� �,�� ,,.al '• yry�» e:ram )n ..,� ttr t ��c ___.,��"'- -_ ......g,/. 1 1 ; • ,. '• ' - .. ' s 'i I7 (V ,� +PA'".\ • i} lite ill i ',1s � t ; ,, p . ', O • + � 4 , I . , . f `• F `+� .T „ "• ► . Z. MOW :2''• '. ' - ...' ."'„,' -Ii..,:;;I:.-eA. S,. O Ii72 !Illy III 1'��� �i1191(�� ,de.-4,.,Ilitt �� '04,,s''4,., .�'o3� II !. ��� "pit . 'tiles- 1 "6 : ` A•. 1 .�• , " u! � i V'. '11t' . m ` •• �� 1- •• .MMIII IL. ,z, �IS it D r R-i ; .�� I ii� It �M �� O . --....f * 1 .,„ .., , ...,im ISUR 416' t y m 11',lk mri--1 A y r� It I — ter, .��Ie lit.' Ilk TN: 'l'',!!1 ; my ' ry �E F k F rr, , 1,1lft ii 11 ' ., L. - I'1 g - IV f 1 � - . l.'r' it I �mil a ws. �► N_ 61f,i, ; ii . r•Irodirv......._,,,,_. Li_ it it\.\,,,t,........ umok\ __ _ _.. _____ (r) FIRM PROFILE AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone C SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience FIRM PROFILE I RRM Design Group RRM exists because we love creating environments people enjoy.That is rrm what got us into the business over 40 years ago, and it is why we continue to thrive today. Our architects and landscape architects, engineers, design surveyors, and planners work with our clients and their communities to group create the parks our children play in, the roads we drive down on our way to work, the neighborhoods we come home to, and the fire stations that keep our communities safe. CREATING Our work culture emphasizes collaboration,frequent communication, ENVIRONMENTS and accessibility.We're a close partner with our clients, helping them PEOPLE understand and navigate through the project lifecycle. Whether your ENJOY. project is public or private, commercial or residential, we listen, we design, and we deliver. On time. On budget. Since 1974. SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 32332 Camino Capistrano Ste.205 6 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 44 fir... { jig.. _ p:(949) 361 7950 f(949)361-7955 SANTA BARBARA PERSONNEL BY DISCIPLINE 10 East Figueroa St.,Ste. 200 Santa Barbara,CA 93101 p:(805) 963-8283 L f(805) 963-8184 1 35 professionals on staff at RRM Design Group in 6 core disciplines: SAN LUIS OBISPO Architecture Landscape Planning 3765 South Higuera St.,Ste. 102 ArchitectureSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Civil Engineering Structural Engineering p:(805)543-1794 Surveying f(805)543-4609 19 California Licensed Architects SAN LEANDRO I I California Licensed Civil Engineers 123 Estudillo Ave.,Ste.200 2 California Licensed Structural Engineers San Leandro,CA 94577 17 California Licensed Landscape Architects p:(510) 751-4910 f(510) 686-8831 3 Certified Planners 1 Licensed Surveyors FIELD OFFICES 22 LEED®Accredited Professionals San Diego,Palm Desert, 5 Congress for New Urbanism Accredited Professionals El Segundo 23 Architecture Designers WEBSITE 18 Engineering Designers www.rrmdesign.com 19 Planning and Landscape Architecture Designers 3 Surveying Technicians 22 Administrative Staff 2 ��i rrrn ... , . , , i ,,..,,-- • i.4_ , ,. ,.. ,, .,..,:, , ,, ,,, %, 74\ . . =, ,.*. �; - .,'', • -••,'N.% t'....."/0--f".1111.. , ,.,, ti t ‘IA'I t:- :1 1:.1.4 ,i l i -.4.... . 17 ti le O ti PLANNING AT RRM DESIGN GROUP RRM started as a local San Luis Obispo architecture firm in 1974.We have since grown into a widely known and respected multidisciplinary California design firm. With humble beginnings, our little firm has grown from the ground up;we now have a professional staff of over 130 with offices throughout the state. RRM takes planning beyond theory and into the realm of successful project implementation.The depth of experience in our planning group staff promotes exceptional effectiveness in creative project solutions, establishing consensus, client relationships, and public representation,which is evidenced through the numerous implemented RRM projects across the state. RRM Design Group is committed to plan for and design beautiful and functional spaces as well as reshape underutilized and transit-oriented areas. We have successfully crafted land use and policy documents that tackle similar issues to those that the City will continue to face within the coming years. Work products include general and community plans, specific and master plans, ordinance updates, design guidelines and design review, urban design, and land use studies. In addition, we are fully capable of developing 3D renderings to depict the scale, color, texture, and context of proposed designs. We enjoy working with public agencies to enhance their communities.We work throughout California providing our services to municipalities, business improvement districts, and designated local authorities. w' 1 F ,; Ow' 0 P. yi/I ° Y' I x, , �1 \II fs/ }R �,r • r # •tF 1 I =aNT 111` = t I 5. s, , r4r r, 4) t ` �;- - ;10.1,1.. r '� 'ds. T a c#: 4.-i `I!t t 3011E i SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience II "Part of the San Gabriel Valley New Generation Rotary group goals for this year included finding ways for young professions to use their talents to create a better community.RRM has been instrumental to our mission.I'm glad Alhambra has people like you leading the revitalization planning effort." -Mauro A.Trejo,SGV New Generation Rotary President ..'fir 3'r;�� ` � f� � 1@IIS - IIIII. 911 ... + 1 liiilii► ► i ® ` ii`'P O m , II * ,' 11111 II x,111 ° 1 iii111' ► - 4- -� :i I ' t ■um „ ill '!w, an;1,..., 10 \ 11111 ,., SII ,�J' ,r:. �� . . "``. !\ e1111 "" !' _ .7 • �' s II fiiiii li . , A- V a: _ on • ALFIAMBRA The City of Alhambra retained RRM Design Group, in collaboration with Rincon Consultants,to prepare the community's comprehensive GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2015 2015 General Plan Update. RRM provided land use/urban design ALHAMBRA, CA services, community engagement, and meeting facilitation. As part of the community outreach strategy, RRM led the effort to educate, inform, NOTABLE INFO & STATS: Ka and promote interaction and dialogue throughout the project process Design Timeline:2015-2018 in this diverse community. RRM devised an outreach campaign that Contract Amount:$134,940 improved citizen participation, including public workshops, commission REFERENCE: w r work sessions, stakeholder interviews,young professional sessions, pop- Vanessa Reynosa up events, project website support, a custom community survey, and Deputy Director of Community press releases. After gaining consensus on the update's general direction, Development RRM guided the urban design effort by providing vision concepts for City of Alhambra 111 South First Street focus areas of change, and architectural and urban design guidelines to Alhambra,CA 91801 illustrate concepts to town citizens. RRM drafted the community design (626)S70-5034 components of the Land Use Element and supported policy development vreynosa@cityofalhambra.org for recreation, open spaces, mobility, and public realm improvements. RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: "' Planning,Landscape Architecture, Architecture,Architectural Visual Simulations,Branding and Identity 4 iiirrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience i SECTION 1 i ,°*.'1,-,--- r-- mo L r mojwimfr f! / ird r - t A. -p. � . _ � Ijfigui , '� ^ y rY y �-� ;.- a 1� !It 1 j "•fig �`� t*ik . / I tsar a '� a'''.. h ,,-- ', )1-'c ..0... C y..•.."` -4 Award of Merit for - a ,. :z•', '..s1 1 1 '. �,_ a Economic Planning L #,,. &Development �' '` �r---' ,,_: ,. /.. x -APA Los Angeles Section, !1 2016 Metro MIA 4 v..., 0 I - s ._... _ ;, s „gob 41111111 - AZUSATOD The City of Azusa retained RRM to prepare a 350-acre TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan focusing on Azusa's GENERAL PLAN/ downtown,two future Gold Line transit stations, and adjacent DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE residential neighborhoods. Funded through a Los Angeles Metropolitan AND SPECIFIC PLAN Transportation Authority(Metro) grant, the work effort addressed a AZUSA, CA mix of commercial, residential, and entertainment-related land uses that will be instrumental in creating a vibrant mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented NOTABLE INFO & STATS: la environment. The project market analysis informed recommended land Design Timeline:2014-2016 uses and development standards, which are complemented by design Contract Amount:$596,400 guidelines to ensure high quality, compatible development. Inclusive REFERENCE: tii; community engagement incorporates ideas voiced by residents, business Manuel Munoz owners, and decision-makers. The overall effort was complemented by Planning Manager an integrated CEQA process for an Environmental Impact Report. City of Azusa 213 E Foothill Boulevard Azusa,CA 91702 (626)812-5226 mmunoz@azusaca.gov RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: "' Planning,Architecture,Engineering, Landscape Architecture City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 5 SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience a____1 it IJl!---' ' ,. _\U . :'''''-'-'-ti, Ut 177 „ _____ , <„,c,„.3,5„ „.1.---rwi ii0 ;it . .,,,,---^747-5....lik . c.o. 1 ,, ----- ' ' 1' '''- ''''',',.' !,1',617-----51."1: :1:1•41-11' It' . , ., ... , ,,, ,..te. _. 4.;,... . ._„ ....___ 4., ise 0 ii , , _, gt'S ip -111airallEP-1-^467W r �.a t le. ,I1 iii, - ` . _.._parr 4t r = 7- 147 ►,�� a ► 1111.0 1�k ��t�, yjo A,0 �� Dy/' l� r ) �i i,-7.�,, lV, j -l , P t4,,c,---i-- --14c,, _,...,-........ t_ .40.400.6046, 14.4' ,RI•ri -- .4j1V10 r&41--- -111/**.e— v 41111111111111100-' --• . - „;-1-,.-- , % 111 • I SET SOME GOALS lets do "'•' cincerr a .,: -Win 1 URBAN ,� ® DESIGNelement - City of Long Beach General Plan , � _„.„_t �I p _.,1 iese rr 1k. : I h , —;e ry. >.. rF .i„,.--%-- E.,.. v _-5- rr -• .._..... • • ., ....`' ,, - I ' 1 t40 111 LONG BEACH The City of Long Beach Department of Development Services hired RRM Design Group to assist with specialized planning services, including URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT design review, special studies, peer reviews, and other similar tasks.As LONG BEACH, CA part of this contract, RRM has provided a significant amount of support to the General Plan Update process including, preparing the Urban NOTABLE INFO & STATS: Era Design Element and Noise Element, assisting with graphics and peer Design Timeline:2011-Current ull�' review of the Land Use Element, and facilitating an extensive multi- Contract Amount:$775,283 lingual outreach effort including surveys, pop-up events, traditional REFERENCE: e... workshops, and informational campaigns to ensure community- Christopher Koontz, �r driven Elements. The Urban Design Element outlines strategies and Planning Bureau Manager policies intended for long-term effects of incorporating sustainable Department of Development Services design practices, promotion of health and wellness opportunities, 333 West Ocean Blvd.,3rd Floor Long Beach,California,90802 appropriate transitions for infill development, protection of the existing (562)570-6288 neighborhood character, and creation of vibrant and active public christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov spaces into development decisions.A variety of visual simulations and renderings were developed to depict improvements to the public realm RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: iii and future development potential. RRM Design Group also developed a Planning,Architecture, Landscape Architecture Parklet and Outdoor Dining Handbook that provides design guidelines and development standards to enhance the public realm with vibrant outdoor spaces that activate the street,foster social interaction, and improve pedestrian activity adjacent to businesses. 6 ill rrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience I SECTION 1 • 14"iSil 00 -'t.S.*_ Mvs�� sF �t 11nIli 101 ' r oft 115n F yrr A r , 44. mg■. ` /'\ l_.; Valley Mall has been L !' V `\�. renamed Mein Street to ` \" bnng greater awareness to _ i . If �..-s. the cultural and traditional ' a..-. , `,,,,i4=. eE.wa.IE heart"of Downtown El .I h' �� a Monte. ! C ''c. L� Suouu /° l ' v 't/. - W SIR,,UP AREA / ,°'l J i ii ^EL MONTE.n. 1ROLLY 4 A ct(F9ue12,) ` W S Are. a -,r It nrq,nsU rW •� A. ong VW'al ° r..o� auras, <w�e.�." T f 1, Ma1n:,Street 4 , �:` roo 1: Sub Area.-� .,, F. .„ O a /• _ Sib-Ar•a Zocalo' o Sub Area I 0 aAa,wo o m ELtoo REE Existing W �cial.3Q .�.� �50400201010K, LAS 0LOAESD - =:'''=",:r"''';''''"0. 00 / R2-PRD, l'° r NNW) —tea M,,-roA aii 6M=��� °`° .: ,• ' .r _ to `A--•a ••., `" .. J= E)a°P E Sub Area•- r, �i sIAnO FAMDNABIvn"" 1---ice~-_ '�/ , / - / c�o.,wwr. wM _ _ _ 1 1. \� ;pure a4 ...Ong*Eum vr_em ® ,1 sW°nd2I01 � ?— _— _ „gym,» sitIIto ELAl ONTE The City of El Monte received a Metro grant and selected RRM Design Group to develop a Downtown Main Street TOD Specific Plan. The DOWNTOWN TOD SPECIFIC project provides the regulatory land use and planning framework PLAN, ZONING CODE AND for implementing the vision articulated in the adopted 2011 Vision DESIGN GUIDELINES UPDATE El Monte General Plan.The plan focuses on the revitalization and EL MONTE, CA plans for physical improvements to Main Street and evaluates transit- oriented development opportunities surrounding the Metrolink NOTABLE INFO & STATS: Io(IjII and Foothill transit stations. In addition, RRM was asked to develop Design Timeline:2013-Current streetscape improvement construction documents to enhance the Contract Amount:$461,881 City's downtown urban core. The design also includes improvements REFERENCE: f... to paseo access to the street, new street pedestrian lighting, traffic Jason Mikaelian,AICP ' calming features, and the design of bioswales and permeable pavement Planning Services Manager to capture urban storm runoff. RRM Design Group is currently City of El Monte working with the City to prepare a comprehensive update of the 11333 Valley Boulevard El Monte,CA 91731 City's Zoning Code and Design Guidelines.The update provides an (626)580-2064 opportunity to add clarity to regulations and fill in the gaps where the jmikaelian@elmonteca.gov code is currently silent, thus providing greater certainty and finality in decision-making.This work effort includes a comprehensive update of RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: "' city-wide design guidelines. Planning,Landscape Architecture City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 7 SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience NDUM MEMORAfli - _ �4y � base 5ec^'^E"1'lU5 _ .TN;nJa apdTw^PM GY ,! i . - ihr r,..34effty,„.: 1.1 .. ,, i� �'- ,k.na .� Mr F :o'''''''''''' _ ,hnlen Numb.r 19A-URIs ■ XIl.�'IM-34s'.-rv4'_ ice. – ���."� I1•.Ni Illllr,�.., r� . .. SM — b.. •,,,„„„i. am e0' -.- ! — MEW IIIII� T..mara,.aeoaaramd _ _ , m Mai TamPacn '" 'a ii,s....arill 4t �. • F-2,46-4,..7:,,,__ — r Dear raaan ��,eeaw^m Tna Te:re«a mr w^d y r _ .. ---r s=�a�ioTSPloe='R^�°i°"ppea^amaa Plans(0.0, WEST ELEVATION(ALLEY) oa.mmrea a.Z.m.Trz nls P:o•�,e,eW rvnWrea are Maaw Ste Plan{s , ,,o,,,.,,3,a^,.a= R;0°m re":~^aa^ ,maw"r West Elevation MSA ''''ad,oth,a„a re^na °�aam aaa„ �'a'g ra " ,, a,e es•.gn. n„aJ lnal Mere'u lnwnzbu��I�t:u qa^e Iwmmants re„e—al— ” mN erre bu,:aa�Mq N.ane p'ep "N' � a^ Tre �a fi�s P m re ,a�a� SCALE,WALL ARTICULATION,AND ROOF aeg,ar„aa, a ,R a, P Pa e °�" a � DESIGN SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ALL — II SIDES OF THE PROJECT n • 1' c' 4' (s' � RESIDENTIAL R,,... — > 1116 ,,i , , ; <f-1 7-... .ate,�" � �" S �-� �.�-��a� Ti Ire„ - _ ;� 4/04 4, I. ,r ' UFS Av ^ ' *`" *-r- s ••• PROJECT SITE a• are _ , OODR E. �. area ,,-" ,oma ► , x> ":„=„;,117, ,,,,......., ^eAreaca,a.�� g �w� Fn" M Mauaar aexuhEawmww x m ••��� g m z COMMERCIAL 1---71,01CM., -—LI m n -' ' EEO...^.. DR m 't LAS TUNAS 2. �t - I. ' , '.t..' RESIDENTIAL y aMa�o,arere�a ar,reaaraa,a i .....-------"'" µ r M •, g Vicinity Map TEMPLE PLE CITY RRM's team of architects and urban designers has provided design review services for Temple City since 2004. Our team has DESIGN REVIEW reviewed and commented on the design of a variety of project TEMPLE CITY, CA types, including mixed-use, residential, commercial,and industrial. Design recommendations for these reviews are supported NOTABLE INFO & STATS: 4110 graphically through sketches and red-lined plans and from time- Design Timeline:2004-Current to-time also include site visits, meetings with applicants, and staff Contract Amount:$106,750 assistance in preparation for hearings. RRM has also assisted REFERENCE: Ir... the City in preparing mixed-use planning and best practices Scott Reimers,Planning Manager w materials as well as comprehensive infill residential design City of Temple City guidelines. Mixed-use materials were used to educate City staff 9701 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City,CA 91780 and elected officials on the complexities of this development type (626)656-73151 sreimers@templecity.us and to frame the City's review approach for future development RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: rri proposals. Planning,Architecture 8 iirrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience I SECTION 1 DOWNTOWNpOMOna 1 SPECIFIC PLAN 1111111 If 11111 ' .f t iiii �' i� �a�� dtae „ _ i- in.■un. n I _L wort_ [� ,. , - �'�� .ad ®ui�:: lirani1 1 F f . —. IG�ifY■' Fli �j Fll�lllla # If :_MIME t ,, zi rai■: ij" six �■1 g 1“-,,.'I'--i—Vi "�� • ,1 w ■moi: w�i.f Seco.I l I knit ainiminitinifflerfuggFi: II --I'll DRAFTJUNE MIS I 1L,-LCO�J W EfpYr�ac � A BuildingTransparency/Required Openings. 2. &ce dons Pork/ Gar Multi-llevel F�Tmi on I! ^_ L I I I I 1 11 1 ■I■II. r Jat rt t saes. garaF — 1 f TTi'1 SIC ftm rm l(1111 —I 11111 X1111 12 Exterior wallsfac ng and within 20 fell ofa front or street side nquire red[o meet the ground-story transpar lot line or pedestrian walkway shall nclude windows.doors, requirement. ®.111 11111111111 or other openings for at least 50 percent of the building wall 3. Reductions.The bu lding transparency requ ram -......w.rv..r... e�u.wr..c-.tee...,..o-....<.ol wm.,..�,...n.ww.q I H RA IIIII 111111111/ area located between 2.5 and seven feet above the level of be reduced or waived by the review authority ul •sax wn.a the sidewalk.Such walls may run Ina continuous plane for no that u- um ..,�+.i.ux ®® ,-,_,--�—/,- morethan30feetwithoutanopening. c. The proposed use has unique operational �� t. Design of Required Openings.Openings fulfilling this characteristics with which providing the req Flgwe Ll.Dinricn One requirement shall have transparent glaring and provide willows and openings is incompatible.55 Into work areas,display areas,sales areas.lobbies, se tfac or[heater:and sa�non nowrvinennvc Deno�urv[.ale 2l news into active spaces.or o window displays that are d. Street-facing building walls will exhibit arch.. or least three feet(3)deep. relief and detail and will be enhanced with landscaping in such a way as to create visual Interest at the pedestrian level. i 1 1 I ..........a:..i_I_ e: .k!i a�;kli�r.am�.r�y,..n�i.ad aFeningz so AD,ARSTeAtv[DRAFT JUNE Nle POMONADowntown Pomona is the cultural, civic and historic heart of the City, surrounding the increasingly popular Downtown DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN Pomona Transit Station. Funded by a Metro Transit Oriented UPDATE Development Planning Grant, RRM Design Group was retained POMONA, CA by the City of Pomona to update the existing 1994 Downtown Specific Plan to support transit-oriented development and NOTABLE INFO & STATS: WI further implement the 2014 General Plan vision for a vibrant Design Timeline:2017-Current downtown. Grant goals include improving mobility, reducing Contract Amount:$220,000 greenhouse gases, and enhancing sustainability. Key themes REFERENCE: c include eliminating contradictory regulations, improving ease Ata Khan,Senior Planner of use, coordinating with the concurrent Zoning Code Update, City of Pomona enhancing Downtown identity and placemaking, updating 505 S.Gary Ave development regulations, implementation actions and incentives Pomona,CA 91769 (909)620-3765/ata khan@ci.pomona.ca.us to align with market-driven revitalization. stakeholder meetings, community workshops, study sessions, and associated website- RRM SERVICES PROVIDED: "f supported development of the updated plan. Planning,Architecture,Landscape Architecture City of Rosernead 1 PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 9 SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO Planning with implementation in mind... tii 1 fit' ...46C 4 :. •, 11 4G` L� etst_+t x r` "- 0 --e.nV. it cotr • . w1 +R < * 011111; x j c , _ 1'V c ', One of the most important distinguishing factors between -. 41-innimom -— „„....---4,4,77-. RRM and other planning consultants is our portfolio of architectural projects that we bring to the assignment. ;„ ;'� • '_' ,,..,,. Writing a plan that enables investors and developers to Lit'. — - partner with the City to help revitalize the downtown area requires a working knowledge of site, building, and project A\ design. At RRM we have an architecture practice with over o• i `4, s 35 staff members who work with developers and owners to ;,' ,, ■i ai design multi-family residential (market rate, affordable and ICildh 1 - I lit ; senior), mixed-use projects and buildings, corporate offices and commercial facilities. This intimate experience designing y : L 11 and constructing projects gives us an advantage in knowing ,1 _�U I �,.p ' . what development standards and design guidelines will .._... - is work to produce desired and marketable placemaking spaces. We plan and write regulations and guidelines based RRM projects featured on this page:Paseo Chapala,Laguna Court,The on our working knowledge of the built environment and Courtyard at Serra Meadows,Casa de las Fuentes,Broad Street Mixed- investment community. Use,and 570 Marsh Street Mixed-Use. 10 it rrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience I SECTION 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS & ZONING REGULATIONS 1 L+[y of llnn[rrg rnn 9ersclr R�rior,.r.and Tetknvlvy,•Iner RRM has experience creating development standards and zoning TECHNICAL BACKGROUND ANALYSIS regulations that are user-friendly and implementable.We collaborate closely with our architectural staff to develop standards and ordinance , language and graphics that realistically guide future redevelopment.We `r. also have experience with GIS and creating and updating zoning maps. a` ., ._ USER-FRIENDLY DOCUMENT0 .,, FORMATTING "LI, � "+ „„_-. , ---—-- • :-3:;;Tc:- '---,1 ir :7--_-.:,.•,-*- "h drgs° E.- -- . momer xcwmormscmexmx mxuw ear.�rebmaueseam Nee recryd \. m wx me mne $ —" DRAFT November 21 2016 nw:.x... w : i:::::::::;,.,..... ..L..•, rm. zo o.n m ! -mncrc. 1 mfrrrnrrr — I m -_ � - 1 • QtlM P°pw°e owpiey.cgwmtlxWrt:.pxlvm N..°e:otmx.°•.m.nm:°giz un aia z. .wgN:s xnxaav:txwwni.vwEuiwa u[tr [*.aoa wn I. Huntington Beach Research and Technology Zone, � " N 1 i Huntington Beach, CA graph[«° j -. ... ...., '..4.-.. e 1 - 2. RRM's Internal Document Formatting Standards 3. Pomona Zoning and Subdivision Code Update, nmrr A 'Gime°"`".° "'""" Pomona, CA ..rtl�x�ae.rm� 4. Hayward Industrial Regulations and Design nme°red° • a. r..xm°mornemv.,,.Nmm.max.munor is rear ............... "amgm"" Y� m. Guidelines, Hayward, CA CITY OF POMONA ZONING MAP 0 , 1[F� ,'7 -7-,-, rwy ZONING DISTRICTS "' �yry u.ae eamr.m.muarr°.oaxan lailiiiiiiiIIIIIII «`_ DRAFT = am�me°[ .y [. For Staff Review ' Y'& ' " Qa ''• II - e. 4. _ _ r .,,,,7,1-.:--- � eMe°ew�M�m. .. +� ♦� _'� v �• g wr m Deck creates j■ .w... s ie a enhanced tbm°rongh unable eor cu�°merSpa, Spa,. r � .y. A w. • ..;. n e se.r.:atenr°xx�xm>ax Entry I ren Simplec°o aI id a m SF ...Pine dmI ®`=/--a D -- AFTER "ace "d smagie n /.' � �a � OVERLAY DISTRICTS tore o,r°r W e :,...g Ir._ AS o.oSC o� Ea, o °r ii �` 'A - MAP FEATURES MO FOR STAFF USE TEMPORARY) ,�'[^.� 5 �� .`0.� emmr°ea.erveoxovae owners I° .el --i,iii _- Ao OzS os 11/22/16 ® seek ipra eb mPa sore a tlo cu adeno caw eli Qe°tt owms ..,.>.,os,x CT or,rx ce,o.r, .r . City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 11 SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience ADMINISTERING GRANT-FUNDED PROJECTS WITH CARE RRM has conducted many grant-funded assignments, including those funded by the California Strategic Growth Council (SGC) Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Program and Metro Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grant Program.We thoroughly understand the importance of ensuring work efforts and products are compliant with grant provisions and are responsive to billing, reporting, and documentation requirements, and the City's need to comply. Our aim is to minimize staff time in dealing with grant administration duties, speed up grant reimbursement payments to the City, and keep everyone happy. Selected Grant-Funded Assignments • Azusa TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan, Azusa, CA • Balboa Avenue Station Area Specific Plan, San Diego, CA • Buena Park Multi-Modal Mobility Plan, Buena Park, CA • Colton Downtown Development Code and Design Manual, Colton, CA • Florence/La Brea Transit-Oriented District, Inglewood, CA • Fullerton Downtown Core and Corridors Specific Plan, Fullerton, CA • Las Positas Multi-Use Path, Santa Barbara, CA • Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail, Santa Cruz County, CA • North Sierra Highway Corridor Plan, Inyo County, CA • Pomona Downtown Specific Plan Update, Pomona, CA • San Sevaine Connectivity Plan, Fontana, CA • Stanton Livable Beach Boulevard Mobility Plan, Stanton, CA 4+`:.-:. 4 .....,: ,,..,,,,,,.---,„...-- .„ ra 0 -, ,„.4.,,,.. ...;„1,...,, , , ,,f„, ,. ,-..______ x ,_.__ . vt ,, ,_ „0,,,- , t:'-k--\7/ , rt J ,.1/4.,.,24..A -- '1� abs' n C v ,e�2 ..._.i,;,:.,.., _ F" .an • ,--,..,.....,..m.7 .+ -c. LL . r N dmf �' � 8x .:. , , .4 ,, a k . ..a.,,- Lei fk 7 ,..„.0, F 40 .. ...CAS A i.:' ,. _ ,,,,..„ SAN SEVAINE . trail connection ,'` „i.e. e....-_-.14-... N». :4444 111 �` -It a L. . ..,......,-,4, -(:-.". ..� K .x t 4 ok,,,44044 1 pr ( 11 0 "140 .t''t ---""- 12 iiirrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience I SECTION 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT How does RRM reach the unreachable? Often hosting public forums to obtain feedback is not enough to capture strong community representation. RRM utilizes a variety of methods to engage a broad spectrum of the community in meaningful dialogue. We'll come to you ` - r r -, nable of . ' Engage a broad cross-section 1` y,- +.4y� 'd Utilizing community of residents by reaching out toII* N '' ambassadors fosters grassroots them where they already meet _ feedback and extends the ' and at places they already are. reach and depth of community •Pop-up events 4.11 d --' - rapport. •Farmer's markets a 'l , •Outreach toolkits •Places of worship ......___ •Service organization meetings -- �.-f • Youth sport events _ s Pio'� ' •eR_ ,s ON''''. t it Bring people .�, together fora . .- � ., k ill -a conversation i ,.• . Events that bring the community together enable a discussion among those with a Formal processes t-, - variety of perspectives. J •Community workshops Check-ins with decision- ' •Open houses makers throughout the process ��+ reduce the potential for •Walking tours surprises at the end, promoting • Youth outreach a smooth public review and Participate from adoption process. anywhere .... •Stakeholder interviews _ . , • • ft_ •Project committees Disseminate information and `"° `- ' '� €`�� i "; � ^ '� •Decision-makers check-ins allow people to access info and 1r provide input on their own �`' •Public hearings time. „ `:.. •Social media • 1111!11111P1 - • ` • : ::51te5 pN►MUN►TY VE EN *I.. • r•.so FARMER'S MARKET • *� w• Surveys THUR$p Ay - ' : • •Mobile Applications THIS digth ,1 , MARCN;�ADSTREET i. 6QMMUHiC!iEE - City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 13 RRM PROJECT Los Altos Downtown Vision „ ° .— - . li _ . *w y .: - 4414;fat______........_•',--------- -.0k,.`- -. r .- 4111011 -7r:,-.-4,---N: *.• ,i'-'‘. - - I I-,' ,,or' ..'•- ••'•• -"," _„••_. :4 • • f- -_ _ , . • if- -'-' - 1:1•11\,. '-'-' (-. ' :-. 41* :-1'.<;.47.; ‘,.. s"-- '"-Irc .•-'-. , 41,,,,•*77,-.• -_'.- < --..-4' -••,-,-- -- ,i',,,.. i--- ° - a :t a ,� "41r ; Ir -' - -. .4, , , . - 40.), - .-1,... -,- .. ,,, ,i, ,:- : -- , - -ei.,,,i,4----,.....,... ., t .. . 7 - . . . -. --,: " ..#.[_,„. .„ ___ - - - ,..i< _1 ***, - -.-•-- .,,,.. . _ iiiii, # 3 :; t ,, I. `i ,rookx i.,_. ,- .41.._i_ ii.,, ,„ _ _ f _ f$$ fff `ti.: ' ax �a ' %holA\may I p . -r __ , —{ } ' rT i t ' Alk t t ' • ''''' = - 4 /111 r •' t N '�1 Of 1 < x ` Alliik kF ` •_ yam: C r . ff y rE .,, ,_ wiii fjf oierit- 14 rrm / +7 �T�# , I - - Jr , ..-Cliaiii ol / I !j11 1 1 1 �a 'III .a.,. a x o + • . , 1 a Q N \4. 1 • 41 • 1 - * _ �...� f 1 .�•� , ,« xl 1 1 - ` 1 . , ' , ION', .t• tt ;di% . : ' . /-,.......„t er ` I � w1 i4, a.4 l 4Z. 1 _m • ., i. 73 Y73 1 J o s ier•:- 73 • x Ill �1 _ ,m ' Y.. _ ._ ...._... 1 , < $ t fes7 ' � . 1 D Ia� . �� te � , • , .,...... .... ,0 '-',-....--,;.:.....-,,,,,,,,, ,7tMit- ,_4 -,. , ...___ 4. , •.... .. •.• „.. 'A .1 Rj }fue. ce°. ,!t!*, PROJECT APPROACH AND N..)SCOPE OF SERVICESo Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone SECTION 2 1 Project Approach and Scope of Services , w ,�a • t e - = ' ♦ Rosemead Blvd - k,4,._" . - . STOP - - - . .0 .17, A . , ,,,,,,,. 4,_ . .. , i I • us i 2 v. . — -ye c 7 I.-r f: 7 fr-f,X'iFi - .-w 66!! - f+.�....� h . T.�... t ' '%&"" ,.. r ' '''''---/. .J.C_.' :'i APPROACH In preparing this scope of work, we carefully reviewed the RFP and supplemental addendum, conducted a site visit and reviewed the primary objectives of the Senate Bill 2 (SB2) Planning Grants Program, the Rosemead Strategic Plan 2018-2020, Rosemead Downtown Design Guidelines, Garvey Avenue Master Plan, Title 17—Zoning of the Municipal Code, relevant policies from the 2010 General Plan, and other available City documents. The following scope of services for development of the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will establish development regulations and companion policies to facilitate new housing opportunities, economic revitalization, and attractive placemaking in underutilized areas.The effort will focus on usability, modern regulations and plan graphics, streamlining procedures, and implementation strategies in a"post redevelopment" environment. A key initiative for the effort is to provide a policy tool to encourage land use conversion from marginal commercial, industrial or residential uses to mixed-use development along major arterials in areas of the City designated for Mixed Use Residential/Commercial. Areas of focus include properties near the 1-10 freeway corridor at New Avenue, Del Mar Avenue, San Gabriel Boulevard, Walnut Grove Avenue, and Rosemead Boulevard, currently home to a variety of outdated uses.The General Plan and Strategic Plan envisions identified areas transforming to a multi-modal, multi-use character featuring strategically placed developments between stretches of diverse commercial uses. New residential development will also be encouraged.The proposed Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will be an important policy tool to facilitate envisioned revitalization and reinvestment. Our scope of work is organized with tasks following the structure included in the issued RFP and SB 2 grant, and further tailored based our familiarity with Rosemead and surrounding communities as well as professional experience with similar planning assignments. Descriptions of tasks, methodologies and deliverable products are identified in the scope of work along with tasks and materials assumed to be provided by City staff.We welcome collaboration to adjust this work plan as necessary to best satisfy the City and grant objectives, budget, and time frames. 16 ill rrm Project Approach and Scope of Services I SECTION 2 SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1: INITIAL RECONNAISSANCE, PROJECT KICK-OFF, AND WORK REFINEMENT PROGRAM Task 1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit The consultant team will prepare for and conduct an initial kick-off meeting with City staff.This task will include the following: • Identification of key project contacts and information exchange • Review of project objectives, scope of work, and project timeline • Obtain client-supplied maps, documents, and related information • Discussion of general problems, hot spots, study area boundaries, and issues to be focused on during the project • Identification of optimal working relationship, in terms of receipt and review of materials, turnaround times, etc. • Review of public outreach strategy and identification of potential stakeholder interviewees • Discussion of document and product format, organization, and graphic quality presentation • Tour of study area The kickoff meeting will serve as a discovery process looking at the existing General Plan, Zoning Code and Map, related Design Guidelines, City's Strategic Plan, and any other necessary information. In addition, the discussion will inform any needed refinements to the project schedule, milestones, and tasks. RRM will prepare an agenda and follow up with a refined scope of work and timeline, as needed. City staff will be responsible for logistics for meeting and tour of the study area. DELIVERABLES: • Meeting agenda and list of data needs ` - p • te • Meeting and study area tour attendance .,_ " moi" �- _ ♦ 4 ,4.. 7. p '4 till leo ' TL: of °$ EL Jami leading a site walk for the San Ysidro Community Plan in San Diego. City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 17 SECTION 2 I Project Approach and Scope of Services TASK 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS, ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES Task 2.1 Review Background Information The consultant team will gather and review data that is relevant to this project.The primary purpose of this effort is to get up to speed on past and current planning efforts and harness the wealth of existing data that can be used in the planning process.This task will include a review of City materials as well as information from other affected agencies as available. Preliminarily resource documents and data include: • Rosemead General Plan • Rosemead Zoning Code and Zoning Map • Garvey Avenue Master Plan • Rosemead Strategic Plan • Final EIR for 2008 Rosemead General Plan Update and subsequent 2010 Addendum • City GIS data This initial phase of the planning process will involve data collection and analysis to: • Identify State and federal laws to be addressed • Identify any necessary General Plan Amendments and Zoning Code and Zoning Map Amendments that need to be completed • Summarize applicable regulatory frameworks • Identify existing land use and circulation conditions • Summarize local social and economic character of the study area Based on the initial data collection effort, an analysis of existing conditions will be compiled.The analysis will present a description of existing conditions and will analyze the information to identify potential issues, opportunities, and challenges. RRM Engineering will support this task by conducting a review of available infrastructure relying on available City documentation. During this phase, in collaboration with City staff, RRM will provide three real-life examples of similar projects. Each example will be analyzed for its effectiveness and applicability to the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone project. Profile information such as project location, applicable zoning and regulations, and development summary will be provided. As part of this task, using City-provided data, RRM will prepare a project area base map in AutoCAD/GIS format. The base map will be used throughout the project for various mapping and design exhibits. DELIVERABLES: • Background report describing existing conditions in the study area and identifying issues to be addressed by the project • Summary of similar successful projects • Base map using City-supplied GIS data 18 oirrm Project Approach and Scope of Services I SECTION 2 Task 2.2 Meet with Staff RRM will meet with City staff to review the background report and discuss important issues to be addressed in the project. Review of the background report and discussion of important issuest will inform the community engagement strategy and efforts under Task 2.3 Community Engagement. DELIVERABLES: • Meeting attendance and PowerPoint presentation Task 2.3 Community Engagement While this effort is numbered as Task 2.3, community engagement is envisioned to be conducted throughout the project process at key points. RRM will further develop and refine the public engagement strategy in an effort to educate, inform, and seek input on the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone regulations. Community engagement will focus on directly affected stakeholders, including property owners, businesses, interest groups, civic decision-makers, and the community-at-large.This effort will be designed to be effective in building a collaborative interest and obtaining consensus in the project given the potentially diverse group of stakeholders that may have differing needs and expectations. Preliminarily, the community engagement task includes a joint study session with the Planning Commission and City Council with the broader community invited, as requested in the addended RFP. In addition, a day of stakeholder interviews is proposed to be conducted to introduce the project and gain insights and gather information relevant to shaping the new Mixed-Use Overlay Zone. We welcome further discussion to augment the proposed scope and fee to include on-line engagement, community workshops, or other community engagement strategies to best serve the effort and reflect City priorities.This task provides a number of hours that can potentially be reallocated to support different types of engagement activities. Over the course of the project, this task also includes the provision of materials for posting on the City's website such as project scope and schedule, frequently asked questions, and completed products as they are developed.To support additional meetings staff may wish to conduct with decision-makers or stakeholders, briefing materials would be provided under this task. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare agenda and assist staff to facilitate one (I) joint study session �• • Prepare for and facilitate one-day of back-to-back ' z stakeholder interviews • City staff will be responsible for meeting .,� notification, facility, and logistics 44010t I.000 Diane at a community workshop for the Pomona Downtown Specific Plan. City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 19 SECTION 2 I Project Approach and Scope of Services TASK 3: FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE PREPARATION Task 3.1 Key Elements and Opportunity Sites RRM's team of planners, urban designers, architects, landscape architects, and engineers will collaborate with the City to generate realistic concepts that consider development, placemaking, and design opportunities and constraints. The concepts will be the basis for the Freeway Corridor Overlay Zone and will likely include: • Urban design framework such as building placement, form, height, and densities • Circulation and streetscape concepts and strategies • Detailed document outline and contents Opportunity sites will be analyzed in this task as well. Building on the existing conditions analysis, RRM will identify underutilized or vacant sites whose location, size, or surrounding uses, provide the opportunity for mixed-use development. For up to three (3) sites, the following will be provided: • Individual maps illustrating area boundaries and parcel-specific land use designations • A brief description of the site characteristics that make an area an opportunity site • A conceptual site plan and elevation sketch describing a future vision for the site with preferred and alternative uses A summary of key concepts and opportunity sites will be prepared in memorandum or PowerPoint form for review and feedback by City staff. DELIVERABLES: • Summary of key concepts and opportunity sites to inform Administrative Draft Task 3.2 Administrative Draft No. I Based on the information collected during previous tasks, the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will be drafted. Any necessary General Plan, Zoning Code, and Zoning Map amendments will be prepared by RRM as well. Preliminarily, the products for this task are envisioned to be organized as follows,to be further tailored in collaboration with City staff. Overall, we envision a graphically-rich, easy-to-use policy document that will reflect the desires of the community and be truth-tested internally by our multi- discipline team of planners, architects, urban designers, landscape architects, and civil engineers. I. Goals, Implementation Measures, Planning Principles—Grant and project goals and supporting measures or principles will describe the vision for the study area and desired outcomes. 2. Planning Process Description—This section will provide an overview of outreach results and the overall planning process. 3. Opportunity Sites—This section will summarize the analysis of up to three (3) opportunity sites as developed under Task 3.1. 20 rarrm Project Approach and Scope of Services I SECTION 2 4. Land Use Element— • Land Use Plan—The location and boundaries of designated land uses will be depicted.This portion of the document will also identify any General Plan or Zoning text and/or map changes and will be accompanied by an explanatory narrative. Permitted and conditional uses will be identified with a lens of streamlining development review where feasible. • Development Standards—These development standards will supersede existing zoning standards and will be written in a clear and concise fashion for ease of implementation with supporting graphics where appropriate. Mixed-use zoning typically requires tailored standards addressing topics such as: • Location and compatibility of uses • Building height and form • Building massing and form Building relationship to the street • Building design • Site landscaping and outdoor space • Services 5. Infrastructure Element—This chapter will describe policies supporting planned uses relating to the transportation and circulation system, streetscape and landscape concepts, and provision of utilities and public services. 6. Implementation Element—This chapter will describe specific implementing actions, potential funding/ financing mechanisms, responsible parties, and phasing. Administration and non-conforming uses and structures may also be addressed. DELIVERABLES: • RRM will provide Administrative Draft No. I as described above • We ask that the City provide one (I) consolidated, marked-up redline version with all City comments Task 3.3 Administrative Draft No. 2 Following the completion of the Administrative Draft of the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and receipt of the single set of redlined comments from the City on the Administrative Draft, RRM will produce a second Administrative Draft. At this point, all of the City's comments will have been integrated and this draft will provide an additional internal review opportunity prior to the development of the Public Hearing Draft. DELIVERABLES: • RRM will provide Administrative Draft No. 2 documents • We ask that the City provide one (I) consolidated, marked-up redline version with all City comments Task 3.4 Public Review Draft This draft is intended for public review and will include any remaining requested revisions and edits from City staff. DELIVERABLES: • Public Review Draft Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Regulations and Map (electronic copy of the suitable for distribution and posting on the City's website) City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 21 SECTION 2 I Project Approach and Scope of Services TASK 4: PREPARE CEQA DOCUMENTATION Task 4.1 CEQA Documentation As the proposed Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will be considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), appropriate CEQA documentation will be required. The proposed approach leverages existing environmental documentation and resources with goals of streamlining future actions and providing defensible CEQA compliance documentation. Morse Planning Group will be responsible for the CEQA documentation task and works frequently and closely with RRM Design Group.We envision an integrated CEQA compliance process to result in improved policy design and self-mitigating strategies where possible. The City certified a Final Environmental Impact Report(EIR) for the General Plan Update in October 2008. The establishment of the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone will implement policy direction in the General Plan, the environmental effects of which are anticipated to have been evaluated in the General Plan EIR. Assumptions for the proposed CEQA approach include: • The CEQA document will tier off the Rosemead General Plan Update Final EIR dated October 2008 and supplemental 2010 Addendum and utilize information relative to the site and applicable mitigation measures. • No technical analyses are included as part of this scope of work. • City staff will be responsible for SB 18 and AB 52 Tribal Consultation. Following preparation of the draft overlay zone regulations, Morse Planning Group will meet with the City staff and the RRM team to confirm the environmental review strategy and timeline. Morse Planning Group will review the draft regulations and the General Plan EIR and identify any inconsistencies or additional analyses required. If no changes are necessary, the options include an EIR Addendum or a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration.A memo confirming the environmental review strategy will be provided to the City.The following task description includes details for both options.The fee scheduled conservatively reflects the more labor-intensive Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. If an Addendum approach is supported, project timeline and budget efficiencies may result. If at any time the need for a Subsequent EIR is potentially triggered due to a significant impact that was not discussed in the previous EIR or any other reason, the team will consult with City staff immediately. If a Subsequent EIR is ultimately determined to be necessary, a revised scope and fee estimate may be required. Option A:EIR Addendum This option assumes preparation of an Addendum to the General Plan EIR and that the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and regulations will result in some changes or additions to the General Plan EIR, but will not change buildout characteristics in a manner that results in new significant impacts or an increase in the severity of a previously identified impact.The EIR Addendum will include: • Introduction. This section will introduce the Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Regulations and describe the level of CEQA review required. • Project Description. Based on project description information provided by RRM, Morse Planning Group will prepare an overview of the project and its relationship to the General Plan. • Environmental Analysis. Morse Planning Group will evaluate each of the topic areas analyzed in the General Plan EIR to determine whether the project could result in adverse impacts not previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR. 22 ioirrm Project Approach and Scope of Services I SECTION 2 Morse Planning Group will prepare an Administrative Draft EIR Addendum for City staff review(one round) and revise the document.The EIR Addendum is not required to be circulated for public review but can be included with public hearing documents when the regulations undergo review by decision-makers.The EIR Addendum would be considered, along with the previous EIR, before decision-makers consider adopting the regulations. Morse Planning Group has assumed that City staff will be responsible for public noticing to comply with City requirements, such as posting notices or newspaper notices. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Determination for City staff review and signature. City staff will file the NOD with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse, if necessary. This task excludes the required California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) consultation and fees. DELIVERABLES: • Administrative Draft Addendum (one round of revisions) • Notice of Determination Option B: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Morse Planning Group will prepare an Initial Study in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Rosemead CEQA Guidelines.The Initial Study will include detailed explanations of all checklist determinations, discussions of potential environmental impacts, and mitigation measures, if applicable. The Initial Study analysis shall be in accordance with all applicable sections of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The environmental document will be presented with the following sections: Introduction, Project Description, Initial Study Checklist, Environmental Analysis, and Initial Study Determination. Morse Planning Group's approach to the analysis portion of the document is to provide thorough, detailed, and conclusive impact analysis.The topics to be reviewed include: • Aesthetics • Land Use/Planning • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Mineral Resources • Air Quality • Noise • Biological Resources • Population/Housing • Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources • Public Services • Energy • Recreation • Geology/oils • Transportation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Utilities/Service Systems • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Wildfire • Hydrology/Water Quality: • Mandatory Findings of Significance City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 23 SECTION 2 I Project Approach and Scope of Services Morse Planning Group will submit the Administrative Draft Initial Study for review and comment by City Staff. Morse Planning Group will also submit one"check copy" of the administrative draft document,which will incorporate one complete set of comments received from City staff. Following receipt of comments and incorporation of revisions, Morse Planning Group will submit the Public Review Draft Initial Study to City staff for distribution for public review. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Intent for City staff review and signature.This task assumes that City staff will be responsible for transmitting notices and CDs to designated reviewing agencies and will be responsible for public noticing to comply with City requirements, such as posting notices or newspaper notices. Following the IS/MND public review period, Morse Planning Group will respond to written comments received on the Public Review Draft Initial Study during the public review period, and prepare thorough, reasoned and sensitive responses to relevant environmental issues. Morse Planning Group will prepare the Administrative Responses to Comments for review and comment by City Staff. Morse Planning Group will submit one"check copy" of the final Responses to Comments document, which will incorporate one complete set of comments received from City Staff on the Administrative Responses to Comments. For budgeting purposes, up to eight hours has been assumed for Morse Planning Group to prepare the Responses to Comments. Should the comments be excessive and require more than the budgeted time,this task and associated costs would be revisited. Morse Planning Group will prepare the mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA Section 21081.6. Morse Planning Group will submit a draft version for City staff review and will follow with a final MMRP. Following City Council approval of the CEQA document, Morse Planning Group will prepare a Final environmental document, which will consist of the revised Public Review Draft Initial Study text, as necessary to address the comments received during the public review period, and the MMRP. CEQA Notices: Morse Planning Group will prepare the Notice of Determination for City staff review and signature. City staff will file the NOD with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse, if necessary. This task excludes the required California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) consultation and fees. DELIVERABLES: • I electronic file (PDF and Word) of Administrative Draft IS/MND • I electronic file (PDF and Word) of"Check Copy" of Draft IS/MND • 20 CDs with PDF Files of Draft IS/MND • I electronic copy(PDF) of Draft IS/MND • I electronic copy(Word) of Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program • I electronic copy (Word) of Final Mitigation Monitoring Program • I electronic copy(PDF) of Final IS/MND 24 iii rrm Project Approach and Scope of Services I SECTION 2 TASK 5: FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE ADOPTION Task 5.1 Public Hearing Materials To support the public hearing process, the consultant team will prepare the necessary public hearing notices using City-supplied templates.The consultant team will prepare initial drafts of staff reports, ordinances, and resolutions for one (I) Planning Commission and one (I) City Council hearing. City staff will be responsible for agendizing the items and finalizing agenda item materials as well as posting and mailing notices. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare public hearing materials as described above Task 5.2 Public Hearing Attendance RRM will prepare for and attend up to five (5) Planning Commission and City Council hearings to help City staff present the Overlay Zone, General Plan Amendments, and Zoning Code Amendments. Morse Planning Group will prepare for and attend up to (2) public hearings. DELIVERABLES: • Prepare for and attend up to five (5) public hearings • Assist City staff in presenting the Specific Plan at City Council hearings including preparation of PowerPoint presentation materials Task 5.3 Final Documents Following the action taken by the City Council, RRM will make the final edits and modifications to the documents. It is assumed that one (I) set of revisions will be made, incorporating both the Planning Commission recommendations and City Council action. Errata sheets may be used to discuss preferred changes between the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. DELIVERABLES: • Make final edits and provide electronic file(s) of final documents Task 5.4 Ongoing Project Management/Coordination Throughout the project, RRM will need to coordinate with City staff, various departments, subconsultants, and interest groups.This task is intended to allow for necessary coordination between the project team members and City staff, including teleconferences, meetings, correspondence, record-keeping, electronic file management, and additional necessary coordination. DELIVERABLES: • Ongoing project coordination and management as described above • This assumes an average of two (2) hours per week for up to ten (10) months City of Rosemead PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 25 RRM PROJECT Courtland and Grand Avenue Mixed-Use Plaza in Arroyo Grande, CA . - . . . . ,., I / , ---, ---,..:-- -------'s-------- k° "tili / , •. - k- ,k,..-- — ----Thor- ;:------'---:-.- - „.„ k- ' - , „...... .› '-- —Sik--.1117.44,\17 4 .r.e. . lk ‘ c\--0 Ilk 1 S _.1111 'VA- ------- ' _ ---.,- „02.-,-.:-...m ''• --- ----*s"--- - \-, ,,, "•••:,,,,,,,,,,.. ..4,L.,__-------,,,„k-----_._.'"--. A___-_ ---- ,', A,..N. i --,1P.--1,: _ N.,ft- ilitt Nit' .."•41- , __ ,,,/_•-• '''' - .4r:.;••• •, , - NI•14VC--'1N _>%411.-, _kt.---ac.--110.1i -- :1-- ':_:-------'1. -='-`- .._ ---,-,. _-- -----------;--- `It 4t-i- ...-------- Ir.” , ‘,... . ---:---• --,-------;•:::!--•.--- .„--,,,,,;`-----\''-:-..-$•-• _ __ -.0.-- -...-=-11-- ---‘ - '"-S'----_''-,-„--a•-„ __-,„-._ --',.---'----,,_ -•••,,, '---':-.I _Air --.3.644-'4,,• ! ------ -:-T------- - -7"-='' --.., 4.., - ..,,,,,, •41^,-., i ' *---\ '41k... --- '. , ,---r ',0.'2Z-.,.---,'.1,---,,,,'7-;-,,,- ,-,._ ,....0...... 1/4`,„ • .1t '• .._.•,k.... -- .._ • , ---.1,„s.-.7- • • 0.-.. •,.,--....„IF .e. .,,,, "*. .4411,41„ ',-.- ,,,'",,,,„- t.,-.. - --, '.: ..: ,,,' --,,.._:,..-----_-_,„:-..,---, .-----., '; • • ..7 le , • •:110b. 4,4c; l'" - ,;,. -.0:4'2.'1' T'''' . .....'• '''''' ---4i •-.._,._"--,...">---_„..., , _A 0101 111 I r* 'v'''**""---•- -''''''- 1 11- '''- ' , 00.'4,„"iit. 2'---::.-- ,I.;-.,-.41- .... '..-,, ..-1..,•i F ___,.._4 -74. .--.---- --.4 . ,...- Or , .. i „...e.... ,_ ,.-7.- • - t.. / .09` , 1 • :4 --"- '"'k ,‘..-4,01.0 `.‘... * . .•••• •--.'-'- ...., 410' 4Fc?,-Z ---e.t..,t• -, '.1,- '', - "<"--t'"--. ( ..Zit( --"s " ;-<<„,.....-"Nitti ii...- 4r, 41-c,..- ikr. ' - - ''''' •••• . -0 -....zu' .- r.-- --- --'_.-. - -- --_ Ilk IsSeg* .-1-4---rr '--'-'47:-.r. .19:_, '.. ..'1-"k. .., ..*:. ',.-,7.-:: •!4„;''.14r k..-V. '' '-j-Fik --' ,''''''-----.---",";444....-,17";:o.. :;.6.4-,,,P. ' ''4,--Iirt; ;g1t--...._— :::: ....- „,. _..... 1 itt ,.'k ---....„,..... vol.A....-,- • . ,. ......, 'V. al. ...,,,,Aft.,,,-... .; ^:t ''...k ......:1#44";:'. 1162.z.th: at'12::.<7.71 ;”-..7:::.1,...: : „..„. fr-lit''''.*‘..-- -77::14:371...31e1::_i A -. '-- -'''‘ alk----..-- ,- -"•<;milt'° '''' --. ''' 's" '41' '' -...-1r....... r le ' .Ifts• .t. ,-- 7.--4-- ',...-;:.-4-....-,74,0";',,,,•••; ' ,•_--jr- 4--;,,,i.. ..1:::.all :..-...q....* .f.:7 Argek ..,--• ,11--; . & ,,... r.. z ----I:N-4, -.,.... ,„...,,, - .4,--.. i.„--.. ,. ..,..4 ,..,;,..,,,t,..-. • . .. p, ,,,..., .i.k, -,:••` e. 4 ,''It''''-,''' V:Lukot.. ---'---,./•":...,..‘ „:- f' IrE4,.- •-;:., ''' -,./.., •, Ani.,,t.--' • '4::-- :' ',--';• 4*.- ,‘‘, -...- . ,„ 3 .... :Veri-:4;f".--%.: '''. itts•' 1 L'i,?,411k ... ' A' , '. '`.A4'0 ''.'- ''''' 1 IPIPr --=k .... 11 •fte- ".%:'N'''''l *r"1 1.k k%-x' — . . ti!l —.7,,,,- - :.....- I . - _.,,.....--- —.... , _ ,1 '•••C 1 4,, , , , ..., irNb 1 . r-4,4-- kriziAra- ------ --- I - i• ,.'.' . ' 1.1.4I,„-•••- ' _sr, 1 11 I • .I ro .1 1 1 ; 0,4 . .... . ....0.0 - ' --1-; .,..,-!4 1 i,7i. .„, . .1-------- ... - „ 1 •zi 1"?...:,§.,‘,WI' ri I 1,4 ..N., \ ; ' /1;.- I / . A , 1 11 f i i,A;4."--• ‘ .,--- if . 0 0 . . .4....,- tii•-‘14.11.11.M.0111111MM\- ... 1 I 1 1 r.rM-57" IIIIIIIIIIIIf e k "14k 1 1 ''' 1 IF 0;111rIJ " I 111111, - iltril ' ...^..f. .........,. .-, ' ) ......-...,4,,,, ar......asEar......e........ _ . 7-'------c7.--- ;2--------- I r fr —--, -------i.-----7----- ----,-----. • --".1 •---- 1 . r _ „--,..-____ _ _______,__ ,...„,,,,, .. 4 1.-- ,, 7 ,.. ........„, ,op, , ; s-,---sAz--,. -- --rca--- ---7.---"7- ', _ k, ---- r t. mi— •4. ',----- ---li V7.----11-, ' .., --f_— .__--- c--- -"----- N 'L 1 11,,,, I____:•-•----,ii , Nit a Iltob,...44, • am , ... 1410 I moo . , „......._ , . ._ A 26 iiirrm '� t 4I ;. ��'.!,1', 'is IX...{! �� f , / \A l y /le r 1. ll it ‘i ' v . )ff . � F SF L`;l'It o 1VL 51 i_l0.Mr 1 Y ply'rig '' { r ! 4 .`1�_ /f/14"gf �r. — hY�i'*y l�#,W �Ilabr i. Hl�/f ui'BVI f ';; -' r . , ��7 ,5',,,'''.....,',Arlo' �._ '�• -- /,/ BJP+i /(/ f / ' i " mow. ',Alit, ie 1 { (f /�+ --,,° ,,,.. t if,It( 1 ...-/ . o - %�.00;0 tuir,--Ammu�-t V • •/�a/ %� if it i `�\ � " $;� ,\� O '� �: -fit \ 1 �' ' " \ )01 , ,!..4,-,!":"' ` � a D �' \ \r- 1 \v�� m TIP" !i 1 ,„=, ' ilAtL;('-, N. ',".4 ' I.,4A .' ' ''''', Alrilitlf;\ i s\ti, N,71111 ir,M t Li'' :•', •iilii . .',,- � 1 � Jf ��gni � „,- ! �t ': '-- �� �.r � - '�.t�^"' Q .,,_..,, . .- . 1111011.114 A _ 1 1 ►• "ice ! . ilk i 11 f! ,i riti ,\,gy� Tiiii rn< i ,:' • ,..'4' 41i, : '''''\'\‘ ....aanimm " \k, m I . (3, i , \ \ ,- mg.,.- * AVAI,4 . ip 11111\ kitio PROJECT TEAM W o Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone p Z N V 0 * * , • • .'' ,s , , ... , „I 1 ,,...... a'e a 1 a a aVAA-11114.-^1e- VIII .e 114111' 3 ,:t 7fik.,'', Vile& ,y ,wdoi404 , 0 -- tp '-II '/ .,„. • .4- .0' 4. I Or 1 ,r ..., or' „mi.__ - , .4r, ,Iiks, ._,il •fo4gor- d[ . 4 l'• 1 14101 111111111 *SP '''''''' '''. ' 4 * * . 'will •irrri. eri-- , ''" '7' ' 1". '''.. '''' • 411 ' ' % . ,aort, \ ''...i.-,11 '$ h'ti i .., .0, . ;7: I- ( i 3 ,, . , I 1/04111 4 4 \ , .0* ,t -' ,— elf e , WI° 4111f014'' ' A, Project Team I SECTION 3 ASSEMBLING OUR TEAM RRM is committed to delivering an on-time and on-budget Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and CEQA compliance document.The key staff members listed below are assigned to the entire life cycle of a project including hands-on principal involvement, and are ready to hit the ground running. Communication will play an important role ensuring resources are available when needed. Frequent discussions with City staff can help anticipate and respond to project needs. RRM staff meets weekly to schedule staff and review long-range needs.The following resumes identify the individual's role in this work effort and highlighting relevant projects of similar nature, size, and dollar value. CITY OF ROSEMEAD RRM DESIGN GROUP taDIANE BATHGATE, AICP, CNU-A PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE MATT OTTOSON, CNU-A PROJECT MANAGER JAMI WILLIAMS SCOTT MARTIN BRYAN REDSUN CNU-A AIA, LEED AP, CNU-A PE ConsultingPrincipal/ Project Architect Civil Engineer Community Engagement I SUBCONSULTANTS ENVIRONMENTAL MORSE PLANNING GROUP Collette Morse, AICP City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 29 SECTION 3 I Project Team DIANE BATHGATE I AICP, CNU-A With 30+years of experience in planning for the public and private 31. sectors, Diane has managed a wide range of RRM's land use planning, ik urban design, and environmental assignments. Her background as the former Mayor, City Councilmember and Planning Commissioner of San Juan Capistrano, and as a professional planning, urban design, and environmental consultant makes Diane a versatile strategist and project manager. She understands the importance of stakeholder support rrm CREATINGENVIRONMENTS and the necessary resolution of the sometimes many layers of agency design PEOPLE requirements. Diane's understanding of multiple perspectives and policy group ENJOY. frameworks are vital elements in successfully addressing the unique challenges that each project brings. She anticipates and resolves issues Project Role collaboratively with property owners, developers, citizens, community PRINCIPAL- ,.....__ organizations, and agency staff. IN-CHARGE RELEVANT PROJECTS EDUCATION • Alhambra General Plan Update • Bachelor of Arts, Environmental 2015,Alhambra, CA Studies and Psychology, University Experience • Azusa TOD General Plan/ of California, Santa Barbara, CA 34 YEARS OF Development Code Update and • Graduate Studies, Public Specific Plan,Azusa, CA EXPERIENCE • Buena Park Multi-Modal Mobility Administration, California State Action Plan, Buena Park, CA University, Long Beach, CA • Colton Downtown Development • Coursework, Planning Law, Code and Design Manual,Colton,CA Environmental Design,Architecture, • El Monte Downtown TOD Specific University of California, Irvine, CA Plan, El Monte, CA • El Monte Zoning Code and Design ACCREDITATIONS • Guidelines Update, El Monte, CA LICENSES • AFFILIATIONS • Fullerton Downtown Core& • Congress for the New Urbanism Corridors Specific Plan, Fullerton, CA Accredited(CNU-A) • Huntington Beach Research and • American Planning Association Technology Zone, Huntington Beach, CA (APA) • Long Beach Urban Design Element • American Institute of Certified and On-Call Planning Services, Planners(AICP) Long Beach, CA • Association of Environmental • Lower Hastings Ranch Residential Professionals (AEP) Neighborhood Zoning Code Revisions, Pasadena, CA • Norwalk Live/Work Overlay Zone, Norwalk, CA • Pomona Downtown Specific Plan Update, Pomona, CA • Temple City Infill Residential Design Guidelines, Temple City, CA 30 iiirrm Project Team I SECTION 3 MATT OTTOSON I CNU-A Matt focuses his efforts on writing clear and concise plans, designing high-quality, easy to understand maps and graphics, and providing exceptional service for both public and private sector clients. With past experience working as a planner in the public sector, Matt's knowledge of local governmental agencies' approach to plans and policy documents ensures delivery of effective plans that help communities and clients achieve their goals. As a key contributor to RRM's design review projects, rrmCREATING ENVIRONMENTS Matt has assisted numerous cities in reviewing current planning projects design PEOPLE for community-specific design consistency while balancing the realities group ENJOY, of current construction methodologies. Matt serves on the Board of Directors for the local USGBC chapter, educating and advocating in the Project Role community for the advancement of green building best practices. PROJECT MANAGER RELEVANT PROJECTS EDUCATION • Arcadia Design Guidelines Update, • Master of Urban & Regional Experience Arcadia, CA Planning, Emphasis in Land Use • Azusa TOD General Plan/ and Design, California Polytechnic 8 YEARS OF Development Code Update and State University, Pomona, CA Specific Plan,Azusa, CA EXPERIENCE Bachelor ofArts, Geography, • Carlsbad Village and Barrio Master Plan, Carlsbad, CA Emphasis in Environmental Analysis, • Carson On-Call Design Review, CSU Fullerton, Fullerton, CA Carson, CA • Colton Downtown Development ACCREDITATIONS • Code and Design Manual,Colton, CA LICENSES • AFFILIATIONS • Del Mar Design Guidelines and • Congress for the New Urbanism Municipal Code Amendments, Del Accredited(CNU-A) Mar, CA • American Planning Association • El Monte Downtown TOD Specific (APA) Member Plan, El Monte, CA • • El Monte Zoning Code and Design US Green Building Council Guidelines Update, El Monte, CA (USGBC), Central Coast Chapter, • Long Beach Urban Design Element Board of Directors, 2015-2018 and On-Call Planning Services, • Congress for the New Urbanism Long Beach, CA (CNU) Urbanist Member • Los Altos Downtown Vision, Los • Urban Land Institute (ULI) Altos, CA Associate Member • Lower Hastings Ranch Residential Neighborhood Zoning Code Revisions, Pasadena, CA • Norwalk Live/Work Overlay Zone, Norwalk, CA • Pomona Zoning and Subdivision Code Updates, Pomona, CA • Temple City Design Review, Temple City, CA City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 31 SECTION 3 I Project Team JAMI WILLIAMS I CNU-A Jami, with a Bachelor of Architecture degree and a Master of Business "° Administration, possesses the qualities necessary to produce creative, realistic, and business-conscious design solutions that will guide future improvements of Rosemead. With over 20 years of experience as an 4001 urban designer and project manager,Jami's unique perspective enables her to advance projects from the early community outreach and visioning stages to the development of urban design plans and policy documents rrm CREATINGENVIRONMENTS that are creative yet realistic and implementation focused. She is well- design PEOPLE versed in smart growth, mixed-use and transit-oriented planning principles group ENJOY, that maximize quality design, minimize costs, and build on community consensus. She excels in public outreach, identifying public concerns and Project Role preferences and translating them into cutting-edge workable designs and CONSULTING policy documents that can be easily understood by community members and implemented by her public agency clients. Further, her strong PRINCIPAL/ communication and organization skills consistently ensure she delivers COMM UNITY projects on time and on budget with always a focus on client satisfaction. ENGAGEMENT _.___.._.___ RELEVANT PROJECTS EDUCATION • Alhambra General Plan Update • Master of Business Administration, Experience 2015,Alhambra, CA Architecture Management Track, 23 YEARS OF • Azusa TOD General Plan/ California Polytechnic State Development Code Update and University, San Luis Obispo, CA EXPERIENCE Specific Plan,Azusa, CA • Bachelor of Architecture, California • Balboa Avenue Station Area Specific Plan, San Diego, CA Polytechnic State University, San • Claremont Village West Specific Luis Obispo, CA Plan and Design Guidelines, • Semester Design Program, Ecole Claremont, CA Des Beaux Art Americaines De • East Colorado Boulevard Specific Fontainebleau, France Plan, Pasadena, CA • Associate of Science, Cuyamaca • El Monte Downtown TOD Specific College, San Diego, CA Plan, El Monte, CA • Huntington Beach Downtown ACCREDITATIONS • Specific Plan, Huntington Beach, CA LICENSES • AFFILIATIONS • Long Beach Urban Design Element and On Call Planning Services, • Congress for the New Urbanism Long Beach, CA Accredited(CNU-A) • Norma Triangle Overlay District • American Planning Association and Design Guidelines, West (APA), Member Hollywood, CA • Urban Land Institute (ULI), • Pomona Downtown Specific Plan Associate Member Update, Pomona, CA • Temple City Design Review, Temple City, CA • Temple City Infill Residential Design Guidelines, Temple City, CA 32 iiirrm Project Team I SECTION 3 SCOTT MARTIN I AIA, LEED AP, CNU-A Scott is a talented architect with a keen ability to be simultaneously innovative and sensitive to clients' needs. His project focus and experience "R Wok is wide-ranging; from illustration, master planning, urban design, needs assessments, design review, to the production and construction of facilities. Scott is a LEED Accredited Professional and has a high level of expertise in the design and implementation of sustainable solutions. Scott's unique relationship with both public and private clients gives him rr m CREATING an understanding of the realities of development and the priorities of a ENVIRONMENTS design PEOPLE community. He excels in working directly with owner and user groups to group ENJOY set project goals and priorities. Scott blends cohesive design solutions with his strong technical skills to bring the vision of a project to reality. Project Role PROJECT RELEVANT PROJECTS EDUCATION • Arcadia Design Guidelines Update, • Bachelor of Architecture, California ARCHITECT Arcadia, CA Polytechnic State University, San • Azusa TOD General Plan/ Luis Obispo, CA Development Code Update and Experience Specific Plan,Azusa, CA ACCREDITATIONS • 18 YEARS OF • Carson Community Development LICENSES • AFFILIATIONS Block Architectural and Landscape EXPERIENCE Architectural Services, Carson, CA • Architect, CA, C32348 • Cerritos Residential Design Manual, • Architect, CO, 00405508 Cerritos, CA • Leadership in Energy and • Colton Downtown Development Environmental Design Accredited Code and Design Manual,Colton,CA Professional(LEED AP) • El Monte Downtown TOD Specific • Congress for the New Urbanism Plan, El Monte, CA Accredited(CNU-A) • Huntington Beach Research and . United States Green Building Technology Zone, Huntington Council, California Central Coast Beach, CA • Long Beach Urban Design Element Chapter(C4), Regional Council and On-Call Planning Services, Board, 2008 Present Long Beach, CA • Architecture for Humanity, Board • Lower Hastings Ranch Residential Member, 2009-Present Neighborhood Zoning Code • Atascadero Main Street Revisions, Pasadena, CA Association, Design Committee • Norma Triangle Overlay District Member, 2008-Present and Design Guidelines, West Hollywood, CA • Pomona Downtown Specific Plan Update, Pomona, CA • Temple City Design Review, Temple City, CA • West Boulevard Community Linkages and Revitalization Plan, Los Angeles, CA City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 33 SECTION 3 I Project Team BRYAN REDSUN I PE In his years working in both the public and private sector, Bryan has it, worked on a wide array of projects for a variety of clients. Bryan is skilled in all project components, but has a special emphasis on the technical aspects involved. His skills in site design have resulted in creative design solutions that help mitigate project risk and assists in efficient construction. rrm CREATING RELEVANT PROJECTS EDUCATION ENVIRONMENTS design PEOPLE • 27 Acre Park, Wildomar, CA • Bachelor of Science, Civil group ENJOY. • Anaheim On-Call Traffic Plan ff Engineering, University of Arizona, Check,Anaheim, CA Tucson,AZ Project Role • Arcadia Gold Line Station - Pedestrian Linkage,Arcadia, CA ACCREDITATIONS • CIVIL ENGINEER • Downey Measure S Park LICENSES • AFFILIATIONS Improvement Projects-Discovery Park, Downey, CA • Professional Engineer, CA, 85505 Experience • Downey Measure S Park • American Public Works Association ____ _ _-_ Improvement Projects-Furman (APWA),Member#837301 9 YEARS OF Park, Downey, CA EXPERIENCE • Downey Measure S Park Improvement Projects- Independence Park, Downey, CA • Fairmount Avenue Fire Station, San Diego, CA • La Mirada Creek Park Master Plan, La Mirada, CA • Livermore Downtown Core Landscape Concept and Stockmen's Park, Livermore, CA • Modesto Area 2 Storm Water to Sanitary Sewer Cross Connection Removal Project-Phase 2 Roosevelt Park,Modesto, CA • Sapwi Trails Community Park, Thousand Oaks, CA • SlausonlOverhill Facade Improvements, Los Angeles, CA • Standard Pacific Park Design, Encinitas, CA • Verdugo Street Beautification, San Juan Capistrano, CA • Whittier Greenway Trail East, Whittier, CA 34 iii rrm Project Team I SECTION 3 COLLETTE MORSE I AICP Ms.Morse is a recognized leader in policy planning,CEQA,and community involvement for both public agencies and private developers in California .. " and Arizona.Ms.Morse has considerable project management experience oxel on a diverse range of policy,environmental,and private development projects,many of which were controversial and/or high-profile projects, during her 30 years of working for private consulting firms.Collette also has more than 25 years of active involvement in APA leadership at local, Morse State,and National levels and brings the knowledge of emerging trends and legislation to any project and has teamed with RRM Design Group on many Planning assignments. Group MOST RELEVANT PROJECTS Stanton,CA • Addendum to Valley Vision: EDUCATION Project Role Valley Boulevard Neighborhoods • Bachelor of Arts, Geography/ C EQA Sustainability Plan Final EIR,San Ecosystems, University of California COMPLIANCE Gabriel, CA Los Angeles • Alhambra Place Specific Plan Amendment Addendum, ACCREDITATIONS • LICENSES Alhambra, CA • AFFILIATIONS Experience • Azusa Staff Support for Azusa TOD Specific Plan and EIR,Azusa,CA • American Institute of Certified 30+ YEARS OF • Camarillo Safety Element Update Planners (AICP) EXPERIENCE and MND,Camarillo,CA • American Planning Association • Carson General Plan Update and EIR,Carson,CA • Commissioner,American Institute • Cerritos General Plan Update and of Certified Planners (AICP) for EIR, Cerritos,CA Region VI, 2006—2010 • Colton Downtown Development • Past President, California Chapter, Code and Design Manual Initial American Planning Association, Study,Colton,CA 2005 • Costa Mesa General Plan Update and EIR, Costa Mesa,CA • President, California Chapter, • Cypress General Plan Update and American Planning Association, EIR,Cypress,CA 2003 to 2004 • Duarte General Plan Update FIR, • President-Elect, California Chapter, Duarte,CA American Planning Association, • Garden Grove General Plan Update 2002 and EIR, Garden Grove, CA • Legislative Review Team Member, • Mixed Use Overlay Zone Negative California Chapter,American Declaration, Bellflower, CA Planning Association, 1990 to • Monterey Park Healthy& Sustainability Elements and EIR Present Addendum,Monterey Park,CA • South Gate General Plan Update EIR,South Gate,CA • Stanton General Plan Update EIR, City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 35 RRM PROJECT Balboa Avenue Station Area Specific Plan Visual Simulation, San Diego, CA lk li .- .., , A , .. , - ,, .s• , - -4■PP • '-', •211 k I*,, --- a: 7-1.____ 'Mb 1111‘ '. 4- • ''' ' ••,0-< -k•-• 411- 4*- - , - .,..-1,4,;..,._.•4 .3,.. • --k.--7, . , 'd ,i---- ...,........, ....• ,ce .. .. . _ , . . ..... .... •. ...4_ .., . ..„... •. .. ... .. .„.... .y.. . , , . . ..,.: . :.. . ., . V - - -:..A.... : • .;A • - •- ...-„. rt . -.....' • .' 4,41''. + - , •. MISSION FIV y D —• - - • .. A.. ::, - - • . . ', ' --- ..,,,,-,1 .c,;•-• ; ' ' ''''" • . .':14!' •- • .11). . .,;,{ .. , , . . ,...,_.‘ ..........',.'., ... - . .... .. . W. ' '1YR: ..... . .:...' f ' .• --', Z7...,7,7t: . ' "fr/' '1.' / ./— .::'-' 7 1, .,'f$•• ,''.....' ,, , , ,.. , , • , 7 Ir. •,, • ,....4„ . .," . _..• •,....:-....• ,.,_ • . . : . . • . , .... .. ,. . . 1,...,4•,. -.. . t .1. . .. . • . s3. • .•,.- .. • . - *‘.. . ..., ._ ,• .... ' ._ ..,._ • 5.....• ......_._. . . - '-• 1-17-,-- :, ,..,--•kl.', - "I- -- :. ....-- \ -A - ik' 10._ . ,t• '`•" .IIIIIIA ee.'" - •% ' . --'i'. A-AK: • ' . ,.4 ri . tii or: - .. . ..ip 11...-.5stbake --,, 7A; '• 4 „_. i emeA- L t' ' • : . Viii ---' Ili ., . ___-_..-:::\ • . 14. .„ • Z.--- , .--• - , - -,1 i-/ - • i'L I, ' , I •4,44 ,.. -11k t% =11Im - 7-7--- - ,-:..4-4..,,, ,,--...-:.---..._445 ,--,,,_. --... - .• . -.-..4,75....g,...4„,,,,,%-&-05..-",_-.,,.,.•Nit-,,,:----. ---:-..-,.-. • -,.......?-... .-., ',.... -•- '•,_ -,- 441, ---- .---4 ,- ,-- - . .•• . .• ..m•- -... 1 • . ,:.zuji .6,-.."- \ ....-c- -• ----- , ,. • \•\---L-^`-' . , : --•.-„,,,___\\ ,-.7 '..- - .: •-•-igqiin•-' m. - -- : 7---'34%r.o.st........— - : . • _-. - .. -- ' .. .....• 4:101111t1 -.4•-•,,,....• . ii 4; — -- ..... \ 4, !,,, . k \ - . . ... • i .' ri i - ,. . _ '4 \ ‘ "L• \ ' . 46---.-;i1K2 Olk . • - \ - ------ ' ' 4 4 t :0 •'', r•' k — ' - -I • . L-- . .....- . • - . , . lit .... 1 .., . . _.... - .. . ...._._ . - ___ :. N. _ --,., -...„.... -...... ......-:-.,;„..- - _ .. •:., . 1 J .....- ...,. -- - .: -_.-:-• - . -011111*, • s L. •.' • il c _..,... -.N. , , _ ---..-. , -- _,,,, -, .. -...: .%i . • 0 - .i , - . . N.- • --.4.k.. . . . . , , ....1.-.. - . •... - --- •.,_. ,. _ /7'V. "• '' '&' .•1. ,:" - . -s- `- - --::.- _ - - . _ ..- 36 rrm N. c.) Z 0 auoz ifiiidano asfi-paxrN dopid.1o3 ifomaad1 4...) SRDN31-3d311 . ., . .. L., . ... 0 . , • . NJ .. .tt,".. >- i, • — ---...11It.,,1 tt 1 f i tt ,!,tt,,‘.:„..,.. < ce . . ,,, 'tt.',t 4 I/1' ---. <II ..,. i li l : 1".;;....': 1:, . ; it.,1•••• i , LU - 11.11 Ill III ll-1-11-.-- Ili"a I - , V w 0, w,_,..........- ' r ce li >t- II I f 3 11111 ,. . .I ,1 it '. tI ' 0iwwwL.. ,—. /,.., ... . ..,. ......,....... ‹t ir ..., ...,.. .1,..r.• ,., ' ',:''''•,.t.'-,s'1,1)1,'•:•,".",t.r..-Ift!, ,,';'4 i i4 ,, ...- i,,,, , w ,, .--- - I, ........ . ,1+ .. Li. ..,,,i.,,..,.t.i.,..;,,ii.,!,..1.1,....,, ,.. / .f/ ''' ' . 1 ' —' --i• -''' '',: ' , , . --', '''''-Li'',1,;•:„""i',F,',",''' -! 1 , li, ,' ' '• '''',, . .. . . ' ,,, 1,s•-'1'''.,","1,". ,,,,,,'',..r 1 Ili 1 i.i- ,',. - ., - ..- • ' ,,,, , ,. :, 1....,,.',..,,.,..-,-.',-;•,!1•!, I: i(' ' .1-,h,) '''''•-it..in",•,•",,1-","; , r:Iii . 0 if: 1 r 1 ---i: --II"' , 1 . ',...i'.1.•i•4-;.•,, •i• . . 1' '.?• • n- • 4 I. 4..' 4.. '-. -17- , .........--, ...tit. , 1 ; .,., ,,,..,,,•;,"'.",.,•1,",;.ii P ti 1,41 ' , il : l' ',t 1 tt •#..I 4E:.).‘ .., 1'i -........i........... .. . "..'ii,t1 ' t'l '1'' '1 1 t'''' 't ---7‘ t ot 1 11 I.•''S. f t't:.' •. i ' ' '"••1'.''".'t•1'', I t. I 4. ,1.; , ,,_, J,,,,,i,,,,,,,,.., ,,,... . , 1 ,,, ,, ,,,,,,,,,.,, ;!;!1:, : '' ' '. :' : ';,,,:': :: .... i i -.. . . , .. ,... . SECTION 1 I Firm Profile and Relevant Experience REFERENCES Jason Mikaelian, AICP, Planning Services Manager (626) 580-2064 I jmikaelian@elmonteca.gov Client:City of El Monte 11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte, CA 91731 Project: El Monte Downtown TOD Specific Plan Key Personnel: Diane Bathgate, Matt Ottoson,Jami Williams, Scott Martin Vanessa Reynosa, Deputy Director of Community Development (626) 570-5034 I vreynosa@cityofalhambra.org Client City of Alhambra I 1 I South First Street,Alhambra,CA 91801 Project:Alhambra General Plan Update 2015 Key Personnel: Diane Bathgate,Jami Williams, Scott Martin Christopher Koontz, AICP, Planning Bureau Manager (562) 570-6288 I christopher.koontz@longbeach.gov Client City of Long Beach 333 West Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802 Project: Long Beach Urban Design Element Key Personnel: Diane Bathgate, Matt Ottoson,Jami Williams, Scott Martin 38 iiirrm Firm Profile and Relevant Experience I SECTION 1 Ata Khan, Senior Planner (909) 620-3765 I ata_khan@ci.pomona.ca.us Client:City of Pomona 505 S. Gary Ave, Pomona, CA 91769 Project:Pomona Downtown Specific Plan Update Key Personnel: Diane Bathgate,Jami Williams, Scott Martin Scott Reimers, Planning Manager (626) 656-7315 I sreimers@templecity.us Client City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Drive,Temple City, CA 91780 Project:Temple City Design Review Key Personnel: Matt Ottoson,Jami Williams, Scott Martin Manuel Munoz, Planning Manager (626)812-5226 1 mmunoz©azusaca.gov Client City of Azusa 213 E. Foothill Blvd., Azusa, CA 91702 Project:Azusa TOD General Plan/Development Code Update and Specific Plan Key Personnel: Diane Bathgate, Matt Ottoson,Jami Williams, Scott Martin City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 39 „,, --. RRM PROJECT .. 7' Shadelands Gateway Specific Plan, Walnut Creek, CA,.:, 7,,._:7:, -'--' ,-. 4 --_,--•-: 4 i 1 t 4.. 6 '.0 : ,,'. ...StLNalEilige7XARWTA: '' :‘'” {. li , —I, 1 ..,;.. .'. , ,,,.. .:,t;, , ..:',..' .\.\ 1 . , • .• . ,...':: •, ,.'•-• r... .; i'''''''4„1:• ,:,,, ill'...:0#,,,;,-.',.:, . '' , , , ; . ••,.. . t --, ..,• 1 ;::i. „•••':::.::::..,,. ,. i ,fr,:'„..__t-g\H.4.-:„,•,.,1„_,.._._._-i,'ii.1,1,1 ..• "1 ,. .,,, ,,. ..•..h• .. .. .,.. • ..... • • . t.• , '. , -. . .0, .....,, _,.....,_ : „,;-Ii.,-- . ., „...,_ .' ' , ,. Ir... ' P i; 1 1 . , , ,...” , L-i , :;.,.,„v. .1. , , , z . )11.- , .. , ,.,ii, :r .... ,... C, . ›.., - ; ., ... ; :, r .,, I.i, ...'''' .. ....,,y.. 1.4 .M... al ..... t:r.V. ,., . , . 4140 i „ f4V . I %SS . ' si i----------' i. . ',..‘1!:".',.. 4-,,;:::: ''. .”' ° — --4 - ... ., ---....--...,_ 's . ... tr 41fits.v - -•,..••• .0,—, .; .- ----- Af ,.„...,,• „.. i ' '''' -'- "-,.. i. ,i + _._...... ".>-4..,-,.'rr cA,;,.."...Z',4.7.:2'. ..1 •Ii. '1 II"`1.. g.''' 1' ' ::::"'k . .4'1' ' ..r: '''' ','''. 5-..' •..g*i 1 .. ll. , r 'e •., -^,. .'4 :,''''''' - '' A. . 3.- - Li', r4 , , 1 ' • -...,:,.:,...,,Awd.. ',.1•4ZrZ.,4" . L ,„.. IN 'r Al•• -• • I i 2 a. Mt..11:1-. I II ' .' I :-.. f# : .1.N '1.'' ' 11 . ' 1 - :1 ' , '.-,.:-L--.-.., '' -" !, .,,:: , . . . 'If. * .,ge2gC,1% , ai 4 1 pp , .. .• , A 1 . ,-. ' 11 t --.' *- ''- - l'' atismia L---1.,/r, r 711. ,4,,,.-_, . mom, .. ., .. .,..-,1,...., _ A dB ------- — e... ..--- . . .-..... .... VIA ...., , , ,,,. , /•.7; A,A 1,1 0. r ;1;,:r 3:f - -- : 4 '• "'„,'- 44. Y• , is A . , , , , • laq.,,To . . . \-- -'-- - 6 ae: , ,, • .. • : 1--'1:11,':7''L„.--..,- 14...7, _---------,, '411 1 , 03 4'. .-.' - . V/ LI • .r.;:f2.....L_____ ,—4 ,—1.-4:A",,' .. — .. . . - - ,...,,... ,.... -''.- -- ----, , •`' -. 11111.11111111111=1 . ....... 401.... .. 411111111.1FILN_TZ,14. i.• . ., .-__. ..... .7..,,,......1.0.01.... - at '-1 ,,,,,,,,."'"-'""""*** Wiliao.... ...............................''. . ''....- ' .4444gigiNtailliallali"V t".I 411'04' ' . 'Air ', f OR' 4 ' -* --'1,''''W101610kiiitia.W .4' 4 ". •• - 11rosir*****MillgOellik"..'"-- — - • • .4.0i . . ._ . ... - 40 iiirrm 1 ise1 !! a1 ; \ . . r I I ,� 1 •I - .! • -: ,,. _,... ..; . L-' . -_1 ,.. J , - \\ I ,H j sj,:- . r i , . , ' 1111-` *1. ..\ '/ V 'J , .i/' • 4.._,._.... /1 , .•2,,,,,,,- 1....-,,, f ,.it,_ !nom . . .�4 c, ,_ ,.....,.4. * ,-.'‘'''--- a -.) — _ ?'/, 6 "1" .''' 'f �� Z.�k,.�.� t• . „4'., w�` ��',,yy`am�,, '�`"� \l "' i I I p )-11-...,, rAci--, . A• ' ,',. .. .. .. ':!:4100' .."*I, : -.1,, , \ J ` y I f . T d /1 �i ALL ' j 71 die,, Y , • O (y�� j . t • ., �, • _ - 4 T ... - .DIY '77-77 < _ 1� ,y y. i m - • eipi"' • '- *.'"."‘'.'1,:-.7 5,4a 7.fi r • O %' .;• g l`71' 0, '�i~ti ,y } ,, , -. . . ,', 7` t •ZJ4LU .—�"� j, fill,,} - r 7.v4. . ,c4,-• r+`' rt 1 • illo. ` - > ' / .' .t:.sit.''51'6.7-'1",4.'.4. ,alfalrle:' '' - , " ,.0 - t \ z ty;. `"J COST BREAKDOWN (j-ii r-r• Freeway Corridor Mixed-(Ise Overlay Zone O Z A Cost Breakdown I SECTION 5 Freeway Corridor Mixed-Use Overlay Zone DOWN NATT ENlij ATT OYAN IIsTAEE a� OuN RIX1HP,Nc— eA H0A E OTTOaON WILLIAMS YAW N t REDSNN Fee Schedule re August 21,2019 Pw P1g° NMeve Pro, P"` c""w"n rmcwt Mane,, P1041.0.1 `EOS Doppia a Engagement MS,now 1155parlour 205 ape hour 2M Spar hour 1S55oerlour MSparlo,e kmpaum Pm.. Task'INITIAL RECONNAISSANCE,PROJECT KICKOFF&WORK REFINEMENT PROGRAM FEE TYPE ®Project Hick-off Meeting 0nd Sale Visit ® 10 M:MEME 52.050 01 :1.1.101111113 l5570 5/3W Task I Value: 5 6,820 Task 2:EXISTING CONDITIONS,ISSUES,OPPORTUMTIES,AND CHALLENGES FEE TYPE 2.1 Review 5acMgroundlnformation ,r... S Man lll1011l !}�e®hill ©lllllll�MIlllll101��®lllllM� 2.2 Meet with Stall 5 ],840 l�lllO1l�llllJW'YMI����S���lll1011lllllllD�llllllllllIIlll1011lllllll0®lllll� i 13M ri: 2.3 Community Engagement '.4..1.1 i t 18,050 fyeM1Y'e lits"•.,.'-EZIMICEIMIMII©MEMI©' Task 2 Value: 5 31,310 Task 3:FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE PREPARATION FEE TYPE �P1��1� 3.1 Key Elements and Opportunity Sites TBMMTE 1 13.000 00I P taWINICIf®r5a��'E'���1��r®®'' 3.2 Administrative Draft No.1 TOrONTE 5 28.040 20 $3.700®''lllll�llllllliiO'eJ MIME011IMME3�A,e� 3.3 Administrative Draft No.0 '4". f 13.700 ��©lllllll� I�ll1011llllieQiie 4 3,4 Public Review Draft 140,0':: 1 5.320IIREMEM20 52,3%lll1011llllllllWM:IIIllllDllllllllllllll3®l11111336:3i Task 3 Value: $ 55.200 Task 4:PREPARE CEQA DOCUMENTATION EEE TYPE PM .11132101111f 01.0o0 MillMililM1=111:1=1111MMIMIZIMIT.1 321.000 Task d Value: 5 21.000 Task 5:FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE ADOPTION FEE TYPE 5.1 Public Nearing Materials TAM/NTE $ 6090MEE= 401 11.000 MIllMEIIIIIIZIIIIIIECIlMIllllllMlll1011lllllll0� 5.2 Public Nearing Attendance TAM/NTE $ 17,370 WIMIEEIll1011llll llllDllllllll1011l1011llllllll11lll1011llllll1011l1011llllll1120 5.3 Final Documents TBMMTE $ ],580 IMINEEMICIIIMIECIMIIIIIMMOIIIMMIMICIIEMICIIM©' 5.4 Ongoing Project Management/Coordination TAM/NTE 5 11,340MEIM=100 38.800�'©' I M'© Task 5 Value: 5 35,350 Fee Footnotes S 155,680 A Estimated fees for tasks shown as'Time and Materials-Not to Exceed'(TBMMTE)are provided for informational purposes only.Amounts billed for these tasks,which will reflect actual hours,will not be exceeded without prior approval by the client 11111111111 S 4,200 Reimbursable Expenses Incidental expenses incurred by RRM Design Group or any subconsuttant It may hire to perform E 159,880 services for this project are reimbursed by the client at actual cost plus 10%to cover its overhead and administrative expenses. Adjustment to Hourly Billing Rates RRM reserves the right to adjust hourly rates on an annual basis. City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 43 ,f, \ R,RNI PROJECTlsr4,,‘444:1", :iiiwl' ..::....,.411 Claremont Village West Specific Plan and Design Guidelines 111111\ \ , , \„.... ., , \ w _, , • ---• ..I-A-,". .."1" 1"1 Z,,... k, , ,, i • •. • t 0:-- —.I 173 - . W Ct. - , 3 - -- '. .tg' . , • '' ,'• -.F"' . i ,,,• ,, oi„,' oe e, ,4 ;414,!st t a - — '-, ' ,-•-, .',, ,;fitz,. ,, . ,....T.. r ) Z cz Ej , ,,,,,•1. ...t-,4 , L., 4 , ... r 1 I 41 EDI R R)4 il _ ;I ',... , . •.i.... "I .1 1,.4 . ,_„4. • c-.6•. , • A 11....„..• ....,, .;.; , s... s.. noli i i BAR_ & •,. / .9,, .4 . fs. ,.-:-.4,- • - 10:. • . 's- , ii' . •; , •,,, t .4., cz c.) '1-111 . -- ' GRILL- ilk i , . 1 , -4., 't•4 . • , A.-.4 •''s ' ' . , ' '''' ,.. ‘...' '•••.: I.0 1 ;.t !.. 6 • - - 4 .., ,... 1, , ,,,,s.y ev)• 4,,, \ ---;-- _ ,..: 5--,-;ATTAN44.-, .,...,..t, ,‘ ,_ ..., li 14: 1111Mk — * ''''' ' . ,.,. ''cInf;.z•,-**, 1 4.. 1 L.j6 ,4114,.• - 4.7, ' T 1 , ......... . - , 3 •; _ ,—. • _ •. _ , - . • 1 N. , . , I , I 'A a. . ; ri ..........- 1 J ,.. " 1110 0116 I .I . 4'r 4 1.t.,.., -7 ;.4" "",',40,1v,A41:1:111.47,1,7',4 1 —.., ,_:) ."- ,,,.. '"aqnfr4t.z.,," , , ,,. City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 45 Timeline I SECTION S PROJECT TIMELINE October November December January February March April May June July TASK 1:INITIAL RECONNAISSANCE,PROJECT KICK-OFF,AND WORK REFINEML1IT PROGRAM 1.1:Project Kick-off Meeting and Site Visit • _____ TASK 2:EXISTING CONDITIONS,ISSUES.OPPORTUNITIES,AND CHALLENGES 2.1:Review Background Information —.— .... 2.2:Meet with Staff411 2.3:Community Engagement ♦ S TASK 3:FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE PREPARATION 3.1:Key Elements and Opportunity Sites ■■ 3.2:Administrative Draft No..i 3.2:Administrative Draft No.2 3.3:Public Review Draft TASK 4:PREPARE CEQA DOCUMENTATION 4.1:CEQA Documentation TASK 5:FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE ADOPTION 5.1:Public Hearing Materials ---- 5.2:Public Hearing Attendance -- - -- 111111 -- IN -.0 • • • • 5.3:Final Documents - ---- - -- -- '� 5.4:Ongoing Project Management/Coordination - Trak Duration • Ktboff/Staff Meeting - Pubbr Review • Public Meeting City of Rosemead I PROPOSAL FOR FREEWAY CORRIDOR MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE 47