CC - Item 3A - Attachment G - Mitigated Negative Declaration, along with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting ProgramMITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
STRATHMORE-GARVEY MIXED-USE PROJECT
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 22-01, ZONE CHANGE 22-02
Lead Agency:
City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
(626) 569-2140
Project Proponent:
Green Park Property, LLC
120 E. Valley Boulevard
San Gabriel, CA 91776
(626) 307-0062
Environmental Consultant:
Phil Martin & Associates
2987 NW Fairway Heights Drive
Bend, Oregon 97703
(949) 454-1800
April 21, 2023
Environmental Checklist
For CEQA Compliance
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page i
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
TABLE of CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1. Project Title ................................................................................................................... 1
2. Lead Agency Name and Address ................................................................................. 1
3. Contact Person and Phone Number ............................................................................ 1
4. Project Location ............................................................................................................ 1
5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ......................................................................... 1
6. General Plan Designation ............................................................................................. 1
7 Zoning ........................................................................................................................... 1
8. Description of Project .................................................................................................... 1
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting .......................................................................... 11
10. Other Public Agencies whose Approval Is Required ................................................. 11
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated
With the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources
Code Section 21080.3.1? ........................................................................................... 11
12. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ............................................................... 16
13. Determination .............................................................................................................. 16
14. Issues .......................................................................................................................... 18
15. Explanation of Issues .................................................................................................. 25
I. Aesthetics ........................................................................................................... 25
II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................. 40
III. Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 41
IV. Biological Resources ......................................................................................... 52
V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................ 53
VI. Energy ................................................................................................................ 55
VII. Geology and Soils .............................................................................................. 58
VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions .............................................................................. 60
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................... 62
X. Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................. 64
XI. Land Use ............................................................................................................ 69
XII. Mineral Resources ............................................................................................. 73
XIII. Noise .................................................................................................................. 74
XIV. Population and Housing ..................................................................................... 86
XV. Public Services .................................................................................................. 87
XVI. Recreation .......................................................................................................... 89
XVII. Transportation .................................................................................................... 89
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................ 101
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems .......................................................................... 106
XX. Wildfire ............................................................................................................. 107
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................ 108
Appendices
Appendix A - Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Report
Appendix B - Geotechnical Report
Appendix C - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Appendix D – Drainage Study and Low Impact Calculations
Environmental Checklist
For CEQA Compliance
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page ii
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Appendix E – Noise Report
Appendix F - Traffic Report
LIST of FIGURES
Figure Page
1. Regional Map ................................................................................................................ 2
2. Local Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................... 3
3. Aerial Photo................................................................................................................... 4
4. USGS Topo Map ........................................................................................................... 5
5. Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Zoning Map ................................................................... 6
6. Ground Floor Landscape Plan ...................................................................................... 8
7. Second, Fourth and Seventh Floor Landscape Plans ................................................. 9
8. Site Plan ...................................................................................................................... 10
9. On-Site Land Uses...................................................................................................... 12
10. Surrounding Land Uses .............................................................................................. 13
11. Surrounding Land Uses .............................................................................................. 14
12. Photo Orientation Map ................................................................................................ 15
13. Project Rendering from Garvey Avenue..................................................................... 27
14. Project Rendering from Strathmore Avenue and Virginia Avenue ............................ 29
15 Exterior Light Fixtures ................................................................................................. 39
16. Noise Measurement Locations ................................................................................... 77
17. Closest Noise Sensitive Land Uses ........................................................................... 78
18. Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 94
19. Sight Distance for Brighton Street ............................................................................ 102
20. Sight Distance for Strathmore Avenue ..................................................................... 103
21. No Parking Areas ...................................................................................................... 104
22. Cumulative Project Location Map ............................................................................. 110
LIST of TABLES
Table Page
1. Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Development Standards – Project Compliance ......... 31
2. Comparison of Emissions by Major Source Category from 2012 AQMP .................. 42
3. Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................................................................... 44
4. Health Effects of Major Criteria Pollutants ................................................................. 46
5. Air Quality Monitoring Summary (2017-2021) ............................................................ 47
6. SCAQMD Daily Emission Thresholds of Significance ............................................... 48
7. Construction Activity Equipment Fleet – Proposed Project ....................................... 49
8. Construction Activity Emissions Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds/day) ............... 49
9. LST and Project Emissions (pounds/day) .................................................................. 51
10. Daily Operational Emissions (2024) ........................................................................... 51
11. Construction GHG Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e) .................................................... 62
12. Annual Operations GHG Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e) ........................................... 62
Environmental Checklist
For CEQA Compliance
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page iii
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
13. Project Community Benefit Points .............................................................................. 71
14. Rosemead Noise Ordinance Limits ............................................................................ 76
15. Short-Term Measured Noise Levels (dBA) ................................................................ 76
16. Construction Equipment Noise Levels ....................................................................... 79
17. Construction Noise Exposure at Adjoining Sensitive Uses (dBA LEQ) ..................... 80
18. Traffic Noise Impact Analysis ..................................................................................... 82
19. Project Noise Level Impact (dBA at 50 feet from centerline) ..................................... 82
20. CNEL For Roadway Segments Exceeding +3 dBA Threshold .................................. 83
21. Peak Hour Traffic Noise at Site Access Points .......................................................... 83
22. Human Response to Transient Vibration ................................................................... 85
23. FTA and Caltrans Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ........... 85
24. Estimated Vibration Levels During Project Construction ........................................... 85
25. Adverse Transportation Effect Threshold ................................................................... 91
26. Existing Intersection Level of Service ......................................................................... 92
27. Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................... 92
28. Opening Year (2024) Without Project ........................................................................ 93
29. Opening Year (2024) With Project.............................................................................. 95
30. Traffic Impact for Opening Year (2024) With Project ................................................. 96
31. Adverse Transportation Effect Threshold ................................................................... 97
32. Significant Impact Assessment for the Proposed Project .......................................... 98
33. Estimated Project Water Consumption .................................................................... 106
34. Cumulative Projects .................................................................................................. 109
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 1
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Project Title: Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project
2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
(626) 569-2140
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Annie Lao, Associate Planner
(626) 569-2144
4. Project Location: The project is located in the City of Rosemead as shown in Figure 1, Regional Map
of this MND. More specifically, the project is located at 7849-7857 Garvey Avenue
and 7900-7916 Virginia Street (APN Nos. 5287-038-030, -033, -018, -019, -020, -
029) as shown in Figure 2, Vicinity Map of this MND. An aerial photograph of the
site and surrounding area is shown in Figure 3, Aerial Photo of this MND. Figure 4,
Topography Map of this MND shows the topography on the site and surrounding
areas.
5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: Green Park Property LLC
120 E. Valley Boulevard
San Gabriel, CA 91776
(626) 307-0062
6. General Plan Designation: Parcels 5287-038-030, -033, -018, -019, -020, -029 of the project site are all
designated as Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
7. Zoning: Parcels 5287-038-030 and -033 are zoned GSP-R/C and parcels 5287-038-018, -019, -020 and
-029 are zoned Garvey Avenue Specific Plan (GSP) as shown in Figure 5 of this MND. The project is
requesting a zone change of the aforementioned parcels to Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, Incentivized
Mixed-Use (GSP-MU).
8. Description of Project: The project site totals approximately 1.21 gross acres (52,926 square feet) and
includes six parcels (APN Nos. 5287-038-030, -033, -018, -019, -020, -029) and developed with
commercial uses and vacant land.
The project proposes a seven-story, mixed-use development that totals 115,400 square feet. The project
proposes 35,105 square feet of non-residential use (retail/office/residential-work) with 5,423 square feet
on the first floor, 6,230 square feet on the second floor, 6,571 square feet on the third floor, and 16,881
square feet of work area within the live/work units. The project proposes 93 residential units on the first
through seventh floors. Of the 93 residential units, 24 are live/work units, including three live/work units
on the ground level, one live/work unit on both the second and third floors, and 19 live/work units on the
fourth floor. The project proposes 69 apartments on the fifth through seventh floors with 21 apartments
on the fifth floor, 25 apartments on the sixth floor, and 23 apartments on the seventh floor. The project
includes 31 one-bedroom units, 52 two-bedroom units and 10 three-bedroom units, including the
live/work units.
The project proposes a floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.2 compared to a maximum allowed FAR of 3.0 with
the allowed provisions of community benefits by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY
MIXED USE PROJECT
FIGURE 1
Regional Map
Source: Phil Martin & Associates, Inc.Source: Phil Martin & Associates, Inc.
Figure 1
Regional Map
N
*
Site Location
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
FIGURE 2
Local Vicinity Map
Source: Google Maps
Project Site
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
FIGURE 3
Aerial Photo
Source: Google Earth
PROJECTSITE
STRATHMORE/GARVEY
MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 4
USGS Topo Map
Project
Site
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
GARVEY AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN, FEBRUARY 2018 3 - 3
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure 3.1 Zoning
Figure 5
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Zoning Map
Project Site
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 7
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan. The building footprint covers approximately 45,456 square feet, or approximately 85.9
percent of the 52,926 square foot project site.
The project proposes 6,831 square feet of landscaping, or approximately 12.9 percent of the site. The
project landscaping includes drought tolerant shrubs and ground cover with drip irrigation, accent street
trees with in-ground up-lights, bike racks on Garvey Avenue and Strathmore Avenue, 3’ diameter accent
flower pots for security barriers on both Garvey Avenue and Strathmore Avenue, a 24” high masonry wall
with stucco finish to match the building adjacent to the proposed park bench adjacent to Garvey Avenue,
rectangular porcelain pavers in running bond pattern in the sidewalk along Garvey Avenue and
Strathmore Avenue, colored concrete in a 3’ x 3’ grid pattern with top cast finish in the sidewalk on Garvey
Avenue, 12” wide colored concrete banding with medium broom finish in the sidewalk on Strathmore
Avenue adjacent to the site. Landscaping is proposed on the second, fourth, and seventh floors of the
building. The landscaping for the second floor includes a planter box along the west side of the open
parking structure with drought tolerant cascading plants with drip irrigation. The landscaping proposed
for the fourth floor courtyard includes medium scale evergreen shade trees in a raised planter with up-
lighting, decorative plank stamped colored concrete, double sided in ground level gas fire pits, outdoor
dining furniture, drought tolerant shrubs and ground cover with drip irrigation, vertical accent palm trees
in raised planter boxes with up-lighting, raised tot-lot playground with approved play equipment and
American Disabilities Act (ADA) approved wood fiber mulch, stainless steel outdoor gas bar-b-q units
with granite counter top, raised planter, etc. The landscaping proposed for the seventh-floor courtyard
includes vertical accent palm trees in raised planter boxes with up-lighting, outdoor sofas, tables, and
chairs, 20” wide shelf-bench attached to the planter wall, granite bar/counter with stool seating at the
edge of the courtyard, decorative stamped colored concrete in 3’ x 3’ grid pattern, raised gas fire pit, etc.
The ground floor landscape plan is shown in Figure 6, the second, fourth and seventh floor landscape
plans are shown in Figure 7 of this MND.
The project proposes 208 parking spaces, including 181 standard spaces, 22 compact spaces, 5
handicap accessible spaces and three loading spaces. Of the 208 parking spaces, 70 parking spaces
are proposed for the ground floor, 67 parking spaces are proposed for the second level and 71 parking
spaces are proposed for the third level. The project proposes 9 more parking spaces for public parking
than required by the Rosemead Municipal Code and consistent with the requirements of the community
benefit program. The project also proposes 20 bicycles spaces.
The height to the top of the roof is 75’. The total height of the building, including the top of the parapet,
is 78’. The project proposes to construct a six-foot masonry wall along the project perimeter adjacent to
the existing residential units.
There are three entry points for vehicular access to the site. There is a driveway at the north end of the
building at Virginia Street, a driveway on the east side of the building at Strathmore Avenue and a
driveway on the west side of the building from the public alley. The driveways at the north and east sides
of the building are 25-feet wide and the driveway at the west side of the building from the public alley is
22-feet wide. The height restriction for the north and east driveways is 12-feet and the height restriction
for driveway on the west from the public alley is 10-feet. All delivery vehicles for the nonresidential space
on the ground level would enter the site from Strathmore Avenue and park in a designated loading area
on the ground level for site deliveries. Delivery trucks would be restricted to two axle trucks. Delivery
trucks would not be allowed to park along either Strathmore Avenue or Garvey Avenue. Project
construction is scheduled to start in the second quarter of 2023 and be completed in the fourth quarter of
2024. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 8 of this MND.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 6
Ground Floor Landscape Plan
Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 7
Second, Fourth and Seventh Floor Landscape Plan
Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
10'-0"10'-0"PUBLIC ALLEY 16% RAMPTRASH
R-2N.A.P.
GSP (EXISTING )N.A.P.GSP (EXISTING )N.A.P.
R-2N.A.P.
R-2N.A.P.
R-2N.A.P.
R-2N.A.P.
R-2N.A.P.
GSP / RC(EXISTING )N.A.P.
GSP (EXISTING )GSP-MU ( PROPOSED )N.A.P.
GSP (EXISTING )N.A.P.RAMP UP TO 2ND FLRSETBACKSETBACK
12'-0"
10'-0"SETBACKTRANS: 60 °
LANDSCAPE
(N)DRIVEWAY(N)DRIVEWAY (N)DRIVEW
A
Y
25'-0"
22'-0"
TRASH
LEASING
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE (OS-1)LANDSCAPE (OS-2)BUILDING LINE ABOVE LOBBY
BA300
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEENIL YTREPORP
PROPERTY LI
N
E
ENIL YTREPORP
ENIL YTREPORP
TRASH
25'-0"25'-0"
24'-0"25'-0"6'-0"5'-0")2-SO( EPACSDNAL
COMMERCIAL10'X20'LOADING COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL COMMERCIALPUBLIC PARKINGHALL WAY25'-0"
(745 SF)PUBLICPARKINGPUBLICPARKINGRESIDENTIALBIKE STORAGE
SECUREDENTRANCE/EXITROLL UPGATE
SECUREDENTRANCE/EXITROLL UPGATE
LIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTRESIDENTGUESTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTLIVE/WORKGUESTLIVE/WORKRESIDENTRESIDENTGUESTRESIDENTGUESTRESIDENTGUESTRESIDENTGUESTRESIDENTGUESTC
C
C
C
C
C
COMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIALCOMMERCIAL23'-10"RETAIL±5,423 SF 25'-0"LOBBY(724 SF)
EL304.4 EL301.5
UP
11'-8"12'-0" (OS-3)
156'-7"AA300(326 SF)20'-0"10'-0"
COMMERCIAL10'X20'LOADING
10'-0"COMMERCIAL10'X20'LOADING20'-0"10'-0"6'-8 3/4"
5' WIDE PARKWAY (AMENITY ZONE)
7' WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK (CLEAR ZONE)5' WIDE PARKWAY (AMENITY ZONE)7' WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK (CLEAR ZONE)TRANS-FORMEROPEN TO SKY ABOVE LANDSCAPE (OS-1)5' WIDE PARKWAY (AMENITY ZONE)7' WIDE DETACHED SIDEWALK (CLEAR ZONE)12'-
0
"25'-0"7'-0 1/4"10'-6"
7'-3 3/4"8'-0"OFFICES
RETAIL
2 BEDROOM
3 BEDROOM
COURTYARD/OPEN AREA
LIVE-WORK UNITS
PLAN LEGEND
SECURED PARKINGAREA
EXTERIOR LIGHT(WALL SCONCE)
RESIDENTIALAMMENITIES
1 BEDROOM
2'-0" CLEAR
8'-0"
1'-0"
8'-0"9'-0"9'-0"18'-0"2'-0" CLEAR
PARKING STALLS SHALL BE STRIPED WITHTHREE-INCH DOUBLE LINES, SIX INCHESAPART. THE STALL WIDTH SHALL BEMEASURED FROM THE CENTER POINT OFEACH DOUBLE STRIPED MARKING.
WALL OROBSTRUCTION 16'-0"16'-0"18'-0"3"6"3"3"6"3"3"3"STALL WIDTHSTALL LENGHTCOMPACT PARKING STANDARD PARKING
1'-0"WALL OROBSTRUCTION
SITE PLAN (GROUND FLOOR)1
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"
APN AREA5287-038-030 ±9,511 S.F.5287-038-033 ±24,183 S.F.5287-038-018 ±6,629 S.F.5287-038-019 ±4,775 S.F.5287-038-020 ±5,085 S.F.5287-038-029 ±2,743 S.F.
TOTAL AREA...................±52,926 S.F.
LOT AREA CALCULATION
Figure 8
Site Plan
Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 11
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Amendment
Parcels 5287-038-030 and -033 of the project site are zoned GSP-R/C and parcels 5287-038-018, -019,
-020 and -029 are zoned GSP. The project includes an amendment to the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan
to change the two zoning designations of the project site to GSP-MU. Therefore, the project applicant is
requesting a specific plan amendment and zone change to change the zoning of the aforementioned
parcels to GSP-MU.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The land uses surrounding the project site include Strathmore
Avenue adjacent to and east of site and east of Strathmore Avenue is a vacant former automobile
dealership and a vacant former construction storage yard, to the north are single-family detached
residences, to the west are single-family detached residences and commercial uses and to the south is
Garvey Avenue and south of Garvey Avenue are commercial uses. Figure 9 of this MND shows
photographs of the on-site land uses and Figures 10 and 11 of this MND show photographs of the
surrounding land uses. Figure 12 of this MND is a photo orientation map that shows the location of the
on-site and surrounding land use photographs.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: The discretionary approvals required from the
City of Rosemead include the following project approvals: Specific Plan Amendment 22-01 and Zone
Change 22-02. No other public agency approvals are required.
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area
requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a
plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to
tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Tribal letters were mailed by
the City of Rosemead on July 6, 2022, to nine tribes and formally invited consultation with the City in
compliance with 21080.3.1. To date the City has received a request from the Gabrielino Band of Mission
Indians – Kizh Nation for consultation. The tribes that were contacted include:
1. Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation – Andrew Salas
2. Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation – Charles Alvarez
3. Gabrieleno/Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council – Robert Dorame
4. Gabrielino-Tongva Nation – Sandonne Goad
5. Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians – Isaiah Vivanco
6. Gabrielino-Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians – Anthony Morales
7. Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians – Joseph Ontiveros
8. Gabrieleno/Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council – Christina Conley
9. Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians – Lovina Redner
Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level
of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict
in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.2) Information may also be available from the California
Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code Section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources
Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code Section 21082.3
(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 9
On-Site Land Uses
A. Looking north from Garvey Avenue at existing commercial uses B. Looking west at northern half of site from Strathmore Avenue
C. Looking south at site from Virgina Street D. Looking east at site from along alley at Brighton Street
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 10
Surrounding Land Uses
E. Looking at residential homes north of site on Virginia Street F. Looking at residential homes west of site on Brighton Street
G. Looking at commercial uses at southwest corner of Brighton Street and Garvey Avenue H. Looking at commercial uses south of Garvey Avenue
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 11
Surrounding Land Uses
I. Looking at commercial use at southeast corner of Strathmore and Garvey Avenues J. Looking at vacant lot east of site
K. Looking at vacant lot and residential homes east of site L. Looking at residential home at northeast corner of site
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 12
Photo Orientation Map
Source: Google Earth
PROJECTSITE
C
D
F
B
A
E
G H I
J
K
L
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 16
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
12. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
13. DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless
mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on an earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
Signature: Date
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 17
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported
by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact”
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does
not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No
Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that
an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a
“Less-than-significant Impact”. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier
Analyses,” as described in (5) below may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).
In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated.
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used, or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies
should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental
effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 18
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
14. ISSUES:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
I. AESTHETICS: Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including
but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of
the site and its surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with applicable zoning and
other regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that
will adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
II. AGRICULTURE and FORESTRY RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources
are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional
model to use in assessing impacts on agricultural farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information
compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest
land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and
forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air
Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning
of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland
zoned Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment,
which due to their location or nature, could
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 19
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
individually or cumulatively result in the loss of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutants for which the project region
is non-attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 20
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a unique archaeological resource as
defined in §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. ENERGY: Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or
death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.)
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of wastewater?
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 21
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on
the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases?
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan,
or where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport, will the project
result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people working or residing in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires?
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 22
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the
addition of impervious surfaces in a manner, which
would:
(i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site;
(ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on-or off-site;
(iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;
or
(iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an
environmental effect?
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 23
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport, will the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
XVI. RECREATION:
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 24
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 5020.1 (k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of
new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state and local management
and reduction statues and regulations related to
solid waste?
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 25
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard
severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from
a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result or runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects that will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
15. EXPLANATION OF ISSUES:
I. AESTHETICS: Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The project site and the properties
adjacent to and surrounding the site are not designated as a scenic vista by the City of Rosemead
General Plan.
The most predominant scenic vista open to the Rosemead community, including the project site, is the
San Gabriel Valley Mountain range that is approximately 8 miles north of the city. There are no existing
residences adjacent to the project that look across the project site to view the San Gabriel mountains to
the north. Therefore, the project would not block or interrupted any existing views of the San Gabriel
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 26
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
mountains by any area residents. The closest residents that look across the site to the San Gabriel
mountains to the north are the residents along both sides of Strathmore Avenue south of Garvey Avenue
and more than 300 feet south of the project site. While direct views of the San Gabriel mountains by the
residents south of the site would be partially interrupted by the proposed mixed-use building, their views
would not be completely blocked. The resident’s south of Garvey Avenue along Strathmore Avenue
would continue to have some distant views of the San Gabriel mountains to the north with development
of the project. There are no other scenic vistas or views that would be impacted by the project. The
Garvey Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report did not identify any scenic resource
impacts with the development of the property within the boundary of the Specific Plan.1 Therefore, the
project would not have a significant scenic vista impact.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. There are no Officially Designated or
Eligible State Scenic Highways2 and no scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic
buildings within a state scenic highway either adjacent to or in direct view from the site that would be
removed, modified or altered by the project. The closest State Scenic Highway to the project is Route 2
near La Canada Flintridge and approximately 16 miles north of the project. The project would not impact
any state scenic resource.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public
views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact.
The project is located within an urbanized area.3 The project site is developed with commercial uses and
the existing buildings and other site improvements would have to be demolished to allow construction of
the proposed project. The architecture of the proposed building is Contemporary-Modern style. New
landscaping would be installed within the proposed 10-foot-wide landscape area along the northeast
project boundary adjacent to the existing residence northeast of the site, within the landscape area along
the northern project boundary adjacent to Virginia Street, within the landscape area along the west project
boundary and in the 8’-8” landscape area along the southern project boundary adjacent to Garvey
Avenue. The landscaping proposed for the landscape areas on the ground level include trees, shrubs,
and groundcover. Landscaping is also proposed for the open space areas on the second, fourth and
seventh floors and include trees, shrubs and groundcover. Drought tolerant cascading plants with drip
irrigation are proposed for the landscaped planter along the northwest side of the second floor. Vines
and other exterior building landscaping materials are proposed for the exterior walls of the courtyards on
the fourth floor. The proposed ground floor landscape plan is shown previously in Figure 6 of this MND.
The architectural design and character of the proposed mixed-use building includes building elevations
that are detailed and articulated with projections and recesses to avoid long and plain surfaces. Building
massing would be further minimized through the use of differentiated building materials, and colors and
the incorporation of architectural features such as extended balconies with glass railings/panels. A
rendering of the proposed mixed-use building from Garvey Avenue is shown in Figure 13 of this MND.
The design and Contemporary-Modern architecture of the proposed mixed-use building along with
landscaped private open space would improve the aesthetics of the site for the existing residents north
and east of the site as well as the commercial businesses adjacent to the site compared to the existing
aesthetics of the site. The project would also improve the street views of the existing development on
the site for motorists and pedestrians on Virginia Street, Strathmore Avenue, Brighton Avenue and
Garvey Avenue by replacing the flat developed site with a new Contemporary-Modern architectural
1 Garvey Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, Volume 1, May 2017, page 1-3.
2 State of California Officially Designated State Scenic Highways, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenichighways/
3 CEQA Guidelines §15387.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
970 N. BROADWAY, SUITE 107LOS ANGELES, CA 90012p. 213.537.0910info@scaleslab.comwww.scaleslab.comPROPOSED MIXED-USEDATE:SHEET:DESCRIPTION:DEVELOPER: GREEN PARK LLC.7849-7857 GARVEY AVE.7900 & 7916 VIRGINIA ST.ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 9177022-07-05A-402MASSING MODEL 3VIEW ALONG GARVEY AVE.
Figure 13
Project Rendering from Garvey Avenue
Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 28
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
mixed-use building and landscaping. Figure 14 of this MND is a rendering of the project from the
intersection of Garvey Avenue and Virginia Avenue.
The Garvey Avenue Specific Plan design and development guidelines and standards provide specific
policies for how parcels and buildings shall be developed, such as setbacks and parking requirements,
or height and density limits. They are intended to supplement the development standards in Rosemead’s
General Plan, as well as the design guidelines outlined in the Garvey Avenue Master Plan and
Rosemead’s Mixed-Use Design Guidelines. These documents specifically addressed many design
guidelines important to the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, including but not limited to those that relate to
the public realm and pedestrian environment, building and storefront design, parking, and utilities. The
design standards and guidelines of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan are largely consistent with those in
the Garvey Avenue Master Plan and Rosemead’s Mixed-Use Guidelines, and likewise, largely share the
same goals as those in the Garvey Avenue Master Plan and Rosemead’s Mixed-Use Guidelines.
These goals include:
Upgrading the image and appeal of Garvey Avenue as a safe, attractive, and high-quality commercial
environment;
a. Encouraging high quality infill and mixed-use redevelopment of vacant lots and underutilized
properties to their highest and best use, whether commercial, residential, office, entertainment,
or open space;
b. Activating the street and enhancing the pedestrian environment and scale;
c. Ensuring compatibility between adjacent uses, especially single-family residential and other
mixed-use projects;
d. Inviting and supporting transit and active transportation;
e. Crafting parking requirements that balance parking needs with updated standards that give
flexibility to developers, manage parking as efficiently as possible, and minimize the negative
impacts of parking on the neighborhood; and
f) Integrating high-quality landscape and streetscape design that is consistent throughout the
corridor.4
As stated in the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, design standards and guidelines should be used by
landowners, developers, tenants, and their consultants, such as architects, who propose any alteration,
addition, constructions and/or development projects within the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan area. City
staff should use the Plan to review projects for: 1) compliance with the design standards, and 2)
compliance with the intent of the design guidelines. Individuals and entities proposing projects within the
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan area should review and understand these standards and guidelines before
initiating the design and development process. To facilitate project approvals, questions regarding the
design standards and guidelines, as well as other development-related questions, should be discussed
with the Community Development Director or designee as early in the development process as possible.
Individuals and entities proposing projects should use these design standards and guidelines at each
project stage to shape concepts and designs to realize compatible architecture and urban design that
meets City of Rosemead requirements and expectations. City staff and others use these standards and
4 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, February 2018, page 3-16.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 14
Project Rendering from Strathmore Avenue and Virginia Avenue 970 N. BROADWAY, SUITE 107LOS ANGELES, CA 90012p. 213.537.0910info@scaleslab.comwww.scaleslab.comPROPOSED MIXED-USEDATE:SHEET:DESCRIPTION:DEVELOPER: GREEN PARK LLC.7849-7857 GARVEY AVE.7900 & 7916 VIRGINIA ST.ROSEMEAD, CALIFORNIA 9177022-07-05A-401MASSING VIEWS 2VIEW FROM CORNER OF STRATHMORE AVE. AND VIRGINIA ST.Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 30
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
guidelines to understand proposed projects in relationship to approved objectives, goals, standards, and
guidelines.5
The Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Development Standards are provided in Table 3.4 of the Specific Plan.6
As shown in Table 1 of this MND, the proposed project meets and complies with all the applicable
development standards required for the development of a project in compliance with the Garvey Avenue
Specific Plan, Incentivized Mixed-Use (GSP-MU) specific plan and zoning designation requested by the
project applicant. As shown in Table 1 of this MND, based on the site plan, building elevations and
landscape plan, the project meets the intent of all applicable design goals of the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan. The project would not have any significant aesthetic impacts.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime
views in the area? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is
currently developed with commercial uses that generate light and glare associated with those existing
uses. The project would introduce new sources of light and glare on the site and the immediate area
adjacent to and surrounding the site greater than the existing condition. The project site is surrounded
by existing commercial and residential development. Therefore, light and glare is generated in the project
vicinity from the existing development adjacent to and surrounding the site. Automobile headlights of
existing motor vehicle traffic on Garvey Avenue, Virginia Street and Strathmore Avenue adjacent to the
site also generates light and glare in the project vicinity and extend onto the project site. Therefore, light
and glare currently exists both on the project site and the adjacent surrounding community.
Light
The project would generate new and more intense sources of light compared to the existing light that is
generated on the site by the existing one-story commercial uses. The sources of light generated by the
project include city required streetlights, interior and exterior lighting of the seven-story building,
landscape lighting, lighting in the parking areas within the building and headlights of the cars that enter
and leave the site at night. All private lighting associated with the project would be required to meet and
comply with all applicable lighting provisions in Rosemead Municipal Code Chapter 17.88.
Lighting generated by the seven-story mixed-use building would be visible from areas surrounding the
project compared to the existing one-story commercial buildings on the site. The light generated by the
mixed-use building would be especially visible and noticeable to the existing residents adjacent to and
west, northwest, north, northeast and east of the site. The existing residents approximately 225 feet and
280 feet southeast and south of the project, south of Garvey Avenue respectively, would see increased
light from the site during the evening and nighttime hours compared to the existing condition. The existing
lights of the commercial uses along Garvey Avenue in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the
automobile traffic on Garvey Avenue would somewhat reduce the level and impact of light from the
proposed project to the residents south of the site. Therefore, the project lighting would not be as
noticeable to the residents south of the project site as the residents adjacent to and northwest, north,
northeast, and east of the site.
The light generated by the project compared to the existing condition would be visible to the residents
adjacent to and west, northwest, north, northeast, and east of the site due to the height of the proposed
mixed-use building, which is 75’ and 78’ including the parapet. However, there is light in the immediate
project area from existing commercial and residential uses and as a result the project lighting is not
anticipated to significantly impact these residents because light exists in the project area. The light in the
immediate project vicinity associated with existing residential and commercial development would
minimize the lighting impact of the project to the existing residents in proximity of the project.
5 Ibid, page 3-19.
6 Ibid, page 3-20.
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 31
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 1
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Development Standards – Project Compliance
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Comments (1)
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY
Minimum Lot Size
See RMC Section 17.08.050 regarding lot area and dimension requirements for direction on an undeveloped, substandard, or
nonconforming lot.
Mixed-Use 10,000 s.f.
Other 5,000 s.f. Comply
Minimum Lot Width 100’ Comply
Maximum Density Without
the Provision of
Community Benefits
25 dwelling units/gross acre N/A
Maximum Density With the
Provision of Community
Benefits
80 dwelling units/gross acre Proposed 77DU/Acre
Allowed 80DU/Acre
Minimum Unit Size
Studio 600 s.f. Comply
One-Bedroom 600 s.f. Comply
Two-Bedroom 800 s.f. Comply
Each Additional Bedroom An additional 200 s.f./ bedroom Comply
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Without the Provision of
Community Benefits
Commercial: 0.75 maximum
Mixed-Use: 1.6 maximum N/A
FAR With the Provision of
Community Benefits Commercial: 1.0 maximum
Mixed-Use: 3.0 maximum Comply
Required Floor Area of the
Ground Floor Space in a
Vertical Mixed-Use
Building located along
Garvey Avenue
Lots with 50’ or less of street frontage: 800
s.f., minimum
Lots with 51’ or more of street frontage:
20% of the lot area, minimum.
A minimum of 20% of the building footprint
shall be dedicated to ground floor space.
Comply
REQUIRED MIXED-USE LAND USE SPLIT
Floor-Area Land Use Mix
65% Residential Use and 35%
Nonresidential Use (Mixed-Use
Development Only)
Comply
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 32
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Comments (2)
BUILDING HEIGHT AND FORM
Maximum Height
Maximum height is calculated to the top of roofline or roof structures including but not limited to elevator
housing, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans, roof signs, etc. Acknowledged
75’ Comply
Height Exception An additional 5’ beyond the height limit is allowed for unique architectural elements as determined by the
Community Development Director. Comply
Maximum Building Length Building façade lengths may not exceed 300’. Comply
BUILDING RELATIONSHIP TO STREET
Minimum Building
Placement on Lot Frontage
Minimum lot frontage that must be developed by a building Comply
Less than 1.00-acre site – 60%
1.00-acre site to 6.99-acre site – 60%
The 60% requirement may be satisfied
with: building placement on the property
line (nonresidential) or setback line
(residential) for 60% of the lot width,
OR
Building placement on the property line
(nonresidential) or setback line (residential)
equal to a minimum of 25% of the lot
frontage, and
Vertical feature placement on the property
line (nonresidential) or setback line
(residential) equal to a maximum of 35% of
the lot frontage. Vertical features satisfying
this requirement are: (1) highly landscaped
decorative wall, which screens parking
area from view of the public right-of-way,
or (2) a highly landscaped public
plaza/public amenity space incorporating a
decorative wall. The vertical feature’s
and/or decorative wall’s design and
placement
Comply
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 33
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Response (3)
must be approved by the Community
Development Director
7.00 acre or greater site – 60%
Ground Floor Height Nonresidential: 14’ minimum
Residential: 10’ minimum Comply
Elevation Above Street Level
Ground Floor Living Space
Ground Floor
Nonresidential
0’ minimum
2’ maximum
Nonresidential Façade
Height at or near Street
Frontage
Minimum height for nonresidential building façade at or near the street frontage, measured to the top of
the façade. For s i n g l e story buildings, a false front or parapet should be used to achieve this
minimum height. Where exterior frontage height varies along the building frontage, the minimum height
shall be considered to be the average height of the building frontage.
25’ minimum
GROUND FLOOR BUILDING DESIGN
Ground Floor Blank Walls
The amount of the ground level wall area directly visible from the street allowed to be left blank. The ground
level wall area is defined as that portion of the building elevation from grade to a height of 9’.
25% maximum
Comply
Ground Floor Wall Glazing
The area of ground level wall area that must be glazed with clear glass display windows and entries.
Nonresidential: 50% minimum
Residential: 40% minimum
Comply
SETBACKS FOR LIGHT, AIR, AND PRIVACY
Front Nonresidential: No minimum Ground Floor
Residential: 10’ Comply
Side – Adjacent to
Nonresidential Use or
Zoning District Other Than
R-1 and R-2
No minimum unless required by
Community Development Director, Public
Works Director, City Manager or his/her
designee, or other reviewing agency. In
such a case, the minimum setback will be
determined by the Community
Development Director, City Engineer, City
Manager, or other reviewing agency.
See Plans and
Sections
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 34
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Response (4)
Side – Adjacent to Existing
Residential, School, or
Park Use
10’ minimum Comply
Side – Adjacent to R-1 or
R- 2 Zoning District
All residential, nonresidential, and mixed-use developments shall have a side variable height when
abutting R-1 or R-2 zone. This specifies a setback minimum of 10’ from the property line, with the height
increasing at a 60-degree angle from that point.
Comply
See Sections
10’minimum
Rear
20’ minimum if abutting existing residential
use, school, or park, otherwise no
minimum required
Comply
See Sections
Rear – Adjacent to R-1 or
R-2 Zoning Districts
All residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments shall have a rear variable height when abutting
R-1 or R-2 zones.
This specifies a setback minimum of 25’ from the property line, increasing at a 60-degree angle from that
point.
Comply See Sections
PEDESTRIAN-FRIENDLY AUTO CIRCULATION & ACCESS
Access Driveway Width One Way: 14’ minimum, 20’ maximum
Two Way: 24’ minimum, 30’ maximum
Comply – Minor
Exception Required
Curb Cuts
1 curb cut/lot, if lot has less than 300’ of lot frontage.
1 curb cut/300’ of lot frontage, if lot frontage is greater than or equal to 300’, unless approved by
Community Development Director and City Engineer, or City Manager. Example: 450’ lot frontage is
allowed 1 curb cut; 600’ lot frontage is allowed 2 curb cuts.
Comply
2 curb cuts
Proposed
Frontage Dedicated to
Parking and/or Driveways 20% of lot frontage maximum NA
PARKING
Minimum Nonresidential Vehicle Parking
Restaurant
Restaurants with floor area less than 2,500
s.f.: 1 standard sized parking space per
400 s.f.
See Plans
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 35
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Comments (5)
Restaurants with floor area greater than or
equal to 2,500 s.f.: 1 standard sized
parking space per 200 s.f.
Outdoor seating area utilized in conjunction
with an approved eating and/or drinking
establishment shall not count towards
calculations for off-street parking
requirements.
However, if the outdoor area is utilized in
conjunction with nonresidential use, other
than eating and/or drinking establishment,
such outdoor area shall count towards
calculations for off-street parking
requirements.
Comply
See Plans
Nonresidential other than
Restaurant and Hotel 1 standard sized parking space/400 s.f. Comply
See Plans
Minimum Residential Vehicle Parking
Residential (includes guest
parking)
For residential developments, the project
shall provide no less than 1.0 standard
sized parking space/dwelling unit.
Comply
See Plans
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 36
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Comments (6)
. In addition to the residential spaces
described above, 0.5 standard sized
parking space/dwelling unit is required
guest parking.
Parking provided for residential uses, or
the residential component of a mixed-use
structure must be covered and secure.
Guest parking may be uncovered.
Comply
See Plans
AUP Required for
Residential Tandem
Parking
Minimum Bicycle Parking
Bicycle Parking
See RMC Section 17.28.030(D)(2)(c).
Bicycle parking spaces provided for
residential use must be covered, secured,
and located separately from bicycle
parking spaces provided for nonresidential
uses.
Comply
See Plans
LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE
Landscaping 6% minimum Comply
See Plans
Usable Public Open Space
– Nonresidential Uses or
Nonresidential Component
of Mixed-Use
5% of total parcel area, minimum
Comply
See Plans
Required Landscaping of
Public Open Space for
Nonresidential Uses or
Nonresidential Component
of Mixed-Use
50% of usable public open space,
minimum
Comply
See Plans
Usable Private Common
Open Space – Residential
Uses and Residential
Component of Mixed-Use
150 s.f./dwelling unit minimum Comply
See Plans
Private Usable Open
Space
Private open space must be open to air, not fully enclosed with walls. Private open space cannot be covered by a
roof by more than 50% of the area; however, balconies can have up to 100% ceiling coverage. Private open space
includes balconies, patios, or yards.
75 s.f./unit minimum OR
1. 60 s.f. /dwelling unit minimum;
Comply
See Plans
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 37
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Specific Plan Standards GSP-MU Comments (7)
2. Private usable open space square
footage per unit and usable private
common open space square footage per
unit shall total at least 350 s.f./ unit; and
3. Approval of the Community
Development Director.
Sidewalks, walkways, equipment areas
associated with usable private open space
are not eligible for inclusion in the
calculation.
calculation cacalculation.
Comply
See Plans
Private Open Space
Ground Floor Dimension
8’ in any direction minimum
Comply
See Plans
Private Open Space
Balcony Dimension
5’ in any direction minimum
Comply
See Plans
There would be an incremental increase in the amount of light on area roadways from
the headlights of the motor vehicles generated by the project. Since all roadways that
would serve project traffic, including Garvey Avenue, Strathmore Avenue, Virginia
Street, the alley from Brighton Street and Brighton Street generate light from the
existing motor vehicle traffic on these roadways the nighttime lighting by project traffic
would not be new or unique to the area. While the project would incrementally
increase the amount of nighttime motor vehicle lighting on these roadways in the
project vicinity the increase in lighting is not anticipated to significantly impact the
existing residential land uses adjacent to the roadways since motor vehicle lighting
currently exists.
Lights from the existing commercial uses adjacent to and within proximity to the
project, including the commercial uses west and south of the site generate nighttime
lighting that extends onto the project site. Therefore, the light that would be generated
by the project would not be new or unique to the project vicinity.
The headlights of the cars leaving the northern project driveway onto Virginia Street
would shine directly onto the single-family residences at 7901 Virginia Street. As cars
exiting the project make a right turn onto Virginia Street the headlights would also
shine onto the single-family residence at 7903 and 7907 Virginia Street. However,
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 38
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
existing landscaping in the front yard of the residence at 7907 Virginia Street would reduce some of the
direct light from the car headlights that exit the site at Virginia Street. The headlights of cars exiting the
site at the alley on the west side of the project would be directed in a west direction and on a vacant lot
west of Brighton Street the same as the existing condition. Similarly, cars leaving the project driveway
at Strathmore Avenue would shine directly onto the vacant property directly east of Strathmore Avenue.
The only properties that would be directly impacted by nighttime project traffic lighting are the single-
family residences at 7903 and 7907 Virginia Street.
City required parking lot lights, exterior safety, and security lighting along with interior lighting of the
residential units would be visible to adjacent residents west, northwest, north, northeast and east of the
site. The wall along the north side of the mixed-use building along with the proposed six-foot decorative
masonry wall along the north project boundary would eliminate headlights from the cars in the ground
level parking garage from shinning onto the yards and residences of the residents adjacent to and north
of the project.
The nighttime safety, security and aesthetic lighting associated with the project would be visible to the
surrounding land uses closest to the project, including the light sensitive residents adjacent to and west,
northwest, north, northeast, and east of the site. While the interior and exterior lights of the proposed
seven-story mixed-use building would be greater than the light that is generated by the existing uses on
the site, there is lighting in the project vicinity that is generated by existing commercial development that
would reduce and minimize the impact of the project lighting.
Figure 15 of this MND shows the proposed exterior light fixtures for the building. As shown, the light
fixtures are located approximately 10 feet from the ground along all sides of the building. Therefore, the
project would not generate new sources of lighting that do not already exist within the project area. The
lighting generated by the project is not anticipated to be significantly greater than the intensity of the light
of existing commercial development adjacent to and within the immediate vicinity of the project.
To ensure that the proposed exterior building lighting plan does not significantly impact existing adjacent
and surrounding land uses, the following measure is recommended to reduce off-site lighting impacts to
less than significant.
Mitigation Measure No. 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit the project applicant shall submit a
lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division that incorporates the
following light reducing measures as applicable:
• Select lighting fixtures with more-precise optical control and/or
different lighting distribution.
• Relocate and/or change the height and/or orientation of proposed
lighting fixtures.
• Add external shielding and/or internal reflectors to fixtures.
• Select lower-output lamp/lamp technologies
• A combination of the above.
Glare
Glare from the windows and metal surfaces of the proposed seven-story mixed-use building could impact
adjacent land uses that are glare-sensitive, especially the existing residences west, northwest, north,
northeast and east of the project. A six-foot decorative masonry wall is proposed along the entire length
of the north project boundary and would block and eliminate ground level glare impacts to the residents
north of the project. Glare from the live-work and apartment windows and metal building materials above
the ground floor could extend to the resident’s north of the project.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY
MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 15
Exterior Light Fixtures
Source: Scales(S) Lab Architects
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 40
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
For the most part, the windows on the second through seventh floors could generate glare to existing
land uses adjacent to and in close proximity to the site depending on the location of the sun at specific
times of the year. The glass panels of the balconies on all sides of the building on the fourth through
seventh floors could generate glare to existing land uses in close proximity of the project. While some of
the windows of the live-work units and apartments are recessed, glare could still be generated during
specific periods of the day and the year. Because the windows are recessed and somewhat set-back
into the building to minimize the angle of the sun shining on the windows, glare from the windows to the
residences north of the site and other surrounding areas would be minimal and is not anticipated to
significantly impact area residents. The project would not generate glare to the residences north of the
site during by the residential units on the north side of the building during the winter months when the
sun is in the southern horizon.
The glass of the storefronts on the ground level along Strathmore Avenue and Garvey Avenue could
generate glare to pedestrians and motorists on the adjacent streets and commercial uses. However,
due to the design of the building, including recessed storefronts and the extended building above the
commercial space along Garvey Avenue the glare from the ground level commercial space is not
anticipated to significantly impact pedestrians, motorists or existing commercial uses adjacent to the site.
While the project would increase the amount of light and glare that is generated from the site currently,
the light and glare impacts to the existing residents adjacent to the site, pedestrians, motorists, and
commercial uses adjacent to and west, south and east of the site would be less than significant.
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project site is developed with
commercial land uses. There are no agricultural uses either on or adjacent to the site. The site is
designated “Urban and Built-Up Land” by the State of California Department of Conservation7, which
means, “Land occupied by structures with a building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or
approximately 6 structures to a 10-acre parcel. This land is used for residential, industrial, commercial,
construction, institutional, public administration, railroad and other transportation yards, cemeteries,
airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, water control structures, and other developed
purposes.”8 The project would not convert prime, unique, or farmland of statewide importance to non-
agricultural use and impact farmland. As a result, the project would not have any agricultural impacts.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The
project site is not in a Williamson Act contact. The existing Garvey Avenue Specific Plan zoning for the
site does not allow agricultural use. The zoning for the properties adjacent to the site does not allow
agricultural use on those properties. The project would not conflict with any existing agricultural use or
existing Williamson Act contracts since there are no agricultural uses on or adjacent to the site.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources
Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? No
Impact. There are no timber or forests in the City of Rosemead, including the project site. The existing
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan zoning does not allow timber or forest production on the site and the project
does not propose timberland production for the property. The project would not impact any forest or
timber production since there is no forest or timber production on the site and the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan does not allow forest or timber production within the boundary of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
7 https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/
8 https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp/Pages/Important-Farmland-Categories.aspx
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 41
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. See
Response to Section “II.c” above of this MND.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could
individually or cumulatively result in the loss of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. As
discussed in Section “II.a” above of this MND, the project would not result in the loss of any farmland,
either individually or cumulatively and would not have any impact to farmland.
III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant
Impact. The Federal Clean Air Act (1977 Amendments) require that designated agencies in any area of
the nation not meeting national clean air standards must prepare a plan demonstrating the steps that
would bring the area into compliance with all national standards. The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB)
could not meet the deadlines for ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, or PM-10. In the SCAB, the
agencies designated by the governor to develop regional air quality plans are the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act Amendment (CAAA) required that all states with air-sheds with “serious”
or worse ozone problems submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Substantial
reductions in emissions of ROG, NOx and CO are forecast to continue throughout the next several
decades. Unless new particulate control programs are implemented, PM-10 and PM-2.5 are forecast to
slightly increase.
The Air Quality Management District (AQMD) adopted an updated clean air “blueprint” in August 2003.
The 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) was approved by the EPA in 2004. The AQMP outlined
the air pollution measures needed to meet federal health-based standards for ozone by 2010 and for
particulates (PM-10) by 2006. The 2003 AQMP was based upon the federal one-hour ozone standard
which was revoked late in 2005 and replaced by an 8-hour federal standard. Because of the revocation
of the hourly standard, a new air quality planning cycle was initiated.
With re-designation of the air basin as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard, a new attainment
plan was developed. This plan shifted most of the one-hour ozone standard attainment strategies to the
8-hour standard. As previously noted, the attainment date was to “slip” from 2010 to 2021. The updated
attainment plan also includes strategies for ultimately meeting the federal PM-2.5 standard.
Because projected attainment by 2021 required control technologies that did not exist, the SCAQMD
requested a voluntary “bump-up” from a “severe non-attainment” area to an “extreme non-attainment”
designation for ozone. The extreme designation was to allow a longer time for these technologies to
develop. If attainment cannot be demonstrated within the specified deadline without relying on “black-
box” measures, EPA would have been required to impose sanctions on the region had the bump-up
request not been approved. In April 2010, the EPA approved the change in the non-attainment
designation from “severe-17” to “extreme.” This reclassification set a later attainment deadline (2024),
but also required the air basin to adopt even more stringent emissions controls.
The federal Clean Air Act requires that non-attainment air basins have EPA approved attainment plans.
The SCAQMD is required to develop an AQMP for the long-term. Because the current SIP for the basin
contains several control measures for the 8-hour ozone standard that are equally effective for one-hour
levels, the 2012 AQMP was believed to satisfy hourly attainment planning requirements.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 42
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
AQMPs are required to be updated at regular intervals. The 2012 AQMP was adopted in early 2013. An
updated 2016 AQMP was adopted by the SCAQMD Board in March 2017. The 2016 AQMD
demonstrates the emissions reductions shown in Table 2 of this MND compared to the 2012 AQMP.
Table 2
Comparison of Emissions by Major Source Category From 2012 AQMP
Pollutant Stationary Sources Mobile Sources
VOC -12% -3%
NOx -13% -1%
SOx -34% -23%
PM2.5 -9% -7%
*Source 2016 AQMP
SCAQMD has initiated the development of the 2022 AQMP to address the attainment of the 2015 8-hour
ozone standard (70 ppb) for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley, which focuses on attaining the
70 ppb 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) by 2037. On-road vehicles and
off-road mobile sources represent the largest categories of NOx emissions. Accomplishment of
attainment goals requires an approximate 70% reduction in NOx emissions. Large scale transition to zero
emission technologies is a key strategy. To this end, Governor Executive Order N-79-20 requires 100
percent EV sales by 2035 for automobiles and short haul drayage trucks. A full transition to EV buses
and heavy-duty long-haul trucks is required by 2045.
The project does not directly relate to the AQMP in that there are no specific air quality programs or
regulations governing mixed use development projects. Conformity with adopted plans, forecasts, and
programs relative to population, housing, employment and land use is the primary yardstick by which
impact significance of planned growth is determined. The SCAQMD, however, while acknowledging that
the AQMP is a growth-accommodating document, does not favor designating regional impacts as less-
than-significant just because the proposed development is consistent with regional growth projections.
Therefore, the air quality impact significance for the project is analyzed on a project-specific basis. As
shown in the analysis below, the specific project construction and operational emissions are less than
significant and as a result, project emissions would not obstruct implementation of the AQMP.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less
Than Significant Impact. Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth
within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from
mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the
cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered,
would cover an even larger area.
The project is located within the SCAB and non-attainment for 8-hour ozone and PM10 particulate matter.
Construction and operation of cumulative projects would further degrade the local air quality, as well as
the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the regional air quality is
the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and
industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of
these projects. Air quality would be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur
separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do
not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do
not add to the overall cumulative impact.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 43
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
As stated in Section “III.c” below of this MND, based on the air quality report that was prepared for the
project, the project would not generate any short- or long-term air emissions that exceed SCAQMD
emission thresholds. Therefore, the project would not have any significant cumulative criteria pollutant
impacts.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Potentially Significant
Unless Mitigation Incorporated. An air quality and greenhouse gas report9 was prepared for the project
and a copy is included in Appendix A of this MND.
A sensitive receptor is a person in the population who is particularly susceptible to health effects due to
exposure to an air contaminant. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are the residents
adjacent to and north of the site. The following are land uses (sensitive sites) where sensitive receptors
are typically located:
• Schools, playgrounds and childcare centers
• Long-term health care facilities
• Rehabilitation centers
• Convalescent centers
• Hospitals
• Retirement homes
• Residences10
Criteria Pollutants, Health Effects, and Standards
Under the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA), the U.S. EPA has established National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants; ozone (O3), respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine
particulate matter (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead.
These six air pollutants are referred to as the criteria pollutants. The NAAQS are two tiered: primary, to
protect public health, and secondary, to prevent degradation to the environment (i.e., impairment of
visibility, damage to vegetation and property).
Under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA), the California Air Resources Board has established California
Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) to protect the health and welfare of Californians. State
standards have been established for the six criteria pollutants as well as four additional pollutants;
visibility reducing particles, sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride. Table 3 of this MND presents
the state and national ambient air quality standards. Table 4 of this MND shows the health effects of the
various pollutants.
Monitored Baseline Air Quality
Air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air
quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Long term air quality
monitoring is carried out by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) at 38 air-
monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station in most areas. There are no air
monitoring stations near the project site that monitor the full spectrum of pollutants. Ozone, carbon
monoxide, PM-2.5 and nitrogen oxides are monitored at the Pico Rivera facility, while 10-micron diameter
particulate matter (PM-10) is measured at the Azusa air monitoring station. Table 5 of this MND
summarizes the last four years of monitoring data from a composite of these data resources.
9 Air Quality and GHG Analysis, Strathmore and Garvey Mixed-Use Project, City of Rosemead, Ca, Giroux & Associates, September 27,
2022.
10 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local
Planning, Chapter 2, page 2-1.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 44
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 3
Ambient Air Quality Standards
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 45
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 46
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 4
Health Effects of Major Criteria Pollutants
Pollutants Sources Primary Effects
Carbon Monoxide
(CO) • Incomplete combustion of fuels and other
carbon-containing substances, such as motor
exhaust.
• Natural events, such as decomposition of
organic matter.
• Reduced tolerance for exercise.
• Impairment of mental function.
• Impairment of fetal development.
• Death at high levels of exposure.
• Aggravation of some heart diseases (angina).
Nitrogen Dioxide
(NO2) • Motor vehicle exhaust.
• High temperature stationary combustion.
• Atmospheric reactions.
• Aggravation of respiratory illness.
• Reduced visibility.
• Reduced plant growth.
• Formation of acid rain.
Ozone
(O3) • Atmospheric reaction of organic gases with
nitrogen oxides in sunlight.
• Aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular
diseases.
• Irritation of eyes.
• Impairment of cardiopulmonary function.
• Plant leaf injury.
Lead (Pb) • Contaminated soil. • Impairment of blood function and nerve
construction.
• Behavioral and hearing problems in children.
Respirable Particulate
Matter
(PM-10)
• Stationary combustion of solid fuels.
• Construction activities.
• Industrial processes.
• Atmospheric chemical reactions.
• Reduced lung function.
• Aggravation of the effects of gaseous pollutants.
• Aggravation of respiratory and cardio respiratory
diseases.
• Increased cough and chest discomfort.
• Soiling.
• Reduced visibility.
Fine Particulate Matter
(PM-2.5) • Fuel combustion in motor vehicles,
equipment, and industrial sources.
• Residential and agricultural burning.
• Industrial processes.
• Also, formed from photochemical reactions of
other pollutants, including NOx, sulfur oxides,
and organics.
• Increases respiratory disease.
• Lung damage.
• Cancer and premature death.
• Reduces visibility and results in surface soiling.
Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) • Combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels.
• Smelting of sulfur-bearing metal ores.
• Industrial processes.
• Aggravation of respiratory diseases (asthma,
emphysema).
• Reduced lung function.
• Irritation of eyes.
• Reduced visibility.
• Plant injury.
• Deterioration of metals, textiles, leather,
finishes, coatings, etc.
Source: California Air Resources Board, 2002.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 47
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 5
Air Quality Monitoring Summary (2018-2021)
(Expected Number of Days Standards Were Exceeded, and Maximum Levels During Such Violations)
Pollutant/Standard 2018 2019 2020 2021
1-Hour > 0.09 ppm (S) 3 5 20 2
8-Hour > 0.07 ppm (S) 5 7 23 3
8- Hour > 0.075 ppm (F) 2 3 15 0
Max. 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.12 0.11 0.17 0.10
Max. 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.08 0.09 0.11 0.07
Carbon Monoxide
1-Hour > 20. ppm (S) 0 0 0 0
1-Hour > 9. ppm (S, F) 0 0 0 0
Max 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 1.8 1.9 1.7 na
Nitrogen Dioxide
1-Hour > 0.18 ppm (S) 0 0 0 0
Max. 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.07
Respirable Particulates (PM-10)
24-Hour > 50 g/m3 (S) 59 24 na 66
24-Hour > 150 g/m3 (F) 0 0 0 0
Max. 24-Hr. Conc. (g/m3) 78. 82. 95. 79.
Fine Particulates (PM-2.5)
24-Hour > 35 g/m3 (F) 6 3 15 9
Max. 24-Hr. Conc. (g/m3) 56.3 50.2 82.9 66
na=not available
S=State Standard
F=Federal Standard
Source: South Coast AQMD – Pico Rivera Air Monitoring Station for Ozone, CO, NOx and PM-2.5
Azusa Monitoring Station for PM-10
data: www.arb.ca.gov/adam/
The following conclusions can be drawn from the data in Table 5 of this MND:
a. Photochemical smog (ozone) levels occasionally exceed standards. The 1-hour state ozone
standard has been exceeded two percent of all measured days and the 8-hour federal standard
have been exceeded on three percent of all measured days in the past four years. The 8-hour
state standard has been exceeded three percent of days for the same period. While ozone levels
are still high, they are much lower than 10 to 20 years ago. Attainment of all clean air standards
in the project vicinity is not likely to occur soon, but the severity and frequency of violations is
expected to continue to slowly decline during the current decade.
b. Measurements of carbon monoxide have shown very low baseline levels in comparison to the
most stringent 1- and 8-hour standards.
c. Respirable dust (PM-10) levels and calculated to have exceed the state standard on
approximately 14 percent of measurement days in the last four years for which there is data, but
the less stringent federal PM-10 standard has not been violated once for the same period. Year
to year fluctuations of overall maximum 24-hour PM-10 levels seem to follow no discernable trend.
d. A substantial fraction of PM-10 is comprised of ultra-small diameter particulates capable of being
inhaled into deep lung tissue (PM-2.5). SCAQMD data suggests that approximately two percent
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 48
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
of all days have exceeded the 24-hour threshold in the past four years. PM-2.5 can be an
occasional air quality concern in the project area.
Air Emission Thresholds
In the "1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook”, SCAQMD establishes significance thresholds to assess the
impact of project related air pollutant emissions. These emissions and their thresholds are shown in
Table 6 of this MND. As shown, there are separate thresholds for short-term construction and long-term
operational emissions. A project with daily emission rates below these thresholds is considered to have
a less than significant effect on air quality. The thresholds shown below are used to evaluate the potential
project air emission impacts of the project.
Table 6
SCAQMD Daily Emissions Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant Construction Operations
ROG 75 55
NOx 100 55
CO 550 550
PM-10 150 150
PM-2.5 55 55
SOx 150 150
Lead 3 3
Source: SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, November 1993 Rev.
Construction Emission Impacts
Dust is typically the primary concern during construction of new buildings. Because such emissions are
not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source they are called "fugitive emissions.”
Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed,
number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). Because of the inherent uncertainty in the
predictive factors for estimating fugitive dust generation, regulatory agencies typically use one universal
"default" factor based on the area disturbed assuming that all other input parameters into emission rate
prediction fall into midrange average values.
CalEEMod was developed by the SCAQMD to provide a model to calculate both construction and
operational emissions from a variety of land use projects. It calculates both the daily maximum and
annual average emissions for criteria pollutants as well as total or annual greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions.
Estimated construction emissions were modeled using CalEEMod2020.4.0 to identify maximum daily
emissions for each pollutant during project construction using default construction equipment and a
construction schedule for a project of the size proposed and shown in Table 7 of this MND. Utilizing the
equipment fleet in Table 7 of this MND, the worst-case daily construction emissions were calculated and
are shown in Table 8 of this MND.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 49
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 7
Construction Activity Equipment Fleet – Proposed Project
Phase Name and Duration Equipment
Demolition (20 days)
1 Concrete Saw
1 Dozer
3 Loader/Backhoes
Grading (4 days)
1 Grader
1 Dozer
2 Loader/Backhoes
Construction (200 days)
1 Crane
1 Generator Set
1 Loader/Backhoe
3 Welders
1 Forklift
Paving (10 days)
1 Paver
1 Paving Equipment
1 Mixer
1 Loader/Backhoe
1 Roller
Table 8
Construction Activity Emissions - Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds/day)
Maximal Construction Emissions ROG NOx CO SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5
2023 39.9 14.6 16.8 0.0 3.2 1.9
SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
As shown in Table 8 of this MND, the peak daily construction activity emissions are calculated to be
below SCAQMD CEQA thresholds without the need for mitigation. The only model-based mitigation
measure that was applied to the project was watering exposed dirt surfaces at least two times per day
during grading to minimize the generation of fugitive dust as required by SCAQMD Rule 403.
Diesel powered construction equipment contain carcinogenic compounds within the exhaust emission
particulates. The toxicity of diesel exhaust is evaluated relative to a 24-hour per day, 365 days per year,
70-year lifetime exposure. The SCAQMD does not generally require the analysis of construction-related
diesel emissions relative to health risk due to the short period for which the majority of diesel exhaust
would occur. Health risk analyses are typically assessed over a 9-, 30-, or 70-year timeframe and not
over a relatively brief construction period, which for the project is from the second quarter of 2023 until
the fourth quarter of 2024, due to the lack of health risk associated with such a brief exposure.
SCAQMD’s Rule 403
The project would be required to comply with SCAQMD rules to reduce fugitive dust emissions during
project construction and the life of the project. Project compliance with Rule 403 is achieved through the
application of standard best management practices during construction and operation activities, which
include the application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, manage haul road dust by the
use of water, cover haul vehicles, restrict vehicle speeds on on-site unpaved roads to 15 mph, sweep
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 50
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
loose dirt from paved site access roadways, stop construction activity when wind speeds exceed 25 mph
and establish a permanent ground cover on finished areas.
While construction activities are not anticipated to cause dust emissions to exceed SCAQMD CEQA
thresholds, especially with compliance with Rule 403, the following mitigation measure is recommended
for enhanced dust control because the air basin is non-attainment.
Mitigation Measure No. 2 Prior to the start and throughout project construction, the contractor shall
implement and maintain the following fugitive dust control measures:
• Apply soil stabilizers or moisten inactive areas.
• Water exposed surfaces as needed to avoid visible dust leaving the
construction site (typically 2-3 times/day).
• Cover all stockpiles with tarps at the end of each day or as needed.
• Provide water spray during loading and unloading of earthen
materials.
• Minimize in-out traffic from construction zone.
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, or loose material and require all
trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
• Sweep streets daily if visible soil material is carried out from the
construction site.
Similarly, ozone precursor emissions (ROG and NOx) are calculated to be below SCAQMD thresholds.
However, because of the regional non-attainment for photochemical smog, the use of reasonably
available control measures to control diesel exhaust emissions is recommended. The following mitigation
measure is recommended to control combustion emissions:
Mitigation Measure No. 3 Throughout project construction the contractor shall:
• Utilize well-tuned off-road construction equipment.
• Establish a preference for contractors using Tier 3 or better heavy
equipment.
• Enforce 5-minute idling limits for both on-road trucks and off-road
equipment.
Localized Significance Thresholds
The SCAQMD developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition
to the more regional emissions-based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called
Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). LSTs were developed in response to Governing Board’s
Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative 1-4 and the LST methodology was provisionally adopted
in October 2003 and formally approved by SCAQMD’s Mobile Source Committee in February 2005.
LST screening tables are available for 25, 50, 100, 200- and 500-meter source-receptor distances. For
the proposed project, there are residential uses adjacent to the site. Therefore, the most conservative
25-meter distance was modeled for the project associated with the adjacent residential uses.
For the project, the primary source of potential LST impact would be during construction. LSTs are
applicable for a sensitive receptor where it is possible that an individual could remain for 24 hours such
as a residence, hospital or convalescent facility. LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria
pollutants: oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5)
and represent the maximum emissions by a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 51
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The following
LST thresholds and estimated emissions (pounds per day) are shown in Table 9 of this MND based on
a disturbance of 1.0 acre per day.
Table 9
LST and Project Emissions (pounds/day)
LST 1.0 acres/25 meters
South San Gabriel Valley CO NOx PM-10 PM-2.5
LST Threshold 673 83 5 4
Max. On-Site Emissions 17 15 3 2
As shown in Table 9 of this MND, the project construction emissions are less than the LST emission
thresholds. As a result, project construction emissions would be less than significant.
Operational Emission Impacts
The calculated operational emissions generated by the project based on CalEEMod2020.4.0 are shown
in Table 10 of this MND. As shown, the operational emissions would not exceed SCAQMD operational
emission thresholds of significance. The construction and long-term operational emissions by the project
would be less than significant.
Table 10
Daily Operational Emissions (2024)
Operational Emissions (lbs./day)
Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5
Area* 2.7 0.1 7.7 <0.1 <0.1 0.1
Energy <0.1 0.3 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Mobile 2.4 2.4 22.5 0.1 5.3 1.4
Total 5.1 2.8 30.4 0.1 5.3 1.5
SCAQMD
Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds
Threshold? No No No No No No
*no wood burning fireplaces-only natural gas
Source: CalEEMod Output in appendix
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The closest residents to the project are adjacent to
and west of the site and the residents north of the site, north of Virginia Street and a residential unit
adjacent to and northeast of the site at the southwest corner of the intersection of Virginia Street and
Strathmore Avenue. As shown in Table 8 above of this MND, the project would not exceed the threshold
of any measured pollutant during project construction. Similarly, as shown in Table 10 above of this
MND, the project would not exceed any measured pollutant during the operational life of the project.
Depending on wind patterns, some diesel odors associated with the operation of construction equipment
during construction could extend to the residents closest to the site. However, this condition would be
temporary and short-term due to the site only 1.21-acres in size and only occur during project grading
when the use of diesel-powered grading equipment would be in operation. on the site would be minimal.
Although there would be a potential for odors due to the operation of diesel-powered construction
equipment to extend to the residents adjacent to and closest to the site, the project is not anticipated to
generate any emissions or odors during either construction or the operational life of the project and
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 52
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
significantly impact the residents because project emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. The
project would not generate any objectionable odors and significantly impact any area sensitive receptors.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Have substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies
or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? No Impact. The project site is developed with commercial uses with minimal introduced urban
landscaping. The existing on-site non-native landscaping does not support any wildlife species, including
special candidate, sensitive or special status animal species and none of the existing introduced non-
native urban landscaping is a candidate for a sensitive or special status species. The project would not
impact wildlife or wildlife habitat.
b) Have substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other natural community identified in
local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The site was disturbed in the past with the
development of the existing commercial uses. There is no riparian habitat or other natural communities
either on or adjacent to the site. The existing land uses adjacent to the site include residential and
commercial development and as a result there is no riparian habitat or other natural habitat communities
adjacent to the project site. The project would not impact any riparian or other natural communities either
on or adjacent to the site.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means? No Impact. Please see Section “IV.b” above of this MND.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. The project is located in an urbanized area surrounded by
residential and commercial development. There is no habitat on the site that serves or could serve as a
migratory wildlife corridor or nursery site. The project would not impact or impede any wildlife corridors
or wildlife nursery sites.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree
preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. There are city eucalyptus street trees along the Garvey
Avenue street frontage adjacent to the site. There are no street trees along the project frontage on
Strathmore Avenue, Virginia Street, or the alley at the west side of the site. There are no oak trees on
or adjacent to the project site that would be removed by the project. Therefore, no oak trees would
require protection or replacement in compliance with Rosemead Municipal Code Chapter 17.104 Oak
Tree Preservation. The project would not have any oak tree or any other tree preservation impacts. The
project would not impact any local policies that protect biological resources, including trees.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No
Impact. The City of Rosemead is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. The
project would not conflict with and impact any habitat or natural community conservation plan.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 53
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5? No Impact. The site is developed with commercial uses. None of the existing commercial
buildings on the site are historical resources and impacted by the project.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource as
defined in §15064.5? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The site was disturbed
in the past with the construction and development of the existing commercial uses on the property.
The project site is in an urbanized area that has been disturbed with the development activities of both
the project site and the adjacent properties. Because the project site has been disturbed in the past with
grading and construction of the existing commercial uses, any cultural resources that may have existed
near the surface have been previously unearthed or disturbed during the construction and demolition of
the commercial buildings and associated site improvements. There are no records of any recorded
archaeological resources either on or adjacent to the project site. Despite previous disturbances of the
project site in the past that may have displaced archaeological resources on the surface, it is possible
that intact archaeological resources could exist below the surface area of the site that was previously
undisturbed during previous grading and building construction.
As a result, Mitigation Measures No. 4 through 7 are recommended to reduce potentially significant
archaeological and Tribal resource impacts to previously undiscovered resources that may be
encountered during project grading and construction to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure No. 4 The project developer shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist
who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and
Standards, to conduct an Archaeological Sensitivity Training for
construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities.
The training session shall be carried out by a cultural resource professional
with expertise in archaeology, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the
Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session
shall include a handout and will focus on how to identify archaeological
resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the
procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of archaeological
monitors, and the general steps a qualified professional archaeologist
would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary.
Mitigation Measure No. 5 In the event that archaeological resources are unearthed during ground-
disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted
away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer
area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where
construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until a qualified
archaeologist has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has
evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside
of the buffer area. All archaeological resources unearthed by project
construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional
archaeologist, who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be
determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals shall be
contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring
shall be initiated. The project developer and the City shall coordinate with
the archaeologist to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 54
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
resources. The plan may include implementation of archaeological data
recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with
subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.
Mitigation Measure No. 6 The project developer shall retain a qualified professional archaeologist,
who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications
and Standards to conduct periodic Archaeological Spot Checks beginning
at depths below 2’ feet to determine if construction excavations have
exposed or have a high probability to expose archaeological resources.
After the initial Archaeological Spot Check, further periodic checks shall be
conducted at the discretion of the qualified archaeologist. If the qualified
archaeologist determines that construction excavations have exposed or
have a high probability to expose archaeological artifacts construction
monitoring for Archaeological Resources shall be required. The project
developer shall retain a qualified archaeological monitor, who will work
under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who
meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications and Standards. The archaeological monitor
shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading,
trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill younger Pleistocene alluvial
sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require
multiple archaeological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be
based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known
archaeological resources, the materials being excavated (native versus
artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance
and type of archaeological resources encountered. Full-time monitoring
can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the
project archaeologist.
Mitigation Measure No. 7 The archaeological monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional
archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion
of archaeological monitoring. The report shall be submitted to the project
developer, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and
representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the
satisfactory completion of the project and required mitigation measures.
The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any,
evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and
CEQA, and treatment of the resources.
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? No Impact.
The project site has not been used as a cemetery in the past. In addition, the site is not known to have
been used for any activities that have resulted in human remains being present on the property. In the
unlikely event that human remains are found during construction, those remains would require proper
treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. State of California Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5-7055 describe the general provisions for human remains. Specifically, Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 describes the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during
excavation of a site. As required by State law, the requirements and procedures set forth in Section
5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the
County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, and consultation with the
individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the “most likely descendant.” If
human remains are found during excavation, the excavation must stop in the vicinity of the find and in
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 55
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
any area that is reasonably suspected to contain remains adjacent to the find, until the County Coroner
has been called, the remains have been investigated, and appropriate recommendations have been
made for the treatment and disposition of the remains. Following compliance with State regulations,
which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, impacts in
this regard would be considered less than significant.
Compliance with Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5-7055 and Public Resources Code Section
5097.98, related to protection of human remains, would reduce potential impacts associated with future
development project proposals to a less than significant level.
VI. ENERGY: Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than
Significant Impact. Information found in this section, as well as other aspects of the project’s energy
implications, are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this MND, including Section “VIII (Greenhouse
Gas Emissions)” and Section “XVII (Transportation)” of this MND.
Construction-Related Energy Consumption
Construction equipment would be operated on the site to demolish the existing buildings on the site, to
grade the site for development, the construction of utilities, paving and the construction of the proposed
seven-story mixed-use building. The types of construction equipment that would be operated on the site
include graders, loaders/backhoes, dozers, air compressors, cranes, forklifts, generators, welders,
mixers, rollers, trenchers and pavers. Most of the equipment would likely be diesel-fueled; however,
smaller equipment, such as air compressors and forklifts may be electric, gas, or natural gas-fueled. For
the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed the construction equipment would be diesel-fueled, due
to the speculative nature of specifying the amounts and types of non-diesel equipment that might be
used, and the difficulties in calculating the energy, which would be consumed by this non-diesel
equipment.
The number of construction workers required to construct the project would vary based on the phase of
construction and the activity taking place. The transportation fuel required by construction workers to
travel to and from the site would depend on the total number of worker trips estimated for the duration of
construction activity. A 2007 study by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) estimates
the statewide average fuel economy for all vehicle types (automobiles, trucks, and motorcycles) in the
year 2020 is 18.78 miles per gallon.11 Assuming construction worker vehicles have an average fuel
economy consistent with the Caltrans study and each construction worker commutes an average of 20
miles a day to and from the site, the maximum 25 workers on-site during each phase of project
construction is estimated to consume approximately 27 gallons of gasoline a day. Assuming all 25
construction workers are employed at the site for a year (52 weeks), the fuel used by construction workers
commuting to the site is approximately 173 barrels (6,922 gallons) of gasoline and represents less than
0.0005 percent of the statewide transportation gasoline consumption in 2017, which is the latest year that
data is available.12
Construction equipment fuels (e.g., diesel, gasoline, natural gas) would be provided by local or regional
suppliers and vendors. Electricity would be supplied by the local utility provider (e.g., Southern California
Edison) via existing on-site electrical connections. A temporary water supply, primarily for fugitive dust
suppression and street sweeping, would also be supplied by the local provider (e.g., Golden State Water
Company).
11 2007 California Motor Vehicle Stock, Travel and Fuel Forecast, California Department of Transportation, Table 1, (2008).
12California 2017 Transportation gasoline consumption – 366,820 barrels; https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_fuel/html/pdf/fuel_mg.pdf
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 56
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Electricity used during construction to provide temporary power for lighting and electronic equipment
(e.g., computers, etc.) inside temporary construction trailers and for outdoor lighting when necessary for
general construction activity would generally not result in a substantial increase in on-site electricity use.
Electricity use during construction would be variable depending on lighting needs and the use of electric-
powered equipment and would be temporary for the duration of construction activities. Thus, electricity
use during construction would generally be considered negligible.
Energy Conservation: Regulatory Compliance
The project would utilize local and regional construction contractors who demonstrate compliance with
applicable CARB regulations governing the accelerated retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of heavy-
duty diesel on- and off-road equipment. CARB has adopted an Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit
heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other
Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). Compliance with the above anti-idling and emissions regulations would
result in a more efficient use of construction-related energy and minimize or eliminate wasteful and
unnecessary consumption of energy.
With respect to solid waste, CALGreen requires 65% of most construction and demolition waste be
diverted from a landfill. The project would generate various types of debris during construction.
Republic Services is the contract solid waste hauler for the City of Rosemead and would serve the project.
The solid waste from the project will be hauled to the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in
the City of Whittier and operated by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County. The MRF separates
recyclable material from municipal solid waste and all residual waste is hauled to permitted landfills and
all recovered recyclable materials are recycled in compliance with state law.
Anticipated Energy Consumption
The daily operation of the project would generate a demand for electricity, natural gas, and water supply,
as well as generating wastewater requiring conveyance, treatment and disposal off-site, and solid waste
requiring off-site disposal. Southern California Edison is the electrical purveyor in the City of Rosemead
and would provide electricity to the project. The Southern California Gas Company is the natural gas
purveyor and would provide natural gas to the project.
Energy Conservation: Regulatory Compliance
The California Energy Commission (CEC) first adopted the Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential
and Nonresidential Buildings (CCR, Title 24, Part 6) in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to
reduce energy consumption in the state. Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Standards Code is referred to
as CALGreen. The purpose of CALGreen is to “improve public health, safety and general welfare by
enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a positive
environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices in the following categories: (1)
Planning and design; (2) Energy efficiency; (3) Water efficiency and conservation; (4) Material
conservation and resource efficiency; and (5) Environmental quality.”13 As of January 1, 2011, CALGreen
is mandatory for the construction of all new buildings in the state. CALGreen establishes mandatory
measures for new residential and non-residential buildings. Such mandatory measures include energy
efficiency, water conservation, material conservation, planning and design and overall environmental
quality.14 CALGreen was most recently updated in 2022 to include new mandatory measures for
13 California Building Standards Commission, 2022 California Green Building Standards Code.
14 Ibid.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 57
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
residential as well as nonresidential uses; the new measures are effective on January 1, 2023.15 The
project would be required by the City to comply with the applicable provisions of Title 24 and CALGreen.
With respect to solid waste, the project is required to comply with applicable regulations, including those
pertaining to waste reduction and recycling as required by the State of California. The waste hauler
serving the project would divert project-generated municipal waste in accordance with applicable city
ordinances.
Energy Conservation: Project Design Features
The project would be designed to include green building, energy saving, and water saving measures and
other sustainability features. Consistent with CALGreen, the project would be required to meet and
comply with the residential mandatory measures that include water efficiency and conservation, material
conservation and resource efficiency, environmental quality, etc. As such, the project would be designed
to reduce wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy.
Estimated Energy Consumption
The long-term operation of the project would result in transportation energy use primarily for residents
that commute to and from their place of employment. Transportation fuels, primarily gasoline, would be
provided by local or regional suppliers and vendors. As discussed previously, in 2017, California
consumed a total of 366,820 thousand barrels of gasoline for transportation, which is part of the total
annual consumption nationwide of 3,404,186 barrels by the transportation sector.16 Project-related
vehicles would require a fraction of a percent of the total state’s transportation fuel consumption. A 2008
study by Caltrans determined that the statewide average fuel economy for all vehicle types (automobiles,
trucks, and motorcycles) in 2020 would be 18.78 miles per gallon.17
Alternative-Fueled Vehicles
Alternative-fueled, electric, and hybrid vehicles could be used by some of the project residents,
commercial space employees and customers. The use of these types of alternative fueled vehicles would
reduce the overall consumption of gasoline by the project. The effect is anticipated to be minimal in
today’s current vehicle market due to the relatively few alternative vehicles that are in use. According to
the Los Angeles Times, alternative-fueled vehicles make up approximately 2.3% of all vehicles registered
in California.18 The above transportation fuel estimates for the project do not account for alternative-
fueled, electric, and hybrid vehicles, which are more energy efficient vehicles. Thus, the assessment is
a conservative estimate of transportation fuel consumption. The project would not have any wasteful,
inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during either the construction of the project
or the life of the project because the project would be required to comply with all applicable state energy
conservation measures.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less
Than Significant Impact. The project would be required by the City to comply with all applicable
CALGreen and Title 24 state energy requirements to minimize energy consumption. Therefore, the
project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local energy plan. The project would not significantly
impact an energy plan.
15 Ibid.
16 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Table F3: Motor Gasoline Consumption, Price, and Expenditure Estimates, 2017,
https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_fuel/html/pdf/fuel_mg.pdf.
17 California Department of Transportation, 2008 California Motor Vehicle Stock, Travel and Fuel Forecast (June 2009).
18 Los Angeles Times, Electric, hybrid car sales up, California auto emissions down, May 22, 2014,
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-electric-vehicle-sales-up-auto-emissions-down-20140521- story.html. Accessed August
2014.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 58
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project:
a) Director or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.) Less Than Significant Impact. A geotechnical report19 was prepared for the project
and a copy is included in Appendix B of this MND.
The project site is not located within a state-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.20
Figure 5-3 of the City of Rosemead General Plan shows the project site is not located within an
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Figure 5-4 of the City of Rosemead General Plan shows the
project is not located in a Fault Hazard Management Zone. The nearest known active regional fault
to the site is the Upper Elysian Park fault that is located approximately 1 mile southeast of the site.
While there are faults in the region that could generate moderate to significant ground shaking at the
site, the incorporation of the recommendations in Section 6.0 of the geotechnical report regarding
seismic design in compliance with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and all other local building
codes would reduce potential fault impacts to less than significant.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. Because the project site is in
Southern California and a seismically active area, there is the potential for strong ground motion at
the site. The Upper Elysian Park fault is the closest known active fault to the site and approximately
1 mile southeast of the site. As with all projects in the City of Rosemead, the design and construction
of the project and all site improvement must comply with the current 2019 CBC and all applicable
local building codes. Project compliance with the 2019 CBC and applicable building codes would
reduce potential strong ground shaking impacts to less than significant.
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact.
Liquefaction is a phenomenon when loose, saturated, relatively cohesionless soil deposits lose their
shear strength during strong ground motions. The primary factors controlling liquefaction include
intensity and duration of ground motion, gradation characteristics of the subsurface soils, in-situ stress
conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Liquefaction is typified by a loss of shear strength in the
liquefied layers due to rapid increases in pore water pressure generated by earthquake accelerations.
Based on Figure 5-5 of the City of Rosemead General Plan the project site is not located within an
area that is mapped as susceptible to an earthquake induced liquefaction. Because the project site
is not located in an area that is susceptible to liquefaction, the soils report did not conduct a
liquefaction study for the site.21
The City of Rosemead’s geotechnical consultant, GeoDynamics, Inc. peer reviewed the project
applicant’s geotechnical report that was prepared by Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc.
Although the project site is not located in a mapped liquefaction zone and not susceptible to an
earthquake induced liquefaction event, in a letter dated February 3, 2023 GeoDynamics, Inc. states,
“The consultant indicates on page 3 that “Based on the historically high groundwater depth map
prepared by CDMG Seismic Hazard Zone Report 024 the historic groundwater is approximately 30 –
19 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Mixed Use Buildings and Associated Structures, APN 5287-038-018, 019,
020, 029, 030, & 033, 7849 – 7859 Garvey Avenue and 7900 – 7916 Virginia Street, Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California,
Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc., August 15, 2022.
20 Ibid, page 3, Section 4.1 Seismicity.
21 Ibid, page 3, Section 4.2 Seismic Inducted Hazards.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 59
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
40 feet below ground surface at the subject site (High Ground Water Map El Monte Quadrangle).”
But based on a review of the 1998 Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the El Monte Quadrangle
(OpenFile Report 98-15) by the CGS (formerly CDMG), historical-high groundwater at the site
appears to be about 30 ft below the existing grade. With that being the case, the consultant should
discuss and evaluate as necessary the potential for liquefaction and related hazards at the site, unless
earth materials below historical-high groundwater are deemed non-liquefiable based on the screening
criteria outlined in Appendix Pg (GS 045.0) of the County of Los Angeles Geotechnical Guidelines.
This will require subsurface exploration extending to at least 50 feet below the proposed finish grade.
Mitigation measures should be recommended as necessary.”22
Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc. provided the City of Rosemead a response to the
potential liquefaction hazard at the site raised by GeoDynamics in its February 3, 2023 letter. The
information was reviewed by the City of Rosemead’s geotechnical consultant, Earth Consultants
International. In a letter dated March 27, 2023 they state, “The geotechnical consultant of record for
this project, Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc. (EGL), has provided a response to the
review letter that we prepared on behalf of the City of Rosemead’s Planning Department. We have
reviewed this response from a geological perspective for compliance with local codes, guidelines and
standards of practice. We find that the consultant has satisfactorily addressed all feasibility level
comments that required a response per our review letter dated February 3, 2023. Several
geotechnical concerns still need to be addressed as part of the design level studies, including
confirmation that the site is not underlain by sediments susceptible to liquefaction. The consultant
has indicated that these items will be addressed at a later stage. Future geotechnical reports
submitted by the consultant for this project should be reviewed by GeoDynamics, Inc., the City’s
geotechnical reviewer.”23
Based on the peer review of the project applicant’s geotechnical report by City of Rosemead
consultants the potential for liquefaction and related hazards and the satisfactory response provided
by the project applicants geotechnical consultant to this issue the potential for liquefaction impacts
by the project is less than significant.
iv. Landslides? No Impact. The project site ranges in elevation from a high of 305 feet above mean
sea level at the southwest corner of the site to a low of 300 feet at the northeast corner of the site, a
difference of 5 feet. Thus, the project site is basically flat and the properties that are adjacent to the
site are also basically flat. The project would not be impacted by landslides.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. The City would
require the grading and construction contractor to install and maintain all applicable City required short-
term construction soil erosion control measures to reduce and minimize soil erosion impacts throughout
project grading and construction. The contractor would be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to identify all Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be incorporated
into the project prior to the start of grading and maintained to completion of all construction activities to
reduce and minimize soil erosion. The City has standard soil erosion protection measures that the
contractor would be required to install and maintain throughout grading and construction to minimize off-
site soil erosion. The requirement by the City for the contractor to incorporate all applicable mandated
soil erosion control measures into project construction would minimize and reduce potential soil erosion
impacts to less than significant.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. Based on the geotechnical report the
22 Ali Abdel-Haq, GeoDynamics, Inc. letter dated February 3, 2023.
23 Tania Gonzalez, Earth Consultants International, letter dated March 27, 2023.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 60
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
proposed development of the project would not be significantly impacted by unstable soil due to an off-
site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or soil collapse. All grading and construction
would have to comply with all applicable requirements of the 2022 CBC and recommendations of the
geotechnical report.24
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. The
geotechnical report did not identify any expansive soils on the site. The project would not be significantly
impacted by expansive soil.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The
project would be required by the City to connect to and be served by the existing public wastewater
collection system that is located in the alley from Brighton Avenue adjacent to and west of the site. The
project developer proposes to connect to the existing public sewer system in Garvey Avenue adjacent to
the site. The project would not have any septic tank or alternative wastewater disposal impacts.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature? No Impact. The Rosemead General Plan does not identify the presence of any paleontological
resources in the City. The site was disturbed previously with the construction of the existing commercial
development and other site improvements. Because the site is developed and has been disturbed and
paleontological resources are not known to exist in Rosemead, it is unlikely that paleontological resources
would be uncovered during project construction. The geotechnical report did not identify any unique
geologic features on the site that would potentially contain paleontological resource and impacted by the
project. The project would not have any paleontological resource or geologic feature impacts.
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS: Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. A greenhouse gas report25 was prepared
for the project and a copy is included in Appendix A of this MND.
“Greenhouse gases” (so called because of their role in trapping heat near the surface of the earth) emitted
by human activity are implicated in global climate change, commonly referred to as “global warming.”
Greenhouse gases contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere by
transparency to short wavelength visible sunlight, but near opacity to outgoing terrestrial long wavelength
heat radiation in some parts of the infrared spectrum. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) are
carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and water vapor. For purposes of planning and
regulation, Section 15364.5 of the California Code of Regulations defines GHGs to include carbon
dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride. Fossil
fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on-road motor vehicles, off-highway mobile sources, and
aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG
emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG
emissions with about one-fourth of total emissions.
24 Report of Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Mixed Use Buildings and Associated Structures, APN 5287-038-018, 019,
020, 029, 030, & 033, 7849 – 7859 Garvey Avenue and 7900 – 7916 Virginia Street, Rosemead, County of Los Angeles, California,
Environmental Geotechnology Laboratory, Inc., August 15, 2022.
25 Air Quality and GHG Impact Analysis, Strathmore and Garvey Mixed-Use Project, City of Rosemead, Ca, Giroux & Associates,
September 27, 2022.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 61
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
California has passed several bills and the Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding
greenhouse gases. AB 32 is one of the most significant pieces of environmental legislation that California
has adopted. The major components of AB 32 include:
• Require the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions beginning with sources or categories of
sources that contribute the most to statewide emissions.
• Requires immediate “early action” control programs on the most readily controlled GHG sources.
• Mandates that by 2020, California’s GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels.
• Forces an overall reduction of GHG gases in California by 25-40%, from business as usual, to be
achieved by 2020.
• Must complement efforts to achieve and maintain federal and state ambient air quality standards
and to reduce toxic air contaminants.
Maximum GHG reductions are expected to derive from increased vehicle fuel efficiency, greater use of
renewable energy, and increased structural energy efficiency. Additionally, through the California
Climate Action Registry (CCAR or the Climate Action Reserve), general and industry-specific protocols
for assessing and reporting GHG emissions have been developed. GHG sources are categorized into
direct sources (i.e. company owned) and indirect sources (i.e. not company owned). Direct sources
include combustion emissions from on-and off-road mobile sources, and fugitive emissions. Indirect
sources include off-site electricity generation and non-company owned mobile sources.
Thresholds of Significance
Under CEQA, a project would have a potentially significant greenhouse gas impact if it:
• Generates GHG emissions, directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment, or,
• Conflicts with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted to reduce GHG emissions.
Emissions identification may be quantitative, qualitative, or based on performance standards. CEQA
guidelines allow the lead agency to “select the model or methodology it considers most appropriate.” The
most common practice for transportation/combustion GHG emissions quantification is to use a computer
model such as CalEEMod, which was used for the GHG analysis for the proposed project.
In September 2010, the SCAQMD Governing Board Working Group recommended a threshold of 3,000
MT CO2e for all land use types. The 3,000 MT/year CO2e threshold is used for the greenhouse gas
emission analysis for the proposed mixed-use project. In the absence of an adopted numerical threshold
of significance, project related GHG emissions in excess of the guideline level are presumed to trigger a
requirement for enhanced GHG reduction at the project level.
Methodology
The CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 software model was used to calculate the GHG emissions from all
phases of the project for the year 2022, which is the scheduled date of project completion. The project's
emissions were compared to the tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e
per year for all land uses.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 62
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction Activity GHG Emissions
During project construction, the CalEEMod2020.4.0 computer model calculates that project construction
activities would generate the annual CO2e emissions shown in Table 11 of this MND.
Table 11
Construction GHG Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e)
CO2e
Year 2023 365.9
Amortized 12.2
The SCAQMD GHG emission policy for construction activities amortizes emissions over a 30-year
lifetime. As shown, the amortized GHG emissions from the project construction activities are less than
the 3,000 MT/year CO2e threshold and less than significant.
Operational GHG Emissions
The total operational emissions of the project are shown in Table 12 of this MND. As shown, the total
GHG operational emissions are below the guideline threshold of 3,000 MTY CO2e suggested by the
SCAQMD.
Table 12
Annual Operational GHG Emissions, MT CO2(e) tons/year
Consumption Source MT CO2(e) tons/year
Area Sources* 1.6
Energy Utilization 261.9
Mobile Source 840.2
Solid Waste Generation 30.7
Water Consumption 43.2
Construction 12.2
Total 1,189.8
Guideline Threshold 3,000
* natural gas hearth
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases? No Impact. The City of Rosemead has not adopted a Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Plan. Therefore, the applicable GHG planning document that is applicable to the project
is AB-32. As discussed in Section “VIII.a” above of this MND, the project would not have a significant
increase in either construction or operational GHG emissions. The project generated GHG emissions
are calculated to be 1,189.8 MTCO2(e) tons/year and below the SCAQMD 3,000 MTCO2(e) tons/year
threshold. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation to
reduce GHG emissions.
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use,
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 63
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. A Phase I26 Environmental Site
Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the site. The Phase I ESA in included in Appendix C of this MND.
The mixed-use project does not propose to transport, use, or dispose of any hazardous materials. The
only hazardous materials that would be transported and stored on the site includes the temporary storage
of hazardous materials for use by the construction contractors to operate and maintain the various types
of motor-powered construction equipment that would be operated during project grading and
construction. The types of hazardous materials that would be anticipated to be used on-site during
construction includes diesel fuel, gasoline, lubricants, paints, solvents, etc. It would be the responsibility
of the contractors to use and store all hazardous materials in compliance with applicable Federal, State,
and local laws and regulations during project construction. The project residents and commercial uses
would use standard cleaning materials to clean and maintain their residences and commercial space
during the operational life of the project. Herbicides and pesticides may be used by the homeowner’s
association to maintain project landscaping. The transportation, use, and storage of all cleaning and
maintenance hazardous materials in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations
would reduce the potential for significant impacts to less than significant. The project would not have any
significant impacts associated with the transportation, use or storage of hazardous materials.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less
Than Significant Impact. The existing buildings on the project site were constructed in the late 1940’s.
The following businesses are located on the site:
➢ 7849 Garvey – Barbershop
➢ 7851-7853 Garvey - Vacant
➢ 7857 Garvey – Morales Termite Control
➢ 7900-7916 Virginia Street – Vacant Yard
Based on the results of the Phase I ESA there is no evidence of Recognized Environmental Condition
(RECs) at the site based on the known past and present uses. The Phase I ESA also reviewed all
available regulatory provided data to assess whether contaminants could potentially be present in soil
and/or groundwater at the site that would result in a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC) using Tier 1
non-numeric screening. Based on the screening analysis that was conducted for the site it is highly
unlikely that a VEC condition exists.27
There are no known hazardous materials associated with the project site. Therefore, no further
environmental studies are required. There are no uses or activities associated with the long-term use of
the proposed mixed-use development for the site that would create or release hazardous materials into
the environment. The project would not have any significant hazardous material impacts.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. The closest school to
the project site is Richard Garvey Intermediate School that is located at 2720 Jackson Avenue and
approximately 0.33 miles (1,800 feet) southwest of the site. Ralph Waldo Emerson Elementary School
is located at 7544 Emerson Place and approximately 0.45 miles (2,400 feet) northwest of the project.
The third closest school of the project is Arlene Bitely Elementary school that is located at 7501 Fern
Avenue and approximately 0.52 miles (2,800 feet) southwest of the project. The project does not propose
any use that would emit, generate, or handle any hazardous or acutely hazardous materials or
substances and impact any schools within one-quarter mile of the project.
26 ASTM E-1527-13/21 Phase I Environmental Assessment, 7900-7916 Virginia Street, 7849 -7853, 7857 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead,
CA, Ambient Environmental, Inc., July 2022.
27 ASTM E-1527-13/21 Phase I Environmental Assessment, 7900-7916 Virginia Street, 7849 -7853, 7857 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead,
CA, Ambient Environmental, Inc., July 2022, page 23.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 64
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or environment? No Impact. During its database records search for the preparation of the Phase
I ESA the project site was not listed as a hazardous material site on the “Cortese” list pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5. The project would not have a hazardous impact to the public or
environment per Government Code Section 65962.5.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise
for people working or residing in the project area? No Impact. The closest airport to the project site
is San Gabriel Valley Airport, which is approximately 4 miles northeast of the site. The project would not
impact airport operations at San Gabriel Valley Airport or result in any safety hazards for project guests
and employees. The operations at the San Gabriel Valley Airport would not have any safety or noise
impacts to the project guests and employees.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. All of the proposed project improvements
are located on private property. The project would not interfere with or impact any designated evacuation
routes in Rosemead, including Garvey Avenue adjacent to and south of the site. The project does not
propose the construction of any driveways at Garvey Avenue. Therefore, the project would not impact
the use of Garvey Avenue as an emergency evacuation route. The project would not significantly impact
any emergency evacuation routes in the City.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires? No Impact. There are no State of California designated wildland fire
areas in Rosemead. Please see Section “XX. Wildfire” of this MND for further wildland fire analysis. The
project would not be exposed to or be impacted by a wildland fire.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Less Than Significant
Impact. A Drainage Study28 and a Low Impact Development Plan29 were prepared for the project and a
copy of each report is included in Appendix D of this MND.
During project grading and construction, silt could be generated from the site, especially if construction
occurs during the winter months from October to April when rainfall typically occurs. The City would
require the project contractor to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in
accordance with California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board), Order No. 99-08-
DWQ, Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Order No. R4-2021-0105 and National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. CAS004004 (Permit). The SWPPP would require the
contractor to implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable measures to reduce and
eliminate storm water pollution from all construction activity through the implementation of Best
Management Practices (BMPs). The purpose of the SWPPP is to identify pollutant sources that may
affect the quality of the storm water that would be discharged from the site during all construction activity.
The SWPPP would require the contractor to identify, construct, and implement the storm water pollution
prevention measures and BMPs necessary to reduce pollutants that are present in the storm water that
is discharged from the site during construction. The SWPPP would include specific BMPs that must be
installed and implemented prior to the start of site clearance, grading, and construction. The installation
28 Garvey & Strathmore Apartments Drainage Study, 7849 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead, CA 91770, Omega Engineering Consultants,
August 11, 2022.
29 Low Impact Development Plan, Garvey & Strathmore Apartments, 7849 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead, CA 91770, Omega Engineering
Consultants, August 12, 2022.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 65
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
and maintenance of all required BMPs by the contractor during construction would reduce potential water
quality impacts to less than significant.
The project developer must comply with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Los
Angeles Water Board) requirements of a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) Plan (MS4 Permit Order
No. R4-2021-0105). A MS4 plan would identify, at a minimum, the details to implement the Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that would reduce the project’s Stormwater Quality Design Volume
(SWQDV) defined as the runoff from the 85th percentile, 24-hour rain event, as determined from the Los
Angeles County 85th Percentile Precipitation Isohyetal Map (http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wrd/hydrologygis/).
The Los Angeles County MS4 Permit requires the implementation of low impact development (LID) BMPs
in addition to site design and source control measures. LID BMPs are engineered facilities that are
designed to retain or biotreat runoff on the project site. All designated projects must detain the water
quality volume on-site through infiltration, evapotranspiration, storm water runoff harvest and use, or a
combination thereof unless it is demonstrated that it is technically infeasible to do so.30
The project site is 100 percent impermeable due to the existing development on the site. As a result, all
rainfall sheet flows off the site to an existing storm drain system in Strathmore Avenue adjacent to and
east of the site. Because the site is impermeable it does not feasibly allow on-site percolation of rainfall.
The project site accepts offsite runoff from the alley and the land uses adjacent to and west of the site.
Runoff from the land uses west of the project site surface flow in the alley west of the site to the project
site where the runoff merges with project runoff and the combined surface runoff flows east to the curb
and gutter in Strathmore Avenue. Surface water runoff in Strathmore Avenue drains south to a catch
basin near the intersection of Strathmore Avenue and Garvey Avenue where the runoff drains into an
existing 24” underground Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) storm drain that is part of the public storm
drain system. The stormwater flows east in an underground 24” storm drain and discharges into the
Alhambra Wash flood control channel approximately one-third of a mile east of the project site.
The project proposes to install catch basins along the west side of the proposed seven-story mixed-use
building and the alley west of the project site to accept the existing offsite runoff generated from the land
uses west of the site. Runoff from the roof drains of the proposed seven-story mixed-use building would
drain directly into proposed storm drains constructed in the ground level parking lot. The storm drains in
the ground level parking garage would connect to a proposed 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System vault
proposed near the southeast area of the ground level parking garage for pretreatment. Following
pretreatment, the project stormwater would drain by an underground 12” storm drain and connect with
an existing underground 24” RCP in Strathmore Avenue east of the site.
All on-site stormwater would be captured and discharged into the proposed 8’x16’ Modular Wetland
System in the ground level parking garage. All offsite surface water from the properties west of the
project would be collected by proposed underground 12” storm drains and discharged into a proposed
18” underground storm drain that would connect with the existing underground 24” storm drain in
Strathmore Avenue east of the site. The capacity of the proposed stormwater collection and Modular
Wetland System is based on the Los Angeles County 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event conditions.
The installation and the regular maintenance of the required BMPs of the SWPPP and the proposed on-
site 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System would reduce storm water runoff pollutants generated from the
project site during both project construction and the life of the project to less than significant.
The project developer would also be required to have a Low Impact Development (LID) plan approved
by City staff prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The purpose of the LID is to identify the BMPs that
would be used on-site to control project generated pollutants from entering the storm water runoff
generated from the site. The LID includes measures that would be included in the project to maximize
30 https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/water_issues/programs/stormwater/municipal/la_ms4/2015/SWRCB_wqo2015_0075.pdf
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 66
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
the use of pervious materials throughout the site to allow storm water percolation and pollutant filtration
with the use of a retention/detention basin, storm water clarifier, and catch basins with BMPs.
The installation and regular maintenance of the State required SWPPP and LID would reduce the
potential impacts from storm water runoff pollutants generated from the site during both project
construction and the ongoing operation of the project to less than significant.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.
Less Than Significant Impact. The project would be required by SCAQMD Rule 403 to reduce
particulate dust during any man-made condition. In this case, Rule 403 would require the project
developer to control fugitive dust during active development operations, including grading and
construction. Water is primarily used for dust suppression during project grading and construction and
would be provided by the Golden State Water Company. The amount of water that would be required to
control dust during grading and construction would be minimal and would not significantly impact existing
groundwater supplies due to the relatively small size of the project, which is approximately 1.21 acres.
The project is currently 100 percent impervious and the proposed project would also be 100 percent
impervious. Therefore, the project would not interfere or impact the existing and on-going sustainable
groundwater management of the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin.
The project site is 100 percent impervious due to the existing development on the site. The project
generates approximately 5.93 cubic feet per second (cfs) of surface water runoff during a 25-year
frequency storm event.31 Because the project site is 100 percent impermeable all the existing surface
water flows east to the curb and gutter in Strathmore Avenue east of the site and flows south to a catch
basin in Strathmore Avenue near the intersection at Garvey Avenue. Once developed, the project is
estimated to generate approximately 5.93 cfs of runoff during a 25-year frequency storm event, the same
as the existing condition. The project proposes to capture the on-site runoff from a 25-year storm and
direct the flow to an 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System proposed for the ground level parking garage for
pretreatment. Pretreated stormwater from the 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System would be discharged into
a proposed underground 18” storm drain that would connect with an existing 24” underground RCP in
Strathmore Avenue east of the site. The project would not increase the rate of the surface water that
would be discharged from the site during a storm compared to the existing condition.
The project site receives its water supply from the Golden State Water Company and relies on three
sources for its water supply, including local groundwater from the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin,
Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District and an emergency connection with the City of
Monterey Park.32 Based on the South San Gabriel Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan,
Golden State Water Company has reliable supplies to meet its retail customer demand in normal, single
dry years, and five consecutive dry year conditions through 2045.33 The Golden State Water Company
can provide potable water to the project as stated by the following, “Upon completion of satisfactory
financial arrangements under our rules and regulations on file with the California Public Utilities
Commission, the proposed water distribution system for the above referenced subdivision will be
adequate during normal operating conditions for the water system of this subdivision as provided in
Chapter 20.16 of Title 20 of the Los Angeles County (Water Code) and as shown on the plans and
specifications approved by the Department of Public Works. This includes meeting minimum domestic
flow requirements as provided by Section 20.16.070 and minimum fire flow and fire hydrant requirements
as provided by Section 20.16.060.
31 Garvey & Strathmore Apartments Drainage Study, 7849 Garvey Avenue, Rosemead, CA 91770, Omega Engineering Consultants,
August 11, 2022, page 2.
32 South San Gabriel Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, July 16, 2021, page ES-2.
33 Ibid, page 5-5.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 67
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
As discussed above, the project would not increase the amount of stormwater that is generated from the
project site compared to the existing condition. The same as the existing conditions the project runoff
would not percolate into the on-site soils. As discussed in Section “X.a” above of this MND, all on-site
stormwater would be captured and discharged into an 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System proposed for the
ground level parking garage for pretreatment prior to discharge to an existing underground 24” RCP in
Strathmore Avenue adjacent to and east of the site. The project would not deplete or increase
groundwater supplies. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact on groundwater
supplies.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration
of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner,
which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? Less Than Significant Impact. During
project construction the exposed soil on the site would be subject to erosion both on and off the site
during periods of rainfall. As discussed in Section “X.a” above of this MND, the project developer
would be required to prepare a SWPPP and LID and implement the BMPs of both plans to reduce
and minimize soil erosion both on and off the site. The implementation of the BMPs would reduce
and minimize the amount of siltation generated from the site. Once the project is completed and
operational all surface water runoff would be collected and discharged to an onsite 8’x16’ Modular
Wetland System in the ground level parking garage to pretreat all onsite stormwater. All stormwater
from the Modular Wetland System would be discharged into an underground 18” storm drain and
discharged into an existing underground 24” RCP in Strathmore Avenue east of the site. The project
would generate the same amount of runoff as the existing condition and all runoff would be collected
and discharged by a proposed on-site underground storm drain system and discharged to an existing
public storm drain system in Strathmore Avenue east of the site.
The installation of and the regular maintenance of all construction BMPs and the proposed on-site
8’x16’ Modular Wetland System in compliance with required SWPPP and NPDES permits would
reduce and minimize both on and off-site siltation from the project site during both project construction
and the life of the project to less than significant. The project would not have significant erosion or
siltation impacts either on or off the site.
ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or off site? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section “X.b” above of
this MND, the project would generate the same amount of runoff that is currently generated from the
site and would not increase the amount of existing runoff. Therefore, the project would not have any
significant on- or off-site flooding impacts.
iii. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
Less Than Significant Impact. As stated in Section “X.b” above of this MND, the project would not
increase the amount of storm water runoff that is currently generated from the site. The existing
public underground storm drain system in Strathmore Avenue that serves the project site would serve
the proposed project. The existing downstream storm water collection system has adequate capacity
to serve the volume of stormwater from the project without significantly impacting the capacity of the
existing storm water drainage system since the project would not increase the amount of stormwater
generated from site compared to the existing condition. The project would not have any significant
impact to the existing storm drain system that serves the site.
The project would be required to treat surface water runoff prior to its discharge to meet Regional
Water Quality Control Board water quality requirements and provide safeguards that surface water
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 68
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
runoff would not provide sources of polluted runoff. As discussed in Section “X.a” above of this MND,
the project would have to meet and comply with the MS4 permit requirements of the Los Angeles
Water Board to remove and prevent most project generated pollutants from being discharge from the
site. The installation and required routine maintenance of the proposed underground storm drain
collection and bio-filter system in compliance with the MS4 permit would treat, reduce, and filter most
project runoff pollutants before discharge to the public stormwater system. As a result, the project
would not significantly impact surface water quality.
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would discharge
project generated surface water into an existing underground 24” RCP in Strathmore Avenue adjacent
to and east of the project. Storm water in the underground 24” RCP in Strathmore Avenue flows
south to Garvey Avenue and east in Garvey Avenue and discharged into the Alhambra Wash
approximately one-third of a mile east of the project. The existing public underground storm drain
collection system that serves the project has capacity to serve the proposed project. The project
would not significantly impede or redirect flood water flows.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation. No
Impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is in Zone
X34, which are areas of moderate or minimal hazard from flooding. In addition, Figure 5-6 of the Public
Safety Element of the General Plan shows that the project is located in FEMA flood hazard zone “X” that
is designated as areas of moderate or minimal hazard from flooding. The elevation of Alhambra Wash,
which is approximately 0.35 miles (1,827 feet) east of the project and in a 100-year flood zone is the
closest potential source of floodwaters to the project. The elevation of Alhambra Wash is approximately
267 feet above mean sea level, and the elevation of the project site is approximately 300 feet above
mean sea level. Thus, the project site is approximately 33 feet higher than the Alhambra Wash channel
east of the site. Therefore, the potential for flooding at the site from Alhambra Wash is minimal.
The project is more than twenty-one miles northeast from the Pacific Ocean and approximately 300 feet
above mean sea level. Due to the distance and the elevation of the project from the Pacific Ocean the
project would not be exposed to or impacted by a tsunami. The project site and the area immediately
surrounding the site are generally flat and there are no water bodies or water tanks adjacent to or in close
proximity to the site that would impact the project due to a seiche. Because the project would not be
impacted by a flood, tsunami or seiche, the project would not be impacted by a release of pollutants
associated with a flood, tsunami or seiche.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan. Less Than Significant Impact. The project developer prepared a
Drainage Study and Low Impact Development calculation report for the project and a copy of both reports
is included in Appendix D of this MND. The City would require the project developer to install and
implement all proposed water quality collection and surface water runoff treatment measures listed in the
Drainage Study, which includes an 8’x16’ Modular Wetland System bio-filtration system in the ground
level parking garage. As a result, the project would not conflict with or obstruct water quality control
measures mandated by the state.
The Golden State Water Company provides potable water to the project site presently and would serve
the proposed project. The Golden State Water Company has an adopted an Urban Water Management
Plan (UWMP)35. The primary objective of the UWMP is to describe and evaluate sources of supply,
reasonable and practical efficient uses, reclamation and demand management activities. In this case,
the UWMP provides water supply planning to the year 2045 in five-year increments and identifies water
supplies needs to meet existing and future demands. The Golden State Water Company, South San
34 https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=rosemead%2C%20california#searchresultsanchor
35 South San Gabriel Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, July 16, 2021.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 69
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Gabriel relies on three sources for its water supply, including local groundwater from the San Gabriel
Valley Groundwater Basin, Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District and an emergency
connection with the City of Monterey Park.36 The future water demand for its service area is based on
land use type, including single-family, commercial, institutional, industrial, etc. The UWMP also analyzed
its future water supply based on the reliability of its existing sources of water including groundwater, water
districts, recycling, etc. The UWMP states that based on projected water supply and demands over the
next 20 years, the Golden State Water Company South San Gabriel Service Area has water supply
capabilities that would be sufficient to meet expected demands through 2045 under single-dry-year and
multiple-dry year conditions.37 Therefore, the project would not significantly impact future sources of
water supply. As stated in Section “X.b)” above of this MND, Golden State Water can meet minimum
domestic flow requirements as provided by Section 20.16.070 and minimum fire flow and fire hydrant
requirements as provided by Section 20.16.060.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project proposes to develop an infill
site that is surrounded by established commercial use to the west, southeast and south and single-family
detached residences to the west, northwest, north, northeast and east. The project site is developed with
commercial uses and includes six separate parcels (APN Nos. 5287-038-030, -033, -018, -019, -020, -
029). The project proposes to combine the six parcels into a single parcel. The proposed project would
not physically divide the existing land uses that are adjacent to and surrounding the site.
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than
Significant Impact. Parcels 5287-038-030 and -033 of the project site are zoned Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan, Residential/Commercial (GSP-R/C) and parcels 5287-038-018, -019, -020 and -029 are zoned
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan (GSP) by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan. The project is requesting a
specific plan amendment and zone change to Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, Incentivized Mixed-Use
(GSP-MU).
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan
The Garvey Avenue Specific Plan designates the zoning for the project site as Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan (GSP) on the southern half of the site and Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, Residential/Commercial
(GSP-R/C) on the northern half of the site. While both zoning designations allow commercial use, only
the GSP-R/C zoning allows residential development. Therefore, the project applicant is requesting a
specific plan amendment to change the land use designation of the entire project site to Garvey Avenue
Specific Plan, Incentivized Mixed-Use (GSP-MU) to allow the proposed commercial and residential uses
on the site.
The requested Garvey Avenue Specific Plan amendment would allow the proposed development of 93
residential units and 35,105 square feet of nonresidential (retail/office/residential-work) use. The
requested GSP-MU land use designation is allowed for other parcels within the Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan, including the area adjacent to and east of Strathmore Avenue as shown in Figure 5 of this MND.
As shown, the GSP-MU land use designation for the property east of the site allows the same types of
land uses as the proposed project, which includes residential and commercial development. The GSP-
MU land use is also proposed for the properties adjacent to and south of the site, south of Garvey Avenue
and the properties adjacent to and west of the southern portion of the project site. Therefore, the project
does not propose any land uses that are not allowed for the properties, east, south, and west of the
southern portion of the site. The properties adjacent to and west of the northern portion of the site and
36 South San Gabriel Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, July 16, 2021, page ES-2.
37 Ibid, page 7-7.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 70
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
north of the site, north of Virginia Street are designated Medium Density Residential by the Rosemead
General Plan.
There are other areas within the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan where the GSP-MU land use is proposed
adjacent to Medium Density Residential. Therefore, the land uses proposed by the project are not unique
or out of character with the GSP-MU land use adjacent to other residential land use. The project would
not have any significant land use impacts greater than or different from the impacts associated with the
development of mixed uses within other areas of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan that are designated
GSP-MU.
As discussed in Section “I.d)” above and shown in Table 1 of this MND the project meets all of the
applicable GSP-MU development standards of Table 3.4 of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, including
minimum lot size, minimum lot width, mixed-use land use split, building height and form, building
relationship to the street, specific plan standards, ground floor building design, setbacks for light, air and
privacy, pedestrian-friendly auto circulation and access, and parking.
Provision of Community Benefits
The Garvey Avenue Specific Plan has provisions for Community Benefit Incentives. Community Benefit
Incentives are provided to allow developer and property owners to increase the development potential if
community benefits are identified as part of the development application, constructed as part of the
project development, and operated in perpetuity. Restrictions and/or covenants are required to be
recorded on the property to ensure the benefits or amenities provided to earn the Community Benefit
Incentive are maintained in perpetuity.38
The Garvey Avenue Community Benefit Program is applicable to all parcels within the Garvey Avenue
Specific Plan corridor. The Garvey Avenue Community Benefit Program is based on a point system.
Each community benefit type is assigned several Community Benefit points. A project may earn points
from a single or multiple categories, depending on the project applicant’s preference. The number of
Community Benefit points earned is then translated into the increased density or FAR. The increase
varies by zone and land use type.39
The project includes five Community Benefit Incentives with a total of 131 earned points as shown in
Table 13 of this MND. As shown, the 131 earned points allows the project a 3.0 FAR and a density of
up to 80 dwelling units/acre. The project proposes a FAR of 2.2 and a density of 77 du/acre and within
the floor area ratio and density allowed for the site with the proposed Community Benefit Incentives.
Zoning
The project site is zoned GSP on the southern half of the site and (GSP-R/C) on the northern half of the
site. The purpose of the GSP zoning district is to facilitate and support a vibrant neighborhood
commercial district accommodating a diverse range of retail, service, and office businesses, with a focus
on businesses that support the needs of the local community. The GSP zoning area is intended to
encourage the development of attractive retail areas where people can walk for dining, groceries,
shopping, limited personal services, community and social services, and social activities and gatherings.
Uses will have active retail storefronts with glass windows, open storefronts, and setbacks for outdoor
dining, thus, offering pedestrians a varied and interesting experience.40
38 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, February 2018, page 3-19.
39 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, February 2018, page 3-29.
40 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, page 3-4.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 71
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 13
Project Community Benefit Points
Type of Benefit Basis for Calculating
Points
Maximum
Points*
Earned
Points
FAR
Earned
Density
Earned
Lot Consolidation 2 lots consolidated into 1
parcel 35 35
Family Friendly
Development
More than 10% of housing
units as three bedroom or
larger units.
1 point for each 15 sq.
ft./unit of common area
open space above the
required minimum per the
Garvey Avenue Specific
Plan, providing the common
area open space contains at
least two of the following: tot
lot play equipment (swings,
slide, climbing structure),
community garden, or
library.
50
30
20
Nonresidential
component of
Mixed-use
development
sites
In order to provide for
significant opportunities for
national and regional retail
tenants, a bonus shall be
granted if the nonresidential
component of a mixed-use
site provides for tenant
space with an average size
of 2,000 s.f. or more
(minimum size of 800 s.f. for
each tenant space), then the
project will receive a 5%
increase in residential to
make the split 70%
residential to 30%
commercial.
20 20
Public Parking 2 Points: For every 1
standard sized parking
space marked for public use
and permanently available
for public use, provided the
project meets the minimum
number of required public
and private spaces, per this
Specific Plan or the City of
Rosemead
50 6 – 3 stalls
Sustainable
Design
40 Points: If 50% or more of
total building roof is an
accessible, operational eco
roof.
30 Points: LEEDTM
Platinum, CALGreen Tier 2,
70
20 –
CALGreen
Tier 1
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 72
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
or equivalent (third-party
certification required)
20 Points: LEEDTM Gold,
CALGREEN Tier 1, or
equivalent (third-party
certification required)
The increased density or
intensity will be granted to
the qualifying building not
the entire development or
site area.
The project will be
conditioned to ensure
compliance and
construction in accordance
with LEED Platinum, LEED
Gold, CALGreen Tier 2, or
CALGreen Tier 1.
Total
Points
131 3 80 du/acre
• Maximum points allowed by Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
The project meets the development standards for the GSP-MU zone, except for the mixed-use land use
split. Based on Table 3.4 of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, a floor-area land use mix of 65% residential
use and 35% nonresidential use is allowed for mixed-use development. However, applicants can deviate
from this standard by proposing to incorporate community benefit amenities as depicted in Table 3.5 of
the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan. Specifically, the community benefit amenity that an applicant has to
incorporate into its project to obtain a deviated floor-area land use mix is shown below.
Type of Benefit
Provided for the
Community Benefit
Incentive
Maximum
Points
Basis for Calculating Points
Nonresidential
Component of Mixed-
Use Development
Sites
20 In order to provide for significant opportunities for national
and regional retail tenants, a bonus shall be granted if the
nonresidential component of a mixed-use site provides for
tenant space with an average size of 2,000 s.f. or more
(minimum size of 800 s.f. for each tenant space), then the
project will receive a 5% increase in residential to make the
split 70% residential to 30% commercial.
The project applicant proposes to utilize the community benefit incentive as shown above. Thus, the
Rosemead Planning Division is granting the project applicant an increase of up to 5% for the proposed
residential use of the project. The applicant is proposing a floor-area land use mix of 69% residential and
31% nonresidential, which is allowed and in compliance with the land use mix allowed by the Garvey
Avenue Specific Plan utilizing the community benefit amenity.
The GSP zone allows a maximum commercial FAR of 0.75 without the Provision of Community Benefits
and 1.0 with the Provision of Community Benefits. Therefore, the 0.44 gross acres (19,232 square feet)
of the site zoned GSP could be developed with up to 14,424 square feet of commercial, public, and open
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 73
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
space use without the Provision of Community Benefits and 19,232 square feet of commercial, public
and open space use with the Provision of Community Benefits.
The purpose of the GSP-R/C zoning district modifies the R-2 and C-3 zoning districts' standards to be
more specific to the Plan area and to facilitate a greater opportunity for residential or commercial
development. Such development in the GSP-R/C area is expected to feature designs and forms that
create an appropriate pedestrian scale along or nearby the Garvey Avenue corridor. The GSP-R/C
zoning district provides transition and buffer areas between single- and multi-family residential land uses
in the surrounding neighborhoods and the higher land use intensity and building scale on Garvey Avenue.
The new zoning enables flexibility in development approaches while requiring high-quality design that
respects and adds value to adjacent residential development.41
The GSP-R/C zone allows a maximum FAR of 0.75 without the Provision of Community Benefits and 1.0
with the Provision of Community Benefits. Therefore, the 0.773 gross acres (33,694 square feet) of the
site zoned GSP-R/C could be developed with up to 25,270 square feet of commercial, public, and open
space use without the Provision of Community Benefits and 33,694 square feet of commercial, public
and open space use with the Provision of Community Benefits.
The proposed mixed-use project is not an allowed use within either the existing GSP or GSP-R/C zones.
Therefore, the project applicant is requesting a zone change to Garvey Avenue Specific Plan,
Incentivized Mixed-Use (GSP-MU) to allow the mixed-use development for the site. The requested GSP-
MU zoning allows the development of mixed-use including residential, commercial, public and open
space land uses. As shown in Table 3.2 of the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, the GSP-MU zoning allows
a maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre without the Provision of Community Benefits and a maximum
of 80 dwelling units per acre with the Provision of Community Benefits and a maximum mixed-use (MU)
FAR of 1.6 and 0.75 commercial use without the Provision of Community Benefits and a maximum mixed-
use maximum of 3.0 and 1.0 commercial with the Provision of Community Benefits.
The proposed Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Amendment to change the 1.25-acre site to GSP-MU would
allow a maximum of 30 residential units without the provisions of community benefits and a maximum of
96 residential units with community benefits. Therefore, the proposed development of 93 residential units
on the site would be consistent with the requested GSP-MU zone with community benefits.
The GSP-MU allows a mixed use of 3.0 with community benefits. The project proposes a FAR of 2.2
compared to a maximum allowed FAR of 3.0 with the allowed provisions of community benefits by the
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan. Therefore, the project is consistent with the GSP-MU development
standards.
The project is not anticipated to have any significant land use or zoning impacts.
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region
and the residents of the state? No Impact. The State Mining and Geology Board classifies land in
California on the availability of mineral resources. There are four Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ)
designations in California for the classification of sand, gravel, and crushed rock resources (MRZ-1, MRZ-
2, MRZ-3, MRZ-4). According to the Rosemead General Plan Update the project site is within the MRZ-
4.42 The MRZ-4 classification is “Areas where available information is inadequate for assignment to any
other MRZ zone”.43 As Rosemead is completely urbanized and the State has not identified any significant
41 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan, page 3-4.
42 Rosemead General Plan, Figure 4-2 Mineral Resources Map.
43 Ibid.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 74
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
recoverable mineral resources within the City, no mineral extraction activities are permitted within the
City limits. There are no mining activities on the site or any of the properties surrounding and adjacent
to the site. The project would not have an impact to mineral resources of value to the region or residents
of the state.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. As discussed above in
Section “XII.a” above of this MND, the project site is not located within an area of known mineral deposits.
In addition, the geotechnical report that was prepared for the project did not identify any mineral deposits
in any of the five on-site soil borings. The project would not result in the loss of and not impact any locally
important mineral resources.
XIII. NOISE: Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation
Incorporated. A noise report44 was prepared for the project and is included in Appendix E of this MND.
The two existing commercial uses on the site generate noise associated with their use. However, the
noise levels generated by the two commercial uses are minimal due to the relatively small scale of those
businesses. Noise sources in the immediate project area impacting the project site includes traffic on
Garvey Avenue adjacent to and south of the site, traffic on Brighton Avenue west of the site, traffic on
Strathmore Avenue adjacent to and east of the site and traffic on Virginia Avenue adjacent to and north
of the site. Daily activities of the commercial and residential uses west of the site, commercial uses south
of the site and commercial and residential uses east of the site along with typical daily noise in the project
area also generate noise on the project site and the general project vicinity. Although the commercial
and residential uses adjacent to the site generate noise that extends onto the site, the greatest source of
noise in the immediate project vicinity is traffic on Garvey Avenue adjacent to and south of the site.
Noise Compatibility Guidelines
The City of Rosemead considers noise compatibility standards when evaluating land use development
projects. A proposed land use must be compatible with the ambient noise environment, particularly with
noise sources that the City does not have direct control such as motor vehicles on public streets and
roads, aircraft, and trains. Since the City cannot regulate the noise levels from the sources, the City
exercises its land use decision authority to ensure that noise/land use incompatibility is minimized.
The decibel (dB) scale is used to quantify sound pressure levels. Although decibels are most commonly
associated with sound, "dB" is a generic descriptor that is equal to ten times the logarithmic ratio of any
physical parameter versus some reference quantity. For sound, the reference level is the faintest sound
detectable by a young person with good auditory acuity.
Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire auditory spectrum,
human response is factored into sound descriptions by weighting sounds within the range of maximum
human sensitivity more heavily in a process called “A weighting,” written as dB(A). Any further reference
to decibels written as "dB" should be understood to be A weighted.
Time variations in noise exposure are typically expressed in terms of a steady-state energy level equal
to the energy content of the time varying period (called LEQ), or alternately, as a statistical description of
the sound pressure level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. Finally,
44 Noise Impact Analysis, Strathmore and Garvey Mixed-Use Project, Giroux & Associates, September 27, 2022.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 75
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at
night, state law requires that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time
noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Ldn (day-night) or the Community Noise Equivalent
Level (CNEL).
The City of Rosemead considers noise exposures for residential/transient lodging use to be “normally
acceptable” if the maximum exterior noise level is 60 dBA CNEL or less. Exterior residential noise levels
of up to 70 dBA CNEL are allowed if a noise analysis is conducted to identify possible noise reduction
measures. Noise levels above 70 dBA CNEL are considered normally unacceptable, except in unusual
circumstances for residential use. These standards apply to outdoor recreational uses such as
backyards, patios, and balconies.
An interior CNEL of 45 dB is mandated by the State of California Noise Insulation Standards (CCR,
Title 24, Part 6, Section T25-28) for multiple family dwellings, hotel and motel rooms. In 1988, the State
Building Standards Commission expanded that standard to include all habitable rooms in residential use,
included single-family dwelling units. Since normal noise attenuation within residential structures with
closed windows is 25-30A dB, an exterior noise exposure of 70-75 dBA CNEL allows the interior standard
to be met without any specialized structural attenuation (dual paned windows, etc.), but with closed
windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning in order to maintain a comfortable living
environment.
Noise Standards
For noise generated on one property affecting an adjacent use, the City of Rosemead limits the amount
of noise that can cross the boundary between the two uses. There are residential uses adjacent to and
north and west of the site. The noise standards described below must be met at the residential units
north and west of the site.
For regulated on-site sources of noise generation, the Rosemead noise ordinance prescribes limits that
are considered an acceptable noise exposure for residential uses in proximity to regulated noise sources.
The L50 metric used in the Rosemead noise ordinance is the level exceeded for 50% of the measurement
period of thirty minutes in an hour. One-half of all readings may exceed this average standard with larger
excursions from the average allowed for progressively shorter periods. The larger the deviation, the
shorter the allowed duration up to a never-to-exceed 20 dB increase above the 50th percentile standard.
Nighttime noise levels limits are reduced by 5 dB to reflect the increased sensitivity to noise occurring
during that time period.
The City’s L50 noise standard for residential use is 60 dB during the day (7 a.m. – 10 p.m.), and 45 dB
at night (10 p.m. – 7 a.m.). For commercial use, the L50 standard is 65 dB during the day (7 a.m. – 10
p.m.), and 60 dB at night (10 p.m. – 7 a.m.). These noise standards for residential and commercial uses
are shown in Table 14 of this MND. Should the ambient noise level exceed any of the noise standards,
the standards shall be increased to reflect the ambient noise level.
Rosemead Municipal Code 8.36.030(A)(3) restricts hours of construction to hours of lesser noise
sensitivity with heavy equipment to not operate from 8 p.m. to 7 a.m. during the week and on Saturdays,
and not exceed 65 dBA at any residential property line. Construction is not permitted on Sundays or
Federal Holidays.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 76
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 14
Rosemead Noise Ordinance Limits (Exterior Noise Level Not to be Exceeded)
Residential Use Commercial Use
Maximum Allowable
Duration of
Exceedance
7 AM to 10 PM
(Daytime)
10 PM to 7 AM
(Nighttime)
7 AM to 10 PM
(Daytime)
10 PM to 7 AM
(Nighttime)
30 minutes/Hour (L50) 60 dB 45 dB 65 dB 60 dB
15 minutes/Hour (L25) 65 dB 50 dB 70 dB 65 dB
5 minutes/Hour (L8) 70 dB 55 dB 75 dB 70 dB
1 minute/Hour (L1) 75 dB 60 dB 80 dB 75 dB
Never (Lmax) 80 dB 65 dB 85 dB 80 dB
Source: Municipal Code Section 8.36.060
Baseline Noise Levels
Short-term (15-minute) baseline noise measurements were taken on Monday, September 19, 2022 at
approximately 11 am at three locations to document the existing noise levels due to activities in the
immediate project vicinity. The existing noise levels are shown in Table 15 of this MND. The measured
noise levels provide a basis to calculate the noise levels that project residents would be exposed to with
the existing noise generating activities in the area. The locations of the noise measurements are shown
in Figure 16 of this MND.
Table 15
Short-Term Measured Noise Levels (dBA)
Site
No. Location Leq Lmin Lmax
1 60-feet to Garvey Ave centerline 70 64 79
2 Along Strathmore on-site 64 58 71
3 Nearest home to the north 62 52 65
Based on previous noise monitoring experience, 24-hour weighted CNELs can be reasonably estimated
from mid-day noise measurements. Thus, CNELs are approximately equal to Leq plus 2-3 dBA (Caltrans
Technical Noise Supplement, 2009). This indicates a CNEL along the Strathmore Avenue project
frontage of approximately 67 dBA CNEL and 73 dBA CNEL along the Garvey Avenue project frontage.
The City of Rosemead considers CNELS of up to 70 dBA to be conditionally acceptable for residential
use with the requirement of a noise analysis. Noise levels of up to 75 dB CNEL are conditionally
acceptable for commercial use. However, unless commercial projects include noise- sensitive uses such
as outdoor dining, exterior noise exposure is generally not considered a facility siting constraint.
Noise impacts are considered significant if they result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity
of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 77
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Figure 16
Noise Measurement Locations
b. Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people living or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.
STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Impacts may be significant if they create either a substantial permanent noise level increase or a
temporary noise level increase. The term "substantial" is not quantified in CEQA guidelines. In most
environmental analyses, "substantial" means a level that is clearly perceptible to humans. In practice,
this is at least a +3 dB increase. Some agencies, such as Caltrans, require substantial increases to be
+10 dB or more if noise standards are not exceeded by the increase. For purposes of this analysis, a
+3 dB increase is considered a substantial increase. The following project noise impacts would be
considered significant:
1. If construction activities were to audibly intrude into adjacent sensitive uses.
2. If project traffic noise were to cause an increase by a perceptible amount (+3 dB CNEL) or expose
receivers to levels exceeding city compatibility noise standards.
3. If future build-out noise levels were to expose sensitive receivers to levels exceeding compatibility
standards of 65 dB CNEL exterior at any outdoor uses or 45 dB CNEL interior noise levels in any
habitable space.
Meter 1
Meter 2
Meter 3
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 78
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Sensitive Receptors
The closest sensitive receptors adjacent to the project include single-family detached residential units
west of the site along the east side of Brighton Avenue and a single-family detached residence adjacent
to and northeast of the project at the southwest corner of Strathmore Avenue and Virginia Avenue. Figure
17 of this MND shows the sensitive receptors near the site. There are also single-family residential units
north of the site, north of Virginia Avenue that are near the project. Not including accessory structures,
most of the residences west of the site have a 70-foot setback. However, one residence immediately
adjacent to the site (Home 1) with a small parking lot to the east will remain. This home is approximately
10-feet to the shared property line and approximately 16 feet to the closest building façade of the
proposed mixed-use building, including the planned landscaping strip.
Figure 17
Closest Noise Sensitive Land Uses
Temporary Noise Impacts
The existing noise levels on the site and the noise levels in the immediate vicinity of the site would
increase temporarily during project construction. Short-term construction noise would be generated
during demolition of the existing buildings and site improvements, grading and the construction of the
proposed site improvements. Noise would also be generated by construction workers commuting to the
site, the delivery of materials and supplies to the site and the operation of on-site construction equipment,
etc.
Temporary construction noise impacts vary markedly due to the noise level range of the various types of
construction equipment, its activity level and the distance from the equipment to the closest noise
sensitive land use. Short-term construction noise impacts typically occur in discrete phases dominated
by earth-moving equipment that would be used for site demolition and grading operations to construction
and paving equipment that generates less noise than the heavier demolition and earth-moving
equipment.
Home 1
Home 2
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 79
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
In 2006, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the Roadway Construction Noise Model
that includes a national database of construction equipment reference noise emissions levels. In
addition, the database provides an acoustical usage factor to estimate the fraction of time each piece of
construction equipment is operating at full power during a construction phase. The usage factor is a key
input variable that is used to calculate the average Leq (Equivalent Continuous Sound Pressure Level)
noise levels.
Table 16 of this MND shows the construction fleet required to construct the project. The table is organized
by construction activity and lists the equipment that is associated with each activity. Table 16 of this MND
also shows the noise level for each individual piece of equipment at a reference 50-foot distance.
Table 16
Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Phase Name Equipment Usage
Factor1
Measured
Noise
@ 50 feet
(dBA)
Cumulative
Noise
@ 50 feet
(dBA)
Demolition Dozer 40% 82 78
Loader/Backhoe 37% 78 74
Grading
Dozer 40% 82 78
Grader 40% 85 81
Loader/Backhoe 37% 78 74
Building
Construction
Forklift 20% 75 68
Loader/Backhoe 37% 78 74
Crane 16% 81 73
Welder 46% 74 71
Paving
Paver 50% 77 74
Paving Equip 40% 76 72
Roller 38% 80 76
Loader/Backhoe 37% 78 74
Source: FHWA’s Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006
1. Estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during a construction operation
The construction noise levels shown in Table 16 of this MND would be reduced at a rate of approximately
6 dBA per the doubling of the distance between the noise source and a receptor. Shielding by existing
buildings and/or terrain often results in lower construction noise levels at distant receptors. The potential
for project construction-related noise levels to impact adjacent and nearby residential receptors would
depend on the location and proximity of the on-site construction activities to these off-site receptors.
Table 17 of this MND shows the adjusted maximal noise levels from the operation of on-site construction
equipment at 50 feet to the closest noise sensitive receptors that are approximately 10 feet from the
common property line of the project site with the construction of a proposed six-foot tall masonry wall
along the project boundary adjacent to existing residential units. The noise levels in Table 17 of this MND
take into account a 4 dBA reduction in noise levels associated with the construction of the six-foot tall
masonry wall.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 80
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 17
Construction Noise Exposure at Adjoining Sensitive Noise Receptor (dBA Leq)
Phase Name Equipment Home 1 Home 2
Demo Dozer 88 86
Loader/Backhoe 84 82
Grading
Dozer 88 86
Grader 91 89
Loader/Backhoe 84 82
Building
Construction
Forklift 70 76
Loader/Backhoe 76 82
Crane 75 81
Welder 73 79
Paving
Paver na na
Paving Equip na na
Roller na na
Loader/Backhoe na na
Home 1: West of site, homes taking access from Brighton, north of alley
Home 2: NE corner of site, Virginia/Strathmore
As shown in Table 17 of this MND, the operation of the dozer during project demolition and grading would
exceed the City of Rosemead adopted 85 dBA Leq significance threshold if demolition equipment is
operated directly adjacent to the shared property line with Home 1 and grading equipment is operated
adjacent to Home 1 and Home 2. However, at 35-feet from both residential units the noise levels at those
residential units would decrease to 81 dBA during the operation of the dozer during demolition to Home
1 and 84 dBA to Home 1 and Home 2 during grading. None of the other construction activities would
exceed the adopted 85 dBA Leq significance threshold.
Some of the residents adjacent to and west and north of the project, north of Virginia Avenue, could
experience noise nuisance during construction activity. However, the construction noise levels would be
temporary and limited to the duration of the construction at any one location within the site and less than
the City adopted 85 dBA Leq. The temporary noise impacts would cease once each component of
construction is completed, which is scheduled to start in the second quarter of 2023 and be completed in
the fourth quarter of 2024. The project is proposed to be constructed in a single phase so once
construction is completed the construction noise levels would cease.
Construction would be restricted to the hours of construction as allowed by Rosemead Municipal Code
8.36.030(A)(3) that restricts hours of construction to hours of lesser noise sensitivity with heavy
equipment to not operate from 8 p.m. to 7 a.m. during the week and on Saturdays, and not exceed 65
dBA at any residential property line. Construction is not permitted on Sundays or Federal Holidays.
As shown in Table 15 of this MND the existing ambient noise level on the site at noise measurement site
1 was 70 dBA and greater than the city standard of 65 dBA. Therefore, the existing noise level at the
project site due to traffic along the project frontage at Garvey Avenue currently exceeds the city daytime
noise standard of 65 dBA.
Rosemead Municipal Code 8.36.060(B)(1) restricts interior noise levels of residential receptor properties
to 45 dBA. As stated earlier, the noise levels in Table 16 of this MND take into account the proposed six-
foot tall masonary wall along the project boundary adjacent to the existing residential units and would
attenuate and reduce the exterior noise levels to the residential units adjacent to the site by approximately
6 dBA. Furthermore, typical residential construction materials and methods reduce exterior noise levels
to interior noise levels by approximately 20-25 dBA. In this case, when taking the proposed six-foot wall
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 81
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
along the project boundary and typical residential construction materials and methods into account, the
interior noise levels of the residential units adjacent to the project site would not exceed interior noise
levels of 45 dBA as restricted by Rosemead Municipal Code 8.36.060(B)(1). Therefore, although off-site
construction noise levels are calculated not to exceed 85 dBA except for the operation of dozers and
graders in close proximity to Home 1 and Home 2 during project grading, interior noise levels would not
exceed 45 dBA in compliance with Rosemead Municipal Code 8.36.060(B)(1).
In order to minimize construction noise levels to the residential units adjacent to the site the following
noise measures are recommended:
Mitigation Measure No. 8 Dozers and graders shall not operate within 35 feet of any residential unit
adjacent to the site. Grading within 35-feet of adjacent residential units
shall use quieter equipment such as a loader/backhoe or rubber tired
equipment.
Mitigation Measure No. 9 All construction equipment shall be equipped with mufflers and other
suitable noise attenuation devices (e.g., engine shields).
Mitigation Measure No. 10 Grading and construction contractors shall use rubber-tired equipment
rather than track equipment, to the maximum extent feasible.
Mitigation Measure No. 11 If feasible, electric hook-ups shall be provided to avoid the use of
generators. If electric service is determined to be infeasible, only whisper-
quiet generators shall be used (i.e., inverter generators capable of
providing variable load.
Mitigation Measure No. 12 Electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel
equipment shall be used, where feasible.
Mitigation Measure No. 13 Generators and stationary construction equipment shall be staged and
located as far from the adjacent residential structures as feasible.
Mitigation Measure No. 14 Construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor
vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for
more than 5 minutes.
Mitigation Measure No. 15 A sign shall be posted in a readily visible location at the project site that
shows the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide
a telephone number where residents can enquire about the construction
process and register complaints to an assigned construction noise
disturbance coordinator.
Motor Vehicle Noise Impacts
Off-Site Project-Related Vehicular Noise Impacts
Long-term noise impacts to the proposed residential and commercial uses on the site would be due to
off-site motor vehicle traffic on roadways adjacent to and in the project vicinity. The potential motor
vehicle traffic noise impacts to the project were addressed using the California specific vehicle noise
curves (CALVENO) in the federal roadway noise model (the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction
Model, FHWA-RD-77-108). This model calculates the Leq noise level for a reference set of input
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 82
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
conditions, and then makes a series of adjustments for site-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds,
and noise barriers.
Table 18 of this MND summarizes the 24-hour CNEL noise at 50 feet from the roadway centerline along
11 roadway segments in the project vicinity. Four traffic scenarios were evaluated that included existing
conditions and future conditions “with Project” and “without Project.” Data from the traffic report was
referenced for this noise analysis.
Table 18
Traffic Noise Impact Analysis
(dBA CNEL at 50 feet from centerline)
Segment Existing
No Project
Existing
With
Project
Future No
Project
Future
With
Project
Virginia St/ E. of Strathmore 44.9 48.7 44.9 48.7
Strathmore/
Virginia to Site
Entrance 44.9 48.7 46.3 49.4
Site Entrance to
Garvey 44.9 51.7 44.9 51.7
S. of Garvey 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1
Garvey/ W. of Brighton 70.6 70.7 71.1 71.2
Brighton-Strathmore 70.7 70.8 71.2 71.2
E. of Strathmore 70.7 70.8 71.2 71.3
W. of San Gabriel 71.2 71.2 71.6 71.7
E. of San Gabriel 70.9 70.9 71.3 71.4
San Gabriel/ N. of Garvey 71.6 71.6 72.1 72.1
S. of Garvey 71.8 71.8 72.1 72.1
As shown, the noise levels on the larger roadways including Garvey Avenue and San Gabriel Boulevard
for the project opening year and the future does not change significantly because the project traffic
volumes are relatively small compared to the existing traffic volumes on those roadways. However,
Strathmore Avenue and Virginia Street have considerably lower traffic volumes such that the addition of
project traffic is potentially significant because the noise level would exceed the +3dBA threshold as
shown in Table 19 of this MND. As shown in Table 20 of this MND, the roadway segments that
experience the largest traffic noise increases of +3.1 dBA to +6.8 dBA due to project traffic the future
CNELs, including project traffic, are calculated to be less than 52 dBA and less than the recommended
significance guideline of 60-70 dBA CNEL for residential uses. Therefore, the noise level increase to off-
site roadways due to project traffic is less than significant.
Table 19
Project Noise Level Impact (dBA CNEL at 50 feet from centerline)
Segment Existing Impact* Future Impact*
Virginia St/ E of Strathmore 3.8 3.8
Strathmore/
Virginia to Site
Entrance 3.8 3.1
Site Entrance to
Garvey 6.8 6.8
S of Garvey 0.0 0.0
Garvey/ W of Brighton 0.1 0.1
Brighton-Strathmore 0.1 0.0
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 83
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
E of Strathmore 0.1 0.1
W of San Gabriel 0.0 0.1
E of San Gabriel 0.0 0.1
San Gabriel/ N of Garvey 0.0 0.0
S of Garvey 0.0 0.0
*bolded entries exceed the +3 dBA traffic noise increase threshold
Table 20
CNEL for Roadway Segments Exceeding +3 dBA Threshold
(dBA CNEL at 50 feet from centerline)
Segment Existing
Project Impact/ CNEL
Future
Project Impact/ CNEL
Virginia St/ E of Strathmore 3.8 / 48.7 3.8 / 48.7
Strathmore/
Virginia to Site
Entrance 3.8 / 48.7 3.1 / 49.4
Site Entrance to
Garvey 6.8 / 51.7 6.8 / 51.7
Site Operational Noise
There are three site entrances at Strathmore Avenue, Virginia Street and a public alley connecting to
Brighton Street at the west side of the property. Approximately 60% of the project traffic is anticipated to
use the Strathmore Avenue entrance, 35% would use the Virginia Street entrance and the remaining 5%
of project traffic would use the Brighton Street entrance.
The traffic analysis calculates that 62 vehicles would enter and exit the site during the AM peak hour and
74 vehicles would enter and exit the site during the PM peak hour. Table 21 of this MND shows the
calculated noise levels at each of the three project entrances during the PM peak hour which would have
the highest number of motor vehicle trips.
Table 21
Peak Hour Traffic Noise at Site Access Points
Entrance Point Number of Vehicles Associated Noise Level
Strathmore Entrance 44 47 dBA Leq
Virginia St Entrance 26 44 dBA Leq
Alley Access 4 36 dBA Leq
The homes west of the site would be exposed to traffic noise from project traffic that uses the alley to
enter and leave the site. This entrance is calculated to have a peak hour noise level of 36 dBA Leq.
Homes north of the Virginia Street entrance is calculated to have a peak hour noise level of 44 dBA Leq.
No sensitive land uses would be impacted by the Strathmore Avenue entrance.
The City of Rosemead Noise Ordinance limits noise from private property adjacent to a residential use
to not exceed 60 dBA Leq at the property line from 7 AM to 10 PM, which is when peak hour traffic would
occur. Therefore, project peak hour traffic entering and leaving the site would not exceed the daytime
noise standards. The nocturnal noise standard is 45 dBA Leq, but as shown in Table 21 of this MND,
the PM peak hour noise levels at the Virginia Street entrance would not exceed 44 dBA Leq. The
measured ambient noise levels shown in Table 15 are higher than those shown in Table 21 and as a
result the noise levels associated with project traffic entering and leaving the site during the peak hours
would not be audible to area residents closest to the entrances.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 84
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
On-Site Traffic Noise
The project site is bound by Garvey Avenue on the south, Strathmore Avenue on the east and Virginia
Street on the north. Due to existing traffic volumes Garvey Avenue traffic would expose project residents
to high noise levels. The first three levels of the project along Garvey Avenue include commercial use
and a parking garage. Residential use is proposed for levels 4-7. The balconies are primarily recessed
within the building façade and are therefore shielded from directional noise from adjacent streets. Most
of the residential recreational space is provided by the two courtyards and the two community decks
which are setback from the roadway, or interior to the building. The balconies of the residential units that
front Garvey Avenue and Strathmore Avenue would not observe exterior traffic noise levels above 70
dBA CNEL.
Mechanical Equipment Noise
The project developer proposes to install air conditioners on the building rooftop. The air conditioners
are proposed to be located away from the edge of the roof and screened to attenuate noise and provide
aesthetic buffering to surrounding land uses. Because the air conditioners would be screened and not
directly visible from surrounding land uses the operation of the air conditioners would not exceed the
City’s noise threshold of significance and noise impacts would be less than significant.
Based on the above analysis the project would not have any significant temporary (construction) or
permanent (operational) noise level impacts.
b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. There are residential homes adjacent to and north of the
project, north of Virginia Street, adjacent to and west of the site, commercial use and single family
detached residences east of the site, east of Strathmore Avenue and commercial use south of Garvey
Avenue. The site is subject to occasional ground borne vibration due to heavy trucks that travel on
Garvey Avenue adjacent to and south of the site. Any vibration levels on the site from the occasional
passing of heavy trucks on Garvey Avenue are short-term in duration and cease once a heavy truck
passes the site. The existing uses on the project site have been in their current locations for many years
and the vibrations from Garvey Avenue do not significantly impact the existing on-site uses.
Construction activities generate ground-borne vibration when heavy equipment travels over unpaved
surfaces or when it is engaged in the movement of soil during grading operations. The effects of ground-
borne vibration include discernible movement of building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on
shelves or hanging on walls, and rumbling sounds. Vibration related issues generally occur due to
resonances in the structural components of a building because structures amplify ground borne vibration.
Due to the “soft” sedimentary surfaces of soil that is present in Southern California the effects of ground
vibration are quickly damped. Ground borne vibration is almost never annoying to people when they are
outdoors (Federal Transit Administration [FTA] 2006).
A vibration descriptor commonly used to determine structural damage is the peak particle velocity (ppv),
which is defined as the maximum instantaneous positive or negative peak of the vibration signal, usually
measured in in/sec. The range of these such vibration is shown in Table 22 of this MND.
As shown in Table 23 of this MND and according to Caltrans and the FTA the threshold for structural
vibration damage for modern structures is 0.5 in/sec for intermittent sources, which includes impact
pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, vibratory pile drivers, and vibratory
compaction equipment. Older, typically historical residential structures have a 0.3 in/sec threshold. Below
this level there is virtually no risk of building damage.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 85
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 22
Human Response To Transient Vibration
Average Human Response ppv (in/sec)
Severe 2.000
Strongly perceptible 0.900
Distinctly perceptible 0.240
Barely perceptible 0.035
Source: Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, 2013.
Table 23
FTA and Caltrans Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria
Building Type PPV (in/sec)
FTA Criteria
Reinforced concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 0.5
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.3
Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 0.2
Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 0.12
Caltrans Criteria
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 0.5
New residential structures 0.5
Older residential structures 0.3
Historic old buildings 0.25
Fragile Buildings 0.1
Extremely fragile ruins, ancient monuments 0.08
To be conservative, the damage threshold of 0.3 in/sec for older residential structures was used for this
vibration analysis. The calculated vibration levels generated by the operation of the construction
equipment anticipated for use by the project are shown below in Table 24 of this MND.
Table 24
Estimated Vibration Levels During Project Construction
Equipment PPV at 10 ft (in/sec) PPV at 15 ft (in/sec) PPV at 25 ft (in/sec) PPV at 40 ft (in/sec) PPV at 50 ft (in/sec)
Large Bulldozer 0.352 0.191 0.089 0.044 0.031
Loaded trucks 0.300 0.163 0.076 0.037 0.027
Jackhammer 0.138 0.075 0.035 0.017 0.012
Small bulldozer 0.012 0.006 0.003 0.001 <0.001
Source: FHWA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment
As shown in Table 24 of this MND, the calculated vibration levels generated by the operation of the
construction equipment such as a large bulldozer could be above levels and have structural
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 86
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
damage to older residential structures (i.e., 0.3 in/sec) if the dozer operates closer than 15-feet to the
property line.
Mitigation Measure No. 8 in Section “XIII. a.” above of this MND requires that dozers and graders shall not
operate within 35 feet of any off-site structure. This mitigation measure would also mitigate potential
vibration impacts to existing structures adjacent to the site. The implementation of Mitigation Measure
No. 8 would reduce potential vibration impacts to off-site structures to less than significant.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no
private airstrips or public airports within the immediate project vicinity or the City of Rosemead. The
closest airport to the project is the San Gabriel Valley Airport, which is approximately 4 miles northeast
of the project. Current and on-going operations at the San Gabriel Valley Airport would not expose project
employees, customers, or residents to excessive noise levels. The project would not be impacted by
noise levels at the San Gabriel Valley Airport due to the distance of the airport from the project.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project:
Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example through extension of roads or
other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project proposes 35,105 square feet of non-
residential use (retail/office/residential-work) and 93 residential units. Of the 93 residential units, 24 are
live-work units, including 3 live-work units on the ground level, 1 live-work unit on both the second and
third floors and 19 live-work units on the fourth floor. The project proposes 69 apartments on the fifth
through seventh floors with 21 apartments on the fifth floor, 25 apartments on the sixth floor, and 23
apartments on the seventh floor.
The project is estimated to generate approximately 344 residents based on 3.7 persons per household
and the average number of people for all household types in the City of Rosemead.45 It is anticipated
that the proposed live/work units and apartments would generate less than 3.7 persons per the average
household in Rosemead, which includes single-family detached units, because the proposed units are
largely one and two bedroom units. Therefore, the number of residents that would be generated by the
project is anticipated to be less than 344 people. It is anticipated that many of the future project residents
are existing Rosemead residents and currently live in Rosemead. Existing Rosemead residents that
move to and relocate from their existing residence in Rosemead to the project would not increase the
city’s population. For those future project residents that currently live outside Rosemead and would move
to the site, the city’s population is not anticipated to increase significantly due to the project. The city’s
population growth from January 1, 2021, to January 1, 2022 decreased by 312 residents, or -0.6.46 Thus,
an incremental increase in the population by the project would not significantly impact the population of
Rosemead.
It is not anticipated at this time that the project would induce a substantial unplanned population growth
in Rosemead either directly or indirectly since some of the future project residents are current city
residents and the number of future residents that move to Rosemead from outside the city would be
minimal. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to significantly increase the city’s population.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project site is developed with commercial uses, and
45 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/rosemeadcitycalifornia,CA/HSD310220.
46 https://dof.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/Forecasting/Demographics/Documents/E-1_2022PressRelease.pdf
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 87
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
it would not displace any existing residential units or residents. As a result, no existing residents would
have to find replacement housing. The project would not have an impact to any existing residents.
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
i. Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Fire protection services are provided by the Los
Angeles County Fire Department. The construction of the proposed mixed-use building would be
required to meet all applicable 2022 California Building and Fire Codes would minimize the need for
fire protection service calls at the site by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The project would
not have any significant impacts to the Los Angeles County Fire Department.47
ii. Police protection? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Police protection
services are provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department. The Temple Sheriff’s Station
located at 8838 Las Tunas Drive serves the project site. The project would incrementally increase
calls for police protection compared to the existing uses on the site.
The Sheriff’s Department has a Crime Prevention Thru Environmental Design (CPTED) program that
is recommended be implemented during project design. The goal of CPTED is to reduce
opportunities for criminal activity by employing physical design features that discourage anti-social
behavior, while encouraging the legitimate use of the site. The CPTED includes defensible space,
territoriality, surveillance, lighting, landscaping, and physical security.48
The Sheriff’s Department recommends that a Construction Traffic Management Plan be implemented
during project construction to address construction-related traffic congestion and emergency project
access. If temporary lane closures are required to install public utilities emergency access should be
maintained at all times.49
The following measures are recommended to reduce potential police protection impacts to less than
significant.
Mitigation Measure No. 16 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the project developer shall
contact the County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department Temple Station
and incorporate all applicable CPTED defensible space measures into
the final project design to reduce criminal activity at the project.
Mitigation Measure No. 17 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project developer shall
submit a Construction Traffic Management Plan to the County of Los
Angeles Sheriff’s Department Temple Station that identifies the
construction management measures that would be implemented during
construction to minimize construction-related traffic congestion and
emergency project access.
47 Specialist Ronald Durbin, Los Angeles County Fire Department, letter dated, October 5, 2022.
48 County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, Captain Mark Reyes, Temple Station, letter dated July 27, 2022.
49 Ibid.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 88
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
While the project would incrementally increase police service calls, the implementation of the
recommended mitigation measures would reduce police protection impacts to less than significant.
iii. Schools? Less Than Significant Impact. The project is in the Garvey School District and serves
students from pre-K to 8th grade. The project would generate students to schools in the Garvey
School District. Students K-6 would attend Bitely Elementary School located at 7501 E. Fern Avenue
and grades 7-8 would attend Garvey Intermediate School located at 2720 Jackson Avenue. The
project is in the Alhambra Unified School District and students grades 9-12 would attend San Gabriel
High School located at 801 S. Ramona Street in San Gabriel. The Alhambra Unified School District
has capacity to serve the students generated by the project.50
Both school districts collect a development fee for residential and commercial development. The
student impact fee is used by schools to provide additional classrooms to accommodate the students
generated by residential and commercial/industrial development projects. The project developer
would be required to pay the State mandated student impact fee to each District before building
permits would be issued for construction. Payment of the required development fee would reduce
impact of the students generated by the project to the Garvey School District and Alhambra Unified
School District to less than significant.
iv. Parks? Less Than Significant Impact. The closest City of Rosemead public park to the project is
Garvey Park that is located at 3233 Kelburn Avenue and approximately 0.2 miles north of the project.
Garvey Park includes a water park, baseball fields, tennis courts, playground, an open field, bar-b-
ques, picnic tables, gym, etc.
The project is required by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan to provide 13,8006 square feet of common
open space for the residential use and 2,646 square feet for the commercial use for a total of 16,446
square feet of common open space. The project proposes 4,235 square feet of common open space
for the commercial use and 19,114 square feet for the residential use for a total of 23,379 square feet
or 6,933 square feet more common open space than required by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
The project is also required by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan to provide 6,975 square feet of
private open space and the project proposes 10,067 square feet of private open space, or 3,092
square feet more of private open space in the form of private decks and balconies than required by
the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan. The project proposes more public and private open space than
required for the site by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan.
It is anticipated that any existing Rosemead residents that move to the project would not significantly
increase their use of existing City park and recreational facilities because their current use of City
park and recreational facilities would not increase upon relocation to the project site. For those
residents that move to the site from outside Rosemead, there could be an incremental increase in the
use of City park and recreational facilities. However, it is anticipated that most of the project residents
would not use City park and recreational facilities to a level that would significantly impact the existing
facilities.
The project developer would be required to pay the city-required development impact fees as required
by RMC Chapter 17.170.010. The development impact fees include park fees that could be used by
the City to provide park facilities as allowed by RMC Chapter 17.170.090, which includes the
purchase of land, design, construction, equipment, etc. as deemed necessary to serve city residents,
including project residents. The payment of the required development impact fees by the project
developer would reduce potential park and recreational impacts to less than significant.
50 George Murray, Alhambra Unified School District, letter dated July 14, 2022.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 89
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
v. Other public facilities? No Impact. There are no public facilities or services that would be impacted
by the project.
XVI. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not significantly impact recreation
facilities. Please see Public Services Section “XV.a.iv” above of this MND.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than
Significant Impact. As discussed in Public Services Section “XV.a.iv” above of this MND, the project
does not propose the construction of any on-site recreational facilities. However, as discussed in Public
Services Section “XV.a.iv” above of this MND, the project would be required to pay the city-required
development impact fees, including a park fee, as required by RMC Chapter 17.170.010. The park fee
would be used by the City at its discretion to either expand existing recreational facilities or acquire new
parkland. The project does not require the construction or the expansion of other recreational facilities
that would impact the environment.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. A traffic report51
was prepared for the project and is included in Appendix F.
Criteria for Requiring a Traffic Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Impact Analysis
The Los Angeles County 2010 CMP provides the following thresholds for requiring a CMP-compliant
traffic impact analysis:
• All CMP arterial monitoring intersections, including monitored freeway on or off-ramp
intersections, where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during either the AM or PM
weekday peak hours (of adjacent street traffic);
• If CMP arterial segments are being analyzed rather than intersections, the study area must
include all segments where the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips (total of both
directions).
• Mainline freeway monitoring locations were the project will add 150 or more trips, in either
direction, during either the AM or PM weekday peak hours.
The project is calculated to generate approximately 62 AM peak hour trips and 74 PM peak hour trips,
which are distributed to/from the project site. The intersections of Del Mar Avenue/Garvey Avenue and
San Gabriel Boulevard/Garvey Avenue are not CMP intersections. The project would not add 150 or
more peak hour trips to the I-10 Freeway since the project generates less than this threshold in total
during each peak hour. Therefore, the project would not result in a CMP impact because it does not
meet the thresholds requiring a traffic impact analysis for CMP purposes and no further CMP traffic
analysis is warranted. Thus, the project would not impact the Los Angeles County 2010 CMP.
51 Strathmore and Garvey Mixed Use Project Traffic Impact Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., September 9, 2022.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 90
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
CMP TRANSIT IMPACT REVIEW
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2010 Congestion Management Program
uses a conversion factor based on the daily and AM and PM peak hour project trip generation to provide
a transit analysis. The conversion is as follows:
• Multiply the total trips generated by 1.4 to convert vehicle trips to person trips;
• For each time period, multiply the result by one of the following factors:
3.5% of Total Person Trips Generated for most cases, except:
10% primarily Residential within 1/4 mile of a CMP transit center
15% primarily Commercial within 1/4 mile of a CMP transit center
7% primarily Residential within 1/4 mile of a CMP multi-modal transportation center
9% primarily Commercial within 1/4 mile of a CMP multi-modal transportation center
5% primarily Residential within 1/4 mile of a CMP transit corridor
7% primarily Commercial within 1/4 mile of a CMP transit corridor
0% if no fixed route transit services operate within one mile of the project
Accordingly, the proposed project-generated transit trips are calculated as follows:
• Daily: ((864 trips x 1.4) x 0.035) ≈ 42
• Morning Peak Hour: ((62 trips x 1.4) x 0.035) ≈ 3
• Evening Peak Hour: ((74 trips x 1.4) x 0.035) ≈ 4
The project is calculated to generate three (3) transit trips during the AM peak hour and four (4) transit
trips during the PM peak hour. Based on the existing transit services available in the immediate project
vicinity and the relatively low transit trip generation, the project would have an insignificant impact on
transit demand and transit capacity.
Project Traffic
The project study area includes the following intersections within the City of Rosemead:
1. Del Mar Avenue (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) Rosemead
2. Brighton Street (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) Rosemead
3. Project Driveway (NS) at Virginia Avenue (EW) Rosemead
4. Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Virginia Street (EW) Rosemead
5. Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Project Driveway (EW) Rosemead
6. Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) Rosemead
7. San Gabriel Boulevard (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) Rosemead
In accordance with the City of Rosemead transportation study requirements, the following scenarios are
analyzed for weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions:
• Existing (2022);
• Opening Year (2024) Without Project (Existing + Growth Factor + Cumulative Projects); and
• Opening Year (2024) With Project (Existing + Growth Factor + Cumulative Projects + Project)
Intersection Capacity Utilization (Signalized Intersections)
In compliance with the City of Rosemead transportation guidelines the analysis of signalized intersections
is based on the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology compares
the volume of traffic using the intersection to the capacity of the intersection. The resulting volume-to-
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 91
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
capacity (V/C) ratio represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
Level of Service (LOS) is used to qualitatively describe the performance of a roadway facility, ranging
from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (extreme congestion and system failure). In accordance with
City of Rosemead transportation requirements this analysis uses the following input parameters for the
ICU analysis: 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane for through and turn lanes, 3,240 vehicles per hour for
dual left-turn lanes, and a total clearance time of 10 percent.
Intersection Delay Methodology (Unsignalized Intersections)
This methodology used to assess the performance of unsignalized intersections in the City of Rosemead
and known as the intersection delay methodology based on the procedures contained in the Highway
Capacity Manual. The methodology compares the traffic volume using the intersection to the capacity of
the intersection to calculate the delay associated with the traffic control at the intersection.
Performance Standards
The City of Rosemead has established minimum acceptable LOS standards during peak hour conditions
of LOS D or better for intersections. In accordance with the City of Rosemead guidelines, a project is
considered to cause an adverse transportation effect if the project-related increase in the volume-to-
capacity ratio equals or exceeds the threshold shown below in Table 25.
Table 25
Adverse Transportation Effect Threshold
Level of Service Volume/Capacity (V/C) V/C Incremental Increase
E/F 0.91 or more +0.02 or more
Although the City does not specify an adverse transportation effect threshold for unsignalized
intersections, the following criteria is commonly used to assess the need for improvements at
unsignalized intersections:
a) The addition of project trips causes the intersection to degrade from an acceptable Level of
Service (D or better) to deficient Level of Service (E or F), or
b) The project increases delay by two or more seconds at an intersection that is already operating
at a deficient Level of Service (E or F) prior to the addition of project trips; and
c) Peak hour volumes satisfy the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Controls (CA MUTCD) peak
hour traffic signal warrant.
Existing Intersection Level of Service
The LOS for the studied intersections for the existing conditions are shown in Table 26. As shown, the
study intersections currently operate at an acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours for the
Existing conditions, except for the following study intersection that currently operates at an unacceptable
Level of Service (E or F) during the PM peak hour:
• Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) - #6 (PM-LOS E
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 92
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Table 26
Existing Intersection Level of Service
Notes:
(1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop
(2) ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization. For unsignalized intersections, delay is shown in [seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with
cross street stop control, delay and Level of Service are based on the worst individual minor street approach or major street left turn
movement.
(3) LOS = Level of Service
Project Trip Generation
Table 27 shows the project trip generation based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021). As shown, the project is
forecast to generate approximately 864 daily trips, including 62 trips during the AM peak hour and 74
trips during the PM peak hour.
Table 27
Project Trip Generation
Land Use
Source1
Land Use
Variable2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
Rate % In
%
Out Rate % In
%
Out Rate
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise, Not Close to Rail
Transit) ITE 221 DU 23% 77% 0.37 61% 39% 0.39 4.54
General Office Building ITE 710 TSF 88% 12% 1.52 17% 83% 1.44 10.84
Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) ITE 822 TSF 60% 40% 2.36 50% 50% 6.59 54.45
Trips Generated
Land Use
Source Quantity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily In Out Total In Out Total
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise, Not Close to Rail
Transit) ITE 221 93 DU 8 26 34 22 14 36 422
Internal Capture3 (AM: 0% In, 4% Out; PM: 23%
In, 21% Out) 0 -1 -1 -5 -3 -8 -9
Subtotal 8 25 33 17 11 28 413
General Office Building ITE 710 12.801 TSF 17 2 19 3 15 18 139
Internal Capture3 (AM: 12% In, 50% Out; PM:
33% In, 13% Out) -2 -1 -3 -1 -2 -3 -6
Subtotal 15 1 16 2 13 15 133
Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) ITE 822 6.040 TSF 9 6 15 20 20 40 329
Internal Capture3 (AM: 11% In, 17% Out; PM:
20% In, 25% Out) -1 -1 -2 -4 -5 -9 -11
Subtotal 8 5 13 16 15 31 318
TOTAL TRIPS GENERATED 31 31 62 35 39 74 864
Study Intersection Traffic Control1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU or Delay2 LOS3 ICU or Delay2 LOS3
1. Del Mar Ave. at Garvey Ave. TS 0.614 B 0.685 B
2. Brighton St. at Garvey Ave. CSS [14.7] B [16.9] C
4. Strathmore Ave. at Virginia St. CSS [8.4] A [8.5] A
6. Strathmore Ave. at Garvey Ave. CSS [30.2] D [37.9] E
7. San Gabriel Blvd. at Garvey Ave. TS 0.693 B 0.777 C
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 93
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Notes:
1. ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021); ### = Land Use Code.
All rates based on General Urban/Suburban setting unless otherwise noted.
2. DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3. Internal capture calculated using the NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool included in the ITE Trip Generation
Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017).
Other Factors Affecting Trip Generation
The traffic volumes shown in Table 27 consist of the total trips generated for each project land use. As
a residential trip generated by the project may also interact with the commercial retail or office land uses
within the project, a double counting of those trips occurs. To account for this internal interaction, the
trips generated by the project were adjusted in accordance with procedures developed by the National
Cooperative Highway Research Program 684 Internal Capture Estimation Tool as incorporated into the
ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition).
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Figure 18 shows the project trip distribution patterns for the project generated trips. The project trip
distribution patterns are based on review of existing volume data, surrounding land uses, and the local
and regional roadway facilities in the project vicinity.
Opening Year (2024) Without Project
Intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year (2024) Without Project conditions are shown in Table 28.
As shown, the study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable Levels of Service, except for the
following study intersection:
• Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) - #6 (AM-LOS E, PM-LOS F)
Table 28
Opening Year (2024) Without Project
ID Study Intersection
Traffic
Control1
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS3
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS3
1. Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave TS 0.655 B 0.744 C
2. Brighton St at Garvey Ave CSS [15.9] C [18.8] C
3. Project Dwy at Virginia St CSS [0.0] A [0.0] A
4. Strathmore Ave at Virginia St CSS [8.4] A [8.5] A
5. Strathmore Ave at Project Dwy CSS [0.0] A [0.0] A
6. Strathmore Ave at Garvey Ave CSS [40.2] E [53.6] F
7. San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave TS 0.728 C 0.843 D
Notes:
(1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop
(2) ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization. For unsignalized intersections, delay is shown in
[seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with cross street stop control, delay and Level of Service are based
on the worst individual minor street approach or major street left turn movement.
(3) LOS = Level of Service
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 18
Project Trip Distribution
Figure 11Project Trip Distribution
N
SiteDEL MAR AVEVIRGINIA ST
BRIGHTON STSTRATHMORE AVEGARVEY AVE SAN GABRIEL BLVD55%
15%
20%
20%
5%
20%
10%
15%45%
Strathmore and Garvey Mixed Use ProjectTraffic Impact Analysis19538
Percent To/From Project
Legend
10%
60%
35%
95%40%
21
Source: Ganddini Group, Inc.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 95
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Opening Year (2024) With Project
Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Levels of Service for Opening Year (2024) Without Project conditions are shown in Table 29.
As shown, the study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable Levels of Service during the peak
hours, except for the following study intersection which is forecast to continue operating at an
unacceptable Levels of Service:
• Strathmore Avenue (NS) at Garvey Avenue (EW) - #6 (AM-LOS E, PM-LOS F)
Table 29
Opening Year (2024) With Project
ID Study Intersection
Traffic
Control1
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS3
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS3
1. Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave TS 0.661 B 0.753 C
2. Brighton St at Garvey Ave CSS [15.8] C [19.1] C
3. Project Dwy at Virginia St CSS [0.0] A [0.0] A
4. Strathmore Ave at Virginia St CSS [8.7] A [8.7] A
5. Strathmore Ave at Project Dwy CSS [8.5] A [8.4] A
6. Strathmore Ave at Garvey Ave CSS [45.3] E [61.3] F
- With Improvements CSS [21.1] C [24.0] C
7. San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey Ave TS 0.733 C 0.852 D
Notes:
(1) TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop
(2) ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization. For unsignalized intersections, delay is shown in
[seconds/vehicle]. For intersections with cross street stop control, delay and Level of Service are
based on the worst individual minor street approach or major street left turn movement.
(3) LOS = Level of Service
The deficient Level of Service at the intersection of Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue (#6) is associated
with the northbound left turn movement. The major street approaches along Garvey Avenue are forecast
to operate at Level of Service A and the southbound approach on Strathmore Avenue is forecast to
operate at Level of Service C.
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Since the currently unsignalized intersection of Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue is forecast to operate
at a deficient LOS, the need for installation of a traffic signal at this study intersection was evaluated
based on the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Controls (CA MUTCD) peak hour volume traffic signal
warrant. The installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue is
not warranted based on the forecast AM and PM peak hour volumes for Opening Year (2024) With Project
conditions.
Although not warranted by the project at this time as discussed above, the City expressed a concern for
the need for a traffic signal at the Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue intersection in the future after the
project is occupied due to cumulative traffic. Therefore, the following mitigation measure is
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 96
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
recommended to address the City’s concern for a traffic signal at the Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue
intersection in the future, if warranted.
Mitigation Measure No. 18 Approximately 12 months after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
or the City Engineers discretion, the project developer shall conduct a traffic
signal warrant at the Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue intersection. If
warranted, the project developer’s fair-share of the cost of the construction
of the traffic signal shall be paid from the Development Impact Fees
collected from the developer.
Transportation Effect Assessment
Table 30 evaluates the project’s transportation impact at the study intersections for Opening Year (2024)
With Project conditions. As shown, the proposed project is forecast to result in no adverse transportation
effects based on the established thresholds.
Table 30
Traffic Impact for Opening Year (2024) With Project
ID Study Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Without
Project
With
Project
Project-
Related
Change Adverse Effect? Without
Project
With
Project
Project-
Related
Change Adverse Effect? ICU or
[Delay]1 LOS2
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS2
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS2
ICU or
[Delay]2 LOS2
1. Del Mar Ave at Garvey Ave 0.655 B 0.661 B +0.006 No 0.744 C 0.753 C +0.009 No
2. Brighton St at Garvey Ave [15.9] C [15.8] C -0.100 No [18.8] C [19.1] C +0.300 No
3. Project Dwy at Virginia St [0.0] A [0.0] A 0.0 No [0.0] A [0.0] A 0.0 No
4. Strathmore Ave at Virginia St [8.4] A [8.7] A +0.300 No [8.5] A [8.7] A +0.200 No
5.
Strathmore Ave at Project
Dwy [0.0] A [8.5] A +8.500 No [0.0] A [8.4] A +8.400 No
6.
Strathmore Ave at Garvey
Ave [40.2] E [45.3] E +5.100 No3 [53.6] F [61.3] F +7.700 No3
- With Improvements4 - - [21.1] C -19.100 No - - [24.0] C -29.600 No
7.
San Gabriel Blvd at Garvey
Ave 0.728 C 0.733 C +0.005 No 0.843 D 0.852 D +0.009 No
Notes:
(1) ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; control delay for unsiganlized intersections shown as [seconds/vehicle].
(2) LOS = Level of Service
(3) AM and PM peak hour volumes are not forecast to satisfy the CA MUTCD peak hour traffic signal warrant; see Appendix E.
(4) Improvement reflects option to remove the raised median on the west leg of Garvey Avenue and replace it with a two-way left turn lane.
Although the proposed project is forecast to decrease the Level of Service at the intersection of
Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue, the peak hour volumes do not warrant installation of a traffic signal;
therefore, the project’s effect does not meet the established definition of an adverse effect at unsignalized
intersections.
Notwithstanding the above, the following improvements were identified to address the deficient Level of
Service at the study intersection of Strathmore Avenue/Garvey Avenue for Opening Year (2024) With
Project conditions:
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 97
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
• Remove the raised median on the west leg of Garvey Avenue and replace it with a two-way left
turn median, or
• Restrict the northbound approach to right turns only during the AM and PM peak hours.
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Background
The project is in the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan (GASP) and requires a Specific Plan Amendment as
discussed in Section “XI.b” above of this MND. The project proposes more development for the site than
allowed by the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan. As a result, the traffic report compared the traffic of the
proposed project to the traffic generated by the buildout of the GASP to determine if the project would
result in new or significant traffic impacts than those identified by the GASP traffic report.
Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Baseline
Baseline traffic conditions for the project were obtained from the GASP EIR and supporting traffic analysis
contained in Appendix G of the GASP EIR52 The GASP EIR traffic report evaluated traffic impacts of the
buildout of the GASP based on the year 2035 baseline. The traffic analysis for the proposed project is
also based on the year 2035.
Affected Study Area
The GASP EIR traffic study included an intersection Levels of Service analysis at nine study intersections,
two freeway mainline segments and six freeway ramp intersections. Based on the trip generation and
assignment for the proposed project, the project is calculated to contribute more than 50 peak hour trips
at the following three intersections that were evaluated in the GASP EIR:
• Del Mar Avenue at Garvey Avenue (City of Rosemead);
• Kelburn Avenue at Garvey Avenue (City of Rosemead); and
• San Gabriel Boulevard at Garvey Avenue (City of Rosemead)
The project trip contributions at the other roadway intersections, segments and freeway ramp
intersections would not exceed the CMP criteria. Therefore, the project would have a negligible effect
on those transportation facilities.
Relevant Thresholds of Significance
The GASP EIR uses the threshold shown in Table 31 to identify significant impacts at study intersections
within City of Rosemead:
Table 31
Adverse Transportation Effect Threshold
Level of Service Without Project
Volume/Capacity (V/C)
Project Related V/C
Increase
F 1.00 or more Equal to or greater than 0.02
52 Traffic Impact Analysis for the Garvey Avenue Specific Plan EIR (KOA Corporation, May 2016.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 98
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Project Traffic Impact Assessment
Table 32 shows the results of the traffic assessment of the potential traffic impacts of the proposed
project. The ICU and Levels of Service for the project for the year 2035 were calculated by adding the
calculated project trips to the GASP 2035 traffic volume. This is a conservative assessment since the
project trips do not consider a credit for the net change in trips between the proposed project and the
trips generated by the existing GASP zoning for the site. As shown, the traffic impacts of the proposed
project are calculated to remain significant and unavoidable at the following two study intersections:
• Del Mar Avenue at Garvey Avenue (AM peak hour)
• San Gabriel Boulevard at Garvey Avenue (AM and PM peak hours)
Table 32
Significant Impact Assessment for the Proposed Project
Study Intersection
Peak
Hour
2035 Without
GASP1 2035 With GASP2 2035 With SPA3
ICU LOS ICU LOS
Change
in ICU
Significant
Impact? ICU LOS
Change
in ICU
Significant
Impact?
Del Mar Ave at Garvey
Ave AM 0.829 D 1.054 F +0.225 YES 1.061 F +0.232 YES
PM 0.810 D 0.938 E +0.128 No 0.946 E +0.136 No
Kelburn Ave at Garvey
Ave AM 0.553 A 0.812 D +0.259 No 0.845 D +0.292 No
PM 0.589 A 0.686 B +0.097 No 0.720 C +0.131 No
San Gabriel Blvd at
Garvey Ave AM 0.812 D 1.153 F +0.341 YES 1.161 F +0.349 YES
PM 0.895 D 1.072 F +0.177 YES 1.079 F +0.184 YES
Notes:
GASP = Garvey Avenue Specific Plan; ICU = Intersection Capacity Analysis; LOS = Level of Service
(1) Source: Draft Environmental Impact Report Garvey Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (May 2017); Table 13-3.
(2) Source: Draft Environmental Impact Report Garvey Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (May 2017); Table 13-8 (including mitigation).
(3) Source: Ganddini Group, September 2022; see Appendix G.
While the project traffic is calculated to remain significant and unavoidable and consistent with the land
use proposed for the site by the GASP, the increase in the ICU’s by the project would not exceed the
threshold of significance (+0.02 at Level of Service F) compared to the buildout of the GASP. Relative
to the GASP, the project would not result in new significant traffic impacts or require new mitigation
compared to the GASP. In addition, the adopted traffic mitigation measures for the GASP to mitigate
traffic impacts of the GASP would serve to mitigate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed project.
Therefore, based on the above analysis the project would not have any significant traffic impacts.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)? Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) addresses
project vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The traffic study that was prepared for the project includes a VMT
analysis.53
California Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) directs the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for evaluating transportation impacts to
provide alternatives to Level of Service that “promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the
53 Garvey Avenue Specific Plan Amendment 21-01 Project Transportation Assessment, Ganddini Group, Inc., October 5, 2021, p. 12.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 99
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” The 2020 CEQA
Guidelines, specifically Section 15064.3, recommends the use of Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) as the
primary metric for the evaluation of transportation impacts associated with land use and transportation
projects. In general terms, VMT quantifies the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to
a project or region. All agencies and projects in California are required to utilize CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.3 that requires VMT to evaluate transportation impacts as of July 1, 2020.
The CEQA Guidelines allow a lead agency the discretion to establish the VMT methodologies and
thresholds, provided there is substantial evidence to demonstrate that the established procedures
promote the intended goals of the legislation. Where quantitative models or methods are unavailable,
Section 15064.3 allows agencies to assess VMT qualitatively using factors such as availability of transit
and proximity to other destinations. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on
Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (State of California, December 2018) [“OPR Technical
Advisory”] provides technical considerations regarding methodologies and thresholds with a focus on
office, residential, and retail developments as these projects tend to have the greatest influence on VMT.
The VMT analysis for the project is based on adopted City of Rosemead VMT guidelines.54 Consistent
with recommendations in the OPR Technical Advisory, the City of Rosemead established screening
criteria for certain projects that may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact and includes
projects located in low-VMT generating areas. The City’s TIA Guidelines specify the following screening
steps: 1) Project Type Screening; 2) Low VMT Area Screening; and 3) Transit Priority Areas Screening.
Project Type Screening Some project types have been identified as having the presumption of a less
than significant impact as they are local serving by nature, or they are small enough to not warrant
assessment.
The project is located in a low-VMT generating area. Therefore, the project satisfies the screening criteria
for low-VMT generating area and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact in
accordance with City of Rosemead VMT guidelines.
The retail component of the project satisfies the City-established project type screening for local serving
retail and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. Transit Priority Area (TPA)
Screening Projects located within a TPA (half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an
existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact
absent substantial evidence to the contrary. There are currently no TPA areas within the City of
Rosemead. Therefore, the project does not satisfy the City-established screening criteria for projects
located within a TPA.
Low VMT Area Screening
Residential and office projects located within a low VMT generating area may be presumed to have a
less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. In addition, other employment-
related and mixed-use land use projects may qualify for the use of screening if the project can reasonably
be expected to generate VMT per resident, per worker, or per service population that is similar to the
existing land uses in the low VMT area. A low VMT area is defined as an individual traffic analysis zone
(TAZ) where the total daily VMT is lower than 15% below the baseline total daily VMT.
According to the maps in Rosemead Resolution No. 2020-22 (June 9, 2020), the project is located in a
low VMT area 15% or more below San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) average daily
residential home-based VMT per capita for Rosemead (2012), in a low VMT area 15% or more below
SGVCOG average daily home-based VMT per employee for Rosemead (2012) and in a low VMT area
15% or more below SGVCOG average daily VMT per service population for Rosemead (2012). The
54 City of Rosemead Transportation Study Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, October 2020.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 100
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
project is located within all three low VMT areas and meets the 15% or more below SGVCOG baseline
VMT criteria.
Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
Projects within a TPA (half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a
high-quality transit corridor) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary. Since there are currently no TPA areas within the City of Rosemead the project
does not meet the City-established screening criteria for projects within a TPA.
As a result, the project is in three low-VMT generating areas and satisfies the screening criteria for a low-
VMT generating area. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant VMT impact.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less Than Significant Impact. Site
access is provided by a driveway at the north end of the building at Virginia Street, a driveway on the
east side of the building at Strathmore Avenue and a driveway on the west side of the building from a
public alley. The driveways at the north and east sides of the building are 25-feet wide and the driveway
at the west side of the building from the public alley is 22-feet wide. The height restriction for the north
and east driveways is 12-feet and the height restriction for driveway on the west from the public alley is
10-feet. All delivery vehicles for the nonresidential space on the ground level would enter the site from
Strathmore Avenue and park in a designated loading area on the ground level for site deliveries. The
project would allow left and right turns from the driveways at Strathmore Avenue and the public alley at
Brighton Street.
Truck Access and Circulation
Service trucks for the commercial uses would have site access from Strathmore Avenue by the driveway
at the east side of the site. The height of the two-way driveway at Strathmore Avenue into the parking
areas of the building is 12 feet and 25 feet wide and would allow access for project residents, employees,
small delivery trucks, emergency personnel, and garbage trucks adequate access to the parking areas
and trash receptacles within the building. Delivery trucks would be limited to a maximum height of 10
feet for access into the parking areas for trash pick-up and commercial use deliveries.
Truck deliveries shall occur only during off-peak hours so that any potential conflict between trucks and
customers of the project site land uses would be minimal.
There are no proposed driveways, curves, dangerous intersections, or site access designs that would
significantly impact traffic or have significant circulation hazards.
Sight Distance Analysis
A sight distance evaluation was prepared for the project driveways based on guidance from the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets (2018). The stopping sight distance was determined in accordance with Table 3-
1 of the AASHTO Greenbook. Garvey Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour, which is the
presumed design speed for this analysis and correlates to a stopping sight distance of 250 feet per
AASHTO guidance. The AAHSTO Greenbook does not specify a location for the decision point (i.e.,
minor road driver’s eye) since it depends on the placement of any marked stop line. In this case, there
are marked stop lines on the southbound approaches of the minor street roads; therefore, the analysis is
based on a point located 10-feet back from the stop line. This allows sufficient space for the driver on
the minor road to wait without the front bumper intruding past the marked stop line on the major road.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 101
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Figure 19 shows the sight distance evaluation for southbound Brighton Street from both directions. Figure
20 shows the sight distance evaluation for southbound Strathmore Avenue from both directions. Each
figure also shows recommended “no parking” zones to prevent on-street parking from obstructing the line
of sight. As shown in Figure 19, “no parking” designation is recommended by installing red curb markings
along the north side of Garvey Avenue from Brighton Street to approximately 76 feet west and 170 feet
east. As shown in Figure 20, “no parking” designation is recommended by installing red curb markings
along the north side of Garvey Avenue from Strathmore Avenue to approximately 66 feet west and 160
feet east. Figure 21 summarizes the recommended “no parking” designations for both intersections
based on the sight distance analysis.
The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce potential sigh distance impacts with stop
sign controlled intersections from Brighton Street and Strathmore Street at Garvey Avenue.
Mitigation Measure No. 19 Red curbs shall be painted as shown in Figure 21 of this MND prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. The existing public streets
and circulation system that serve the site would continue to provide adequate emergency vehicle access
for the project. The proposed project driveways at the north project boundary at Virginia Street and
Strathmore Avenue are both 25 feet wide and 12-foot high. The project driveway at the public alley on
the west side of the building has a width of 22-feet and 10-feet high. Police, fire, paramedic/ambulance,
and other emergency vehicles would have adequate site access to respond to on-site emergencies to
the site via the proposed project driveways. As stated in Section “VII. c)” above of this MND, the proposed
project driveways would be reviewed by the city, including the police and fire departments, to ensure the
driveways have adequate widths, heights and turning radius for emergency vehicles to safely enter and
exit the site prior to the issuance of a building permit. The project would not significantly impact
emergency access to the site.
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1 (k).
Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As required by AB 52, the City mailed
letters to nine area Native American Indians that are on record with the City that may have cultural
resources associated with the site. On July 11, 2022 the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh
Nation (Kizh Nation) submitted a letter to the City requesting consultation. The City consulted with
Chairman Salas of the Kizh Nation on July 7, 2022.
Because the project site lies within the ancestral tribal territory of the Kizh Nation, tribal cultural
resources could exist on the site. The Kizh Nation and the City agreed to the following mitigation
measures to reduce potential impacts to Tribal resources, if present.
Mitigation Measure No. 20 Prior to the commencement of any ground disturbing activity at the
project site, the project applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor
approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. A
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 19
Stopping Sight Distance for Southbound Brighton Street41
Source: Ganddini Group, Inc.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 20
Stopping Sight Distance for Southbound Strathmore Avenue42
Source: Ganddini Group, Inc.
STRATHMORE/GARVEY MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 21
Recommended “No Parking” Zones43
Source: Ganddini Group, Inc.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 105
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of
Rosemead Planning and Building Department prior to the issuance of
any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The
Tribal monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction
phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing
activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are
not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree
removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the
project area. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs
that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including
construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials
identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing
activities on the project site are completed, or when the Tribal
Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming
ground-disturbing activities at the project site have little to no potential
to impact Tribal Cultural Resources.
Mitigation Measure No. 21 Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities
shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the
surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessed. All Tribal Cultural
Resources unearthed by project activities shall be evaluated by the
qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting
Tribe. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Consulting
Tribe shall retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems
appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human
remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the project
site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county
coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98,
and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and
grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2). Work may continue
on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary,
mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-
Native American resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist
to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,”
time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of
avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The
treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and
PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources.
Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of
treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may
include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to
remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and
analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native
American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with
a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an
institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the
archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical
society in the area for educational purposes.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 106
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would reduce potential tribal cultural resource
impacts to less than significant.
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As
discussed in Section “XVIII.a.i.” above of this MND, the project could significantly impact tribal
resources if present. The implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would reduce
potential impacts to tribal resources to less than significant.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater
treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities,
the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than
Significant Impact. Water is currently provided to the project site by the Golden State Water Company.
There is an existing 10-inch water main in Garvey Avenue adjacent to the site that would serve the
project. The 12-inch water main in Garvey Avenue and an 8-inch water main in Strathmore Avenue
adjacent to the site that could serve the project. An existing sewer line in the alley lead from Brighton
Avenue adjacent to the site has existing capacity to serve the project. Wastewater in the existing sewer
line flows east in Brighton Avenue south to Garvey Avenue and eventually connects to an existing 27-
inch diameter sewer trunk line at the north terminus of Charlotte Avenue that is owned by the Los Angeles
County Sanitation Districts. Wastewater in the 27-inch sewer line flows to the Whittier Narrows Water
Reclamation Plant located in the City of South El Monte, which has capacity to treat the wastewater from
the project.55 All other utilities required to serve the project, including storm drainage, electricity, natural
gas, and telecommunications are located in Strathmore and Garvey Avenues and have capacity to serve
the project and would not have to be relocated. The project would not have any significant public utility
impacts.
The project is estimated to consume approximately 36,161 gallons of water per day as shown in Table
30 of this MND. The project is estimated to generate approximately 24,792 gallons per day of
wastewater.56 The project water and wastewater needs can be accommodated by the existing facilities
and construction of new or expanded water or wastewater facilities would not be required. The project
would be required to install State mandated low flow water fixtures to minimize water consumption and
wastewater generation. The project will not require the construction of any sewer or water lines and have
any significantly environmental impacts.
Table 33
Estimated Project Water Consumption
Use Units/Sq. Ft. Consumption Rate Consumption
Residential 93 units 324 gallons/day/unit57 30,132 gallons/day
Retail/Office/Residential-work 35,105sq. ft. 320 gallons/day/1,000
sq. ft.58
11,234 gallons/day
Total 41,366 gallons/day
55 Ms. Donna Curry, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, letter dated July 12, 2022.
56 Ibid.
57 Assumes 4 persons/apartment at 81 gallons/person/day equals 324 gallons/unit/day. Los Angeles County Public Works, October 27,
2022.
58 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 107
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact. Potable
water is provided to the project site by the Golden State Water Company. As shown in Table 30 of this
MND the project is estimated to consume approximately 20,909 gallons of water per day. Based on the
Golden State Water Company, South San Gabriel Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan,
July 16, 2021, the Golden State Water Company has an adequate water supply to meet the demand of
the project into the future. The project would have a less than significant impact on water supply.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. Please see Section “XIX.a” above
of this MND.
d) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste
disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would generate more solid waste from the
site than the current uses due to an increase in the amount of development proposed for the site
compared to the existing development on the site. The solid waste from the project would be hauled to
the Puente Hills Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in the City of Whittier and operated by the Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County. The MRF separates recyclable material from municipal solid waste and
all residual waste is hauled to permitted landfills and all recovered recyclable materials are recycled. The
Puente Hills MRF is permitted to accept up to 4,400 tons per day (8,800,000 pounds/day) of municipal
solid waste.
The project is estimated to generate approximately 61759 pounds per day of solid waste of which
approximately 50% is recycled and the remaining 50% is hauled to a permitted landfill. The municipal
solid waste generated by the project is not anticipated to significantly impact the permitted capacity of
any Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts landfills. Solid waste collection will be required to conform
to RMC 17.74.050(B)(7) in terms of collection hours, trash enclosures, screening, etc. The project will
not have any significant solid waste impacts.
Once the project is constructed and operational, it is estimated to generate approximately 617 pounds of
solid waste per day.60 Of the 617 pounds, approximately 50%, or 309 pounds per day would be recycled
and the balance of non-recycled material would be hauled to a permitted landfill. The 309 pounds of
solid waste that is estimated to be generated by the project represents a nominal amount of the solid
waste that would be hauled to a landfill that would serve the project. Therefore, the impact of the solid
waste generated by the project would be less than significant.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than
Significant Impact. The City of Rosemead complies with all Federal, State, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste. The project would not have any solid waste impacts because the
residents and commercial uses would be required to comply would all applicable solid waste statues and
regulations and large quantities of solid waste would not be generated.
XX. WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No
Impact. The project does not propose any improvements that would impair or impact any emergency
59 https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, Residential - 4 pounds/day/unit, Commercial – 13
pounds/1,000 sq. ft/day
60 https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, Residential - 4 pounds/day/unit, Commercial – 13
pounds/1,000 sq. ft/day.
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 108
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
response or emergency evacuation plan associated with an emergency evacuation plan, including a
response to a fire in the closest Local Responsibility Area (LRA) or State Responsibility Area (SRA) fire
hazard zones as discussed in Section “XX. b.” below of this MND.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire? Less Than Significant Impact. There are no moderate, high or very high fire hazard severity
zones in an SRA within the City of Rosemead.61 The closest SRA designated fire hazard zone to the
project site is the open space in Turnball Canyon located approximately six miles southeast of the project
and outside the City. There are also no Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zones in a LRA in the City of
Rosemead. The closest LRA designated Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone is the open space in the
City of Whittier located approximately four miles southeast of the project. While the project is not within
or adjacent to any LRA or SRA fire hazard areas, Santa Ana winds could expose project occupants and
employees to smoke and other pollutants associated with wildfires located the LRA and SRA fire hazard
areas southeast of the project. However, that exposure would not be site specific because much of the
City of Rosemead and the general geographic area adjacent to Rosemead would also be exposed and
not the project site specifically. The project would not expose project occupants or employees to
significant pollutant concentrations from a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, or other factors.
c) Reguire the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. The project would be
required by the 2022 CBC to install fire sprinklers. However, the project would not be required to install
and maintain any roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities to protect
the project and the immediate area from a wildfire because the project is not located in a Moderate, High
or Very High fire hazard zone as discussed in Section “XX. a.” above of this MND.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result or runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. As
discussed in Section “XX. a.” above of this MND, the project is not located within a Moderate, High or
Very High fire SRA or LRA hazard zone. The project site as well as the area surrounding the project site
are relatively flat and there are no slopes or flooding that could impact the project site due to landslides
as a result of slope runoff, post-fire slope instability or drainage changes. Therefore, the project would
not be exposed and impacted by secondary impacts of a wildfire.
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than
Significant Impact. The 1.21-acre site is developed with commercial use. The site is sparely vegetated
and the vegetation that is present includes introduced urban landscape materials. There are no rare,
endangered, or sensitive plants or wildlife on the site that would be impacted by the project. The existing
commercial buildings on the project site do not represent California history or prehistory that would be
impacted by their demolition and removal. The project would not significantly impact biological resources
and would have no historical resource impacts.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
61 https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6705/fhszs_map19.pdf
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 109
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Rosemead
identified fourteen projects that, along with the proposed project, could have cumulative impacts. The
cumulative projects are shown in Table 34 and their locations are shown in Figure 22.
Table 34
Cumulative Projects
Address Proposed Project Status
#1 - 7419-7459 Garvey Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• Phase I: 17,270 Sq. Ft. Commercial & 241
Apartments Units
• Five to Six-Stories
• Phase II: 120 Apartment Units
• Five-Stories
Total Residential Units: 361
Total Sq. Ft. of Commercial 17,270
Total Live/Work Units: 110
Plans Being Revised
#2 - 7801-7825 Garvey Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 35,548 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 92 Residential Units (some live/work units)
• Six-Stories
Building Plan Check
#3 - 8002 Garvey Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 11,542 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 109 Residential Units (40 Live-Work Units)
Plans Being Revised
#4 - 8449 Garvey Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 15,600 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 26 Residential Units
• Four-Stories
Construction Completed –
Certificate of Occupancy Issued
#5 - 8900 Glendon Way Five story Hampton Inn & Suites Hotel with 123
guest rooms Building Plans Approved
#6 - 3133-3141 Willard Avenue 31 residential units
General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, & TTM
Construction Completed –
Certificate of Occupancy Issued
#7 - 500 Montebello Boulevard Six story Marriott Dual Hotel with 199 guest rooms Entitlements Submitted – On
Hold
#8 - 3035 San Gabriel Boulevard
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 73,750 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 160 Residential Units (some live/work units)
• Six-Stories
Site Plan Review – Plans being
revised
#9 - 4316 Muscatel Avenue 10 condominiums – Small lot subdivision Entitlements Submitted
#10 - 8399 Garvey Avenue Proposed 15,000 sq. ft. medical clinic Construction Completed –
Certificate of Occupancy Issued
#11 – 3001 Walnut Grove
Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 17,394 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 42 Residential Condos (Seven-Low Income)
• Four-Stories
Building Plan Check
#12 – 2562 River Ave 36,596 sq. ft. warehouse Entitlements Submitted
#13 - 8601 Mission Drive 37 Residential Units
General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, & TTM Under Construction
#14- 7539 &7545 Garvey Avenue
Residential/Commercial Mixed Use:
• 6,346 Sq. Ft. Commercial
• 75 Apartment Units (some live/work units)
• Seven-Stories
Entitled
STRATHMORE/GARVEY
MIXED USE PROJECT
Figure 22
Cumulative Project Location Map
N
Project Site
10
14
8
4
11
6
7
5
9
13
12
LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Strathmore/Garvey Mixed-Use Project Page 111
Mitigated Negative Declaration – April 21, 2023
Based on the air quality report, the short-term construction emissions and the long-term operational
emissions of the project would not exceed any adopted air emission thresholds. Therefore, the project
would not have any significant short-or long-term cumulative air quality impacts. The project would not
have any individual or cumulative noise or traffic impacts. In addition, the project would not have any
significant impacts associated with aesthetics, agricultural, biological resources, cultural resources,
hazardous, hydrology, soils and geology, land use, public services, utilities, or wildfire that along with the
cumulative projects listed in Table 2817.74 would not result in any significant cumulative impacts.
c) Does the project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact. There are no significant
impacts associated with the proposed project that would cause substantial adverse effects and
significantly impact human beings either directly or indirectly.
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
STRATHMORE-GARVEY MIXED-USE PROJECT
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 22-01, ZONE CHANGE 22-02
Lead Agency:
City of Rosemead
8838 E. Valley Boulevard
Rosemead, CA 91770
(626)-569-2140
Project Proponent:
Green Park Property
120 E. Valley Boulevard
San Gabriel, CA 91776
(626) 307-0062
Environmental Consultant:
Phil Martin & Associates
2987 NW Fairway Heights Drive
Bend, Oregon 97703
(714) 454-1800
May 3, 2023
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 1
1.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
1.1 Introduction
This is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Strathmore-
Garvey Mixed-Use project. It has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public
Resources Code §21081.6 which, among other things, states that when a governmental
agency adopts or certifies a CEQA document that contains the environmental review of
a proposed project, “The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program
for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order
to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring
program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.”
The City of Rosemead is the lead agency for the project, and is therefore, responsible
for administering and implementing the MMRP. The decision-makers must define
specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements that will be enforced during project
implementation and prior to final approval of the project.
1.2 Project Overview
The project site totals approximately 1.21 gross acres (52,926 square feet) and includes
six parcels (APN Nos. 5287-038-030, -033, -018, -019, -020, -029) and developed with
commercial uses and vacant land.
The project proposes a seven-story, mixed-use development that totals 115,400 square
feet. The project proposes 35,105 square feet of non-residential use
(retail/office/residential-work) with 5,423 square feet on the first floor, 6,230 square feet
on the second floor, 6,571 square feet on the third floor, and 16,881 square feet of work
area within the live/work units. The project proposes 93 residential units on the first
through seventh floors. Of the 93 residential units, 24 are live/work units, including
three live/work units on the ground level, one live/work unit on both the second and third
floors, and 19 live/work units on the fourth floor. The project proposes 69 apartments
on the fifth through seventh floors with 21 apartments on the fifth floor, 25 apartments
on the sixth floor, and 23 apartments on the seventh floor. The project includes 31 one-
bedroom units, 52 two-bedroom units and 10 three-bedroom units, including the
live/work units.
The project proposes a floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.2 compared to a maximum allowed
FAR of 3.0 with the allowed provisions of community benefits by the Garvey Avenue
Specific Plan.
Specific Plan. The building footprint covers approximately 45,456 square feet, or
approximately 85.9 percent of the 52,926 square foot project site.
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 2
The project proposes 6,831 square feet of landscaping, or approximately 12.9 percent
of the site. The project landscaping includes drought tolerant shrubs and ground cover
with drip irrigation, accent street trees with in-ground up-lights, bike racks on Garvey
Avenue and Strathmore Avenue, 3’ diameter accent flower pots for security barriers on
both Garvey Avenue and Strathmore Avenue, a 24” high masonry wall with stucco
finish to match the building adjacent to the proposed park bench adjacent to Garvey
Avenue, rectangular porcelain pavers in running bond pattern in the sidewalk along
Garvey Avenue and Strathmore Avenue, colored concrete in a 3’ x 3’ grid pattern with
top cast finish in the sidewalk on Garvey Avenue, 12” wide colored concrete banding
with medium broom finish in the sidewalk on Strathmore Avenue adjacent to the site.
Landscaping is proposed on the second, fourth, and seventh floors of the building. The
landscaping for the second floor includes a planter box along the west side of the open
parking structure with drought tolerant cascading plants with drip irrigation. The
landscaping proposed for the fourth floor courtyard includes medium scale evergreen
shade trees in a raised planter with up-lighting, decorative plank stamped colored
concrete, double sided in ground level gas fire pits, outdoor dining furniture, drought
tolerant shrubs and ground cover with drip irrigation, vertical accent palm trees in raised
planter boxes with up-lighting, raised tot-lot playground with approved play equipment
and American Disabilities Act (ADA) approved wood fiber mulch, stainless steel outdoor
gas bar-b-q units with granite counter top, raised planter, etc. The landscaping
proposed for the seventh-floor courtyard includes vertical accent palm trees in raised
planter boxes with up-lighting, outdoor sofas, tables, and chairs, 20” wide shelf-bench
attached to the planter wall, granite bar/counter with stool seating at the edge of the
courtyard, decorative stamped colored concrete in 3’ x 3’ grid pattern, raised gas fire pit,
etc.
The project proposes 208 parking spaces, including 181 standard spaces, 22 compact
spaces, 5 handicap accessible spaces and three loading spaces. Of the 208 parking
spaces, 70 parking spaces are proposed for the ground floor, 67 parking spaces are
proposed for the second level and 71 parking spaces are proposed for the third level.
The project proposes 9 more parking spaces for public parking than required by the
Rosemead Municipal Code and consistent with the requirements of the community
benefit program. The project also proposes 20 bicycles spaces.
The height to the top of the roof is 75’. The total height of the building, including the top
of the parapet, is 78’. The project proposes to construct a six-foot masonry wall along
the project perimeter adjacent to the existing residential units.
There are three entry points for vehicular access to the site. There is a driveway at the
north end of the building at Virginia Street, a driveway on the east side of the building at
Strathmore Avenue and a driveway on the west side of the building from the public
alley. The driveways at the north and east sides of the building are 25-feet wide and the
driveway at the west side of the building from the public alley is 22-feet wide. The height
restriction for the north and east driveways is 12-feet and the height restriction for
driveway on the west from the public alley is 10-feet. All delivery vehicles for the
nonresidential space on the ground level would enter the site from Strathmore Avenue
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 3
and park in a designated loading area on the ground level for site deliveries. Delivery
trucks would be restricted to two axle trucks. Delivery trucks would not be allowed to
park along either Strathmore Avenue or Garvey Avenue. Project construction is
scheduled to start in the second quarter of 2023 and be completed in the fourth quarter
of 2024.
1.3 Monitoring and Reporting Procedures
This MMRP includes the following information: (1) mitigation measures that will either
eliminate or lessen the potential impact from the project; (2) the monitoring milestone or
phase during which the measure should be complied with or carried out; (3) the
enforcement agency responsible for monitoring mitigation measure compliance; and (4)
the initials of the person verifying the mitigation measure was completed and the date of
verification.
The MMRP will be in place through all phases of a project including project design
(preconstruction), project approval, project construction, and operation (both prior to and
post-occupancy). The City will ensure that all monitoring is documented through
periodic reports and that deficiencies are promptly corrected. The designated
environmental monitor will track and document compliance with mitigation measures,
note any problems that may result, and take appropriate action to rectify problems.
Each mitigation measure is listed and categorized by impact area, with an
accompanying discussion of:
• The phase of the project during which the measure should be monitored;
❑ Project review and prior to project approval
❑ During grading or building plan check review and prior to issuance of a
grading or building permit
❑ On-going during construction
❑ Throughout the life of the project
• The enforcement agency; and
• The initials of the person verifying completion of the mitigation measure and
date. The MMRP is provided as Table 1 (Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting
Program).
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 4
Table 1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation
Measure
No.
Mitigation Measure Monitoring
Milestone
Enforcement
Agency
Verification of
Compliance
Aesthetics
1. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit the project
applicant shall submit a
lighting plan for approval by
the Planning Division that
incorporates any of the
following light reducing
measures as applicable:
• Select lighting fixtures with
more-precise optical control
and/or different lighting
distribution.
• Relocate and/or change the
height and/or orientation of
proposed lighting fixtures.
• Add external shielding and/or
internal reflectors to fixtures.
• Select lower-output
lamp/lamp technologies
• A combination of the above.
Prior to the
issuance of
a building
permit.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Air Quality
2. Prior to the start and
throughout project
construction, the contractor
shall implement and maintain
the following fugitive dust
control measures:
• Apply soil stabilizers or
moisten inactive areas.
• Water exposed surfaces as
needed to avoid visible
dust leaving the
construction site (typically
2-3 times/day).
• Cover all stockpiles with
tarps at the end of each
day or as needed.
• Provide water spray during
loading and unloading of
earthen materials.
• Minimize in-out traffic from
construction zone.
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt,
sand, or loose material and
Prior to the
start and
throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 5
require all trucks to
maintain at least two feet of
freeboard.
• Sweep streets daily if visible
soil material is carried out
from the construction site.
3. Throughout project
construction the contractor
shall:
• Utilize well-tuned off-road
construction equipment.
• Establish a preference for
contractors using Tier 3 or
better heavy equipment.
• Enforce 5-minute idling limits
for both on-road trucks and
off-road equipment.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Cultural Resources
4. The project developer shall
retain a qualified professional
archaeologist who meets U.S.
Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications and
Standards, to conduct an
Archaeological Sensitivity
Training for construction
personnel prior to
commencement of excavation
activities. The training session
shall be carried out by a
cultural resource professional
with expertise in archaeology,
who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards.
The training session shall
include a handout and will
focus on how to identify
archaeological resources that
may be encountered during
earthmoving activities and the
procedures to be followed in
such an event, the duties of
archaeological monitors, and
the general steps a qualified
professional archaeologist
would follow in conducting a
salvage investigation if one is
necessary.
Prior to the
start of
excavation
activities.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 6
5. In the event that
archaeological resources are
unearthed during ground-
disturbing activities, ground-
disturbing activities shall be
halted or diverted away from
the vicinity of the find so that
the find can be evaluated. A
buffer area of at least 50 feet
shall be established around
the find where construction
activities shall not be allowed
to continue until a qualified
archaeologist has examined
the newly discovered
artifact(s) and has evaluated
the area of the find. Work
shall be allowed to continue
outside of the buffer area. All
archaeological resources
unearthed by project
construction activities shall be
evaluated by a qualified
professional archaeologist,
who meets the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards.
Should the newly discovered
artifacts be determined to be
prehistoric, Native American
Tribes/Individuals shall be
contacted and consulted, and
Native American construction
monitoring shall be initiated.
The project developer and the
City shall coordinate with the
archaeologist to develop an
appropriate treatment plan for
the resources. The plan may
include implementation of
archaeological data recovery
excavations to address
treatment of the resource
along with subsequent
laboratory processing and
analysis.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
6. The project developer shall
retain a qualified professional
archaeologist, who meets the
U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s
Prior to the
start of
excavation
activities
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 7
Professional Qualifications
and Standards to conduct
periodic Archaeological Spot
Checks beginning at depths
below 2’ feet to determine if
construction excavations have
exposed or have a high
probability to expose
archaeological resources.
After the initial Archaeological
Spot Check, further periodic
checks shall be conducted at
the discretion of the qualified
archaeologist. If the qualified
archaeologist determines that
construction excavations have
exposed or have a high
probability to expose
archaeological artifacts
construction monitoring for
Archaeological Resources
shall be required. The project
developer shall retain a
qualified archaeological
monitor, who will work under
the guidance and direction of
a professional archaeologist,
who meets the qualifications
set forth by the U.S. Secretary
of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications and Standards.
The archaeological monitor
shall be present during all
construction excavations
(e.g., grading, trenching, or
clearing/grubbing) into non-fill
younger Pleistocene alluvial
sediments. Multiple earth-
moving construction activities
may require multiple
archaeological monitors. The
frequency of monitoring shall
be based on the rate of
excavation and grading
activities, proximity to known
archaeological resources, the
materials being excavated
(native versus artificial fill
soils), and the depth of
excavation, and if found, the
abundance and type of
and
throughout
project
construction.
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 8
archaeological resources
encountered. Full-time
monitoring can be reduced to
part-time inspections if
determined adequate by the
project archaeologist.
7. The archaeological monitor,
under the direction of a
qualified professional
archaeologist who meets the
U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications
and Standards, shall prepare
a final report at the conclusion
of archaeological monitoring.
The report shall be submitted
to the project developer, the
South Central Costal
Information Center, the City,
and representatives of other
appropriate or concerned
agencies to signify the
satisfactory completion of the
project and required mitigation
measures. The report shall
include a description of
resources unearthed, if any,
evaluation of the resources
with respect to the California
Register and CEQA, and
treatment of the resources.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Noise
8. Dozers and graders shall
not operate within 35 feet of
any residential unit adjacent
to the site. Grading within
35-feet of adjacent
residential units shall use
quieter equipment such as a
loader/backhoe or rubber
tired equipment.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
9. All construction equipment
shall be equipped with
mufflers and other suitable
noise attenuation devices
(e.g., engine shields).
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
10. Grading and construction
contractors shall use
rubber-tired equipment
rather than track equipment,
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 9
to the maximum extent
feasible.
_______________
Date
11. If feasible, electric hook-ups
shall be provided to avoid
the use of generators. If
electric service is
determined to be infeasible
for the site, only whisper-
quiet generators shall be
used (i.e., inverter
generators capable of
providing variable load.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
12. Electric air compressors
and similar power tools
rather than diesel
equipment shall be used,
where feasible.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
13. Generators and stationary
construction equipment
shall be staged and located
as far from the adjacent
residential structures as
feasible.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
14. Construction-related
equipment, including heavy-
duty equipment, motor
vehicles, and portable
equipment, shall be turned
off when not in use for more
than 5 minutes.
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
15. A sign shall be posted in a
readily visible location at the
project site that indicates
the dates and duration of
construction activities, as
well as provide a telephone
number where residents
can enquire about the
construction process and
register complaints to an
assigned construction noise
disturbance coordinator.
Prior to the
start and
throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Public Services – Police Protection
16. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit, the project
developer shall contact the
County of Los Angeles
Sheriff’s Department
Temple Station and
incorporate all applicable
Prior to the
issuance of a
building permit.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 10
CPTED defensible space
measures into the final
project design to reduce
criminal activity at the
project.
17. Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit, the project
developer shall submit a
Construction Traffic
Management Plan to the
County of Los Angeles
Sheriff’s Department
Temple Station that
identifies the construction
management measures that
would be implemented
during construction to
minimize construction-
related traffic congestion
and emergency project
access.
Prior to the
issuance of a
grading permit.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Transportation
18. Approximately 12 months
after the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, or
the City Engineers
discretion, the project
developer shall conduct a
traffic signal warrant at the
Strathmore Avenue/Garvey
Avenue intersection. If
warranted, the project
developer’s fair-share of the
cost of the construction of
the traffic signal shall be
paid from the Development
Impact Fees collected from
the developer.
12 months
issuance of
Certificate of
Occupancy.
City of
Rosemead
City
Engineer
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
19. Red curbs shall be painted
as shown in Figure 21 of
this MND prior to the
issuance of a building
permit.
Prior to the
issuance of a
building permit.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Tribal Cultural Resources
20. Prior to the commencement
of any ground disturbing
activity at the project site, the
project applicant shall retain
a Native American Monitor
approved by the Gabrieleno
Prior to the
start of any
ground
disturbing
activity.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 11
Band of Mission Indians-Kizh
Nation. A copy of the
executed contract shall be
submitted to the City of
Rosemead Planning and
Building Department prior to
the issuance of any permit
necessary to commence a
ground-disturbing activity.
The Tribal monitor shall only
be present on-site during the
construction phases that
involve ground-disturbing
activities. Ground disturbing
activities are defined by the
Tribe as activities that may
include, but are not limited
to, pavement removal,
potholing or auguring,
grubbing, tree removals,
boring, grading, excavation,
drilling, and trenching, within
the project area. The Tribal
Monitor shall complete daily
monitoring logs that shall
provide descriptions of the
day’s activities, including
construction activities,
locations, soil, and any
cultural materials identified.
The on-site monitoring shall
end when all ground-
disturbing activities on the
project site are completed, or
when the Tribal
Representatives and Tribal
Monitor have indicated that
all upcoming ground-
disturbing activities at the
project site have little to no
potential to impact Tribal
Cultural Resources.
21. Upon discovery of any Tribal
Cultural Resources,
construction activities shall
cease in the immediate
vicinity of the find (not less
than the surrounding 100
feet) until the find can be
assessed. All Tribal Cultural
Resources unearthed by
Throughout
project
construction.
City of
Rosemead
Building
Department
_____________
Initial
_______________
Date
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 12
project activities shall be
evaluated by the qualified
archaeologist and Tribal
monitor approved by the
Consulting Tribe. If the
resources are Native
American in origin, the
Consulting Tribe shall retain
it/them in the form and/or
manner the Tribe deems
appropriate, for educational,
cultural and/or historic
purposes. If human remains
and/or grave goods are
discovered or recognized at
the project site, all ground
disturbance shall
immediately cease, and the
county coroner shall be
notified per Public
Resources Code Section
5097.98, and Health &
Safety Code Section 7050.5.
Human remains and
grave/burial goods shall be
treated alike per California
Public Resources Code
section 5097.98(d)(1) and
(2). Work may continue on
other parts of the project site
while evaluation and, if
necessary, mitigation takes
place (CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5[f]). If a non-
Native American resource is
determined by the qualified
archaeologist to constitute a
“historical resource” or
“unique archaeological
resource,” time allotment
and funding sufficient to
allow for implementation of
avoidance measures, or
appropriate mitigation, must
be available. The treatment
plan established for the
resources shall be in
accordance with CEQA
Guidelines Section
15064.5(f) for historical
resources and PRC Sections
Strathmore – Garvey Mixed-Use Project May 3, 2023
Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 13
21083.2(b) for unique
archaeological resources.
Preservation in place (i.e.,
avoidance) is the preferred
manner of treatment. If
preservation in place is not
feasible, treatment may
include implementation of
archaeological data recovery
excavations to remove the
resource along with
subsequent laboratory
processing and analysis.
Any historic archaeological
material that is not Native
American in origin shall be
curated at a public, non-
profit institution with a
research interest in the
materials, such as the
Natural History Museum of
Los Angeles County or the
Fowler Museum, if such an
institution agrees to accept
the material. If no institution
accepts the archaeological
material, it shall be offered to
a local school or historical
society in the area for
educational purposes.