CC - Approval of Minutes 02-25-97 1 T C.7F:^f P,! UNTIL
APPRO i:::. '' s'.Y i H RDS`Q E'AD
REDEVE.LOPVr NT AGENCY
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ROSEMEAD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FEBRUARY 11, 1997
The regular meeting of the Rosemead Agency was called to order by Chairman Clark at
7:02 p.m. in the conference room of City Hall, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California.
The Pledge to the Flag was led by Agencymember Taylor.
The Invocation was led by Vice-Chairman Imperial
ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS:
Present: Agencymembers Bruesch, Taylor, Vasquez, Vice Chairman Imperial and Chairman
Clark
Absent: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 10, 1996 -REGULAR MEETING
MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY AGENCYMEMBER
VASQUEZ that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 10, 1996 be approved as
submitted. Vote resulted:
Aye: Bruesch, Vasquez, Clark, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
1. RRA RESOLUTION NO. 97 -03 CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
The following Resolution was presented to the Agency for adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-03 - CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
ROSEMEAD ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS IN THE
SUM OF $8,185.71 AND DEMANDS NO. 4583 THROUGH 4589.
MOTION BY AGENCYMEMBER BRUESCH, SECOND BY VICE-CHAIRMAN
IMPERIAL that the Agency adopt Resolution No. 97-03. Vote resulted:
Aye: Bruesch, Vasquez, Clark, Imperial, Taylor
No: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
The Chairman declared said motion duly carried and so ordered.
2. REJECTION OF BIDS FOR THE 1995-96 AND 1996-97 CONCRETE REPAIR
PROJECT
Agencymember Bruesch asked what the procedure is by rejecting the top three bidders,
does the bidding process have to start all over again or can we go to the fourth bidder.
Robert Kress, City Attorney, responded that the fourth bidder can be selected.
RRA 2-11-97 •
Page#1
..
Agencymember Taylor requested that the fourth bidder be selected as all of these
contractors have expended time to analyze this bid and go through the bidding process. •
Mr. Kress explained that should the Agency reject the top three bidders sequentially and
then consider the next ones, those low bidders need to be given the opportunity to be heard,
which means that this item will have to be continued. Mr. Kress stated that all the bidders will
have to be noticed.
There being no objection, this item will be deferred to the next meeting.
3. MATTERS FROM OFFICIALS -None
4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE ON REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MATTERS -None
5. CLOSED SESSION
A. The Rosemead Redevelopment Agency met in a Closed Session at 7:10 p.m.
pursuant to Government Code 54956.8 for the following purpose:
•
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR. Property: 7645
Highcliff. Negotiating Parties: Rosemead Redevelopment Agency and property
owner. Under Negotiation: Price for acquisition of right-of-way.
The Agency reconvened at 7:40 p.m. in a Open Session.
Robert Kress, City Attorney, stated that the Agency met in a Closed Session for the
purposes as stated on the Agenda and provided direction to staff regarding Item A.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further action at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 7:41 p.m. The
next regular meeting is scheduled for February 25, 1997, at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted: APPROVED:
Agency Secretary CHAIRMAN
RRA 2-11-97
Page#2