Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CC - Item 5E - Approval of the Traffic Commission Recommendations for Traffic Improvements at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BEN KIM, INTERIM CITY MANAGER -3 DATE: MARCH 22, 2022 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRAFFIC IMPORVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL MAR AVENUE AND FERN AVENUE SUMMARY At the February 3, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting, staff presented recommendations to improve the existing roadway conditions at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. After discussion and presentation of the item, the Traffic Commission approved the staff recommendations for the area. Public Works Field Services staff will be able to complete all the recommended items. If necessary, additional materials and supplies may be purchased at a minimal expense to complete the recommended work, and staff would utilize the approved Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Traffic Signs and Markers available funds. BACKGROUND Staff completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate measures at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. The City of Rosemead received a resident request to evaluate the installation of a stop sign at the crosswalk on the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue due to drivers reportedly not stopping for children who are walking to school. In response to this request and on behalf of the City, staff completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate measures on Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the guidelines in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), and based on engineering judgement, it was determined that the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of all -way stop control but would benefit from additional signage and red curb installation to make vehicles and pedestrians more visible to approaching cars. Pedestrian Activated In -Road Lights along the crosswalk were previously installed to make the yellow crosswalk more visible to approaching motorists. Based AGENDA ITEM 5.E City Council Meeting March 22, 2022 Page 2 of 4 on a field review, the lights appear to be non-functioning, however, the LED Pedestrian signs and beacons appear to be operational. Public Works is working to address the non-functioning lights. DISCUSSION During the February 3, 2022, Traffic Commission Meeting, staff provided a presentation regarding the existing roadway conditions at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. The traffic review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 5.5 years of available collision data, an intersection turning movement count with peak hour vehicular and pedestrian counts, as well as an examination of field conditions. Staff obtained collision data from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). An analysis was conducted of available collisions that were reported to SWITRS and that occurred within 250 -feet of the subject intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue. The collision analysis was conducted over approximately a 5.5 -year period between January 2016 and October 2021 (available data at the time of traffic review). Per the Collision History Analysis, there was a total of five collisions reported within the 5.5 -year period. All five of those collisions occurred at or within 250 -feet of the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue. Of the five reported collisions, one collision in 2018 involved collision between a vehicle and a bike. The bicyclist was a 58 -year-old adult not in the crosswalk traveling southbound on Del Mar Avenue and was struck by a motorist making a left turn onto Fern Avenue, resulting in an injury. To determine what type of turning movements are encountered at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue, peak hour intersection turning movement counts and pedestrian counts were taken at this intersection during the hours of 7:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. — 3:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. — 6:00 p.m. on October 21, 2021, with the afternoon peak conducted on November 17, 2021. The counts were taken while school was in session to ensure that counts represented the peak number of traffic and pedestrian movements. To determine how many pedestrians are using this intersection to cross, peak hour pedestrian counts were taken during the same count periods as the intersection turning movement counts. The pedestrian counts tally the number of adults and school-age pedestrians in each leg of the intersection during the count times of 7:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. — 6:00 p.m. As part of the initial request, the resident asked the City to look into providing all -way stop control. Installation of stop signs or all -way stop control at the intersection, which is guided by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Sections 2B.04 through 213.07 (Page 126). Traffic control devices work in concert with the basic "rules of the road" contained in traffic laws and ordinances. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Devices (CAMUTCD) describes applications, warrants, and placement of stop signs (Rl-1). The stop sign is a regulatory device that is used when traffic is required to stop. Stop signs are used to assign right-of-way at an intersection. Multi -way control is used where the volume of traffic on the City Council Meeting March 22, 2022 Page 3 of 4 intersecting roads is approximately equal. Stop signs are not used as a speed control device. Based on the data collected, this location did not meet warrants for installing an all -way stop. A line -of -sight analysis was conducted to determine the stopping sight distance for vehicles to clearly see oncoming traffic to safely proceed onto the roadway and to determine how much red curb should be installed. A detailed traffic report and proposed recommendations diagram are included in the Technical Report within Attachment A; please refer to Figure 11 in Attachment A for the proposed recommendations diagram. TRAFFIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Traffic Commission voted 5-0 to approve the staff recommended improvements at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. It is recommended that the City Council authorize approval for the following improvements at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue: 1. Repaint the existing STOP pavement legend and stop bar for the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue. 2. Remove and replace the existing 30"00" STOP sign in the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue with a new 36"x36" STOP sign (R1-1). Install a "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" plaque (W44P) below the new STOP sign. Per CAMUTCD Section 2C.59 guidelines, the "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" (W44P) plaque may be used in combination with a STOP sign when engineering judgment indicates that conditions are present that are causing or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all -way stop. 4. Install a vertical red retroreflective strip on the STOP sign post for enhanced visibility. 5. Install a "School Crossing Ahead Signage" (SW24-3(CA)) on the north and south legs of Del Mar approaching the intersection. 6. Red Curb Installation: Extend the existing red curb on the west side of the north leg of Del Mar Avenue to 16' north of the crosswalk and install 10' of red curb on the east side of the south leg of Del Mar Avenue, north of the shark teeth. 7. Removal of Non -Conforming Signage: The existing non -conforming signage "WHEN FLASHING" plaque under the existing "School Speed 25 mph" sign should be removed and replaced with a new S4 -2P plaque "WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT." Per CAMUTCD Section 7B.16, reduced school speed limit ahead sign (S4-5, S4 -5A). City Council Meeting March 22, 2022 Page 4 of 4 FINANCIAL IMPACT The City of Rosemead Public Works Field Services Division can complete the recommended items utilizing approved Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Traffic Signs and Markers available funds in account 202-3010-5660. All recommended items will be carried out by in-house staff. If necessary, additional materials and supplies may be purchased at a minimal expense to complete the tasks. STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT The project is consistent with the City of Rosemead's Strategic Plan Goal C - Infrastructure and Facilities, which is to enhance streets, sidewalks, and public infrastructure; coordinate with relevant utility agencies regarding safety and enhancements; and modernize facilities by expanding the use of wireless network technology and renewable energy. PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS This item has been noticed through the regular agenda notification process. Submitted by: ra, Michael Chung, P. . Director of Public Works Attachment A: February 3, 2022, Traffic Commission Staff Report Attachment B: February 3, 2022, Traffic Commission Minutes Attachment A Traffic Commission Staff Report Dated February 3, 2022 ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO: TRAFFIC COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FROM: MICHAEL CHUNG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2022 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC REVIEW AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL MAR AVENUE AND FERN AVENUE SUMMARY On behalf of the City of Rosemead, engineering staff completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate measures at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. The City of Rosemead received a resident request to evaluate installation of a stop sign at the crosswalk on the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue due to drivers reportedly not stopping for children who are walking to school. In response to this request and on behalf of the City, engineering staff completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate measures on Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. ANALYSIS The traffic review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 5.5 years of available collision data, an intersection turning movement count with peak hour vehicular and pedestrian counts, as well as an examination of field conditions. Del Mar Avenue: Within the City of Rosemead, Del Mar Avenue runs north and south and is considered a Minor Arterial Road per the City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. This intersection, however, is within a school zone with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH when the beacon is flashing at the intersection. Del Mar Avenue is approximately 48 feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line. Parking is allowed on both sides of Del Mar Avenue where the curbs are not marked red except during street sweeping. The intersection of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue is stop controlled on Fern Avenue, with an uncontrolled crosswalk in the north leg of the intersection with flashing beacons on top of LED School Pedestrian signs and pedestrian activated in -road lights on City Traffic Commission Meeting February 3, 2022 Page 2 of 4 Del Mar Avenue. This intersection runs through Light Multiple Residential zoning per the Rosemead Zoning Map. Fern Avenue: Within the City of Rosemead, Fern Avenue runs east and west and is considered a local road with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. Fern Avenue is approximately 36 feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and no marked center line. Parking is permitted on both sides of Fern Avenue where the curbs are not marked red. There are two schools within 1000-1500 feet from this intersection: Arlene Bitely Elementary School with access off of Fern Avenue to the west and Richard Garvey Intermediate School with access off of Newmark Avenue. Land use on Fern Avenue is Light Multiple Residential zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map. A Collision History Analysis was conducted for the subject location. Collision data was obtained from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). An analysis was conducted of available collisions that were reported to SWITRS and that occurred within 250 -feet of the subject intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue. The collision analysis was conducted over approximately a 5.5 -year period between January 2016 through October 2021 (available data at the time of traffic review). Per the Collision History Analysis, there was a total of 5 collisions reported within the 5.5 -year period. All five of those collisions occurred at or within 250 feet of the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue. Of the 5 reported collisions, I collision in 2018 involved collision between a vehicle and a bike. The bicyclist was a 58 -year-old adult not in the crosswalk traveling SB on Del Mar Avenue and was struck by a motorist making a left turn onto Fern Avenue which resulted in an injury. Turning Movement and Peak Hour Traffic CountsNolumes: To determine what type of turning movements are encountered at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue, peak hour intersection turning movement counts and pedestrian counts were taken at this intersection during the hours of 7-9 AM, 1-3PM and 4-6 PM on October 21, 2021 with the Afternoon peak conducted in November 17, 2021. The counts were taken while school was in session. Pedestrian Counts: To determine how many pedestrians are using this intersection to cross, peak hour pedestrian counts were taken during the same count periods as the intersection turning movement counts. The pedestrian counts tally the number of adult and school age pedestrians in each leg of the intersection during the count times of 7-9AM, 1-3PM and 4-6PM. Stop Sign Analysis: As part of the initial request the resident asked the City to look into providing all -way stop control. Installation of STOP Signs or all -way stop control at the intersection is guided by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Sections 213.04 through 213.07 (Page 126). Traffic control devices work in concert with the basic "rules of City Traffic Commission Meeting February 3, 2022 Page 3 of 4 the road" contained in traffic laws and ordinances. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Devices (CAMUTCD) describes applications, warrants, and placement of STOP signs (RI -1). The STOP sign is a regulatory device that is used when traffic is required to stop. STOP signs are used to assign right-of-way at an intersection. Multi -way control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. Stop signs are not used as a speed control device. Based on the data collected this location did not meet warrants for installation of an all -way stop. A line of sight analysis was conducted to determine the stopping sight distance for vehicles to clearly see oncoming traffic to safely proceed onto the roadway and to determine how much red curb should be installed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the guidelines in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), and based on engineering judgement, it was determined that the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of all -way stop control but would benefit from additional signage and red curb installation to make vehicles and pedestrians more visible to approaching cars. Pedestrian Activated In -Road Lights along the crosswalk were previously installed to make the yellow crosswalk more visible to approaching motorists. Based on a field review the lights appear to be non-functioning. The LED Pedestrian signs and beacons appear to be operational based on the field review. Public works maintenance is working to address the non-functioning lights. Please refer to Figure 11 in Attachment A for a conceptual representation of the proposed recommendations. A detailed traffic report and proposed figure diagram is attached as Attachment A to this staff report, please refer to the proposed diagram (Figure 11) in the attachment. Below is a detailed list of the recommendations, these improvements are also shown on Figure 11 of Attachment A: 1. The existing STOP pavement legend and stop bar for the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue is faded and should be repainted and refreshed. 2. The exiting STOP sign in the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue should be removed and replaced with a new 36x36 STOP sign (R1-1). City Traffic Commission Meeting February 3, 2022 Page 4 of 4 3. A "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" plaque (W44P) should be installed below the new STOP sign. Per CAMUTCD Section 2C.59 guidelines the "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" (W44P) plaque may be used in combination with a STOP sign when engineering judgment indicates that conditions are present that are causing or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all -way stop. 4. A vertical red retroreflective strip should be installed on the STOP sign post for enhanced visibility. Per CAMUTCD Figure 2A-1: Examples of enhanced conspicuity for signs. 5. School Crossing Ahead Signage (SW24-3(CA)) should be installed on the north and south legs of Del Mar approaching the intersection as shown in Figure 11. 6. Red Curb Installation: Extend the existing red curb, on the west side of the north leg of Del Mar Avenue to 16' north of the crosswalk and install 10' of red curb on the east side for the south leg of Del Mar Avenue, north of the shark teeth as shown in Figure 11. 7. Removal of Non -Conforming Signage: The existing non -conforming signage "WHEN FLASHING" plaque under the existing School Speed 25 mph should be removed and replaced with a new S4 -2P plaque "WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT." Per CAMUTCD Section 7B.16 reduced school speed limit ahead sign (54-5, S4 -5A). Prepared by: Jana Robbins, Contract Traffic Engineering Division Attachments: A. Attachment A — Technical Traffic Engineering Report B. Attachment B — Courtesy Notification i TRANsTEch TO: City of Rosemead, Department of Public Works FROM: Traffic Engineering, Transtech Engineers, Inc. DATE: January 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue INTRODUCTION The City of Rosemead received a resident request to evaluate installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. In response to this request and on behalf of the City, engineering staff completed a traffic review and recommended appropriate measures on Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. The traffic review included an analysis of existing roadway conditions, a review of approximately 5.5 years of available collision data, an intersection turning movement count with peak hour vehicular and pedestrian counts, as well as an examination of field conditions. Figure 1: Vicinity Map for Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue 'P`.t�i� �, —� I ��6a a •-�`._L � �. 1 "� 1. t •q II+' 6 1 a ;` i i yy .r77II-1/N ttr" =til" �/��,C3' ti' "i,�l1 Arlt-�.7t'P!�7� i'. tr-•+-fir.. LEGEND Request Location: Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 1 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue EXISTING CONDITIONS Del Mar Avenue: Del Mar Avenue runs north and south and is considered a Minor Arterial Road per the City of Rosemead Engineering and Traffic Survey with a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. This intersection, however, is within a school zone with a posted speed limit of 25 MPH when the beacon is flashing at the intersection. Del Mar Avenue is approximately 48 feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and a double yellow center line. Parking is allowed on both sides where the curbs are not marked red except during street sweeping. This intersection runs through Light Multiple Residential zoning perthe Rosemead Zoning Map. The intersection of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue is stop controlled on Fern Avenue, with an uncontrolled crosswalk in the north leg of the intersection with flashing beacons on top of LED School Pedestrian signs and pedestrian activated in -road lights on Del Mar Avenue. During the field review it was noted that the uncontrolled crosswalk has an existing in -road light system. Based on a field review the in -road light system needs a functionality review. Public Works is aware, and their maintenance team is addressing the field conditions. Fern Avenue: Fern Avenue runs east and west and is considered a local road with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. Fern Avenue is approximately 36 feet wide with one lane of travel in each direction and no marked center line. Parking is permitted on both sides where the curbs are not marked red. There are two schools within 1000-1500 feet from this intersection: Arlene Bitely Elementary School with access off of Fern Avenue to the west and Richard Garvey Intermediate School with access off of Newmark Avenue. Land use on Fern Avenue is Light Multiple Residential zoning, per the Rosemead Zoning Map. Figure 2: Existing Conditions on Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue LEGEND 'As 0 Stop Sign (R1-1) PAIRKING No Parking 4s(Variation of R30) MN A. . School Zone (SW24- sceoo� 1(CA) ASSEMBLY A) School Zone Speed Limit (S4 -3P & R2-1 & S4 -4P) CITY OF ROSEMEAD ---- r D Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 2 of 19 Pedestrian Crossing Here LED Flashing Ped FA ---1 Signage (S1-1 &W16 -7P) Yield Here to Pedestrians (R1-5) A. . School Zone (SW24- sceoo� 1(CA) ASSEMBLY A) School Zone Speed Limit (S4 -3P & R2-1 & S4 -4P) CITY OF ROSEMEAD ---- r D Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 2 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue PICTURE SUMMARY ,' CITY OF ROSEMEAD 0 4e Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 3 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue OSEME'AD CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 4 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue OSEINE'AD ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 5 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue COLLISION INVESTIGATION A Collision History Analysis was conducted for the subject location. Collision data was obtained from the computerized collision records system maintained by the State of California called the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records Systems (SWITRS). An analysis was conducted of available collisions that were reported to SWITRS and that occurred within 250 -feet of the subject intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue. The collision analysis was conducted over approximately a 5.5 -year period between January 2016 through October 2021 (available data at the time of traffic review). Based on the information provided, a summary breakdown of the number of collisions within the studied segment are listed below and shown in Table 1. Total collisions: 5 2021— 0 collisions 2020 —1 collision 2019 — 2 collisions 2018 — 2 collisions 2017-0 collisions 2016-0 collisions Table 1: Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Collision History OSE1v1E'AD CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 6 of 19 le Fa[al Lighting Collision 2 - Severe Injury Motor Vehicle, Dale Primary Road Secondary Road Disc Time Day of Ne Week (DayNlght. Type 3-Ofit,%siele Pedestrian, Collison Fanorand Primary Collision tlry Otherinfo ;ION Etc,) Injury 4. Complaint of Pain BI[V[Ie Involved Detail Descriptions Factor _I 5 -Plot Dam Onl•- rp— ' 1 3/1Of2020 Del Mar Ave Fern Ave 0 7:20 Tuesday DARK -ST RearEnd 3 Motor Vehicle NB DRVR HITTWO TOO CLOSE 2 Raining 'JB DRVRS 2 Del Mar Ave FernAve 140'5 0:29 Saturday DARK -5T Sideswipe 5 Parked Motor NB DRVR HIT THREE IMPROP TURN 0 NIA 4/20/2019 Vehicle PKD NB MVS 4/6/2019 Del Mar Ave fern Ave 66'5 0:19 Saturday DARK -ST Head -On 5 Parked Motor NB DRVR HIT TWO Ih1PROPTURN 0 N/A Vehicle PY,D NB MV 4 7/14/2018 Del Mar Ave Fern Ave 750'N 15:40 Saturday DA1'UGHT R—End 3 Motor Vehicle NB DRVR HIT TWO UNSAFE SPEED 2 N/A OTHER NB DRVRS 5 2/1912018 DEI or Ave Fern Ave 0 18:41 hlontlay DARK -ST Auto/Bike 3 Bicycle WB LFT TURN DWR-O-W ALTO 1 N/A HIT SB BICYCLE OSE1v1E'AD CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 6 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Per the Collision History Analysis, there was a total of 5 collisions reported within the 5.5 -year period. All five of those collisions occurred at or within 250 feet of the intersection of Del MarAvenue at Fern Avenue. Of the 5 reported collisions, 1 collision in 2018 involved an auto versus a bike collision. The Bicyclist was a 58 -year-old adult not in the crosswalk traveling SB on Del MarAvenue and was struck by a motorist making a left turn onto Fern Avenue which resulted in an injury. Please referto Figure 3 for a visual representation of the collisions at Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue during the selected period. Figure 3: Collision Diagram, Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue J lam— rl -" • I I�_91 'R'1j �� 111�L _ Fq I .��(. �• LEGEND ALL COLLISIONS - Fatality (Death) 0 Severe Injury O 0 Injury - Other ® 2 Visible - Injur0 y- � Complaint of 0 Pain Property • Z Damage Only Total 4 � 0 Damage Only Total — 1 r ` LInjury- d � Complaint of 0 G I i TOTAL CRASHES 5 TURNING MOVEMENT AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTS/VOLUMES 1111 Crash Type # of (Non -Ped &Bike Crashes Collisions/[rashes) Fatality (Death) 0 Severe Injury O 0 Injury - Other ® 2 Visible Visible Injur0 y- � Complaint of 0 Pain Property • Z Damage Only Total 4 PED&BIKE- #of C rash Type Crashes Fatality (Death) 0 Severe Injury e� 0 Injury - Other � 1 Visible t ► Pain Property � 0 Damage Only Total 1 To determine what type of turning movements are encountered at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue, peak hour intersection turning movement counts and pedestrian counts were taken at this intersection during the hours of 7-9 AM, 1-3PM and 4-6 PM on October 21, 2021 with the Afternoon peak conducted in November 17, 2021. The counts were taken while school was in session. Figures 4, 5, and 6 depict the highest peak 1 hour of vehicles at the intersection during the peak hours. Please refer to Attachment 1 for the count sheets. Figure 4 shows the highest one hour during the AM peals hours of 7:00 to 9:00 AM. The peak hour volume for the AM Peak was 8:00 to 9:00 AM at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. EVE'AE CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 7 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Figure 5 shows the highest one hour during the AFT peak hours of 13:00 to 15:00 PM. The peak one hour was between the Afternoon hour of 14:00 to 15:00 (2:00-3:00 PM) at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. Figure 6 shows the highest one hour during the PM peak hours of 16:00-18:00 PM. The peak one hour was between the PM Peak hours of 16:45 to 17:45 (4:45-5:45 PM) at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. Figure 4: AM Peak Hour Count 8:00-9:00 AM Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue N Highest 1 Hour in AM PEAK (8:00-9:00 AM) O M O � 0 Air— 0 17 J 0 30 41 rn , O Figure 5: AFT Peak Hour Count 2:00-3:00 PM Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue N Highest 1 Hour in AFT PEAK (2:00-3:00 PM) ID E— 0 0 13 0 —� 38 Figure 6: PM Peak Hour Count 4:45-5:45 PM Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue N Highest 1 Hour in PM PEAK (4:45-5:45 PM) M 00M O "0 � O 0 0 51 0 17 CITY OF ROSEMEAD ! Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 8 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue As Figures 4, 5 and 6 indicate Del Mar Avenue carries a significant amount of peak hour traffic compared to the side street of Fern Avenue. PEDESTRIAN COUNTS To determine how many pedestrians are using this intersection to cross, peak hour pedestrian counts were taken during the same count periods as the intersection turning movement counts. The pedestrian counts tally the number of adult and school age pedestrians in each leg of the intersection during the count times of 7-9AM, 1-3PM and 4-613M. Each hour is shown in the table below (Table 2). Table 2: Summary of Pedestrians Crossing at Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue LOCATION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSING — MARKED OR UNMARKED CROSSWALKS TIME NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG WEST LEG ADULTS SCHOOL AGE ADULTS SCHOOLAGE ADULTS SCHOOLAGE 7-8AM 1 2 1 0 3 3 8-9AM 3 0 0 0 3 1 1-213M 2 1 0 0 1 0 2-313M 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 -SPM 3 1 0 0 3 2 5-6PM 1 0 0 0 5 2 TOTALPEDS 12 4 1 0 17 8 As shown in the table above there were a total of 16 pedestrians crossing over Del Mar Avenue in the uncontrolled marked crosswalk in the north leg over a 6 -hour period. There were 12 adults and 4 school age pedestrians. STOP SIGN ANALYSIS As part of the initial request the resident asked the City to look into providing all -way stop control. Installation of STOP Signs or all -way stop control at the intersection is guided by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) Sections 213.04 through 213.07 (Page 126). The CAMUTCD States the following: ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING IF STOP CONTROL IS WARRANTED Traffic control devices work in concert with the basic "rules of the road" contained in traffic laws and ordinances. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Devices (CAMUTCD) describes applications, warrants, and placement of STOP signs (111-1). The STOP sign is a regulatory device that is used when traffic is required to stop. STOP signs are used to assign right-of-way at an intersection. Multi -way control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. Stop signs are not used as a speed control device. CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 9 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Since a STOP sign causes inconvenience to motorists, it should be used only where warranted. The placement of these signs is dictated by engineering judgment and based on guidelines found in the CAMUTCD and CVC. The City's criteria for determining if two-way or all -way stop control is warranted is based on several factors as set by the CAM UTCD. These factors include minimum volumes on each of the street approaches, collision investigation, speed of traffic, number of pedestrians and potential sight obstructions. As shown in the peak hour intersection count and pedestrian counts this location would not exceed minimum thresholds in volume and would not be a candidate for all -way stop control. All -Way Stop Installation The following briefly outlines the Criteria for the installation of All -Way stop warrants. The placement of All -Way stop control is warranted when' minimum volume thresholds are exceeded: A. Traffic control signals are justified B. A crash problem exists as indicated by 5 or more collisions in a 12 -month period C. Minimum Volumes are met if: 1. Volume entering intersection from the major approach (total of both approaches) averages 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. And 2. The combined vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours. 3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street exceeds 40 mph the minimum volumes are 70 percent of the above values. LINE OF SIGHT AT INTERSECTIONS The driver of a vehicle approaching or departing from an intersection or driveway should have an unobstructed view of the roadway, including any traffic control devices, with sufficient lengths along the intersecting highway to permit the driver to anticipate and avoid potential collisions (Maze and Plazak 2000) as well as see any pedestrians waiting at a crossing. These unobstructed views form triangular areas known as sight triangles as seen in Figure 7. Any object within the sight triangle that would obstruct the driver's view of an approaching vehicle or waiting pedestrian should be removed or modified or appropriate traffic control devices should be installed as per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Obstructions within sight triangles could be buildings, vehicles, hedges, trees, bushes, tall crops, walls, fences, or parked cars. A parked vehicle extends approximately LOCI-L STREAREA TO BE CLECR OFVIEW ODBTRUCTION EDGEOP SHOULDER ID. EDGE OF PAVEMENT STATE HIGHWAY 7 -feet from the curb, so it's necessary to consider the Figure 7: Example of Stopping Sight Distance width of a vehicle when determining the amount of red curb needed to obtain a clear sight triangle. California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Section 28.07 Multiway Stop Applications CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 10 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Per A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO) Table 3-1, for a roadway with a posted speed of 35 MPH the clear sight distance needed is 250 feet. Although there are 25 mph SCHOOL signs in the area the speed limit is 35 MPH unless children are present. Table 3 below summarizes the Stopping Sight Distance based on design speeds and Figure 8 presents an example of a clear sight triangle at an intersection or driveway. Figure 9 below shows the calculated amount of clear sight that is needed for vehicles exiting the intersection at Fern Avenue onto Del Mar Avenue. Table 3: Stopping Sight Distance Design Speed (MPH) Brake reaction distance (ft) Braking distance on level (ft) Stopping Sight Distance Calculated Design (ft) (ft) 15 55.1 21.6 76.7 80 20 73.5 38.4 111.9 115 25 91.9 60.0 151.9 155 30 110.3 86.4 196.7 200 35 128.6 117.6 246.2 250 40 147.0 153.6 300.6 305 45 165.4 194.4 359.8 360 50 183.8 240.0 423.8 425 55 202.1 290.3 492.4 495 60 220.5 345.5 566.0 570 65 1 238.9 405.5 644.4 645 Note: Brake reaction distance predicated on a time of 2.5s; deceleration rate 11.2 ft/sect Figure 8: Example of Stopping Sight Distance Triangle with Vehicles Parked Along Curb Stopping Sight Distance Stopping Sight Distance Min 7' distance for vehicle clearance Vehicle obstructing view ,. Area to be clear of view obstruction ROSE CITY OF ROSEMEAD EVD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 11 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Figure 9: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Vehicle Exiting Fern Avenue Improving Sight Lines at Crosswalks At pedestrian crossings, generous sight distances and unobstructed sight lines allow motorists and pedestrians to detect each other in time to avoid collisions. Sight lines should be designed so that the motorist can observe the movement of the pedestrian for a long enough period of time to accurately determine the pedestrian's speed. If the motorist has only a brief glimpse of the pedestrian and cannot observe the pedestrian's speed, he or she may overestimate the speed of slower pedestrians and not sufficiently slow his or her approach to the crosswalk. Figure 10 calculates the amount of clear sight distance needed for approaching vehicles on Del Mar Avenue to see a pedestrian waiting to cross in the north leg of the crosswalk in time to stop or avoid a collision. As shown in the figure 50 feet of red curb is needed to the north and south of the intersection. Cars should not be parked between the crosswalk and Yield Here to Pedestrian signs. CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 12 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Figure 10: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Vehicle approaching the Crosswalk and a Waiting Pedestrian at the Crosswalk in North Leg. RECOMMENDATIONS After a thorough review of existing field and traffic conditions and per the guidelines in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), California Vehicle Code (CVC), and based on engineering judgement, it was determined that the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of all -way stop control but would benefit from additional signage and red curb installation to make vehicles and pedestrians more visible to approaching cars. Pedestrian Activated In -Road Lights along the crosswalk were previously installed in order to make the yellow crosswalk more visible to approaching motorists. Please refer to Figure 11 for a conceptual exhibit representation of the proposed recommendations. CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 13 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Figure 11: Conceptual Sample Exhibit Showing the Proposed Recommendations for the Intersection of on Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue ORemoval of Non -Conforming Signage: The existing non -conforming signage "WHEN FLASHING" plaque 1 � ' (i —'_"z,.ayyv31yyl`xv-�C'�J e. Jl T `k 2 �I 7 3 4 HEAD — 6-( oil 5- �O_s 1.v M b . CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 14 of 19 under the existing School Speed 25 mph should be removed and replaced with a new 54-2P plaque "WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT." Per CAMUTCD Section 713.16 reduced school speed limit ahead sign (S4-5, 54 -SA). Please refer to images below for detail. OThe existing STOP pavement legend and stop bar for the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue ' exiting STOP sign in the west leg of Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue should be removed and OThe replaced with a new 36x36 STOP sign (111-1). camas TnerncA "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" plaque (W4 -4P) should be installed below the new STOP sign. Per Dors N07 STOP O CAMUTCD Section 2C.59 guidelines the "CROSS TRAFFIC DOES NOT STOP" (W4 -4P) plaque may be used in combination with a STOP sign when engineering judgment indicates that conditions are present that are causing or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all -way stop. 5 i A vertical red retroreflective strip should be installed on the STOP sign post for enhanced visibility. Per CAMUTCD Figure 2A-1: Examples of enhanced conspicuity for signs. s AHEAD School Crossing Ahead Signage (SW24-3(CA)) should be installed on the north and south legs 6 approaching the intersection as shown in Figure 11. Red Curb Installation: Extend the existing red curb, on the west side of the north leg crosswalk 16' and c I ioerN ] M'l PRESENT install 10' of red curb on the east side for the south leg, north of the shark teeth as shown in Figure 11. CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 14 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Turning Movement and Peak Hour Traffic Counts/Volumes Attachment 2: Figure 2A-1. Examples of Enhanced Conspicuity for Signs (CAMUTCD) Attachment 3: CAMUTCD Section 76.16 Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead Sign (S4-5, S4 -5a) CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 15 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Attachment 1: Turning Movement and Peak Hour Traffic Counts/Volumes TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT PROJECTNAME: Rosemead PROJECTNO: DATE: 10-21-21 S - School age pedestrian A- Adult oedeslrlan ll�®�__��illlllllmllllllllll�llllllllll�llllllllll�___®.l�l■.-.l■. N -S STREET: Del Mar Avenue PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM E -W STREET: Fern Avenue PEAK PED COU IT _I_I_ IIIIIIIIIIC ______1�...----I■ TIME NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT LE WS TOTAL EASTBOUND WESTBOUND E -W S A S A S LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL NL NL SL SL EL A S A, EL WL W 07:00-07:15 6 100 162 6 B 2 07:16-07:30 11 138 1 219 3 1 4 1 1 1 07:30.07:45 9 201 WR 327 4 4 8 2 07:45-08:00 15 195 M 363 8 7 16 2 1 08:00-08:16 23 204 llllllllm®_©___ 41 40B 4 15 19 2 1 3 08:15.08:30 22 212 423 3 11 14 NT NR 08:30-08:45 19 203 640313 NT NR 08:46-09:00 26 187 2 394 5 7 12 1 ll�®�__��illlllllmllllllllll�llllllllll�llllllllll�___®.l�l■.-.l■. CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM ADJUSTED PEAK ®_I__ _I_I_ IIIIIIIIIIC ______1�...----I■ -AM ®_I__I_I__IIIIIIIIIIC______IIIIIIIIIIGIIII�I■-----I■ 60 683 0 _ SR ST SL ®______ IIIIIIIIIIG ______ �----I■--I■ SL ll�®�__��illlllllmllllllllll�llllllllll�llllllllll�___®.l�l■.-.l■. CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 60 683 0 _ SR ST SL SR '®� � l�l�__�llllllllll�llllllllm®I_©___��©-...1■. SL 17 EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 08:00-09:00 WT 0 ll�®ll�_ _�� llllllllm®_©___ 41 ER l�..l■--.1�. WL 0 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 90 PEAK -HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 16 of 19 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 60 683 0 _ SR ST SL SR ST SL 17 EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 08:00-09:00 WT 0 ET WT 41 ER WL 0 ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 90 806 0 _ CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON 0 0 0 SR ST SL SR ST SL 0 EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 13:30-14:30 WT 0 ET WT 0 ER WL o ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR 0 0 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -PM ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -PM 68 633 0 SR ST SL SR ST SL 51 EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 16:46-17:46 WT 0 Er WT 17 ER WL 0 ER WL _ NL NT NR NL NT NR 96 785 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 16 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT' PROJECT NAME: Rosemead PROJECT NO: _ DATE: '11-17-2021 _ S - School age pedestrian A- Adult pedestrian TIME N -S STREET: Del Mar Avenue NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND N -S LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL E -W STREET: Fern Avenue EAST BOUND WEST BOUND E -W LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT I THRU RIGHT TOTAL PED COUNT S A S A S A S A NL NL SL SL EL EL WL W 07:00-07:15 0 0 0 0 07:15-07:30 0 0 07:30-07:45 0 0 SR 07:45-08:00 0 0 ST 08:00-08:15 0 0 EL 08:16-013:30 0 0 EL 08:30-08:46 0 0 0 08:45-09:00 1 1 1 01 0 1 1 ',PEAK -HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 17 of 19 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 'ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -AM 0__.. _.. 0 0 _..... SR ST SL - _ SR ST SL .... 0. EL _ WR .07:00-OB:00 0 EL WR.. 0 ET WT. 0 ET Wi 0. ER - ... WL 0 ER..... _ WL. NL NT NR '. .. .. NL NT NR _... 0 0 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON _. ',ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -NOON', __._. 24 556 0.. SR ST SL SR ST SL... 13 EL WR 0 EL WR 0 ET 14:00-16:00 WT 0 ET WT 38 ER WL 0ER WLI NL NT NR NL NT NR 26 545 0 CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -PM �iADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES -PM 0 0 0 ._ __.. SR ST SL SR ST SL 0 EL WR. 0 EL WR_ 0. ET _.. 16:00-17:00. WT 0 ET.. _ER. Vrr _. 0 ER. WL 0 _... WIL NL NT NR NL NT NR 0 0 0 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 17 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Attachment 2: Figure 2A-1. Examples of Enhanced Conspicuity for Signs (CAMUTCD California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 115 (FHWA's MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions I & 2, as amended for use In California) Figure 2A-1. Examples of Enhanced Conspicuity for Signs A - W16 -15P plaque above B - Red or orange flags C -W16-18P plaque above a regulatory or warning & above a regulatory, a regulatory sign sign if the regulation or warning, or guide sign condition is new NEW -S . I D - Solid yellow, solid fluorescent yellow, or diagonally striped black and yellow (or black and fluorescent yellow) strip of retroreflective sheeting around a warning sign EXIT 25 MPH Chapter 2A - General Part 2 - Signs SPEED LIMIT 35 NOTICE WEIGHT LIMIT 10 TONS F - Supplemental beacon [November 7. 2014 CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. i Page 18 of 19 Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue Attachment 3: CAMUTCD Section 78.16 Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead Sign (S4-5, S4 -5a) Guidance: o1A Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead (S4-5, S4 -5a) sign (see Figure 7B-1 or 7B- school Speed Limit Assemb y 1(CA)) should be used to SCHOOL S4 3P inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where SPEED engineering judgment indicates that advance notice would be appropriate for LIMIT 132-1 the School Advance Warning Assembly 20 D(CA). Standard: S4.1 P oz If used, the Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead sign shall be followed by a OR School Speed Limit sign or a School Speed Limit assembly Assembly C(CA).ZD MEINosThe speed limit displayed on the Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead sign shall be identical to the speed limit displayed on the subsequent School Speed Limit sign or School Speed Limit assembly Assembly C(CA). OR o-e.3o Z. S4 -1P , N -SP S4 -6P CITY OF ROSEMEAD Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 19 of 19 AEM3 rrUSE Traffic Commission Courtesy Notification NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Thursday, February 3, 2022, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Rosemead Traffic Commission will hold a virtual public meeting for the purpose of reviewing the following item: Traffic Review at the Intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. In an effort to protect the health and safety of the public during the pandemic and pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 361, this meeting will be held virtually. The public will have access to observe the meeting by visiting www.cityofrosemead.org and may provide real time comments by using zoom or calling the number using the meeting details below. You are being notified of this meeting because your property is within proximity to the location. We encourage your comments regarding traffic safety in this area. Citizens' wishing to comment on the night of the meeting may do so by joining via Zoom Meeting ID: 860 0310 1343 Passcode: 867015 or calling (669) 900-9128. Written comments may be submitted via email at publiccommentp-citvofrosemead.org by 5:00 p.m. Please identify the topic you wish to comment in your email's subject line. All comments are public record and will be recorded in the official record of the City. Mailed written comments must be addressed to: City of Rosemead Public Works Department 8838 E. Valley Boulevard Rosemead, California 91770 Attention: Director of Public Works Again, written comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 3, 2022. We appreciate your concern for traffic safety in the City of Rosemead. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Public Works Department at 626-569-2150. For information please call: Parraobtener mafs� informaci6n, favor de hamar al: Rm h�A �iC MR:V[ f De biet them chi tiet, xin goi: 626-569-2150 Location Map 1 411;40 ro � 1 I LUI ro LEGEND ® Request Location: Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue Attachment B Traffic Commission Minutes Dated February 3, 2022 Minutes of the Regular ROSEMEAD TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING February 3, 2022 The regular meeting of the Rosemead Traffic Commission was called to order by Chair Masuda at 7:07 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 8838 E. Valley Boulevard, Rosemead, California. FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Drange INVOCATION: Commissioner Escobar PRESENT: Commissioner Drange, Commissioner Escobar, Commissioner Nguyen, Vice Chair Quintanilla and Chair Masuda ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins, Director of Public Works Michael Chung, and Commission Liaison Danielle Garcia 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Masuda opened the public comment period. Resident Janet Schneider expressed her concerns regarding bicyclist on the sidewalk. She stated the bicyclist should not be on the sidewalk as there is not enough room for pedestrians to walk safely. She described her encounter with bicyclists on the sidewalk that resulted in her almost falling over from being caught off guard. Chair Masuda closed the public comment period. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR Chair Masuda asked Traffic Commissioners if anyone would like to make revisions or additions to the minutes of November 4, 2021. Commissioner Nguyen made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Escobar, to accept consent calendar. Vote resulted in: Yes: Masuda, Quintanilla, Drange, Escobar, Nguyen No: None Abstain: None Absent: None Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page I of 6 3. NEW BUSINESS A. TRAFFIC REVIEW OF THE NORTHWEST CURB RAMP AT THE INTERSECTION OF GARVEY AVENUE AND BARTLETT AVENUE Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint presentation of the studies that were conducted. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to evaluate the existing driveway access and curb ramp adjacent to the Wilson Complete Auto Repair shop, located at the northwest corner of Garvey Avenue and Bartlett Avenue. It was reported that drivers sometimes drive up the curb ramp thinking it is a driveway. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the existing roadway conditions, collision data, and an examination of existing field conditions. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided recommendations for the installation of yellow railings along the outside of the ADA curb ramp on the northwest corner of the intersection. As well as red curb on the curb ramp aprons as further reinforcement of no parking areas. Chair Masuda opened the Public Comment period. Resident Javier Magdaleno acknowledged the issue being discussed and explained how unsafe it is for pedestrians when cars are driving in and out using the curb ramp. He mentioned a legal case involving a trip and fall at this location and expressed that the property owner should not be held accountable. He approved staff recommendations. Resident Janet Schneider expressed her concerns with the ADA curb ramp indicating that it looks like a driveway and feels the slope is a safety hazard when walking. She questioned the width of the curb ramp, how much of the sidewalk would be taken away with the installation of the railing and reiterated that bicyclist should not be on the sidewalk. She also mentioned of a broken sewer lid in that area and a raised bolt on the yellow section of the ADA curb ramp that needs to be fixed. Chair Masuda closed the Public Comment period. Chair Masuda asked if we know how much actual leveled sidewalk there is. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins responded that Wilson has a thirteen foot driveway next to the wrought iron fence and it is all based on right of way. The yellow railing would sit on top of the lip and would not be taking any of his property. Chair Masuda asked if we know what the width of that area is from the railing to the front. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins responded it should at least be a minimum of five foot because it is ADA compliant. Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Vice Chair Quintanilla asked if the City had received a response after reaching out to Wilson Auto Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins responded that the City Engineer had reached out to Mr. Wilson, and although the report was not shared directly with him, believes he was amenable to installing the railing. Commissioner Drange made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Escobar, to accept Staff recommendations. Vote resulted in: Yes: Masuda, Quintanilla, Drange, Escobar, Nguyen No: None Abstain: None Absent: None B. TRAFFIC REVIEW AT KLINGERMAN STREET AND ANGELUS AVENUE, WEST OF THE ALHAMBRA WASH Director of Public Works Chung addressed to Traffic Commission to defer Agenda Item 3B to a future Traffic Commission meeting. C. TRAFFIC REVIEW AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL MAR AVENUE AND FERN AVENUE Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint presentation of the studies that were conducted. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to evaluate the installation of a stop sign at the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the existing roadway conditions, collision data, an intersection turning movement count with peak hour vehicular and pedestrian counts, all -way stop control warrants and an examination of existing field conditions. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained that after a thorough review it was determined that the intersection of Del Mar Avenue at Fern Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of all - way stop control. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided recommendations for additional signage and red curb installation to make vehicles and pedestrians more visible to approaching cars. Chair Masuda opened the Public Comment period. Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page 3 of 6 The City received a Public Comment via email from Resident R Zuniga regarding the intersection of Del Mar Avenue and Fern Avenue. Resident R Zuniga described the increase in traffic over the years and how it has resulted in multiple accidents due to the street being one lane. She explained that cars are not stopping at the crossing light on Fern Avenue. She also inquired about widening the street in order to make it a two-lane street. Commissioner Drange asked if there is a traffic signal light at Highcliff Street & Del Mar Avenue, Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins confirmed that there is a traffic signal light. Commissioner Drange commented on his experience with driving in that area and agreed with staff recommendation to install red curb to help with making a left turn onto Fern Avenue from Del Mar Avenue. A Public Comment via Zoom from Resident April Fung was received agreeing with Commissioner Drange regarding the difficulty of making a left turn onto Del Mar Avenue from Wasola Street, She expressed that a stop sign would not be effective and inquired about installing a traffic signal light on Fern Avenue and Del Mar Avenue. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins responded that traffic signal lights also have warrants that must be met in order to be installed and are more stringent in terms of minimum volume thresholds and pedestrians. High installation cost is also considered when deciding to install traffic signal lights. Resident April Fung expressed that she feels there is much more traffic on Del Mar Avenue now due to drivers trying to avoid traffic on San Gabriel Boulevard, She acknowledged the cost is a concern, but believes safety is more of a priority, Chair Masuda closed the Public Comment period. Chair Masuda asked about the non-functioning In -Road Lights along the crosswalk and if they are going to be made functional. Director of Public Works Chung responded that staff is in plans to repair the In -Road Lights. Commissioner Escobar made a motion, seconded by Vice Chair Quintanilla, to accept Staff recommendations. Vote resulted in: Yes: Masuda, Quintanilla, Drange, Escobar, Nguyen No: None Abstain: None Absent: None D. TRAFFIC REVIEW AT THE INTERSECTION OF MISSION DRIVE AND DELTA AVENUE Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided a brief description of the item and presented a PowerPoint presentation of the studies that were conducted. Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained that the resident requested the City to review the line of sign and existing conditions at the intersection of Mission Drive and Delta Avenue, Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins explained as part of the traffic review, engineering staff looked at the existing roadway conditions, collision data, and a line -of -sight analysis. On behalf of the City of Rosemead, Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins provided recommendations for upgrading the striping of the existing crosswalks and red curb installation to provide a clear line of sight for any waiting pedestrians. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins mentioned the City is also in plans to repair the non-functioning In - Road Lights along the crosswalk. Chair Masuda opened the Public Comment period. The City received a Public Comment via email from Resident Simon Ho acknowledging the City's efforts to improving the intersection and requested to add a set of traffic control lights for people turning off from Delta Avenue, Commissioner Drange if there are flashing yellow lights at this intersection. Traffic Engineer Jana Robbins replied there is a LED pedestrian sign. Commissioner Escobar made a motion, seconded by Vice Chair Quintanilla, to accept Staff recommendations. Vote resulted in: Yes: Masuda, Quintanilla, Drange, Escobar, Nguyen No: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4. STAFF REPORTS - None 5. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Drange commented on the City's bicycle plan and would like to revisit the plan. Chair Masuda agreed with Commissioner Drange's comment on the bicycle plan and would like to see if it can be added as an agenda item for discussion. Director of Public Works Chung responded it will be added on to a future Traffic Commission meeting. Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Chair Masuda recalled the public comment made by Resident April Fung and asked if Staff would consider her comment regarding line of sight on her street turning onto Del Mar Avenue a request to look into. Director of Public Works Chung responded Staff can evaluate it. Resident Darice Larson asked why the agenda item for traffic review at Klingerman Street and Angelus Avenue not discussed during this meeting. Director of Public Works Chung responded the City received new information regarding the agenda item and plan to defer it to a future Traffic Commission meeting. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m. The next Traffic Commission meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2022, at 7:00 p.m. and will take place at the Rosemead City Hall, City Council Chambers, 8838 East Valley Boulevard. Howard Masuda Chair ATTEST: & W Michael Chung, Director of Public Works Rosemead Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes of February 3, 2022 Page 6 of 6